ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT ANNUAL ...

LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.33%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.75%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
31.65%
LEA
Rate
19.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
88.57%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0101 - DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0104 - STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.56%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.51%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.59% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.17%
37.97%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0104 - STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
41.14%
LEA
Rate
17.72%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0104 - STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
100.00%
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 100.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 100.00% Y 76.69% 78.50% 100.00% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
100.00%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
33.33%
66.67%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0104 - STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0104 - STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0201 - CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
69.23%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.50%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.97% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.25%
25.53%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0201 - CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
69.78%
LEA
Rate
2.75%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0201 - CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0201 - CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
75.76%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0201 - CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0203 - HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
61.54%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.74%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.25%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 94.87% N
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.62%
40.85%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0203 - HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
85.89%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.68%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0203 - HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0203 - HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
83.87%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0203 - HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0302 - COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.86%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.00%
61.22%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0302 - COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
76.29%
LEA
Rate
5.15%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0302 - COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0302 - COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0302 - COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0303 - MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
43.75%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.89%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.99% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
37.89%
43.65%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0303 - MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
72.51%
LEA
Rate
15.71%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.26%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0303 - MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0303 - MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.59%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0303 - MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0304 - NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
46.88%
40.54%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0304 - NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
80.00%
LEA
Rate
6.15%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0304 - NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0304 - NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.33%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0304 - NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0401 - BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
74.63%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.22%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.18%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.25% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
53.94%
71.90%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0401 - BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
48.92%
LEA
Rate
22.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.16%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0401 - BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
5.13%
20.51%
38.46%
7.69%
28.21%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 64.29% N 90.31% 90.50% 62.50% N 90.82% 92.50% 59.26% N
66.58% 69.50% 35.90% N 57.43% 60.50% 35.90% N 76.69% 78.50% 46.15% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
7.69%
23.08%
33.33%
17.95%
17.95%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 5.13%
23.08%
25.64%
15.38%
30.77%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0401 - BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
83.08%
94.29%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0401 - BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0402 - DECATUR SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
45.16%
48.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0402 - DECATUR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.67%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0402 - DECATUR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0402 - DECATUR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0402 - DECATUR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0403 - GENTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.82%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.97%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.02% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.84%
43.88%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0403 - GENTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.15%
LEA
Rate
5.03%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.26%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0403 - GENTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0403 - GENTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.34%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0403 - GENTRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0404 - GRAVETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
76.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.20%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.26%
48.04%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0404 - GRAVETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.91%
LEA
Rate
9.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.99%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0404 - GRAVETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0404 - GRAVETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.44%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0404 - GRAVETTE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0405 - ROGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.69%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.89%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.69% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.92%
58.20%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0405 - ROGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.16%
LEA
Rate
19.02%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.87%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0405 - ROGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0405 - ROGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.75%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0405 - ROGERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0406 - SILOAM SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
86.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.66%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.56% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.56%
53.88%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0406 - SILOAM SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
76.28%
LEA
Rate
1.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.50%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0406 - SILOAM SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0406 - SILOAM SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
86.36%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0406 - SILOAM SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0407 - PEA RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.52%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.81%
67.95%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0407 - PEA RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.27%
LEA
Rate
6.34%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.70%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0407 - PEA RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0407 - PEA RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0407 - PEA RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0440 - BENTON COUNTY SCHOOL OF ARTS
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.45% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.41%
36.84%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0440 - BENTON COUNTY SCHOOL OF ARTS
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
90.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0440 - BENTON COUNTY SCHOOL OF ARTS
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0440 - BENTON COUNTY SCHOOL OF ARTS
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0440 - BENTON COUNTY SCHOOL OF ARTS
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0501 - ALPENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
77.78%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.38%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
28.89%
47.73%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0501 - ALPENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
71.60%
LEA
Rate
1.23%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0501 - ALPENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0501 - ALPENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0501 - ALPENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0502 - BERGMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.45%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
45.16%
54.69%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0502 - BERGMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.88%
LEA
Rate
