05.02.2013 Views

2012 annual meeting & cardiothoracic forum - Society for ...

2012 annual meeting & cardiothoracic forum - Society for ...

2012 annual meeting & cardiothoracic forum - Society for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JOINT ANNUAL MEETING <strong>2012</strong> ABSTRACTS<br />

081 Outcome of Chest Wall De<strong>for</strong>mity Repair Using Ravitch<br />

Procedure Without Sternal Support Bar<br />

Authors: R.S. George; K. Papagiannopoulos<br />

St James’s University Hospital, United Kingdom<br />

Objective: Chest wall de<strong>for</strong>mity imposes a serious cosmetic problem and<br />

depending on severity can be associated with respiratory and cardiovascular<br />

complications. Traditional Ravitch procedure is the standard surgical approach with<br />

the use of metal bars to eliminate postoperative flail chest and to reduce pain.<br />

However, sternal bars have been associated with multiple complications and often<br />

require a second anaesthetic <strong>for</strong> removal. The purpose of this study is to evaluate<br />

the post-operative outcome of metal free Ravitch repair against the use of any<br />

metal support.<br />

Methods: Between October 2006 and August 2011, 58 patients underwent Ravitch<br />

procedure: 28 pectus excavatum and 30 pectus carinatum. 41 patients (Group 1)<br />

did not have a pectus bar; instead a gortex patch or marlex mesh fashioned into<br />

‘hammock’ shape was used. The remaining 17 (Group 2) had a pectus bar<br />

implanted: 14 <strong>for</strong> pectus excavatum and 3 <strong>for</strong> pectus carinatum.<br />

Results: Group1 patients were younger (20.7±6.4 years vs 25.5±10.5 years,<br />

p=NS) with more females (34.1% vs 23.5%, p=NS). Post-operative length of stay<br />

was similar between both groups (5.4±1.5 days vs 6.7±3.1 days, p=0.12). Six<br />

(14.6%) group 1 patients developed procedure related complications as compared<br />

to 10 (58.8%) from group 2 (x2=11.7, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!