26.11.2020 Views

COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

we typically receive the machines, the ballot marking devices – on

the Friday before the election, with a chain of custody letter to be

signed on Sunday, indicating that we had received the machines and

the counts on the machines when received, and that the machines

have been sealed. In this case, we were asked to sign the chain

of custody letter on Sunday, even though the machines were

not delivered until 2:00 AM in the morning on Election Day.

The Milton precinct received its machines at 1:00 AM in the morning

on Election Day. This is unacceptable and voting machines should

[not] be out of custody prior to an Election Day. Id.

155.

Defendants have a duty to treat the voting citizens in each County in

the same manner as the citizens in other counties in Georgia.

156.

As set forth in Count I above, Defendants failed to comply with the

requirements of the Georgia Election Code and thereby diluted the lawful

ballots of the Plaintiffs and of other Georgia voters and electors in violation of

the United States Constitution guarantee of Equal Protection.

157.

Specifically, Defendants denied the plaintiffs equal protection of the

law and their equal rights to meaningful access to observe and monitor the

electoral process enjoyed by citizens in other Georgia Counties by:

(a) mandating that representatives at the pre-canvass and

canvass of all absentee and mail-ballots be either Georgia barred

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!