11.02.2022 Views

Newsletter ACERA - Enero 2022

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

04.<br />

DECARBONIZATION:<br />

AN INSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGE<br />

The current climate crisis has been one of the recurring themes picked up within<br />

the participatory-programmatic process of President-elect Gabriel Boric.<br />

Surprisingly, in light of the results, it transcends as one of the priority issues for<br />

Chilean men and women from the Atacama region to Los Lagos in the south of<br />

the country.<br />

At the sectoral level, there is a broad consensus on the fundamental role of the<br />

energy sector in mitigating the effects of climate change. In this sense, little by<br />

little we observe a transition of the sector from the logic of the 80's based on<br />

economic efficiency, energy security and subsidiarity of the State, towards the<br />

incorporation of new purposes such as resilience, through adaptation to climate<br />

change, quality of service, decentralization, among others.<br />

Currently, the most relevant bet on the matter is in the decarbonization, initially, of<br />

our electricity sector. However, the current design of the Chilean electricity<br />

market is not prepared to support an efficient process of deep decarbonization of<br />

the national electricity matrix. Not, at least, with the signals currently provided by<br />

the regulatory framework.<br />

O<br />

PI<br />

NION<br />

Carlos<br />

Suazo<br />

Executive Director of<br />

Consultora SPEC<br />

Therefore, the energy transition of the coming years will require a new look,<br />

where, among others, it is necessary to review the economic signals that facilitate<br />

the cost-efficient adoption of renewable energies, new technologies and<br />

end-user participation, while ensuring a safe operation of the grid.<br />

Relevant changes will be needed in different areas of electricity regulation, for<br />

which regulatory stability will be called into question in the context of deep<br />

decarbonization: a balance between necessary changes and refinements or less<br />

important modifications that can be relieved. Regulatory stability does not mean<br />

maintaining the current rules, but rather that the modifications made are aimed at<br />

a clear public policy objective.<br />

The task requires the maturity that comes from an informed debate that generates<br />

consensus among the different industry players in order to give validity and<br />

robustness to the process. It must have the character of a State policy, bringing<br />

together shared visions among the most diverse agents of the sector, since its<br />

implementation will undoubtedly require the permanent effort of several<br />

governments. It is worth asking ourselves about the need for a more independent<br />

regulatory agency, which will allow us to bring together the visions of the different<br />

actors in the industry and the citizenry, to gather the strategic value of our sector,<br />

and to give continuity to this transforming process.<br />

The question arises from the inherent difficulty of choosing between tactical<br />

adjustments to the current approach or leading structural change in a strategic<br />

direction. In the face of good results, the regulator may be held captive by the<br />

success of its current approaches and the reluctance to move away from a model<br />

that continues to work tolerably well is entirely understandable.<br />

The path to energy transition will require institutions and organizational cultures<br />

that are comfortable challenging the status quo. To this end, we must recover the<br />

sectoral culture where opinions based on scientific evidence prevail, so as to<br />

generate a debate with a constructive spirit. Along these lines, it would be<br />

interesting to promote the creation of specialized units or teams within the<br />

regulator with the mandate to constructively challenge orthodoxy, develop<br />

innovative alternative policies, and convene other agencies in the sector so that<br />

they can proactively lead the necessary changes that will facilitate<br />

decarbonization in the coming years.<br />

* Column originally published in Ciper.<br />

This will not be an easy task: decarbonization will be not only a technical,<br />

regulatory, environmental and economic challenge, but also a human and<br />

institutional one. It means leaving no one behind. It will require strong and<br />

visionary leadership. In view of this, we must work now so that the current context<br />

does not become an internal barrier and hinder our energy transition.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!