05.10.2021 Views

Lupus

Artículo de lupus Nature

Artículo de lupus Nature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PRIMER

a

b

c

Although evidence for their efficacy in renal lupus

is stronger, agents including azathioprine (a purine

analogue that blocks immune cell proliferation) or

mycophenolate mofetil (an inhibitor of purine synthesis

that blocks immune cell proliferation) are often coprescribed

with antimalarials in non-renal SLE. However,

because immunosuppression can cause adverse effects,

including bone marrow suppression or liver test abnormalities,

blood tests must be monitored during use for

these changes.

Figure 4 | Multifocal osteonecrosis in a patient with SLE Nature following Reviews long-term | Disease Primers

corticosteroid treatment. MRI scans showing typical serpiginous osteonecrosis in the

left knee (part a; arrow), right knee (part b; arrows) and shoulder (part c; arrow).

Osteonecrosis in young patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an important

comorbidity as MRI is needed to confirm diagnosis in early stages and joint replacements

might be required in advanced stages. The management of SLE-associated bone disease

is to try to reduce glucocorticoid exposure while ensuring adequate control of SLE.

Intravenous iloprost (a vasodilator) and bisphosphonates (bone resorption inhibitors)

have successfully been used in early osteonecrosis.

immunosuppressive action) are used if problems persist.

Mild-to-moderate arthritis or pleurisy that causes chest

pains are usually treated with NSAIDs 121 .

More-severe SLE disease activity often requires systemic

glucocorticoids as initiation therapy with the

addition of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in

the longer term to permit glucocorticoid dose tapering.

The optimal dose of glucocorticoids as initiation therapy

varies in practice. Minimizing total dosage is vital

to prevent signifi cant steroid-induced comorbidities,

yet undertreatment can lead to insufficient immunosuppression

and tissue damage accrual. More-persistent

or severe joint or skin involvement often involves using

oral prednisolone (<0.5 mg per kg) while intravenous

methyl prednisolone can be used for more-aggressive

neuropsychiatric or skin manifestations.

Maintenance treatment of non-renal SLE

To permit steroid tapering over the following weeks or

months (dependent on response) and to prevent the

high risk of relapse, immunosuppressive therapy is

initiated in the early stages of glucocorticoid treatment.

This is because, unlike glucocorticoids, many immunosuppressive

agents require weeks to become effective.

Antimalarials that are used for their immunosuppressive

actions, for example, hydroxychloroquine or, less commonly,

quinacrine (also known as mepacrine) or chloroquine,

are commenced immediately. The LUMINA study

suggested that hydroxychloroquine is well tolerated and

is associated with prolonged lifespan 122 , effects that are

potentially mediated by reducing flares 123 , and damage

accrual. Hydroxychloroquine may also reduce the risk of

incident diabetes mellitus in a dose-dependent manner 124 .

Hydroxychloroquine is effective against cutaneous lupus

and might have other clinical benefits, such as improvement

of arthralgias and fatigue. Some experts recommend

that antimalarials should be used for all patients with

SLE unless there are contraindications. Potential retinal

toxicity, albeit rare, requires ophthalmological monitoring

with long-term use.

Refractory non-renal SLE

Belimumab — a humanized recombinant IgG monoclonal

antibody directed against BAFF — is licensed

for the treatment of patients with ‘active SLE despite

conventional therapy’ (REF. 125). Current SLE activity

indices might be inappropriate to monitor the efficacy

of belimumab, as the drug is effective but has a slow

onset of action. Although the exact role of belimumab in

SLE management remains to be determined, subgroup

analyses of the belimumab trials (BLISS I and BLISS II)

showed that the drug has greater therapeutic benefit in

patients with higher disease activity, anti-dsDNA positivity

and low complement levels than in patients with SLE

with lower levels of these markers 125 . One concern is that,

although licensed for SLE, belimumab has not received

approval from funding bodies in some countries, which

might limit its use. Although well tolerated with no

significant adverse events over conventional therapy,

prescription requires tailored assessment of the overall

course of the disease, including past degree of activity,

recent flare frequency, the dose of glucocorticoids

that is required to control the disease and the degree of

response to conventional agents. A subcutaneous version

of belimumab is undergoing phase III testing 126 .

Management of specific features of SLE

Several other drugs have been used in the management of

additional SLE features, with limited evidence supporting

their use. Treatment of patients with SLE with DHEA,

a corticosteroid intermediate in the biosynthesis of androgens

and oestrogens, can improve overall disease activity

and enable reduction in glucocorticoid dosage with

minor adverse effects of hirsutism (excessive hairiness)

or acne 127 . However, this drug is not licensed for SLE.

Haematological SLE manifestations including refractory

thrombocytopaenia or haemolytic anaemia can improve

with the semi-synthetic androgen analogue danazol 128 .

Thalidomide (an immunomodulatory drug) has successfully

been used in the treatment of cutaneous lupus 129 , but

shows toxicity (especially peripheral neuropathy) and is

contraindicated in women of childbearing age.

While fatigue, joint pains, muscle aches and cognitive

symptoms are common in patients with SLE, they do

not always represent disease activity. These symptoms are

similar to fibromyalgia, which may coexist with SLE 130 .

Complicating the clinical picture, thyroid dysfunction 131 ,

headaches and depression are all over-represented in

patients with SLE and require differentiation from SLE

disease activity before treatment is tailored. Treatments

aimed at controlling SLE activity do not always act against

12 | 2016 | VOLUME 2 www.nature.com/nrdp

©2016 Mac mill an Publishers Li mited. All ri ghts reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!