16.01.2013 Views

January / February 2009 - Nebraska Public Power District

January / February 2009 - Nebraska Public Power District

January / February 2009 - Nebraska Public Power District

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6 ENERGY INSIGHT • jaNuaRY / fEbRuaRY <strong>2009</strong><br />

ENERGY INSIGHT • jaNuaRY / fEbRuaRY <strong>2009</strong> 7<br />

Chartered Territory<br />

...understanding the issues in LB53<br />

Sen. Deb Fischer introduced Legislative Bill 53 in the Natural Resources Committee on Jan. 22. The<br />

bill would change state statutes relating to the chartered territory of public power districts. Passage<br />

of the bill would amend state statutes to align NPPD’s chartered territory more closely with its<br />

wholesale and retail service territory, thus affecting areas of the state where citizens currently vote<br />

and run for NPPD’s Board of Directors. The following Q&A with Vice President and General Counsel<br />

John McClure delves deeper into why NPPD supports this bill.<br />

In regard to chartered territory, can<br />

you explain the current state statutes?<br />

From the original establishment of public power<br />

districts in 1933 until 1986, there was one set of<br />

statutes governing chartered territory. In 1986, a<br />

statutory change established two separate sets of<br />

requirements. One set of requirements governs public<br />

power districts operating in 50 counties or fewer, and<br />

the other one governs public power districts operating<br />

in more than 50 counties. NPPD is the only public<br />

power district in the state that operates in more than<br />

50 counties<br />

Why does NPPD<br />

want to see a change<br />

in the state statutes?<br />

LB 53 would eliminate<br />

the “more than 50 counties”<br />

requirements, thus returning<br />

the statutes to one set of<br />

requirements for all public<br />

power districts. It also<br />

adds a provision to require<br />

municipalities and other<br />

wholesale customers to<br />

purchase 50 percent or more<br />

of their firm wholesale annual<br />

energy from a public power<br />

district to be included in the<br />

chartered territory of the<br />

supplying district.<br />

What is NPPD’s current chartered<br />

territory?<br />

NPPD’s current chartered territory is the entire state<br />

except for Douglas and Sarpy counties and five first<br />

class cities which are not electrically interconnected<br />

with NPPD—Alliance, Blair, Fremont, <strong>Nebraska</strong><br />

City and Sidney. These exclusions are the only ones<br />

permitted by current law. All other areas of the state<br />

must be included, even if NPPD does not serve<br />

those areas directly at retail or indirectly through a<br />

wholesale customer.<br />

DIRECTOR SUBDIVISIONS OF THE AREA AND TERRITORY OF THE<br />

NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT<br />

How would amending the state statutes<br />

affect NPPD’s Board of Directors?<br />

Currently, NPPD’s chartered territory includes some<br />

areas where the citizens do not receive their electricity<br />

either directly or indirectly from NPPD; however, the<br />

people in these areas still have the authority to vote<br />

and run for NPPD’s Board of Directors. NPPD is<br />

governed today by an 11-member, popularly elected<br />

Board of Directors. Each Director is elected from one<br />

of 11 subdivisions of the chartered territory which<br />

include one or more counties. The population of those<br />

subdivisions—based on the U.S. Census which is<br />

conducted every 10 years—must be approximately the<br />

same.<br />

The issue before us is that customers who rely<br />

exclusively on NPPD for power supply are at risk<br />

of seeing their voices diluted by citizens who have<br />

limited or no direct financial stake in the outcome<br />

of NPPD’s actions. After the 2010 U.S. Census is<br />

released, areas that have limited or no long-term<br />

power supply contracts with NPPD—such as Lincoln,<br />

Grand Island and Hastings—could have an increased<br />

voice in NPPD governance simply because of the shift<br />

in population to larger communities.<br />

As drafted, LB53 would result in the elimination of<br />

the chartered territory where three directors currently<br />

reside (two directors in Lincoln and one in Broken<br />

Bow), thus eliminating their positions on NPPD’s<br />

Board.<br />

Now that the bill has been introduced<br />

and advanced by the Natural Resources<br />

Committee, what happens next?<br />

The bill went to General File, which is the first<br />

time the full Legislature has the opportunity to<br />

debate and vote on bills. On Monday, Feb. 9, LB 53<br />

was advanced from General File to Select File by a<br />

