28.01.2013 Views

Society and Economy in England, 1715–1763 - Lyceum Books

Society and Economy in England, 1715–1763 - Lyceum Books

Society and Economy in England, 1715–1763 - Lyceum Books

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

50 Part I The Age of the L<strong>and</strong>ed Oligarchy<br />

the lower end of the middl<strong>in</strong>g scale stood artisans, shopkeepers, tradesmen, <strong>and</strong><br />

their families, earn<strong>in</strong>g perhaps £50 a year. Artisans had their own hierarchies:<br />

apprentices, journeymen, <strong>and</strong> masters, most of whom were male, though women<br />

sometimes did become apprentices <strong>and</strong> learned the trades. Some master artisans<br />

owned their own shops <strong>and</strong> employed apprentices <strong>and</strong> journeymen. The London<br />

Tradesman <strong>in</strong> 1747 listed more than 350 different crafts <strong>and</strong> trades: butchers, bakers,<br />

<strong>and</strong> c<strong>and</strong>lestickmakers; but also jewelers, goldsmiths, shipwights, carpenters,<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>ers, shoemakers, saddlers, harnessmakers, tailors, lacemakers, weavers, cutlers,<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>ters, cha<strong>in</strong>makers, spurriers, gunsmiths, hatters, clockmakers, <strong>and</strong> all the rest<br />

of a world of manufactur<strong>in</strong>g now largely gone.<br />

Above the artisans <strong>and</strong> shopkeepers <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards of liv<strong>in</strong>g were<br />

the merchants <strong>and</strong> professional people. Rich bus<strong>in</strong>essmen could earn anyth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from hundreds to thous<strong>and</strong>s of pounds a year. Professional men—women could not<br />

enter any of the professions until the late n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century—<strong>in</strong>cluded clergymen,<br />

lawyers, <strong>and</strong> doctors; they earned a wide range of <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> improved their<br />

status throughout the century. At the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the century, professional men<br />

were regarded, like tradesmen <strong>and</strong> merchants, as overly ambitious <strong>and</strong> therefore<br />

not genteel. By the end of the century, however, they had ga<strong>in</strong>ed considerable<br />

respectability <strong>and</strong> were even thought of as satellites of the l<strong>and</strong>ed orders. The middl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

sorts would eventually form the germ of the middle class, but <strong>in</strong> the eighteenth<br />

century their ma<strong>in</strong> desire was to make enough money to buy an estate <strong>and</strong><br />

jo<strong>in</strong> the elite circle of l<strong>and</strong>ed society.<br />

Eighteenth-century society, then, was a f<strong>in</strong>ely graded hierarchy <strong>in</strong> which status<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ctions were carefully def<strong>in</strong>ed, observed, <strong>and</strong> protected. Yet Engl<strong>and</strong> was<br />

not a caste society. While there was little movement at the top level, the titled aristocracy,<br />

none of the rungs on the social ladder was legally closed to outsiders.<br />

L<strong>and</strong>owners enjoyed privileges, but the privileges def<strong>in</strong>ed by the law were surpris<strong>in</strong>gly<br />

few <strong>in</strong> number: the titled nobility sat <strong>in</strong> the House of Lords <strong>and</strong> were entitled<br />

to trial by their peers; otherwise, nobility <strong>and</strong> gentry were subject to the same body<br />

of law as everyone else <strong>and</strong> theoretically opened their ranks to newcomers. These<br />

concessions composed the social price that the l<strong>and</strong>owners paid for the preem<strong>in</strong>ence<br />

they won <strong>in</strong> 1688. In eighteenth-century Engl<strong>and</strong>, property determ<strong>in</strong>ed status,<br />

<strong>and</strong> property could be purchased. In medieval society, property followed status,<br />

but this rule had now been reversed. It was possible for a person to acquire a fortune,<br />

buy property, <strong>and</strong> move up to the appropriate rung on the social ladder. At the<br />

same time, it was possible for a family to squ<strong>and</strong>er its fortune <strong>and</strong> its estates <strong>and</strong><br />

thus to f<strong>in</strong>d itself reduced <strong>in</strong> status. Rich bus<strong>in</strong>essmen tried to marry daughters of<br />

the gentry so as to acquire status; younger sons of l<strong>and</strong>ed families often had to<br />

marry mercantile wealth or to f<strong>in</strong>d positions <strong>in</strong> the professions. In sum, there were<br />

numerous opportunities for social mobility <strong>in</strong> eighteenth-century Engl<strong>and</strong>.<br />

There was also an often unseemly scramble as people jostled for positions <strong>in</strong><br />

the social hierarchy. Barons sought to become earls, squires to become knights,<br />

farmers to become squires, merchants to become gentlemen, <strong>and</strong> shopkeepers to<br />

become merchants. Money was the key, <strong>and</strong> Englishmen impressed foreigners with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!