ENG122 ENG/122 ENG 122 Week 3 Discussion 1/DQ 1 Revising Your Outline for Logic (LATEST)
ENG122 ENG/122 ENG 122 Week 3 Discussion 1/DQ 1 Revising Your Outline for Logic (LATEST)
ENG122 ENG/122 ENG 122 Week 3 Discussion 1/DQ 1 Revising Your Outline for Logic (LATEST)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong><strong>ENG</strong><strong>122</strong></strong> <strong>ENG</strong>/<strong>122</strong> <strong>ENG</strong> <strong>122</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 3 <strong>Discussion</strong> 1/<strong>DQ</strong> 1<br />
<strong>Revising</strong> <strong>Your</strong> <strong>Outline</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Logic</strong> (<strong>LATEST</strong>)<br />
Download here<br />
<strong><strong>ENG</strong><strong>122</strong></strong> <strong>ENG</strong>/<strong>122</strong> <strong>ENG</strong> <strong>122</strong> <strong>Week</strong> 3 <strong>Discussion</strong> 1/<strong>DQ</strong> 1 <strong>Revising</strong> <strong>Your</strong> <strong>Outline</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Logic</strong> (<strong>LATEST</strong>) Prepare- As you<br />
prepare to write your first discussion <strong>for</strong> this week, complete the following: Read An Introduction to <strong>Logic</strong> and<br />
Syllogisms. Watch Syllogism, Mood, and Figure via YouTube. Review the grading rubric <strong>for</strong> this discussion. Reflect -<br />
Be<strong>for</strong>e drafting your initial post, take time to reflect on the rhetorical situation and the appeal to logos in your paper.<br />
Have you given logic and reason enough emphasis? Are you concerned about fallacies in your work? Think about your<br />
argument, its claims, and the supporting evidence. Have you developed a logical argument supported by credible<br />
evidence? Write (due Thursday, Day 3) - Utilize your outline to make a list of every claim and all supporting evidence <strong>for</strong><br />
your argument thus far, keeping an eye on the appeal to logos. Each claim should be written by you in your own words<br />
and should introduce a part of your unique argument. Paraphrase or summarize your supporting evidence and include a<br />
proper APA-style in-text citation. You may include multiple pieces of evidence <strong>for</strong> each claim. List your thesis statement,<br />
claims, and evidence in the following <strong>for</strong>mat: Thesis statement: Write your single-sentence thesis statement here. Claim:<br />
Write your first claim in a complete sentence here. Evidence: Paraphrase or summarize your source and cite it here<br />
(Sample, 2015). Evidence: Paraphrase or summarize additional sources that support this claim and cite them here as 2.,<br />
3., 4., and so on (Sample, 2015). Evidence: If you feel the need to use a quote, add it to the list with proper quotation<br />
marks and the appropriate in-text citation containing the page, section, or paragraph number in the original source<br />
(Sample, 2015, p. 22). Claim: Write your second claim in a complete sentence here. Evidence: Paraphrase or<br />
summarize your source here (Sample, 2015). Evidence: Continue to paraphrase and summarize your sources <strong>for</strong> each<br />
claim (Sample, 2015). Claim: Continue to write your claims in complete sentences. Evidence Evidence In 200 to 300<br />
words, compare your claims and evidence to the common fallacies described in An Introduction to <strong>Logic</strong> and Syllogisms.<br />
Describe any fallacies you locate and describe how you will remove those fallacies this week. Describe how your claims<br />
logically support your thesis statement as well-supported premises. Be sure to use the correct vocabulary when<br />
discussing fallacy: Slippery slope, hasty generalization, post hoc ergo propter hoc, either/or, ad hominem, etc. End your<br />
post with any questions or concerns you have regarding the appeal to logos, the use of supporting evidence, the role of<br />
claims in an argument, or fallacies. Respond to Peers (due Monday, Day 7) - In 125 to 200 words each, respond to at<br />
least two classmates. In each response, begin by addressing your classmate?s questions and concerns. Then, review<br />
the list of claims and supporting evidence <strong>for</strong> possible fallacies. State whether your classmate?s claims effectively<br />
support the thesis statement and explain why.Share your thoughts on the research selected to support the list of claims.<br />
Has your classmate provided enough evidence? Be sure to follow up with classmates who respond to your post. Utilize<br />
feedback from this discussion as you revise your paper outline and compose your rough draft.<br />
Page 1/{nb}