4.55%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0502 - BERGMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0502 - BERGMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.26%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0502 - BERGMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0503 - HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
56.25%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.78%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.39%
45.60%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0503 - HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.42%
LEA
Rate
11.28%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.56%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0503 - HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
10.00%
10.00%
50.00%
30.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 85.71% N 90.31% 90.50% 60.00% N 90.82% 92.50% 85.71% N
66.58% 69.50% 80.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 50.00% N 76.69% 78.50% 90.00% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
40.00%
10.00%
50.00%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
10.00%
— —
60.00%
30.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0503 - HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0503 - HARRISON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0504 - OMAHA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.33%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.52%
31.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0504 - OMAHA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
78.43%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0504 - OMAHA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0504 - OMAHA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0504 - OMAHA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0505 - VALLEY SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
58.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.26%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.60%
62.50%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0505 - VALLEY SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.91%
LEA
Rate
5.22%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.87%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0505 - VALLEY SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0505 - VALLEY SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0505 - VALLEY SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
60.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0506 - LEAD HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.30%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.77% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.22%
26.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0506 - LEAD HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.67%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0506 - LEAD HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0506 - LEAD HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
91.94%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0506 - LEAD HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0601 - HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
10.00%
21.74%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0601 - HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
88.24%
LEA
Rate
1.96%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0601 - HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0601 - HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.83%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0601 - HERMITAGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0602 - WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
61.54%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.17%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.63%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.61% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
15.28%
18.57%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0602 - WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
67.86%
LEA
Rate
4.29%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0602 - WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0602 - WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.55%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0602 - WARREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0701 - HAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.00%
24.24%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0701 - HAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.25%
LEA
Rate
3.13%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0701 - HAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0701 - HAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
85.71%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0701 - HAMPTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0801 - BERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
70.59%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.02%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.20%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.24% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.05%
51.20%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0801 - BERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.28%
LEA
Rate
8.45%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.47%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0801 - BERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0801 - BERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
95.73%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0801 - BERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0802 - EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.44%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.62%
40.54%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0802 - EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.14%
LEA
Rate
18.60%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0802 - EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0802 - EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.59%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0802 - EUREKA SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 0803 - GREEN FOREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.64%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.19%
44.23%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0803 - GREEN FOREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.03%
LEA
Rate
11.38%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0803 - GREEN FOREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0803 - GREEN FOREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
85.71%
96.69%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0803 - GREEN FOREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0901 - DERMOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.43%
12.90%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0901 - DERMOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.30%
LEA
Rate
19.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0901 - DERMOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0901 - DERMOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.96%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0901 - DERMOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 0903 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.75%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
10.91%
16.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 0903 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
65.31%
LEA
Rate
14.29%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.02%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 0903 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 0903 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 0903 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1002 - ARKADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
69.57%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.80%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.81%
38.24%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1002 - ARKADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
48.59%
LEA
Rate
14.12%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1002 - ARKADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1002 - ARKADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.83%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1002 - ARKADELPHIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1003 - GURDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.16%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.36%
45.24%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1003 - GURDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
81.48%
LEA
Rate
3.70%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.23%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1003 - GURDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1003 - GURDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1003 - GURDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1020 - DAWSON EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1020 - DAWSON EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1020 - DAWSON EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
4.27%
37.18%
42.74%
15.81%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 94.92% Y 90.31% 90.50% 98.17% Y 90.82% 92.50% 97.84% Y
66.58% 69.50% 58.55% N 57.43% 60.50% 54.70% N 76.69% 78.50% 71.37% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
1.71%
43.59%
48.29%
6.41%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
1.71%
26.92%
50.43%
20.94%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1020 - DAWSON EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
84.38%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1020 - DAWSON EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1101 - CORNING SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.47%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.94%
47.62%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1101 - CORNING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
41.33%
LEA
Rate
3.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1101 - CORNING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1101 - CORNING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.27%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1101 - CORNING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1104 - PIGGOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.39%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
95.31%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.77% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.97%
49.23%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1104 - PIGGOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
51.03%
LEA
Rate
5.52%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1104 - PIGGOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1104 - PIGGOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1104 - PIGGOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1106 - RECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.85%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.35%
