Visualisatie Profielen voor Geografische Gegevens - Unigis
Visualisatie Profielen voor Geografische Gegevens - Unigis
Visualisatie Profielen voor Geografische Gegevens - Unigis
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
a number of graphic parameters. When the graphic parameters are changed the<br />
information transition will be affected.<br />
In this research the TOP10NL product is used in a case as task-neutral<br />
topographically oriented geographic data on which besides the traditional<br />
1:25.000 map two other visualizations are developed. The data are intended as<br />
a source for a cross-section of the geo-information users in the Netherlands.<br />
The real world is viewed through topographical glasses and translated into a<br />
more or less neutral master without thematic information added.<br />
Below two of the three TOP10NL visualizations that are developed are shown.<br />
A traditional TOP25 visualization and a visualization that has been based on<br />
schoolchildren perception by using smiley symbols.<br />
Figuur 1 Traditional visualization (variant B) Figure 2 Smiley visualization (variant C)<br />
To evaluate the acceptance of a map a Visualization Evaluation Function<br />
(VEF) has been developed. The VEF is based on the assumption that the<br />
acceptation of the map is influenced by the used colors, symbols, information<br />
hierarchy in relation with the relevance of the information for the user. The<br />
VEF gives a good picture of the users. With the results of the VEF, in an<br />
iterative approach it is possible to develop an optimal visualization that can rely<br />
on a broad acceptance within the domain. In advance, it is necessary to get a<br />
clear picture of the users and their wishes with regard to visualization.<br />
The traditional Topographic visualization is for the students not acceptable.<br />
Although the map is widely used in many professional domains it does not<br />
speak to the imagination of the students. Further research has shown that<br />
especially the symbols that are used for the function of the buildings are not<br />
being recognized.<br />
© 2008, Ben Bruns, MSc UNIGIS - 2 -