05.10.2021 Views

Lupus

Artículo de lupus Nature

Artículo de lupus Nature

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PRIMER

Author addresses

1

Department of Rheumatology, St. George’s, University of

London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.

2

Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation

and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences,

University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

3

Mary Kirkland Center for Lupus Research, Hospital for

Special Surgery, New York, New York, USA.

4

University of Toronto Lupus Clinic, Toronto Western

Hospital, Centre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic

Diseases, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

5

Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases

(ClinTRID), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

6

Autoimmune Diseases Research Unit, Department of

Internal Medicine, BioCruces Health Research Institute,

Hospital Universitario Cruces, University of the Basque

Country, Bizkaia, Spain.

7

The London Lupus Centre, London Bridge Hospital,

London, UK.

on ethnic origin and can be associated in ~15% of these

patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome, which

presents as recurrent pregnancy loss and/or arterial or

venous thrombosis 8 . In addition, patients with SLE are at

risk for accelerated cardiovascular disease (CVD), which

also contributes to damage accrual and mortality 9 .

Mortality from SLE improved in the second half

of the twentieth century, with 10‐year survival at

60% in the 1950s to >90% in the 1980s. The improvement

in survival reached a plateau in the 1980s and

1990s despite improvements in diagnosis and treatment.

This may be owing to increasing levels of SLEassociated

damage accrual and morbidity that occur

with increasing lifespan 10 .

Measuring disease activity in routine clinical care

remains challenging because of disease heterogeneity.

Serological markers are in routine clinical use but do

not adequately predict flares or activity in all patients;

however, some clinical associations are important 11 .

Global disease activity indices, such as the SLE Disease

Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI‐2K), and organ-specific

scales, such as the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group

(BILAG) index, are used in clinical trials but are not

routine bedside measures 12 .

This Primer explores the nature of SLE and its causes

and effects on patient well-being in more detail. In addition,

the approaches to management and an outlook on

future directions are discussed.

Epidemiology

SLE is a global disease associated with an increased

risk of premature death. The number of people who

have SLE, the age of onset and the mortality risk varies

consider ably between countries 13 . The best information

we have on the incidence, prevalence, mortality and

morbidity outcome are from Europe and North America;

less data are available from Africa, South America, Asia

and Australia (TABLE 1). Given that the disease is least

common in children (before puberty), many studies only

report data from adult populations 14 . Annual incidence

rates in the United States range from 2 to 7.6 per 100,000

and prevalence varies even more widely from 19 to

159 per 100,000 depending on the defin ition of SLE

used, methods of case ascertainment, age standardization

and the racial and ethnic background of the

population 15,16 . Similarly, figures for Europe show

considerable vari ation with annual incidence rates

between 1 and 4.9 per 100,000 and prevalence ranging

from 28 to 97 per 100,000 (REFS 17,18).

SLE is more common in women than in men and

affects women particularly between puberty and menopause

14 . The female/male ratio of 3/1 in children shifts

to about 9/1 between puberty and menopause, but is

up to 15/1 in some studies 19,20 . SLE is more common in

certain racial and ethnic groups 15,20 (TABLE 1). People of

African origin, particularly those who have migrated to

North America or Europe, have a higher incidence and

prevalence of SLE than those of white north European

origin. These individuals also tend to develop the disease

at a younger age, have a higher risk of renal involvement

and of serious renal complications (end-stage renal disease)

15,16,21 . In a study in Georgia, USA, black women

had higher prevalence rates than white women (196.2

per 100,000 versus 59 per 100,000, respectively) 15 . There

is a high incidence of SLE in black people of African-

Caribbean origin 20,22 , Native Americans, (including

Alaska Natives) 23 and Indigenous Australians 24,25 .

Although populations of people with Chinese backgrounds

have been reported to have an increased prevalence

of SLE 26 , lower regional rates have been reported

from Korea 27,28 .

Mortality in patients with SLE has improved over

the past 30 years but remains considerably higher than

in people from the same geographical area without

SLE, with a standardized mortality ratio of 3 in a metaanalysis

29 . People of African, Chinese and Hispanic

origin with SLE have an increased frequency of SLEassociated

renal complications (that is, lupus nephritis)

— one of the strongest predictors of an increased

mortality risk 30,31 . As a result, mortality risk due to active

SLE and associated renal disease is highest in patients

of these ethnicities and/or from low socioeconomic

backgrounds 22,30,31 . Other explanations for the variability

in mortality risk between different populations are

different beliefs and perceptions about the condition as

well as the availability of and adherence to treatments 13 .

Furthermore, infection constitutes another important

and common cause of death in patients with SLE

worldwide (a standardized mortality ratio of 5) 29 . CVD

is strongly associated with premature death later in the

disease course and in those who develop the disease at

an older age (>40 years) 32 .

Mechanisms/pathophysiology

SLE is caused by an autoimmune reaction in which

the innate and adaptive immune systems direct an

inappro priate immune response to nucleic acidcontaining

cellular particles. However, the production

of anti bodies against these nucleic acids (antinuclear

antibodies (ANAs)) is fairly common in the general

popu lation and not all people who have ANAs develop

SLE, suggesting that other mechanisms must promote

2 | 2016 | VOLUME 2 www.nature.com/nrdp

©2016 Mac mill an Publishers Li mited. All ri ghts reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!