02.01.2013 Views

Absorbency Tests for Quality Diapers - Race Car Diaper and Star ...

Absorbency Tests for Quality Diapers - Race Car Diaper and Star ...

Absorbency Tests for Quality Diapers - Race Car Diaper and Star ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Absorbency</strong> <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong><br />

We have had many questions on how well does the <strong>Star</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Race</strong> <strong>Car</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong> work, how many wettings does<br />

it keep you dry <strong>for</strong>, <strong>and</strong> many more such questions. The answers are not simple as we will discuss below.<br />

The <strong>Star</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Race</strong> <strong>Car</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong> are essentially identical <strong>and</strong><br />

thus we will lump results together.<br />

Wetting <strong>and</strong> how much a diaper holds depends on a host<br />

of issues including how you are measuring the capacity<br />

<strong>and</strong> your criteria <strong>for</strong> saying it is leaking. It depends on the<br />

fit of the diaper. Putting on either a too small or too large<br />

a diaper will impact how well the leg gathering work. Too<br />

small a diaper will mean that the front-side absorption<br />

zone will not extend around enough. So the first thing is<br />

that the <strong>Diaper</strong> must fit properly if it is to prevent leaks!<br />

We tried a number of tests. The RCD X-Large weighs 54<br />

grams (5.4 oz) br<strong>and</strong> new <strong>and</strong> fully saturated weighs<br />

2,154 grams (76 oz). The difference is 72 Fluid oz or about<br />

or about 4.5 pounds of water. This is effectively the total<br />

weight if you drop it in a bucket of water <strong>and</strong> let it absorb<br />

as much as it could.<br />

The second test was a little more realistic. The RCD was<br />

filled with water until water penetrated back up through<br />

the absorbent mat to the stay-dry lining (when pressure or<br />

<strong>for</strong>ce was applied downward). In this case, the RCD XL<br />

could absorb up to 10 times it weight or 54 Fluid ounces<br />

(about 3.5 pounds).<br />

We ran another test. We poured water in the diaper under<br />

test until the water began to puddle. On small <strong>Star</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> small Tranquility ATN, they each held, fully soaked, 40<br />

oz of water. We measured Underjams <strong>and</strong> Goodnites XLs<br />

at the same time. The Underjams held 20 oz <strong>and</strong><br />

Goodnites 24 oz. All of these numbers are corrected <strong>for</strong><br />

the starting weight of each diaper.<br />

Finally, we got a subject to see how much a diaper would<br />

hold if it was worn <strong>and</strong> fitted properly. He lay down on a<br />

mat <strong>and</strong> then he inserted a tube down the front of his<br />

diaper. Warm water was then allowed to flow<br />

through the tube, gradually soaking the diaper.<br />

When water leaked out the top or thru the leg<br />

gathering, the test was called <strong>and</strong> the weight<br />

was measured. He did roll a little bit back <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong>th as he normally would do in his sleep as<br />

the diaper filled.<br />

We tried this, a couple of times, <strong>and</strong>, in one<br />

case, we got 48 oz (3 pounds) <strong>and</strong>, in the<br />

other case, 54 oz (3.5 pounds) be<strong>for</strong>e the<br />

diaper started to leak around the legs. We also<br />

did a test with the <strong>Star</strong> Booster Pad <strong>and</strong> that<br />

increase the capacity to 83 oz or 5.25 pounds.<br />

This subject normally wears a RCD XL or <strong>Star</strong><br />

Adult Medium. We wanted to see what would<br />

happen with the RCD Large. It actually fit him<br />

but when we tested the Large RCD, the point<br />

where leaking occurred dropped to between 32<br />

to 36 oz. We were disappointed in this result<br />

www.<strong>Quality</strong>Dipers.Net <strong>Absorbency</strong> <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>and</strong> Comments <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong> Page 1<br />

