17.01.2013 Views

Download PDF - CIFAR

Download PDF - CIFAR

Download PDF - CIFAR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

YOU ARE WHAT YOUR<br />

GENES EXPERIENCE<br />

T<br />

he nature/nurture dilemma has<br />

long framed debates about the relative<br />

importance of genes and environment on<br />

human development. For <strong>CIFAR</strong> member<br />

Clyde Hertzman, who is a professor of<br />

population health at the University of<br />

British Columbia, the question is far more<br />

nuanced. Ongoing research illustrates how,<br />

rather than genes being responsible for one<br />

job and environmental factors for another,<br />

the real story centres around how nature<br />

and nurture interact with one another.<br />

Events in the external world can leave<br />

biochemical fingerprints on a child’s DNA,<br />

changing the course of everything from<br />

brain complexity to motor skills – some<br />

of the fundamental characteristics of<br />

individual identity.<br />

“We’re coming to understand now that early<br />

experience gets under the skin,” he says.<br />

That thesis holds enormous implications<br />

for early childhood education, parenting<br />

techniques and health policy. The<br />

phenomenon also suggests that<br />

an individual’s genetic make-up is<br />

programmed to adapt during the formative<br />

early years to both positive and negative<br />

external stimuli.<br />

The mechanics of this process involve<br />

subtle changes in brain chemistry.<br />

When very young children experience<br />

things – anything from the soothing<br />

sound of a parent’s voice to the screams<br />

emanating from a domestic assault – those<br />

occurrences are carried into the brain<br />

in the form of electrical signals. Stressinducing<br />

experiences are associated with<br />

heightened cortisol levels, Hertzman says.<br />

These signals create a kind of biochemical<br />

“cascade” that can trigger structural and<br />

chemical changes to cytosine, one of the<br />

four building-block components of DNA.<br />

The cascade leaves behind distinctive<br />

patterns of a methyl compound, which<br />

in turn affects the way these genes will<br />

express themselves.<br />

This is “the outside world and DNA talking<br />

to one another,” he says.<br />

Animal and early human studies on blood<br />

and saliva cells suggest that methylation<br />

patterns differ noticeably with exposure to<br />

positive and negative stimuli.<br />

Events in the external world can leave biochemical fingerprints<br />

on a child’s DNA, changing the course of everything from<br />

brain complexity to motor skills – some of the fundamental<br />

characteristics of individual identity.<br />

09<br />

“Right now, we’re at the statistical<br />

association point,” Hertzman says,<br />

noting that researchers thus far have<br />

had to infer methylation patterns in<br />

brain tissue.<br />

How gene-environment interactions<br />

affect children’s development and<br />

help shape their identities may be<br />

“way upstream,” affecting not only<br />

the brain circuits that regulate stress<br />

hormones, but also the evolution of<br />

the organ systems that manufacture<br />

these hormones.<br />

“Preliminary evidence suggests that<br />

the capacity of early experience to leave<br />

epigenetic marks is greater than with<br />

later experiences,” Hertzman says,<br />

(although the phenomenon has also<br />

been observed among people who<br />

have endured profoundly traumatic<br />

experiences later in life, including living<br />

through the Holocaust).<br />

It may also be the case that these<br />

changes can become intergenerational,<br />

explaining how the effects of trauma can<br />

indeed be passed from parent to child.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!