63.49%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1106 - RECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.26%
LEA
Rate
3.48%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1106 - RECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1106 - RECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.73%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1106 - RECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1201 - CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.48%
56.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1201 - CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.00%
LEA
Rate
2.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1201 - CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1201 - CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.66%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1201 - CONCORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1202 - HEBER SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.95%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.90%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.90%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.89% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.82%
35.23%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1202 - HEBER SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.24%
LEA
Rate
9.64%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.20%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1202 - HEBER SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1202 - HEBER SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.80%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1202 - HEBER SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
16.67%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1203 - QUITMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.78%
47.73%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1203 - QUITMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
50.00%
LEA
Rate
5.13%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1203 - QUITMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1203 - QUITMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1203 - QUITMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1204 - WEST SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
41.67%
60.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1204 - WEST SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
77.97%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
8.47%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1204 - WEST SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1204 - WEST SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.62%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1204 - WEST SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1304 - WOODLAWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.12%
47.37%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1304 - WOODLAWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
82.26%
LEA
Rate
1.61%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1304 - WOODLAWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1304 - WOODLAWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1304 - WOODLAWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1305 - CLEVELAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.22%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
15.79%
28.57%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1305 - CLEVELAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
79.76%
LEA
Rate
2.38%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1305 - CLEVELAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1305 - CLEVELAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
91.30%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1305 - CLEVELAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1402 - MAGNOLIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.90%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.62%
24.19%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1402 - MAGNOLIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
46.80%
LEA
Rate
9.60%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.20%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1402 - MAGNOLIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1402 - MAGNOLIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.06%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1402 - MAGNOLIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
21.43%
LEA
Rate
35.71%
LEA
Rate
35.71%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1408 - EMERSON-TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.06%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.77%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 93.33% N
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.67%
60.71%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1408 - EMERSON-TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
81.43%
LEA
Rate
4.29%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1408 - EMERSON-TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1408 - EMERSON-TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.87%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1408 - EMERSON-TAYLOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1503 - NEMO VISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.03%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
39.02%
69.23%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1503 - NEMO VISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.33%
LEA
Rate
5.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1503 - NEMO VISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1503 - NEMO VISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
91.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1503 - NEMO VISTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1505 - WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.57%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.29%
10.71%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1505 - WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
40.00%
LEA
Rate
4.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1505 - WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1505 - WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.91%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1505 - WONDERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1507 - SO. CONWAY CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
73.91%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.95%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.05% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.71%
46.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1507 - SO. CONWAY CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.48%
LEA
Rate
10.43%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.43%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1507 - SO. CONWAY CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1507 - SO. CONWAY CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.77%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1507 - SO. CONWAY CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1520 - ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1520 - ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1520 - ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
1.49%
3.96%
16.34%
78.22%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 93.18% Y 90.31% 90.50% 86.69% N 90.82% 92.50% 87.50% N
66.58% 69.50% 94.55% Y 57.43% 60.50% 79.70% Y 76.69% 78.50% 95.30% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
9.16%
11.14%
48.51%
31.19%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
2.48%
2.23%
15.10%
80.20%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1520 - ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
98.99%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1520 - ARCH FORD EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1601 - BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
85.71%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.58%
38.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1601 - BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
44.05%
LEA
Rate
16.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1601 - BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1601 - BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
78.57%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1601 - BAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1602 - WESTSIDE CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.95%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.17%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.98%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.27%
39.80%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1602 - WESTSIDE CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.16%
LEA
Rate
13.16%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
5.26%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1602 - WESTSIDE CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1602 - WESTSIDE CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1602 - WESTSIDE CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1603 - BROOKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
94.74%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.78%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.90% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.75%
51.16%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1603 - BROOKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.37%
LEA
Rate
10.43%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.61%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1603 - BROOKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1603 - BROOKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.05%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1603 - BROOKLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1605 - BUFFALO IS. CENTRAL SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.59%
47.76%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1605 - BUFFALO IS. CENTRAL SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
38.40%
LEA
Rate
2.40%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1605 - BUFFALO IS. CENTRAL SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1605 - BUFFALO IS. CENTRAL SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.40%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1605 - BUFFALO IS. CENTRAL SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1608 - JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
82.05%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.89%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.51% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.07%
37.29%
Y
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1608 - JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
40.33%
LEA
Rate
11.76%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.60%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1608 - JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1608 - JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.77%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1608 - JONESBORO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
