25.01.2013 Views

PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID RAVENNA MI PERMIT NO. 320

PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID RAVENNA MI PERMIT NO. 320

PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID RAVENNA MI PERMIT NO. 320

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

y Paul Davison<br />

NFAA Historian<br />

Way Back When<br />

R e m e m b e r i n g t h e F a c t o r y P r o<br />

Te a m S h o o t<br />

The Allen Compound<br />

Bow was introduced in<br />

the 1960’s primarily as<br />

a hunting weapon. With its<br />

superior arrow speed and easeof-shooting,<br />

it was only natural<br />

that it would be adapted to<br />

the recreational archery market.<br />

After all, there was nothing in<br />

the NFAA rules that prohibited<br />

Visit<br />

Paul Davison’s<br />

<br />

Official adjunct to NFAA’s<br />

<br />

NFAA History and historyrelated<br />

articles published in<br />

magazine<br />

Recent NFAA/WAF tournament<br />

write-ups and photo galleries<br />

Lists of all National Outdoor<br />

(from 1946) and National<br />

Indoor (from 1980) Champions<br />

NFAA Barebow Fraternity news<br />

and membership roster<br />

Field and 3-D Range Design<br />

Guidelines<br />

Every <br />

article published in <br />

Recently-published general<br />

interest articles by Paul<br />

Davison in <br />

“NFAA and WAF news for<br />

all archers”<br />

the compound bow. By the early<br />

1970’s, Allen agreed to let other<br />

bow manufacturers produce<br />

their own compound bows<br />

under the Allen license. Upstarts<br />

Jennings and PSE were the first<br />

to jump on the bandwagon.<br />

The traditional recurve bow<br />

manufacturers soon followed.<br />

By the mid-1970’s, there<br />

were about a dozen different<br />

compound bow brands on the<br />

market, and the competition was<br />

quite fierce. There was no better<br />

way to convince the public that<br />

you had the best bow than to<br />

have the top professional archers<br />

shoot and win with it.<br />

Primarily because the<br />

Professional Archers Association<br />

prohibited compound bows,<br />

the NFAA Professional Division<br />

was born in 1973 for those<br />

top archers who wanted to<br />

compete for cash awards using<br />

“unlimited” equipment. At<br />

that time, there were virtually<br />

no big money tournaments<br />

that allowed anything but FITA<br />

equipment. The recurve-only<br />

PAA continued to have their<br />

standalone tournaments, while<br />

the NFAA Pros experimented<br />

with a few “anything goes”<br />

tournaments, most notably<br />

the “Lake of the Woods” shoot<br />

held near PSE’s headquarters<br />

outside Mahomet, IL. Almost<br />

all top competitors at these early<br />

NFAA Pro tournaments were<br />

sponsored by one of compound<br />

bow manufacturer, principally<br />

Jennings, PSE and Astro. By<br />

1974, Carroll, Bear and a<br />

few others began to sponsor<br />

factory teams. Still, unless the<br />

recreational archer watched<br />

one of these tournaments, or<br />

read a magazine advertisement<br />

expounding the staff shooter’s<br />

winning ways, he probably end<br />

up buying whatever bow his<br />

local proshop was pushing.<br />

Then at the 1976 NFAA<br />

National Outdoor tournament<br />

at Aurora, IL, the NFAA Pros and<br />

their sponsors finally got the<br />

exposure they needed. They<br />

came up with a winner-takeall,<br />

“World Professional Team<br />

Championship.” It was held<br />

in the late afternoon after each<br />

day’s field competition on the<br />

practice field behind the Holiday<br />

Inn. The format was quite simple.<br />

Contributing sponsors put up<br />

$500 per two-archer team. Each<br />

day’s round consisted of six, fivearrow,<br />

ends at 50 yards. In 1976,<br />

the target was the experimental<br />

NFAA Expert face. Later, it<br />

was the 50 cm Hunter face we<br />

