Tanja Samardžić Filološki fakultet u Beogradu OSNOVNE ...

LITERATURA
Barnbrook, G. 2002. Language of Definitions. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Publishing Company.
Biber, D. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Combley, R., Murphy, M., Rammel, C., and Wedgeworth, L. 2002. Collins COBUILD New
Student's Dictionary. Glasgow: HarperCollins.
Daniellsson, P. 2001. The Automatic Identification of Meaningful Units in Language.
Sprakdata, Department of Swedish, Göteborg University (PhD Dissertation).
Francis, G., Hunston S. and Manning, E. 1996. Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1:
Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
Hunston, S. and Francis, G. 1999. Pattern Grammar: A corpus­driven approach to the
lexical grammar of English. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing
Company.
Mel'cuk, I. 1998. "Collocations and Lexical Functions" in Cowie A. P. (ed) Phraseology,
Theory, Analysis, and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press, str. 23­55.
Sinclair J.M. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
Stubbs, M. 2001. Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics, Oxford:
Blackwell.
SUMMARY
This paper reviews the key notions within the corpus linguistics approach. Text is seen as a
scientifically observable and possibly measurable language object. Corpus is a sample of
language. Continuous scales are seen as a possible instrument for quantification of linguistic
data. Context plays a significant role in identification and description of linguistic units.
Reoccurrence, co­occurrence, and frequency are seen as possible evidence for linguistic
facts. Pattern is a generalized linguistic unit based on this evidence. The idiom principle
denoting strategy is seen as primary, and the open choice principle as secondary.