vote of 36-2. Select File is the second debating and<br />

voting stage. This step allows another opportunity<br />

for amendment. Bills on Select File may be killed<br />

or advanced to the next stage, Final Reading. The<br />

<strong>Nebraska</strong> Constitution requires that before final<br />

passage, all bills must be read aloud in their entirety<br />

by the Clerk of the Legislature, unless three-fifths (30<br />

members) of the Legislature vote not to do so. After<br />

the bill is passed on Final Reading, the Governor has<br />

five days to decide to either approve or veto the bill.<br />

The Legislature can override the bill, but it takes the<br />

vote of 30 senators.<br />

RESOLuTION<br />

Of NEbRaSKa PubLIC POWER DISTRICT<br />

No. 08-151<br />

adopted: December 12, 2008<br />

WHEREAS, it is the mission of <strong>Nebraska</strong> <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Power</strong> <strong>District</strong> (NPPD) to safely<br />

generate and deliver low-cost, reliable energy and provide outstanding customer<br />

service; and<br />

WHEREAS, NPPD generally supports legislation that sustains <strong>Nebraska</strong>’s public<br />

power system and protects the interests of electric consumers in <strong>Nebraska</strong>, and<br />

WHEREAS, NPPD generally opposes legislation and regulation that impose broadbased<br />

mandates that do not account for local conditions, experience, evidence, and<br />

performance.<br />

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED with reference to the <strong>2009</strong> sessions of the<br />

<strong>Nebraska</strong> Legislature and the 111th U.S. Congress and related regulatory actions,<br />

that the <strong>District</strong>:<br />

1.<br />

Opposes legislation which would jeopardize public power.<br />

2. Supports water-related legislation and regulation designed to protect both<br />

groundwater and surface water needs of the <strong>District</strong>, and will consider the<br />

surface water and groundwater needs of its customers as it formulates<br />

positions.<br />

3. Supports legislation which provides increased funding for Renewable Energy<br />

Production Incentives (REPI), or for other state and federal incentives<br />

comparable to those afforded investor-owned utilities and other private entities<br />

for renewable energy projects.<br />

4. Opposes legislation mandating a renewable portfolio standard without<br />

guaranteed adequate incentives to carry out the mandate in a cost-effective<br />

manner.<br />

5. Opposes the sale of federally-owned and operated generation and<br />

transmission facilities.<br />

6. Supports continued sale of Western Area <strong>Power</strong> Administration power at costof-service<br />

prices.<br />

7. Supports federal legislative and regulatory actions which advance the<br />

development of a high-level nuclear waste management/disposal facility.<br />

8. Supports economy-wide solutions to address greenhouse gases based on<br />

proven science, which for the electric industry, focuses on early commercially<br />

viable technology development, expansion of energy efficiency and renewable<br />

technologies, and a diverse generating mix to reduce CO2 emissions.<br />

9. Opposes expanding the applicability of taxes/fees on public power districts.<br />

10. Supports state environmental legislation and regulation that is equivalent to<br />

federal requirements unless it can be demonstrated that federal regulations do<br />

not adequately protect public health and the environment.<br />

11. Supports a modification of the public power district procurement statutes to<br />

increase the sealed bid threshold from $100,000 to $500,000 for public power<br />

districts with annual revenues in excess of $500,000,000.<br />

12. Supports legislation which reduces statutory barriers to receive <strong>Power</strong> Review<br />

Board approval for renewable energy projects.<br />

13. Supports legislation which requires that wholesale customers of a public power<br />

district receive at least 50 percent of their annual power and energy under a<br />

firm power contract in order to be included within the chartered territory of the<br />

supplying district.<br />

14. Supports legislation allowing officer salaries to be approved by the board with<br />

a majority vote.<br />

* An original motion was made to approve the <strong>2009</strong> Legislative Policy Resolution, to<br />

include Item Nos. 1-12, and Item No. 14; this motion carried by a vote of 11-0.<br />

A second motion was made for the approval of the <strong>2009</strong> Legislative Policy<br />

Resolution, Item No. 13, which passed by a vote of 8-3, and 1 abstention.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!