use today. After Monday and<br />

Tuesday, the bottom half of the<br />

teams were eliminated. Then<br />

after Wednesday and Thursday,<br />

only the top two men’s and<br />

women’s teams made the cut for<br />

Friday finals.<br />

This was my first experience<br />

in watching “stadium archery.”<br />

The practice field was laid out<br />

south-to-north on the east<br />

side of the three-story Holiday<br />

Inn. There was a grassy bank<br />

between the motel and the<br />

practice field which provided an<br />

ideal spot to watch the action.<br />

Then, with favorite beverage in<br />

hand, a few hundred spectators<br />

cheered their favorite team on to<br />

victory. I had no favorite. I was<br />

still shooting a recurve in 1976,<br />

but was certainly in the market<br />

for a new compound bow. The<br />

target butts, the spectators, and<br />

most of the range were in the<br />

shade. Only the shooting line<br />

was in the sun. Since most of<br />

the Pros shot right-handed with<br />

their backs to the sun, the late<br />

afternoon glare was no problem<br />

— except to left-handed Dean<br />

Pridgen.<br />

The final two women’s teams<br />

were sponsored by PSE and<br />

Carroll, while the men’s teams<br />

were sponsored by Jennings and<br />

Bear. The wasn’t much drama in<br />

the women’s finals — PSE’s Eva<br />

Troncoso and Nancy Pfeilmeier<br />

won handily — but it was<br />

another story in the men’s finals.<br />

Jennings’ Gary Lyman and Dean<br />

Pridgen enjoyed a comfortable<br />

six-point margin over Team<br />

Bear’s Dave Young and Joe Drury<br />

with only two, five-arrow ends<br />

to go. Then with one end left,<br />

the lead was reduced to two<br />

points. Finally, with just two<br />

arrows remaining, Team Bear<br />

grabbed the winner-take-all<br />

$6000 purse by converting a<br />

two-point deficit into a two-point<br />

victory. Although Dean Pridgen<br />

probably won’t admit it, Team<br />

Jennings’ hopes went down with<br />

Dean Pridgen fights the sun in 1976<br />

the sun. As the accompanying<br />

photo shows, teammate Gary<br />

Lyman did his best to shade<br />

Dean’s peep sight.<br />

The World Professional Team<br />

Championship continued using<br />

the same format for several<br />

years, always in conjunction<br />

with the NFAA National Outdoor<br />

tournament, but sometimes<br />

starting on Sunday instead of<br />

Monday. The sponsors changed,<br />

too. More bow manufacturers<br />

got into the act, and some other<br />

companies, like Bowhunters<br />

Warehouse and Toxonics,<br />

sponsored or co-sponsored<br />

teams. Even a few states, like<br />

Michigan, joined in. Then in<br />

1986, factory-sponsorship<br />

disappeared, and the “teams”<br />

competed as either Professional<br />

or Adult, with all NFAA shooting<br />

styles being recognized. The<br />

“winner-take-all” prize money<br />

disappeared, too. The Team Shoot<br />

slowly became an entertaining,<br />

self-supporting, time-filler at<br />

both the Outdoor and Indoor<br />

National Championships. It<br />

went from being 100% pro, to<br />

pro and amateur, to today’s pro<br />

with amateur, or, as we know it,<br />

the Pro-Am. The “amateur” is<br />

really a misnomer. The Pro-Am<br />

prize money is awarded without<br />

prejudice.<br />

Today, the contingency<br />

money awarded to top factory<br />

shooters more than makes up<br />

for losing the old factory team<br />

shoot. There’s more “bang-forthe-buck.”<br />

If you’ve attended<br />

a national tournament, or even<br />

looked through this magazine,<br />

you’re bound to notice the<br />

super-sized contingency checks<br />

the factory-sponsored winners<br />

are holding. You’ll certainly<br />

notice what brand of bow the<br />

winner is shooting.<br />

I still miss the old Team Shoot,<br />

though.<br />

28 Archery Magazine April / May 2008 Archery Magazine April / May 2008 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!