12.01.2013 Views

502-320-6419 - The American Distilling Institute

502-320-6419 - The American Distilling Institute

502-320-6419 - The American Distilling Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

— C O N T I N U E D<br />

aged, some distillers have been able to experiment<br />

aging their products with new, charred<br />

oak barrels. Others have experimented widely<br />

with wash recipes. <strong>The</strong>y tend to agree that it<br />

is great to have the freedom to release their<br />

products when they see fit, and to have room<br />

for creative expression.<br />

Consumer Education: “not All Rum is bad”<br />

Another significant challenge for <strong>American</strong><br />

craft rum producers is that many consumers<br />

have preconceived notions of what rum<br />

“should be like.” <strong>The</strong>se notions are usually<br />

based on negative experiences with poor quality<br />

distillates, or on the belief that all rum<br />

should fit the flavor profiles already established<br />

by the various styles of Caribbean, Central and<br />

South <strong>American</strong> products. This issue is partly a<br />

product of the historical experience of Prohibition,<br />

as noted before, since cheap rums were<br />

ubiquitous on the black market and the public<br />

perception of rum as a cheap mixer became<br />

ingrained in the <strong>American</strong> drinkers’ collective<br />

consciousness. It is equally due to the fact that<br />

there is a plethora of inexpensive, mass-produced,<br />

big-name brands of rum on the market<br />

today. And finally, from the time of Prohibition<br />

until the mid to late 1990’s, there were no<br />

<strong>American</strong> distillers producing rum. <strong>The</strong> general<br />

public has only had the Islands and South<br />

<strong>American</strong> rums to use as reference guides, and<br />

the cultural associations that attend them.<br />

However, rum producers have differing<br />

views as to just how big of a challenge consumer<br />

education is for them. For Kelly Railean,<br />

proprietor of and distiller at Railean Distillers,<br />

at the Eagle Point Distillery in San Leon,<br />

tX, consumer education is crucial for sales,<br />

and in order to teach people that rum can be<br />

16 w w w . d i s t i l l i n g . c o m<br />

Kelly Railean, proprietor and distiller at Railean Distillers, in San Leon, TX<br />

a great product in its own right. This is not a<br />

big issue on the gulf Coast where she distills,<br />

since the area boasts a large sailing community<br />

with many rum connoisseurs. Rather, getting<br />

the word out past the seaside community is<br />

the real challenge. Railean accomplishes this<br />

through hosting distillery tours, tastings,<br />

speaking at symposiums, and giving lectures.<br />

She explains that when you tell people how<br />

it is made differently from mass-produced<br />

products, first by using quality molasses and<br />

then doing every aspect of production herself<br />

by hand, “People don’t mind paying a couple<br />

dollars more for it. <strong>The</strong>y realize that you can<br />

actually sip a fine aged rum the way you would<br />

a bourbon, whiskey, or a Scotch.”<br />

Andrew Cabot, president of Privateer<br />

International in Ipswich, MA, views consumer<br />

education as “less of a challenge because of<br />

the general ‘Food movement’ in this country.<br />

People are a little more predisposed to listening<br />

these days.” Cabot observes that “there is a<br />

willing and able audience out there.”<br />

More of a challenge for Cabot is the<br />

misinformation about rum that comes from<br />

marketing campaigns, as well as a bias by many<br />

rum experts towards Caribbean and South<br />

<strong>American</strong> rums. “Even experts promote biases,<br />

and they aren’t necessarily aware of them.<br />

Preferences are different from biases.”<br />

Phil Prichard offers some insight as to how<br />

to address the Caribbean and South <strong>American</strong><br />

Ambiguities in the Legal Definition and Interpretation of Rum<br />

ALtHOugH the united States<br />

government Standards of Identity<br />

appear to give a broad interpretation<br />

as to what kind of sugar cane or sugar<br />

cane derivative spirits can be called “rum,”<br />

in practice there has been much ambiguity<br />

and confusion among both distillers and<br />

the Alcohol and tobacco tax and trade<br />

Bureau (ttB) regarding this issue.<br />

For example, a few distillers have sought<br />

to produce a rum-like product whose raw<br />

ingredient is sorghum. Like sugar cane,<br />

sorghum is a species of grass whose juice<br />

can be processed into sweet, fermentable<br />

syrup. So far, the ttB has stated that<br />

spirits made from sorghum cannot be<br />

classified as rum. Because of this, such<br />

products have often fallen under the “spirit<br />

specialty” catch-all designation. However,<br />

Colglazier and Hobson Distillery in Indiana<br />

has recently produced a sweet sorghum<br />

spirit they call “Sorgrhum” and refer to it<br />

as “America’s First Sweet Sorghum Rum”<br />

as well as “Sweet Sorghum Spirit” on their<br />

website. <strong>The</strong>y are currently awaiting label<br />

approval, so it will remain to be seen as to<br />

what class within the Standards of Identity<br />

this spirit will fall.<br />

Another point of ambiguity concerns<br />

rum-like distillates produced from fresh<br />

cane juice. This category ordinarily consists<br />

of cachacas from Brazil and rhum agricoles<br />

from Martinique and the French West<br />

Indies. Cachaca, for instance, has not<br />

been separated into a class of its own in<br />

u.S. Standards of Identity nomenclature.<br />

bill owenS<br />

However, in recognition of the fact that<br />

cachaca is intimately intertwined with<br />

Brazilian culture, the Brazilian government<br />

has taken strong measures to secure use of<br />

the name “cachaca” as a spirit that is internationally<br />

recognized as being exclusively<br />

produced in Brazil. Clearly, Brazil and the<br />

French West Indies are not the only places<br />

that make distillates from fresh fermented<br />

cane juice, but <strong>American</strong> distillers are dissuaded<br />

from using the terms “cachaca” or<br />

“rhum agricole” to describe their similarly<br />

produced spirits.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se are but a few of the legal issues<br />

and questions of nomenclature interpretation<br />

confronting rum distillers in the<br />

united States.<br />

— Nancy Fraley

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!