19.01.2013 Views

2012 thomson reuters australia citation & innovation awards

2012 thomson reuters australia citation & innovation awards

2012 thomson reuters australia citation & innovation awards

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CITATION & INNOVATION AWARD<br />

WINNERS <strong>2012</strong><br />

Methodology - Citation Awards <strong>2012</strong><br />

This exploration of Australian research began with an identification of fields which were strengths for the<br />

country, by a combination of three criteria: first, how many papers Australian researchers published; second,<br />

how great a proportion of the field globally Australian research represented; and third, the level of impact,<br />

measured in <strong>citation</strong>s, relative to global performance in the field.<br />

The next step was to consider individuals who contribute to those fields. All Australian-affiliated authors<br />

from papers published between 2002 and October 2011, in journals indexed in Thomson Reuters’ Web of<br />

Science, were reviewed. A shortlist of researchers in each field was established by finding those authors who<br />

had published a given number of papers, each of which had been cited that given number of times – a metric<br />

called the h-index. This meant that only researchers who had made a strong contribution in terms of both<br />

quality and quantity were considered. Because field activity can vary widely, adjustments were made in the<br />

threshold levels for each field to eliminate false leads and focus on those researchers with substantial and<br />

long-term contributions.<br />

The shortlist was then ranked by average <strong>citation</strong>s per paper received, and the highest ranking author currently<br />

and actively producing research output was identified. This ensured that researchers would be selected who<br />

had a proven track record of high-impact research over the course of the ten year period. Where variation<br />

between the top and second ranked candidates was less than one <strong>citation</strong> per article, a second metric, average<br />

percentile, was used to differentiate them. This metric looks at how highly ranked a paper is by <strong>citation</strong>s<br />

against papers of the same type, published in the same year and in the same field, thereby allowing accurate<br />

comparison of the candidates’ impact.<br />

Field of Study Names Institution H-Index Cites Publications<br />

Astronomy &<br />

Astrophysics<br />

Biochemistry &<br />

Molecular Biology<br />

Biodiversity<br />

Conservation<br />

Professor<br />

Karl Glazebrook<br />

9<br />

Swinburne<br />

University of<br />

Technology<br />

Professor Terry Speed Walter and Eliza<br />

Hall Institute of<br />

Medical Research<br />

Dr Jane Elith University of<br />

Melbourne<br />

Ecology Professor<br />

Ove Hoegh-Guldberg<br />

University of<br />

Queensland<br />

69 22,245 181<br />

51 19,623 263<br />

25 2,986 42<br />

39 8,623 172<br />

Economics Dr Tommy Wiedmann CSIRO 15 574 25<br />

Environmental Studies Dr Shaobin Wang Curtin University 32 3,018 129<br />

Geosciences Professor<br />

Kurt Lambeck<br />

Immunology Professor<br />

Fabienne Mackay<br />

Australian<br />

National<br />

University<br />

Monash<br />

University<br />

Neurosciences Dr Greg Stuart Australian<br />

National<br />

University<br />

52 9,682 217<br />

46 8,297 105<br />

39 6,585 71<br />

Plant Sciences Professor Rana Munns CSIRO 45 9,848 114<br />

Psychology Professor<br />

Colin MacLeod<br />

Public, Environmental<br />

& Occupational Health<br />

University<br />

of Western<br />

Australia<br />

Dr Evie Leslie Flinders<br />

University<br />

25 5,062 53<br />

18 2,149 36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!