27.27%
LEA
Rate
27.27%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1611 - NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
82.61%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.20%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
30.53%
49.49%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1611 - NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
36.36%
LEA
Rate
18.44%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.26%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1611 - NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1611 - NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.71%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1611 - NETTLETON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1612 - VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.07%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.08% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.27%
48.57%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1612 - VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.46%
LEA
Rate
12.20%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1612 - VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1612 - VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
99.12%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1612 - VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1613 - RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.59%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.68% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.23%
35.82%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1613 - RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.54%
LEA
Rate
6.72%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.75%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1613 - RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1613 - RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1613 - RIVERSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1701 - ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.10%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.57%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.58% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.07%
56.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1701 - ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
71.76%
LEA
Rate
12.47%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1701 - ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1701 - ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.18%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1701 - ALMA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1702 - CEDARVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.63%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
7.69%
24.14%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1702 - CEDARVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.92%
LEA
Rate
12.36%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1702 - CEDARVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1702 - CEDARVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.36%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1702 - CEDARVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1703 - MOUNTAINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.28%
38.18%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1703 - MOUNTAINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.67%
LEA
Rate
8.25%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.03%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1703 - MOUNTAINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1703 - MOUNTAINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1703 - MOUNTAINBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1704 - MULBERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.56%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
93.02%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
98.61% 95.00% 93.18% N
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
12.50%
25.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1704 - MULBERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
44.29%
LEA
Rate
12.86%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
11.43%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1704 - MULBERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1704 - MULBERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.77%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1704 - MULBERRY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1705 - VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.90%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.63%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.01% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
28.43%
42.27%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1705 - VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.84%
LEA
Rate
12.50%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.69%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1705 - VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
3.03%
— —
9.09%
18.18%
69.70%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 90.00% N 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 87.88% Y 57.43% 60.50% 90.91% Y 76.69% 78.50% 90.91% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
9.09%
27.27%
63.64%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
9.09%
21.21%
69.70%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1705 - VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
98.75%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1705 - VAN BUREN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 72.73% N
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1802 - EARLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.68%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.96%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.62% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
13.64%
10.26%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1802 - EARLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
24.71%
LEA
Rate
5.88%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1802 - EARLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1802 - EARLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1802 - EARLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1803 - WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
56.94%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
7.56%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.11%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.80% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.33%
41.18%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1803 - WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.96%
LEA
Rate
15.57%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.15%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1803 - WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1803 - WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.89%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
61.90%
— —
61.90%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1803 - WEST MEMPHIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1804 - MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
65.71%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.97%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.23%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.88% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
28.03%
40.42%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1804 - MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
36.38%
LEA
Rate
25.25%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.80%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1804 - MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1804 - MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.98%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
91.78%
— —
91.78%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1804 - MARION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 1901 - CROSS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.56%
48.94%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1901 - CROSS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
65.22%
LEA
Rate
9.78%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1901 - CROSS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1901 - CROSS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.24%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1901 - CROSS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 1905 - WYNNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
72.22%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.53%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.56% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.20%
47.15%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 1905 - WYNNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
33.13%
LEA
Rate
26.01%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.62%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 1905 - WYNNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 1905 - WYNNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.71%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 1905 - WYNNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2002 - FORDYCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
8.89%
11.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2002 - FORDYCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
25.26%
LEA
Rate
6.32%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
57.37%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2002 - FORDYCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2002 - FORDYCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
83.87%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2002 - FORDYCE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2104 - DUMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.63%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.00%
35.79%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2104 - DUMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
37.74%
LEA
Rate
16.35%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2104 - DUMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2104 - DUMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.74%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2104 - DUMAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2105 - MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.08%
32.35%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2105 - MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.75%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2105 - MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2105 - MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
80.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2105 - MCGEHEE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2202 - DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.88%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
