- Page 1 and 2: HRSA State Planning Grants Program:
- Page 3 and 4: Introduction The Health Resources a
- Page 5 and 6: State Initial Year Funded for Plann
- Page 7 and 8: � Premium Assistance: 10 states
- Page 9 and 10: Pilot Planning States In 2004, HRSA
- Page 11 and 12: State Pilot Grants Award Amount Yea
- Page 13 and 14: A critical resource for states’ d
- Page 15 and 16: The Planning Grant States The origi
- Page 17 and 18: State Policy Environments In order
- Page 19: challenges, including low employer
- Page 23 and 24: Other national data sources include
- Page 25 and 26: groups in the policy making process
- Page 27 and 28: State Household Uninsured or Consum
- Page 29 and 30: Ketsche, P. "Employment Based Healt
- Page 31 and 32: supporting this proposal. The state
- Page 33 and 34: 10 employees offered health insuran
- Page 35 and 36: State CPS Estimate 2-year average:
- Page 37 and 38: and 34 years of age, and one of eve
- Page 39 and 40: State Percent of Private-Sector Est
- Page 41 and 42: the stigma of public programs, sayi
- Page 43 and 44: Modeling and Actuarial Studies Many
- Page 45 and 46: Table 3-1 lists the lead agency ide
- Page 47 and 48: consumers, businesses, local govern
- Page 49 and 50: • The Vermont Ethics Network (VEN
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter IV: Policy Options The SPG
- Page 53 and 54: Policy Options: Emerging Themes As
- Page 55 and 56: For purposes of the following overv
- Page 57 and 58: establishment of working committees
- Page 59 and 60: • In 2002, Illinois received appr
- Page 61 and 62: • New Mexico worked through the G
- Page 63 and 64: Options “Off the Table” Some st
- Page 65 and 66: • Learn from the experiences of o
- Page 67 and 68: • Keep expectations realistic. St
- Page 69 and 70: Chapter VI: Recommendations to the
- Page 71 and 72:
• Research on public input proces
- Page 73 and 74:
an effort to successfully engage st
- Page 75 and 76:
Michigan is developing an initiativ
- Page 77 and 78:
Commission reflect the same element
- Page 79 and 80:
To achieve the reforms that lead to
- Page 81 and 82:
whether federal action on the unins
- Page 83 and 84:
APPENDICES
- Page 85 and 86:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 87 and 88:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 89 and 90:
Cumulative number of new Coverage S
- Page 91 and 92:
Cumulative number of new Coverage S
- Page 93 and 94:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 95 and 96:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 97 and 98:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 99 and 100:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 101 and 102:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 103 and 104:
State New Mexico North Dakota Cumul
- Page 105 and 106:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 107 and 108:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 109 and 110:
State Virginia None Cumulative numb
- Page 111 and 112:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 113 and 114:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 115 and 116:
State Cumulative number of new Cove
- Page 117 and 118:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 119 and 120:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 121 and 122:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 123 and 124:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 125 and 126:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 127 and 128:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 129 and 130:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 131 and 132:
Table B1. Summary of SPG Consumer F
- Page 133 and 134:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 135 and 136:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 137 and 138:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 139 and 140:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 141 and 142:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 143 and 144:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 145 and 146:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 147 and 148:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 149 and 150:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 151 and 152:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 153 and 154:
Table B2. Summary of SPG Employer F
- Page 155 and 156:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 157 and 158:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 159 and 160:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 161 and 162:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 163 and 164:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 165 and 166:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 167 and 168:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 169 and 170:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 171 and 172:
Table B3. Summary of SPG Household
- Page 173 and 174:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 175 and 176:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 177 and 178:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 179 and 180:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 181 and 182:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 183 and 184:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 185 and 186:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 187 and 188:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 189 and 190:
Table B4. Summary of SPG Employer S
- Page 191 and 192:
Indiana-implement in 2007 Iowa Kent
- Page 193 and 194:
Individual Coverage Mandate Conside
- Page 195 and 196:
Considered North Dakota South Carol
- Page 197 and 198:
Colorado Idaho Massachusetts Minnes
- Page 199 and 200:
Buy-in to employees health plan or
- Page 201 and 202:
Individual/small market reform Cons
- Page 203 and 204:
Implemented Delaware-implemented (s
- Page 205 and 206:
Reed, J.A. et al. "International Ap
- Page 207 and 208:
Duncan, P. et al. "The Florida Heal
- Page 209 and 210:
Economic Analysis of the Effects of
- Page 211 and 212:
Commission to Study Maine's Hospita
- Page 213 and 214:
Health Economics Program, Minnesota
- Page 215 and 216:
Nebraska Carlson, E. et al. "Reacti
- Page 217 and 218:
White Paper on Uninsurance in New M
- Page 219 and 220:
Oregon Health Policy and Research,
- Page 221 and 222:
Sheils, J. et al. "Covering VHAP an
- Page 223 and 224:
Richardson, S.K. "Health Insurance
- Page 225 and 226:
HRSA STATE PLANNING GRANTS FINAL RE
- Page 227:
whether legislation or waivers were