11.07.2015 Views

Report annuale 2004 Regione Emilia - RIPO - Cineca

Report annuale 2004 Regione Emilia - RIPO - Cineca

Report annuale 2004 Regione Emilia - RIPO - Cineca

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

16.2 Protesi bi-tricompartimentaliModelli protesici utilizzati su pazienti con data di ricovero compresa fra il 01/07/2000 e il31/12/<strong>2004</strong>, negli interventi primari bi/tricompartimentali.TIPO DI PROTESI N. %NEXGEN – Zimmer 2.979 27.0PROFIX – Smith & Nephew 1.835 16.6P.F.C – DePuy 897 8.1INTERAX – Stryker Howmedica 634 5.7T.A.C.K. – Link 615 5.6SCORPIO – Stryker Howmedica 516 4.7LCS – DePuy 411 3.7913 – Cremascoli 312 2.8GENIUS TRICCC – Dedienne Santé 295 2.7ADVANCE – Wright 290 2.6OPTETRACK – Exactech 287 2.6ROTAGLIDE – Corin Medical 287 2.6PERFORMANCE – Kirschner Biomet Merck 236 2.1GENESIS II – Smith & Nephew 207 1.9NUOVA DURACON II – Stryker Howmedica 171 1.5GEMINI MK II – Link 151 1.4ENDO-MODEL – Link 142 1.3HLS – EVOLUTION – Tornier 136 1.2G. K. S. – Permedica 105 1.0RO.C.C. – Biomet Merck France 102 0.9C. K. S. – Stratec Medical 101 0.9AGC – Kirschner Biomet Merck 56 0.5CONSENSUS – Hayes Medical. 42 0.4CEDIOR – Sulzer 33 0.3GENUFITT – Lafitt (comp. femorale e inserto) +EFDIOS – Citieffe (componente tibiale)330.3NON NOTO 30 0.4Altro 137 1.2TOTALE 11.040 100.068

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!