60.61%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2202 - DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.19%
LEA
Rate
10.58%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2202 - DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2202 - DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.45%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2202 - DREW CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2203 - MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
82.35%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.24%
35.38%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2203 - MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.14%
LEA
Rate
4.57%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2203 - MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2203 - MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
85.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2203 - MONTICELLO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2220 - SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2220 - SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2220 - SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
3.20%
— —
4.27%
52.31%
40.21%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 94.64% Y 90.31% 90.50% 98.80% Y 90.82% 92.50% 95.80% Y
66.58% 69.50% 92.53% Y 57.43% 60.50% 86.48% Y 76.69% 78.50% 96.44% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
0.71%
0.36%
12.46%
75.09%
11.39%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 2.14%
— —
1.42%
47.33%
49.11%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2220 - SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
92.49%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2220 - SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2301 - CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
72.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.78%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.33%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.69% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
46.14%
70.46%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2301 - CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.36%
LEA
Rate
17.21%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.89%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2301 - CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2301 - CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.94%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2301 - CONWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2303 - GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
92.31%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.57%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.83%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.01% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
34.57%
51.63%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2303 - GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.72%
LEA
Rate
10.20%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.87%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2303 - GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2303 - GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.29%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2303 - GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2304 - GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.22% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.43%
60.61%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2304 - GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.18%
LEA
Rate
10.45%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.49%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2304 - GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2304 - GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2304 - GUY-PERKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2305 - MAYFLOWER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
63.64%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.48%
24.53%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2305 - MAYFLOWER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.48%
LEA
Rate
17.32%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.79%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2305 - MAYFLOWER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2305 - MAYFLOWER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.88%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2305 - MAYFLOWER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2306 - MT. VERNON/ENOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.70%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.65% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.67%
44.44%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2306 - MT. VERNON/ENOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.98%
LEA
Rate
2.44%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2306 - MT. VERNON/ENOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2306 - MT. VERNON/ENOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.74%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2306 - MT. VERNON/ENOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2307 - VILONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
92.31%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.54%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
47.72%
62.16%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2307 - VILONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.05%
LEA
Rate
14.38%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2307 - VILONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2307 - VILONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.35%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2307 - VILONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2402 - CHARLESTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
85.71%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.45%
42.86%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2402 - CHARLESTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.73%
LEA
Rate
1.23%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
4.94%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2402 - CHARLESTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2402 - CHARLESTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2402 - CHARLESTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2403 - COUNTY LINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.50% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
55.26%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2403 - COUNTY LINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.67%
LEA
Rate
1.28%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.85%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2403 - COUNTY LINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2403 - COUNTY LINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.30%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2403 - COUNTY LINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2404 - OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
70.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.50%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.70% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
42.67%
51.76%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2404 - OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.06%
LEA
Rate
5.73%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
7.64%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2404 - OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2404 - OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.87%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2404 - OZARK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2420 - WESTERN ARKANSAS CO-OP
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2420 - WESTERN ARKANSAS CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2420 - WESTERN ARKANSAS CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
4.38%
4.38%
40.15%
27.01%
24.09%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 88.46% N 90.31% 90.50% 86.36% N 90.82% 92.50% 79.35% N
66.58% 69.50% 51.09% N 57.43% 60.50% 50.36% N 76.69% 78.50% 62.04% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
2.19%
8.76%
38.69%
30.66%
19.71%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 2.92%
10.95%
24.09%
29.20%
32.85%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2420 - WESTERN ARKANSAS CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
92.50%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
99.32%
99.32%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2420 - WESTERN ARKANSAS CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2501 - MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
41.38%
62.50%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2501 - MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
45.95%
LEA
Rate
5.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.35%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2501 - MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
14.29%
71.43%
14.29%
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 85.71% N 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 14.29% N 57.43% 60.50% 28.57% N 76.69% 78.50% 42.86% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
71.43%
28.57%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
57.14%
42.86%
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2501 - MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
90.00%
97.87%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2501 - MAMMOTH SPRING SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2502 - SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.71%
51.28%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2502 - SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
69.90%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.94%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2502 - SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2502 - SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2502 - SALEM SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2503 - VIOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
52.00%
57.69%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2503 - VIOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.29%
LEA
Rate
2.86%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.43%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2503 - VIOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2503 - VIOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.33%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2503 - VIOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2601 - CUTTER-MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
92.68%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
98.61% 95.00% 95.65% Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
42.86%
