10.02.2013 Views

Nabokov's Invitation to Plato's Beheading

Nabokov's Invitation to Plato's Beheading

Nabokov's Invitation to Plato's Beheading

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NOJ / НОЖ: Nabokov Online Journal, Vol. I / 2007<br />

Nabokov’s antipathy <strong>to</strong>ward Pla<strong>to</strong> grew out of his distinctly modernist<br />

sensibilities as well as personal experiences. Overall, he might have felt some<br />

dissatisfaction with the philosopher’s lasting authority in such questions as metaphysics,<br />

the nature of art, and the relation of art <strong>to</strong> politics, all of which came under intense<br />

scrutiny during the social cataclysms of the twentieth century. It seems that the kind of<br />

experiences which Nabokov went through, and which many of his contemporaries<br />

shared, had pushed Pla<strong>to</strong> out of favor. A refugee from the Soviet Russia and Fascist<br />

Germany, Nabokov must have been quite suspicious of the kind of political ideas which<br />

one can discern, mistakenly or not, in Pla<strong>to</strong>’s Republic and some other dialogs. Pla<strong>to</strong>’s<br />

famous vision of the perfect state, in which everything, including art, is subjugated by the<br />

state’s interests, was more real than Nabokov and his contemporaries really wanted. He<br />

was not alone in reacting against it. 5<br />

Nabokov also held in contempt the notion that art is an inferior and even<br />

dangerous intellectual endeavor. Socrates, who is generally (even if naively) seen as a<br />

stand-in for Pla<strong>to</strong>, often emphasized the intellectual inferiority of art. He usually<br />

contrasted artistic endeavors with high aspirations of philosophy which aim at the<br />

knowledge in its highest form (Republic 595a-608a). At one point, he famously declared<br />

that an artist “produces work that is inferior with respect <strong>to</strong> truth and that appeals <strong>to</strong> a part<br />

of the soul that is similarly inferior rather than <strong>to</strong>p the best part” (605a). This led him <strong>to</strong><br />

conclude that poets should be excluded from the perfect state. Nabokov, a refugee from<br />

the “perfect” states, could easily relate his experience <strong>to</strong> that of an exiled poet, and he<br />

5 Many twentieth-century readers of Pla<strong>to</strong> could not ignore what appears <strong>to</strong> be Pla<strong>to</strong>’s <strong>to</strong>talitarian<br />

streak. Karl Popper’s Open Society and Its Enemies (1945) is a perfect example of a reader’s dismay at<br />

Pla<strong>to</strong>’s fascination with the ideal states. Other classics of anti-Pla<strong>to</strong>nism include Warner Fite’s Pla<strong>to</strong>nic<br />

Legend (1934) and R.H.S. Crossman’s Pla<strong>to</strong> Today (1937).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!