RF - RHYTHM Congress
RF - RHYTHM Congress
RF - RHYTHM Congress
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Comparaison efficacité Cryo vs <strong>RF</strong><br />
- 272 patients avec tachycardie<br />
par réentrée intra-nodale<br />
• 123 Cryo<br />
• 149 <strong>RF</strong><br />
- 3 applications de Cryo de 240<br />
sec sur 2 sites distincts avec<br />
Freezor ® Xtra 7F 6mm<br />
vs procédure conventionnelle en<br />
<strong>RF</strong><br />
Freezor ® Xtra 7F 6mm<br />
« The initial acute procedural success was 93% (114/123) with<br />
Cryo and 95% (142/149) with <strong>RF</strong> (P .8). There was a greater<br />
recurrence of AVNRT with Cryo (12/114, 10% vs. 4/142, 3%; P<br />
.02) when compared with <strong>RF</strong>. » Opel et al., Heart Rhythm 2010
Change language