56.10%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2601 - CUTTER-MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.94%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.53%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2601 - CUTTER-MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2601 - CUTTER-MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2601 - CUTTER-MORNING STAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2602 - FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
68.75%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.96%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.96%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
39.13%
51.40%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2602 - FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.17%
LEA
Rate
7.19%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.96%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2602 - FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2602 - FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.45%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2602 - FOUNTAIN LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2603 - HOT SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
64.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.15%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.68%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.82% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.72%
39.77%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2603 - HOT SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
37.48%
LEA
Rate
9.37%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.62%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2603 - HOT SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2603 - HOT SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.19%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2603 - HOT SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2604 - JESSIEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.27%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.21%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.31% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.40%
54.72%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2604 - JESSIEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.28%
LEA
Rate
4.88%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
4.07%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2604 - JESSIEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2604 - JESSIEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2604 - JESSIEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2605 - LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.88%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.49%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.58%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.26% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.27%
58.94%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2605 - LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.03%
LEA
Rate
16.44%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.03%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2605 - LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2605 - LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.01%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2605 - LAKE HAMILTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 20.00% N
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2606 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.52%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.39% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.06%
59.74%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2606 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
43.06%
LEA
Rate
8.38%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.45%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2606 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2606 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2606 - LAKESIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 40.00% N
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2607 - MOUNTAIN PINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.62%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
8.33%
25.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2607 - MOUNTAIN PINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.18%
LEA
Rate
2.35%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.18%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2607 - MOUNTAIN PINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2607 - MOUNTAIN PINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
90.91%
— —
90.91%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2607 - MOUNTAIN PINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2703 - POYEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.09%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.43%
32.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2703 - POYEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.04%
LEA
Rate
3.77%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2703 - POYEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2703 - POYEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.37%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2703 - POYEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2705 - SHERIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.38%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.47% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.26%
57.87%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2705 - SHERIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
47.94%
LEA
Rate
17.78%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.26%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2705 - SHERIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2705 - SHERIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.84%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2705 - SHERIDAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2803 - MARMADUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.03%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.55%
25.42%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2803 - MARMADUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.76%
LEA
Rate
8.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2803 - MARMADUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2803 - MARMADUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.92%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2803 - MARMADUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2807 - GREENE COUNTY TECH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
63.64%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.03%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.25%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.90% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.45%
50.78%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2807 - GREENE COUNTY TECH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
40.70%
LEA
Rate
16.28%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.19%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2807 - GREENE COUNTY TECH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2807 - GREENE COUNTY TECH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2807 - GREENE COUNTY TECH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2808 - PARAGOULD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
69.23%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.05%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.44%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.44% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.12%
49.38%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2808 - PARAGOULD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.02%
LEA
Rate
10.08%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.28%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2808 - PARAGOULD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
19.05%
42.86%
38.10%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 92.86% Y 90.82% 92.50% 66.67% N
66.58% 69.50% 80.95% Y 57.43% 60.50% 71.43% Y 76.69% 78.50% 80.95% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
4.76%
23.81%
38.10%
33.33%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
14.29%
4.76%
23.81%
57.14%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2808 - PARAGOULD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
98.75%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2808 - PARAGOULD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2901 - BLEVINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.52%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.58%
23.40%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2901 - BLEVINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
65.38%
LEA
Rate
19.23%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2901 - BLEVINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2901 - BLEVINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2901 - BLEVINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 2903 - HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
94.74%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.15%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.15% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
10.40%
17.93%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2903 - HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
83.69%
LEA
Rate
7.80%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.35%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2903 - HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2903 - HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2903 - HOPE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2906 - SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.75%
50.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2906 - SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
82.93%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.44%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2906 - SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2906 - SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2906 - SPRING HILL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 2920 - SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 2920 - SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 2920 - SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
2.76%
13.81%
50.83%
32.60%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 95.90% Y 90.31% 90.50% 96.41% Y 90.82% 92.50% 94.87% Y
66.58% 69.50% 83.43% Y 57.43% 60.50% 71.82% Y 76.69% 78.50% 85.08% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.31%
24.86%
64.09%
7.73%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
3.31%
11.60%
49.72%
35.36%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 2920 - SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
99.12%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 2920 - SOUTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3001 - BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
76.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.67%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.25%
38.46%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3001 - BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.86%
