09.02.2013 Views

PDF (11.37 MB) - Europhysics News

PDF (11.37 MB) - Europhysics News

PDF (11.37 MB) - Europhysics News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rutherford’s model of the atom<br />

Rutherford published his model of the atom [1] in<br />

1911 as an interpretation of the α-scattering work carried<br />

out by Geiger and Marsden [3] two years earlier.<br />

�e puzzle centred on finding a convincing explanation<br />

for the small fraction of α particles (around 1 in<br />

20,000) which were deflected through large angles,<br />

a�er passing through gold foil only 0.00004 cm thick.<br />

He argued that the probability of occasional largeangle<br />

scatters was inconsistent with multiple small angle<br />

scattering, and could only be explained by a single scattering<br />

event. �is required an“intense electric field”and<br />

led him to propose his model of an atom with a charge<br />

of ±Ne at its centre surrounded by a uniformly distributed<br />

sphere of the opposite charge.<br />

His arguments did not depend on the charge at the centre,<br />

but he chose the correct sign: “...the main deductions of<br />

the theory are independent of whether the central charge<br />

is supposed to be positive or negative. For convenience,<br />

the sign will be assumed to be positive.” He was aware that<br />

there were unanswered questions about how such a structure<br />

could exist: “�e question of the stability of the<br />

atom proposed need not be considered at this stage…”<br />

�ese questions were only fully answered much later.<br />

Using a reasonable estimate for the nuclear charge he<br />

calculated the distance of closest approach (~34 fm) for<br />

a typical head-on α particle to be completely stopped<br />

and provided the first ever order-of-magnitude estimate<br />

of the size of the nucleus. He showed that the trajectory<br />

taken by an α particle was hyperbolic and related the<br />

angle of deviation δ to the perpendicular distance b between<br />

the line of approach and the centre of the nucleus.<br />

He showed the scattering probability was proportional<br />

to cosec 4 (δ/2) and inversely proportional to the 4 th<br />

power of velocity. An important test of his model was<br />

to calculate the dependence of the relative number of<br />

scattered particles n on the atomic weight A. �e ratio<br />

n/A 2/3 should be constant. �e measured values for eight<br />

elements between Al and Pb ranged from 208 to 250<br />

with an average of 233. He concluded: “Considering the<br />

difficulty of the experiments, the agreement between<br />

theory and experiment is reasonably good.”<br />

Following the publication of his ground-breaking paper<br />

[1], Rutherford worked closely with other leading physicists<br />

of the day.Niels Bohr visited Manchester in 1912 and<br />

again 1914-16. Bohr’s model of stationary non-radiating<br />

electron orbits [4] added credence to Rutherford’s atom<br />

and answered the question of why the electrons do not<br />

fall into the nuclear core. Subsequent developments in the<br />

theory of quantum mechanics gave this an even sounder<br />

footing.However,understanding the small size and strong<br />

binding of the nucleus would have to wait till the 1930s,<br />

when the neutron was discovered and Yukawa first described<br />

the strong attractive force binding neutrons and<br />

protons together in terms of meson exchange.<br />

� fig. 1:<br />

Photograph of<br />

Hans geiger (left)<br />

&ernestrutherford<br />

(right) in their<br />

laboratory at<br />

manchester university<br />

circa 1908.<br />

� fig. 2: The α<br />

particle, experiencing<br />

an inverse<br />

square repulsive<br />

force, follows a<br />

hyperbolic trajectory<br />

(green) as it<br />

approaches the<br />

nucleus located<br />

at S, the external<br />

focus of the<br />

hyperbola. it<br />

enters along the<br />

asymptotic direction<br />

Po (red)<br />

reaching its closest<br />

approach<br />

d=Sa at the apse<br />

of the hyperbola<br />

before exiting<br />

along the second<br />

asymptote oP’.<br />

The angle of deviation<br />

δ=π-2θ<br />

depends on the<br />

energy of the<br />

alpha particle<br />

and its impact<br />

parameter b=Sn.<br />

EPN 42/5 19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!