equipo y transdiciplinariedad - Asociación Española de ...

WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHOSOCIAL REHABILITATION EUROPEAN REGIONAL CONGRESS
II CONGRESO DE LA FEDERACIÓN ESPAÑOLA DE ASOCIACIONES DE REHABILITACIÓN PSICOSOCIAL
Akil H, Watson SJ . Science and the future of psychiatry. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2000; 57(1):86-7.
Brendel DH. Reductionism, eclecticism, and pragmatism in psychiatry: the dialectic of clinical explanation J Med Philos 2003; 28(5-6):563-80.
Cohen CI. The biomedicalization of psychiatry: a critical overview. Community Ment Health J 1993; 29(6):509-21.
Cohen CI, Feiner JS, Huffine C, Moffic HS, Thompson KS. The future of community psychiatry. Community Ment Health J (2003); 39(5):459-71.
Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196(4286):129-36.
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2’’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government
relations. Research Policy 2000; 29:109–123.
Fava GA. The intellectual crisis of psychiatric research. Psychother Psychosom 2006; 75(4):202-8.
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. En Krimsky S, Golding D (Eds): Social theories of
risk. Westport CT: Praeger; 1992. p. 251-274.
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 1993; 25;7:739-755.
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in
contemporary societies. London: Sage Publications; 1994.
Kendler KS. A psychiatric dialogue on the mind-body problem. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158(7):989-1000.
Kendler KS. Toward a philosophical structure for psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162(3):433-40.
Kinderman P. A psychological model of mental disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry 2005; 13(4):206-17.
Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1962. Trad. cast.: La estructura de las revoluciones
científicas, México: FCE; 1972. pp. 33-79.
Limoges C. L’Université à la croisée des chemins: une mission à affirmer, une gestion à réformer. En ACFAS, CST, CSE (Ed): Le lien formation
-recherche à l’université : les pratiques aujourd’hui. Québec: Gouvernement du Québec; 1996. p. 7-32.
Marlett N, Shklarov S. Interdisciplinary relationships and approaches in community mental health. International Journal of Disability,
Community & Rehabilitation 2007; 6(2). Disponible en URL: http://www.ijdcr.ca/VOL06_02_RUS/articles/marlettsvet.shtml
Philips SD, Burns BJ, Eds. Assertive community treatment: workbook for clinical and practical supervisors. Rockville: SAMHSA; 2003. Disponible en
URL: http://download.ncadi.samhsa.gov/ken/pdf/toolkits/community/ACT_wkbk.pdf
Piaget J. L'épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. En: L'interdisciplinarité: problèmes d'enseignement et de recherche dans les
universités. Paris: OCDE; 1972. p. 144.
Rutz W. Rethinking mental health: a european WHO perspective.World Psychiatry 2003; 2(2):125-7.
Saraceno B. La fine dell’intrattenimento. Manuale di riabilitazione psichiatrica. Milano: Etas Libri; 1995.
Thompson-Klein J. The dialogue sessions. En Thompson-Klein J, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (Eds.):
Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology and society. An effective way for managing complexity. Birkhäuser:
Zurich; 2001. p. 109.
Walker MT. The social construction of mental illness and its implications for the recovery model. Int J Psychosoc Rehab 2006; 10(1):71-87.
Woodruff G, McGonigel MJ. Early intervention team approaches: the transdisciplinary model. En: Jordan JB, Gallagher JJ, Hutinger PL, Karnes MB
(Eds): Early childhood special education: birth to three. Reston, Va: Council for Exceptional Children; 1990. p. 164-181.
Ziman J. Real Science: what it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.