06.09.2013 Views

här! - Utrikespolitiska Föreningen Södertörn

här! - Utrikespolitiska Föreningen Södertörn

här! - Utrikespolitiska Föreningen Södertörn

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Söderut in english<br />

SUDAN’S VOTE<br />

BETWEEN THE 9TH and 15th of January<br />

2011 a referendum took place in the<br />

southern part of Sudan, which settled<br />

if this region would still be a part<br />

of Sudan or become an independent<br />

state. The final result of this referendum<br />

weren’t questionable: 98.83% of<br />

population voted for independence.<br />

Strong support for an own and<br />

sovereign country among people in<br />

southern Sudan isn’t surprising if we<br />

look on the aspect, which divided Sudan<br />

in two different parts already since<br />

1956, when the dominance of the<br />

Muslim and Arabian northern part of<br />

Sudan over the Christian and African<br />

south had become more visible. Continuous<br />

conflicts and civil war became<br />

an everyday life for people. Power<br />

was in the hands of the northern elite,<br />

which discriminated the south part of<br />

the country by letting people starve,<br />

neglecting children’s education and<br />

lack of health care. Differences bet-<br />

The hope for peace<br />

Ethnical, religious, cultural and language differences as well as the oil<br />

question divided Sudan in a north and south part long before the referendum<br />

2011. However, this historical election did not manage to erase<br />

old conflicts, of which oil is the biggest issue and this clash can lead to<br />

other tensions.<br />

ween those big groups have also had<br />

a religious ground.<br />

Year 1978 oil deposits were discovered<br />

in the southern part of Sudan.<br />

This resource became another conflict<br />

issue in the country. The ambition<br />

of the Northern part of the country<br />

was to control all benefits from the<br />

oil. In order to do this the Khartoum<br />

regime built up, in cooperation with<br />

others actors, a pipeline and refinery<br />

in the northern part of the country. In<br />

this way they appropriated both profits<br />

and workplaces.<br />

IT IS ALSO important to emphasize that<br />

in conjunction with getting out oil,<br />

Sudan attract more and more companies,<br />

which started to throw their<br />

weight around and it was particularly<br />

negative for the local population. People,<br />

which traditionally had been<br />

living in those rich in oil areas was<br />

thrown out from their houses.<br />

Human rights violations in Sudan<br />

drew charity organisations attention.<br />

Year 1999 the UN General Assembly<br />

presented a report that in one<br />

of these exploited areas people were<br />

evicted with use of massive violence<br />

in the course of ten days. Later UN´s<br />

report from year 2002 showed that<br />

the situation given to human rights<br />

has not changed. This report underlines<br />

even that oil exploration do have<br />

an interconnection with the conflict.<br />

Human Rights Watch in turn points<br />

out that oil in Sudan instead of bringing<br />

peace, prosperity and security; it<br />

brings out conflicts, people expulsion<br />

and widespread abuses.<br />

Nevertheless the possibility that<br />

Sudan is going to be condemned as a<br />

genocidal regime by the UN Security<br />

Council is very small because the involved<br />

foreign oil companies comes<br />

from countries, which has veto in the<br />

Security Council.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!