©2012 <strong>Quality</strong><strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong>.net


until we figured out the cause. This was NOT related to<br />

the holding capacity but rather an improper fit on the leg<br />

gathering. We tried a third time after he carefully fitted<br />

the diaper <strong>and</strong> got 40 oz. This seems to make sense when<br />

compared to the XL at 48 to 54 oz. The XL should hold<br />

more water. We just want to emphasize, however, that a<br />

proper fit is essential <strong>for</strong> determining true capacity <strong>and</strong><br />

assuring a dry bed in actual use.<br />

Thus, with a couple of different tests, we have come up<br />

with about a 48 to 54 oz (3 to 3.5 pound) holding capacity<br />

<strong>for</strong> the RCD XLs. There<strong>for</strong>e, if the person goes an average<br />

of 12 ounces, the diaper should be good <strong>for</strong> at least 3 to 4<br />

wetting. With the <strong>Star</strong> Booster, this was increased by a<br />

little less than additional 32 oz, or a total of around 83 oz.<br />

The Large RCDs will have a slightly lower capacity than<br />

the XLs do but because the user is smaller, he will likely<br />

wet less <strong>and</strong> thus need a little less capacity.<br />

What these tests do not take into account in normal use is<br />

if the diaper was fitted properly initially, if the subject<br />

sleeps on his back or side, if the natural stream points up<br />

or down or to the side. We did not run tests on the speed<br />

of wetting either. This can impact the capacity. Further,<br />

we did not look at how the diapers do if wet once, wait a<br />

while, <strong>and</strong> wet again.<br />

We did want to know on average how much a person who<br />

wears RCD XLs would go overnight so we asked the<br />

subject to weigh his RCDs each night <strong>for</strong> a week. He<br />

averaged 32 oz liquid weight with a low of 20 oz <strong>and</strong> a<br />

high of 42 oz. Thus, with a target of 48 oz to 54 oz<br />

maximum, he sometimes came within 20% of the limit.<br />

However, in a year of wearing <strong>Quality</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong>, he has had<br />

only 4 minor leaks. He said in each case he had not<br />

adjusted the diapers properly; so even with the 48 to 54<br />

oz capacity, he did have a fair bit to spare. When asked if<br />

anything caused the higher peak, he said he had had a<br />

little more soda at an evening event than he should have<br />

<strong>and</strong> now he would use a <strong>Diaper</strong> Booster if he has too<br />

much to drink be<strong>for</strong>e bed. The other option, of course, is<br />

to use <strong>Star</strong> Plastic Pants to minimize leaks if you<br />

occasionally reach the capacity of the diaper.<br />

For people who find that the diapers have leaked, we have<br />

a few questions:<br />

� Was the diaper fitted right? We already noted the<br />

issues there.<br />

� Were things pointed in the right direction? For<br />

smaller boys, it may not matter but <strong>for</strong> older boys<br />

<strong>and</strong> teens it does.<br />

� How do you lay in bed? While the <strong>Quality</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong><br />

do have an absorbent area to the sides, the<br />

padding is not nearly as heavy as down thru the<br />

center. So while the wings do provide a lot more<br />

protection from side-ways leaks than other<br />

diapers, the wings still cannot hold as much as the<br />

center.<br />

� How much did you go compared to a “normal”<br />

night? As we also noted above, our subject had<br />

one night where he wet more than normal<br />

because we recorded his norm. He realized why<br />

<strong>and</strong> said he will be using the <strong>Star</strong> Booster in the<br />

future <strong>for</strong> those occasions.<br />

Editor’s Note: This is strictly a rough estimate of the<br />

capacity of the <strong>Star</strong> <strong>and</strong> RC <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong>. Results may vary<br />

person-to-person <strong>and</strong> from even day-to-day depending on<br />

many factors.<br />

Current <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong> from www.<strong>Quality</strong><strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong>.Net<br />

www.<strong>Quality</strong>Dipers.Net <strong>Absorbency</strong> <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>and</strong> Comments <strong>for</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> <strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong> Page 2<br />

©2012 <strong>Quality</strong><strong><strong>Diaper</strong>s</strong>.net

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!