26.11.2020 Views

COMPLAINT-CJ-PEARSON-V.-KEMP-11.25.2020

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

COUNT III

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE U.S.

CONST. AMEND. XIV, 42 U.S.C. § 1983

DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS

DISPARATE TREATMENT OF ABSENTEE/MAIL-IN VOTERS AMONG

DIFFERENT COUNTIES

168.

Plaintiffs incorporate each of the prior allegations in this Complaint.

Voting is a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment

to the United States Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment protects the

right to vote from conduct by state officials which seriously undermines the

fundamental fairness of the electoral process. Marks v. Stinson, 19 F.3d 873,

889 (3d Cir. 1994); Griffin, 570 F.2d at 1077-78. “[H]aving once granted the

right to vote on equal terms, the State may not, by later arbitrary and

disparate treatment, value one person’s vote over that of another.” Bush, 531

U.S. at 104-05.

169.

Defendants are not part of the General Assembly and cannot exercise

legislative power. Rather, Defendants’ power is limited to executing the laws

as passed by the legislature Although the Georgia General Assembly may

enact laws governing the conduct of elections, “no legislative enactment may

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!