05.02.2013 Views

CCR Annual Report 2005 - Center for Constitutional Rights

CCR Annual Report 2005 - Center for Constitutional Rights

CCR Annual Report 2005 - Center for Constitutional Rights

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ABUSE:INTERNATIONALLAW<br />

12<br />

<strong>CCR</strong> v War Crimes<br />

Despite overwhelming evidence that the use of torture in U.S. detention facilities was<br />

“almost routine,” the Pentagon and the Bush Administration continue to maintain that<br />

illegal acts were limited to a few rogue soldiers. In response to the U.S. government’s<br />

refusal to allow a proper independent investigation to go <strong>for</strong>ward, <strong>CCR</strong> has crossed the<br />

nation’s borders in pursuit of accountability <strong>for</strong> the policies and command failures that<br />

led to U.S. human rights violations.<br />

Upon <strong>CCR</strong>’s request, the Inter-American Commission on Human <strong>Rights</strong> previously<br />

issued Precautionary Measures requesting the U.S. Government to have the legal status<br />

of the Guantánamo detainees determined by a competent tribunal, to provide in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

concerning the location and treatment of all post-9/11 detainees held by the U.S.<br />

around the world, and to investigate and prosecute all torture allegations. At a <strong>2005</strong><br />

hearing be<strong>for</strong>e the Commission, <strong>CCR</strong> requested that these measures be extended to<br />

prevent the use of evidence obtained through torture in any proceedings.<br />

The impossibility of an independent and far-reaching domestic investigation of highranking<br />

U.S. officials compelled <strong>CCR</strong> to make an even more daring bid <strong>for</strong> U.S.<br />

accountability. On November 30, 2004, <strong>CCR</strong> filed a criminal complaint with the German<br />

Federal Prosecutor’s Office. The complaint was filed under the doctrine of universal<br />

jurisdiction, which allows <strong>for</strong> the prosecution of suspected war criminals irrespective of<br />

where they are located or where the violations took place, and requested a comprehensive<br />

investigation into the role played by Rumsfeld, Gonzales and nine other<br />

high-ranking U.S. officials in the torture and abuse of Iraqi detainees.<br />

In February, the Pentagon announced that Secretary Rumsfeld would not attend a<br />

conference in Munich as long as <strong>CCR</strong>’s lawsuit was pending in Germany. One day be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

Rumsfeld was scheduled to attend the conference, the German prosecutor’s office<br />

announced it would not open an investigation. <strong>CCR</strong> has appealed the decision and will<br />

file new evidence as it becomes available through FOIA requests and other sources.<br />

<strong>CCR</strong> is confident that evidence will become public supporting our fundamental<br />

contention: high-ranking U.S. officials, both military and civilian, are responsible <strong>for</strong> war<br />

crimes. We will continue to work to ensure that those responsible will be brought to<br />

justice.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!