LEA
Rate
12.61%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
5.88%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3001 - BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3001 - BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.36%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3001 - BISMARCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3002 - GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.91%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.54%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.51%
46.77%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3002 - GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
40.77%
LEA
Rate
8.46%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.77%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3002 - GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3002 - GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
83.82%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3002 - GLEN ROSE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3003 - MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
92.86%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
42.42%
43.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3003 - MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.24%
LEA
Rate
11.94%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
5.97%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3003 - MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3003 - MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
87.50%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3003 - MAGNET COVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3004 - MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
70.59%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.68%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.25% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.86%
34.51%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3004 - MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.97%
LEA
Rate
10.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.30%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3004 - MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3004 - MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3004 - MALVERN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3005 - OUACHITA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.76%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.53%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3005 - OUACHITA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.33%
LEA
Rate
2.22%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.22%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3005 - OUACHITA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3005 - OUACHITA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3005 - OUACHITA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3102 - DIERKS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
7.69%
29.63%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3102 - DIERKS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.81%
LEA
Rate
4.69%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3102 - DIERKS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3102 - DIERKS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
84.21%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3102 - DIERKS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3104 - MINERAL SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.35%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3104 - MINERAL SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.79%
LEA
Rate
6.85%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.74%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3104 - MINERAL SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3104 - MINERAL SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.44%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3104 - MINERAL SPRINGS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3105 - NASHVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
93.75%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.32%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.16% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.53%
46.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3105 - NASHVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.38%
LEA
Rate
8.76%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3105 - NASHVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3105 - NASHVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.59%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3105 - NASHVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3201 - BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
65.22%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.73%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.53% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.98%
53.77%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3201 - BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.73%
LEA
Rate
3.94%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.84%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3201 - BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
8.82%
40.20%
50.98%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 92.19% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 91.18% Y 57.43% 60.50% 76.47% Y 76.69% 78.50% 92.16% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
4.90%
18.63%
39.22%
37.25%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
7.84%
82.35%
9.80%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3201 - BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
90.91%
97.90%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3201 - BATESVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
33.33%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3209 - SOUTHSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.26%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.57%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
39.78%
61.70%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3209 - SOUTHSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.95%
LEA
Rate
2.79%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3209 - SOUTHSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.85%
— —
23.08%
73.08%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 85.71% N 90.31% 90.50% 96.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 93.75% Y
66.58% 69.50% 96.15% Y 57.43% 60.50% 46.15% N 76.69% 78.50% 96.15% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.85%
50.00%
42.31%
3.85%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
3.85%
— —
57.69%
38.46%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3209 - SOUTHSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
96.77%
94.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3209 - SOUTHSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3211 - MIDLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.85%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.88%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.77% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.00%
53.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3211 - MIDLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.05%
LEA
Rate
16.22%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3211 - MIDLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
81.25%
18.75%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 100.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 75.00% Y 76.69% 78.50% 75.00% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
25.00%
75.00%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
25.00%
75.00%
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3211 - MIDLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3211 - MIDLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3212 - CEDAR RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
85.71%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.31%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.33% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.03%
37.29%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3212 - CEDAR RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
68.18%
LEA
Rate
6.36%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3212 - CEDAR RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
5.26%
94.74%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 100.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 100.00% Y 76.69% 78.50% 100.00% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
10.53%
89.47%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
5.26%
94.74%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3212 - CEDAR RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
96.08%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3212 - CEDAR RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3301 - CALICO ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3301 - CALICO ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
89.80%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3301 - CALICO ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3301 - CALICO ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3301 - CALICO ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3302 - MELBOURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
34.29%
58.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3302 - MELBOURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.79%
LEA
Rate
8.25%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.06%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3302 - MELBOURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3302 - MELBOURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.44%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3302 - MELBOURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3306 - IZARD CO. CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
28.89%
48.89%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3306 - IZARD CO. CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.75%
LEA
Rate
9.89%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3306 - IZARD CO. CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
15.38%
23.08%
61.54%
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 84.62% N 90.31% 90.50% 92.31% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 61.54% N 57.43% 60.50% 84.62% Y 76.69% 78.50% 100.00% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
7.69%
7.69%
84.62%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
84.62%
15.38%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3306 - IZARD CO. CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
98.28%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3306 - IZARD CO. CONS. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3320 - NORTH CENTRAL ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3320 - NORTH CENTRAL ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3320 - NORTH CENTRAL ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
5.56%
19.14%
58.64%
