Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution
Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution
Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BItE My shINy DElRIN skIDPlAtE!<br />
Brad’s notoriety and the respect he’s garnered from<br />
enthusiasts worldwide all stems from his own product<br />
l<strong>in</strong>e that started with him compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the 2.2" class <strong>in</strong><br />
Colorado and Moab. These competitions evolved <strong>in</strong>to<br />
him develop<strong>in</strong>g products such as the SW2, which Brad<br />
manufactured to sell to the general public under the<br />
name ‘Bender Customs’. The SW3 was the next chassis<br />
he designed which was essentially a no frills competition<br />
specification which went on to w<strong>in</strong> the 2007 RCCRawler.<br />
com ‘Peoples Choice Award’ for ‘Best Chassis’. After a<br />
short break from manufactur<strong>in</strong>g chassis, he designed the<br />
<strong>SWX</strong> chassis for <strong>Axial</strong> Rac<strong>in</strong>g’s AX10 kit. A culm<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
of four years of R&D, it’s by far the most compact and<br />
capable chassis he’s designed to date.<br />
‘MAD’ PEtE INtERVIEWs BRAD<br />
Here’s my <strong>in</strong>terview with the<br />
man himself, his thoughts and<br />
ideas on what makes a good<br />
competition rig perform and<br />
his views on the ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
crawler scene:<br />
Mad Pete: Where does the Bender <strong>in</strong><br />
Bender Customs come from then? I’m<br />
th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Futurama, am I on the right<br />
track?<br />
Brad: You are correct, the name ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
comes from Futurama. That show cracks<br />
me up, and Bender is the best character<br />
on it <strong>in</strong> my op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />
So how long have you been <strong>in</strong>to R/C<br />
rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g?<br />
I’ve been R/C rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000,<br />
but became heavily <strong>in</strong>volved with<br />
it when I stumbled upon RC<strong>Crawler</strong>.<br />
com <strong>in</strong> 2004. I won the 2006 USRCCA<br />
nationals with a rig I designed and built.<br />
Been compet<strong>in</strong>g all over the US for<br />
the last couple years. My first chassis<br />
design for the public was the SW2,<br />
which was designed to be a chassis<br />
that could be built with any axles out<br />
there. The next chassis was my SW3,<br />
which was designed to be strictly a 2.2<br />
comp chassis. Then I designed the <strong>SWX</strong><br />
hIs MAIN POINts ON BuIlDING A GOOD COMP RIG ARE As fOllOWs:<br />
• For a 4-l<strong>in</strong>ked chassis, l<strong>in</strong>k set-up, ride height<br />
and shock angle play the biggest role <strong>in</strong> how<br />
a rig performs<br />
• Have the upper and lower l<strong>in</strong>ks double triangulated<br />
• Ride height has to be set so the rig has a decent<br />
‘break over’ angle (ground clearance), but<br />
still set low enough to climb steep vertical faces<br />
• Driv<strong>in</strong>g style, as well as terra<strong>in</strong>, can play a big role<br />
too. Some people prefer wheel speed and some<br />
prefer a lot of torque, one set-up may not work<br />
for both situations. Experiment to see what’s<br />
good for you!<br />
around <strong>Axial</strong>’s AX10, which they decided<br />
to buy the rights too. I <strong>in</strong>terviewed with<br />
them shortly after that for a job as a<br />
product designer/R&D tester, which is<br />
now where I currently work <strong>in</strong> California.<br />
So where do you see rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the future?<br />
For the future of R/C crawl<strong>in</strong>g I’d like<br />
to see the Super Class evolve more.<br />
I’m hop<strong>in</strong>g more companies will start<br />
to support this class. Right now there<br />
isn’t much support for it as far as<br />
aftermarket parts go. I th<strong>in</strong>k that’s the<br />
biggest reason that the attendance<br />
numbers for comps are down <strong>in</strong> that<br />
class. The 2.2 class seems to be gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />
all the attention lately, which is great to<br />
see but the Super Class is what really<br />
kicked this aspect of R/C off, and now it<br />
seems to have taken a back seat to the<br />
other classes. I also th<strong>in</strong>k that the scale<br />
trucks are go<strong>in</strong>g to receive a lot of<br />
attention over the next year. I can see<br />
more and more competitions popp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
up for them. Especially now that <strong>Axial</strong><br />
is releas<strong>in</strong>g the new SCX10 ‘scaler’. The<br />
toughest part about compet<strong>in</strong>g with<br />
the scale trucks is hav<strong>in</strong>g a set of rules/<br />
guidel<strong>in</strong>es that keeps the play<strong>in</strong>g field<br />
level, but still allows for all the creative<br />
ideas that people are com<strong>in</strong>g up with.<br />
The wheelbases vary greatly too, and<br />
<strong>RRCi</strong> fEAtuRE<br />
that is a big factor on how capable a rig<br />
is. The wheelbase rule for the 2.2 class<br />
is what keeps it very competitive.<br />
To dig or not to dig..?<br />
That is the question<br />
I don’t see dig go<strong>in</strong>g away <strong>in</strong> the US. It<br />
has really taken the capability of the 2.2<br />
class to a whole new level. There are so<br />
many situations where it is beneficial,<br />
and it allows us to run more technical/<br />
difficult courses then ever before. The<br />
USRCCA has also recently added a 1.9<br />
class to the rules. I believe this class<br />
will grow very fast, because they are<br />
not allow<strong>in</strong>g dig. This will let more new<br />
people that are on tight budgets to<br />
come <strong>in</strong> with relatively simple rigs and<br />
be competitive.<br />
So what are you work<strong>in</strong>g on at the<br />
moment? Is there an essential hop-up<br />
or must have <strong>Axial</strong> add-on?<br />
<strong>Axial</strong> is work<strong>in</strong>g on a bunch of new<br />
products for the 2009 season, but that’s<br />
about all I can say at this po<strong>in</strong>t without<br />
giv<strong>in</strong>g up any top-secret <strong>in</strong>fo. Right now<br />
I th<strong>in</strong>k the hottest hop-ups we have are<br />
the alum<strong>in</strong>ium knuckles, alum<strong>in</strong>ium axle<br />
C’s, the CVD’s. The <strong>SWX</strong> chassis also<br />
seems to be a pretty popular hop-up<br />
right now too, which is nice to see.<br />
• If you get a lot of torque twist <strong>in</strong> a shaft driven rig,<br />
add a stronger spr<strong>in</strong>g and oil to the offend<strong>in</strong>g rear<br />
shock, then try it aga<strong>in</strong>. If you still get twist move<br />
the upper l<strong>in</strong>k mount<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts on the chassis<br />
down closer to the lower mount<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />
and see if that helps<br />
• The best 4-l<strong>in</strong>k set-up is one that can flex<br />
with little change <strong>in</strong> the wheelbase<br />
02/09 WWW.RADIORACECAR.COM 63