12.01.2013 Views

EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

EAES Guidelines for Endoscopic Surgery.pdf - E-Lib FK UWKS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VI<br />

Preface<br />

as possible, early in the development of new indications when evidence was<br />

still sparse, to prevent harm and to critically appraise the potential benefits<br />

of this new technology. A novel type of CDC was developed including essential<br />

elements of the NIH process such as panel selection by specific transparent<br />

criteria, a <strong>for</strong>mal consensus procedure, and specific statements <strong>for</strong>mulated<br />

as guidelines. Up until 1999, six CDCs took place including topics such<br />

as laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, hernia repair, surgery <strong>for</strong><br />

gastroesophageal reflux disease, treatment of common bile duct stones, and<br />

colonic diverticular disease.<br />

Owing to the evolving field of evidence-based medicine with rigorous<br />

evaluation of the scientific evidence and the necessity to keep CDC statements<br />

in synchronous pace with medical knowledge, the <strong>EAES</strong> ad hoc committee,<br />

under the guidance of Neugebauer and within the Scientific Committee<br />

of the <strong>EAES</strong>, started a critical revision of the consensus methodology at<br />

the <strong>EAES</strong> conference in 1999 in Linz, Austria. Moreover, it was felt that there<br />

was a need <strong>for</strong> improved methods of dissemination and implementation of<br />

these <strong>EAES</strong> guidelines. One of the key factors <strong>for</strong> acceptance and impact of<br />

clinical practice guidelines is the strength and validity of the development<br />

process itself. The critical appraisal and analysis showed that further improvement<br />

was needed in identification, evaluation, synthesis of scientific<br />

evidence, as well as <strong>for</strong> the transparency of the recommendations. This was<br />

achieved by connecting the levels of scientific evidence with the grades of recommendation,<br />

through participation of all relevant stakeholders in the<br />

guideline panel, and application of <strong>for</strong>mal consensus development methods.<br />

With use of this updated methodology, starting in Maastricht in 2001, evidence-based<br />

guidelines have been developed <strong>for</strong> the creation of pneumoperitoneum,<br />

laparoscopic surgery in colonic cancer, quality of life after laparoscopic<br />

surgery, obesity surgery, and laparoscopy <strong>for</strong> abdominal emergencies.<br />

After open discussion between the panel and all members of the <strong>EAES</strong> at the<br />

annual congresses of the <strong>EAES</strong> in 2-h plenary sessions, and diligent work of<br />

the ad hoc committee, all evidence-based guidelines have been expediently<br />

published over the years in Surgical Endoscopy, the official organ of the<br />

<strong>EAES</strong>, <strong>for</strong> quick and wide dissemination.<br />

<strong>Endoscopic</strong> surgery is still an area of rapid development. Nearly not one<br />

month goes by without new studies being published that need to be examined<br />

to link and relate the new in<strong>for</strong>mation to the impact on existing guidelines.<br />

Regular updates are there<strong>for</strong>e necessary. The first update, concerning<br />

the guidelines developed from the start until 1999, was published in the<br />

Springer booklet released at the <strong>EAES</strong> Congress in Nice (2000) [1]. It was<br />

only natural that a new book be undertaken. The Berlin <strong>EAES</strong> and World<br />

Congress was the ideal occasion to publish a further and ever so necessary<br />

update. It summarizes all the original recommendations, followed by updates

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!