30.01.2013 Views

Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution

Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution

Axial SWX Crawler reviewed in RRCi - CML Distribution

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BItE My shINy DElRIN skIDPlAtE!<br />

Brad’s notoriety and the respect he’s garnered from<br />

enthusiasts worldwide all stems from his own product<br />

l<strong>in</strong>e that started with him compet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the 2.2" class <strong>in</strong><br />

Colorado and Moab. These competitions evolved <strong>in</strong>to<br />

him develop<strong>in</strong>g products such as the SW2, which Brad<br />

manufactured to sell to the general public under the<br />

name ‘Bender Customs’. The SW3 was the next chassis<br />

he designed which was essentially a no frills competition<br />

specification which went on to w<strong>in</strong> the 2007 RCCRawler.<br />

com ‘Peoples Choice Award’ for ‘Best Chassis’. After a<br />

short break from manufactur<strong>in</strong>g chassis, he designed the<br />

<strong>SWX</strong> chassis for <strong>Axial</strong> Rac<strong>in</strong>g’s AX10 kit. A culm<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

of four years of R&D, it’s by far the most compact and<br />

capable chassis he’s designed to date.<br />

‘MAD’ PEtE INtERVIEWs BRAD<br />

Here’s my <strong>in</strong>terview with the<br />

man himself, his thoughts and<br />

ideas on what makes a good<br />

competition rig perform and<br />

his views on the ever-grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crawler scene:<br />

Mad Pete: Where does the Bender <strong>in</strong><br />

Bender Customs come from then? I’m<br />

th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Futurama, am I on the right<br />

track?<br />

Brad: You are correct, the name ma<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

comes from Futurama. That show cracks<br />

me up, and Bender is the best character<br />

on it <strong>in</strong> my op<strong>in</strong>ion<br />

So how long have you been <strong>in</strong>to R/C<br />

rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

I’ve been R/C rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000,<br />

but became heavily <strong>in</strong>volved with<br />

it when I stumbled upon RC<strong>Crawler</strong>.<br />

com <strong>in</strong> 2004. I won the 2006 USRCCA<br />

nationals with a rig I designed and built.<br />

Been compet<strong>in</strong>g all over the US for<br />

the last couple years. My first chassis<br />

design for the public was the SW2,<br />

which was designed to be a chassis<br />

that could be built with any axles out<br />

there. The next chassis was my SW3,<br />

which was designed to be strictly a 2.2<br />

comp chassis. Then I designed the <strong>SWX</strong><br />

hIs MAIN POINts ON BuIlDING A GOOD COMP RIG ARE As fOllOWs:<br />

• For a 4-l<strong>in</strong>ked chassis, l<strong>in</strong>k set-up, ride height<br />

and shock angle play the biggest role <strong>in</strong> how<br />

a rig performs<br />

• Have the upper and lower l<strong>in</strong>ks double triangulated<br />

• Ride height has to be set so the rig has a decent<br />

‘break over’ angle (ground clearance), but<br />

still set low enough to climb steep vertical faces<br />

• Driv<strong>in</strong>g style, as well as terra<strong>in</strong>, can play a big role<br />

too. Some people prefer wheel speed and some<br />

prefer a lot of torque, one set-up may not work<br />

for both situations. Experiment to see what’s<br />

good for you!<br />

around <strong>Axial</strong>’s AX10, which they decided<br />

to buy the rights too. I <strong>in</strong>terviewed with<br />

them shortly after that for a job as a<br />

product designer/R&D tester, which is<br />

now where I currently work <strong>in</strong> California.<br />

So where do you see rock crawl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the future?<br />

For the future of R/C crawl<strong>in</strong>g I’d like<br />

to see the Super Class evolve more.<br />

I’m hop<strong>in</strong>g more companies will start<br />

to support this class. Right now there<br />

isn’t much support for it as far as<br />

aftermarket parts go. I th<strong>in</strong>k that’s the<br />

biggest reason that the attendance<br />

numbers for comps are down <strong>in</strong> that<br />

class. The 2.2 class seems to be gett<strong>in</strong>g<br />

all the attention lately, which is great to<br />

see but the Super Class is what really<br />

kicked this aspect of R/C off, and now it<br />

seems to have taken a back seat to the<br />

other classes. I also th<strong>in</strong>k that the scale<br />

trucks are go<strong>in</strong>g to receive a lot of<br />

attention over the next year. I can see<br />

more and more competitions popp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

up for them. Especially now that <strong>Axial</strong><br />

is releas<strong>in</strong>g the new SCX10 ‘scaler’. The<br />

toughest part about compet<strong>in</strong>g with<br />

the scale trucks is hav<strong>in</strong>g a set of rules/<br />

guidel<strong>in</strong>es that keeps the play<strong>in</strong>g field<br />

level, but still allows for all the creative<br />

ideas that people are com<strong>in</strong>g up with.<br />

The wheelbases vary greatly too, and<br />

<strong>RRCi</strong> fEAtuRE<br />

that is a big factor on how capable a rig<br />

is. The wheelbase rule for the 2.2 class<br />

is what keeps it very competitive.<br />

To dig or not to dig..?<br />

That is the question<br />

I don’t see dig go<strong>in</strong>g away <strong>in</strong> the US. It<br />

has really taken the capability of the 2.2<br />

class to a whole new level. There are so<br />

many situations where it is beneficial,<br />

and it allows us to run more technical/<br />

difficult courses then ever before. The<br />

USRCCA has also recently added a 1.9<br />

class to the rules. I believe this class<br />

will grow very fast, because they are<br />

not allow<strong>in</strong>g dig. This will let more new<br />

people that are on tight budgets to<br />

come <strong>in</strong> with relatively simple rigs and<br />

be competitive.<br />

So what are you work<strong>in</strong>g on at the<br />

moment? Is there an essential hop-up<br />

or must have <strong>Axial</strong> add-on?<br />

<strong>Axial</strong> is work<strong>in</strong>g on a bunch of new<br />

products for the 2009 season, but that’s<br />

about all I can say at this po<strong>in</strong>t without<br />

giv<strong>in</strong>g up any top-secret <strong>in</strong>fo. Right now<br />

I th<strong>in</strong>k the hottest hop-ups we have are<br />

the alum<strong>in</strong>ium knuckles, alum<strong>in</strong>ium axle<br />

C’s, the CVD’s. The <strong>SWX</strong> chassis also<br />

seems to be a pretty popular hop-up<br />

right now too, which is nice to see.<br />

• If you get a lot of torque twist <strong>in</strong> a shaft driven rig,<br />

add a stronger spr<strong>in</strong>g and oil to the offend<strong>in</strong>g rear<br />

shock, then try it aga<strong>in</strong>. If you still get twist move<br />

the upper l<strong>in</strong>k mount<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts on the chassis<br />

down closer to the lower mount<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>ts,<br />

and see if that helps<br />

• The best 4-l<strong>in</strong>k set-up is one that can flex<br />

with little change <strong>in</strong> the wheelbase<br />

02/09 WWW.RADIORACECAR.COM 63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!