Chapter 3 Acceleration and free fall - Light and Matter
Chapter 3 Acceleration and free fall - Light and Matter
Chapter 3 Acceleration and free fall - Light and Matter
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
e / A coin slides across a table.<br />
Even for motion in one<br />
dimension, some of the forces<br />
may not lie along the line of the<br />
motion.<br />
f / A simple double-pan balance<br />
works by comparing the<br />
weight forces exerted by the<br />
earth on the contents of the two<br />
pans. Since the two pans are<br />
at almost the same location on<br />
the earth’s surface, the value<br />
of g is essentially the same for<br />
each one, <strong>and</strong> equality of weight<br />
therefore also implies equality of<br />
mass.<br />
g / Example 9.<br />
134 <strong>Chapter</strong> 4 Force <strong>and</strong> motion<br />
A coin sliding across a table example 8<br />
Suppose a coin is sliding to the right across a table, e, <strong>and</strong> let’s<br />
choose a positive x axis that points to the right. The coin’s velocity<br />
is positive, <strong>and</strong> we expect based on experience that it will slow<br />
down, i.e., its acceleration should be negative.<br />
Although the coin’s motion is purely horizontal, it feels both vertical<br />
<strong>and</strong> horizontal forces. The Earth exerts a downward gravitational<br />
force F2 on it, <strong>and</strong> the table makes an upward force F3<br />
that prevents the coin from sinking into the wood. In fact, without<br />
these vertical forces the horizontal frictional force wouldn’t exist:<br />
surfaces don’t exert friction against one another unless they are<br />
being pressed together.<br />
Although F2 <strong>and</strong> F3 contribute to the physics, they do so only<br />
indirectly. The only thing that directly relates to the acceleration<br />
along the horizontal direction is the horizontal force: a = F1/m.<br />
The relationship between mass <strong>and</strong> weight<br />
Mass is different from weight, but they’re related. An apple’s<br />
mass tells us how hard it is to change its motion. Its weight measures<br />
the strength of the gravitational attraction between the apple <strong>and</strong><br />
the planet earth. The apple’s weight is less on the moon, but its<br />
mass is the same. Astronauts assembling the International Space<br />
Station in zero gravity cannot just pitch massive modules back <strong>and</strong><br />
forth with their bare h<strong>and</strong>s; the modules are weightless, but not<br />
massless.<br />
We have already seen the experimental evidence that when weight<br />
(the force of the earth’s gravity) is the only force acting on an object,<br />
its acceleration equals the constant g, <strong>and</strong> g depends on where<br />
you are on the surface of the earth, but not on the mass of the object.<br />
Applying Newton’s second law then allows us to calculate the<br />
magnitude of the gravitational force on any object in terms of its<br />
mass:<br />
|FW | = mg .<br />
(The equation only gives the magnitude, i.e. the absolute value, of<br />
FW , because we’re defining g as a positive number, so it equals the<br />
absolute value of a <strong>fall</strong>ing object’s acceleration.)<br />
⊲ Solved problem: Decelerating a car page 152, problem 1<br />
Weight <strong>and</strong> mass example 9<br />
⊲ Figure g shows masses of one <strong>and</strong> two kilograms hung from a<br />
spring scale, which measures force in units of newtons. Explain<br />
the readings.<br />
⊲ Let’s start with the single kilogram. It’s not accelerating, so<br />
evidently the total force on it is zero: the spring scale’s upward<br />
force on it is canceling out the earth’s downward gravitational<br />
force. The spring scale tells us how much force it is being obliged