Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Synopsis of an Investigative Journalism ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

if the judges reviewing the complaints have themselves engaged in the type of conduct complained about, then if they were to declare it unbecoming of a judge and deserving of discipline, they would be incriminating and exposing themselves to being the target of the same discipline. 10. The other answer is that judges disregard complaints against their peers in order to avoid retaliation. So if today they were to pay any attention to a complaint, not to mention set up a special committee or call in a standing committee under 28 U.S.C. §§353(a) and 356(b), respectively, to examine the complained-about judge, then if tomorrow they were the subject of a complaint, the formerly investigated judge or his friends, allies, and accomplices would take the opportunity to retaliate by investigating them and perhaps even disciplining them. 11. Such conduct involves judging ‘with’ regard to persons, contrary to their oath of office. It illustrates the axiomatic principle that due to inescapable grave conflict of interests, one cannot sit in judgment of oneself or of those in one’s web of personal relationships. Judges do act in self-interest, taking the easy, unprincipled way out in dereliction of duty and to the detriment of complainants and the integrity of judicial process. (On webs of personal relationships see Statement of Facts:4§14.) 12. ‘Big deal! Why would we judges ever indispose ourselves with our peers with whom we will spend the rest of our professional lives as Article III life-term appointees or renewable 14-year term bankruptcy judges 8 ? Why create for ourselves an avoidable hostile work environment and the repellant reputation of an unreliable class traitor just because one Joe or Jane thought in their very impeachable judgment that a judge had misbehaved or even broken the law? Who cares! Let them deal with it for the short time they will be upset! They will get over it, trust us!, since we judges are the last resort of those complainants.’ 13. Such is the mentality arising from the dynamics of a web of personal relationships whose members are endowed with unappellable judicial power. It rests on a judicial system of self-discipline inherently flawed: Federal judges have no incentive to do what is right but inimical to themselves because they do not have to fear any adverse consequences of doing what is wrong. Hence, they have taken out of service the mechanism of judicial discipline that they are supposed to operate. However, that does not mean that they are idle. Far from it, the ˝Statement of Facts” shows that they operate or tolerate the operation of a bankruptcy fraud scheme. Homepage 8 §H. Comments in response to the invitation by CA2 for public comments on the reappointment of Judge John C. Ninfo, II, to a new term as bankruptcy judge ....... ToEC:42 http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/docs/Tables_of_Exhibits/pdf (downloadable) http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/ToeC.htm (on website) 4 of 4 Dr. Cordero’s “A Bankruptcy Fraud Scheme and its Coordinated Cover up by Federal Judges”
http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf Biographical Directory of Federal Judges About the Directory Magistrate Judges Bankruptcy Judges Milestones of Judicial Service Impeachments of Judges A Guide to the Preservation of Judges' Papers (pdf) http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf (1 of 3)5/28/2006 7:51:30 AM [ History Home | Judges | Courts | Teaching | Talking | Courthouses | Administration | Legislation | Programs | Contact ] Impeachments of Federal Judges John Pickering, U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 2, 1803, on charges of mental instability and intoxication on the bench; Trial in the U.S. Senate, March 3, 1803, to March 12, 1803; Convicted and removed from office on March 12, 1803. Samuel Chase, Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 12, 1804, on charges of arbitrary and oppressive conduct of trials; Trial in the U.S. Senate, November 30, 1804, to March 1, 1805; Acquitted on March 1, 1805. James H. Peck, U.S. District Court for the District of Missouri. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives on April 24, 1830, on charges of abuse of the contempt power; Trial in the U.S. Senate, April 26, 1830, to January 31, 1831; Acquitted on January 31, 1831. West H. Humphreys, U.S. District Court for the Middle, Eastern, and Western Districts of Tennessee. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, May 6, 1862, on charges of refusing to hold court and waging war against the U.S. government; Trial in the U. S. Senate, May 7, 1862, to June 26, 1862; Convicted and removed from office, June 26, 1862. Mark W. Delahay, U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives, February 28, 1873, on charges of intoxication on the bench; Resigned from office, December 12, 1873, before opening of trial in the U.S. Senate.
Page 1 and 2: Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Ph.D., Un
Page 3 and 4: Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org Tabl
Page 5 and 6: 72 Table S-22. Report of Complaints
Page 9 and 10: Table S-22. Report of Complaints Fi
Page 11 and 12: Administrative Office of the U.S. C
Page 25: council to which the dismissal of a
Page 29 and 30: http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf
Page 35 and 36: Judicial‐Discipline‐Reform.org
Page 43 and 44: VII.A.3. Contact information with d
Page 45 and 46: 100 Meridian Centre Blvd., Suite 12
Page 47 and 48: Ghysel, Margaret (Peggy) Appeals Cl
Page 49 and 50: tel. (585) 258-8475, (800) 724-2440
Page 51 and 52: c) complaint v. staff (C:441, 465 &
Page 53 and 54: c) letters re complaint v. J. Ninfo
Page 55 and 56: c) petition for review of Judicial
Page 57 and 58: Washington, D.C. 20543 tel. (202) 4
Page 59 and 60: Byron White U.S. Courthouse 1823 St
Page 61 and 62: 1 First Street, N.E. Washington, D.
Page 63 and 64: (from ToEC:89) VII.A. 2. Official D
Page 65 and 66: Federal judges have no grant of imm
Page 69 and 70: 5. Many entities and individuals ha
Page 71 and 72: through the web of personal and fin
Page 73 and 74: and shapes of relevance and credibi
Page 75 and 76: action. It allows evidence of fraud

Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq. Synopsis of an Investigative Journalism ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?