16.67%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 93.33% Y 90.31% 90.50% 95.97% Y 90.82% 92.50% 95.33% Y
66.58% 69.50% 75.31% Y 57.43% 60.50% 75.93% Y 76.69% 78.50% 85.80% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.09%
20.99%
52.47%
23.46%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
3.09%
11.11%
51.85%
33.95%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3320 - NORTH CENTRAL ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
95.17%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3320 - NORTH CENTRAL ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3403 - NEWPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
68.75%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.33%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.74%
44.76%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3403 - NEWPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.68%
LEA
Rate
7.18%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3403 - NEWPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
27.27%
63.64%
9.09%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 72.73% Y 57.43% 60.50% 36.36% N 76.69% 78.50% 72.73% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
63.64%
36.36%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
27.27%
63.64%
9.09%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3403 - NEWPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3403 - NEWPORT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3405 - JACKSON CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.33%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.78% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.03%
75.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3405 - JACKSON CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
63.53%
LEA
Rate
8.24%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.18%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3405 - JACKSON CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3405 - JACKSON CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3405 - JACKSON CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3502 - DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
57.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.48%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.87% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
17.86%
34.07%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3502 - DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
43.56%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
9.20%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3502 - DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3502 - DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
98.11%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3502 - DOLLARWAY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3505 - PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
65.79%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.63%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.18%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.33% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.47%
38.89%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3505 - PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
13.48%
LEA
Rate
25.35%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
5.32%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3505 - PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3505 - PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.31%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
63.16%
— —
63.16%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3505 - PINE BLUFF SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3509 - WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.45%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.42%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.30% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.53%
32.87%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3509 - WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
31.27%
LEA
Rate
10.31%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
7.56%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3509 - WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3509 - WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.90%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3509 - WATSON CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3510 - WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
61.11%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.61%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.03%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.68% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.88%
56.03%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3510 - WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
47.39%
LEA
Rate
16.42%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.61%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3510 - WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3510 - WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.02%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
98.15%
— —
98.15%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3510 - WHITE HALL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3520 - ARKANSAS RIVER EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3520 - ARKANSAS RIVER EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3520 - ARKANSAS RIVER EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
13.68%
0.94%
18.87%
49.53%
16.98%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 82.39% N 90.31% 90.50% 90.50% Y 90.82% 92.50% 86.33% N
66.58% 69.50% 66.51% N 57.43% 60.50% 31.60% N 76.69% 78.50% 76.89% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
8.02%
0.94%
59.43%
25.94%
5.66%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 7.08%
1.89%
14.15%
42.45%
34.43%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3520 - ARKANSAS RIVER EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
83.74%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3520 - ARKANSAS RIVER EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3601 - CLARKSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
95.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.83%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.55%
47.30%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3601 - CLARKSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
45.19%
LEA
Rate
9.63%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.74%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3601 - CLARKSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3601 - CLARKSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.93%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3601 - CLARKSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3604 - LAMAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.33%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.31%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.18% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
34.00%
45.65%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3604 - LAMAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
49.06%
LEA
Rate
13.21%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.94%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3604 - LAMAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3604 - LAMAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3604 - LAMAR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3606 - WESTSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.58%
48.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3606 - WESTSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
47.19%
LEA
Rate
7.87%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.12%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3606 - WESTSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3606 - WESTSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
91.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3606 - WESTSIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3701 - BRADLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
8.33%
17.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3701 - BRADLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
82.86%
LEA
Rate
2.86%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.86%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3701 - BRADLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3701 - BRADLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3701 - BRADLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3704 - LAFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.91%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.69%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.50%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.35% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
13.51%
27.03%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3704 - LAFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
75.00%
LEA
Rate
11.84%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.63%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3704 - LAFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3704 - LAFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3704 - LAFAYETTE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3804 - HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
73.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.88%
49.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3804 - HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
51.20%
LEA
Rate
7.20%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.80%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3804 - HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3804 - HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.80%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3804 - HOXIE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3806 - SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.56%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.44%
34.78%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3806 - SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.24%
LEA
Rate
1.10%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.20%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3806 - SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3806 - SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.52%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3806 - SLOAN-HENDRIX SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3809 - HILLCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.88%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.24%
50.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3809 - HILLCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
51.61%
LEA
Rate
3.23%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.61%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3809 - HILLCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3809 - HILLCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3809 - HILLCREST SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 3810 - LAWRENCE COUNTY
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
86.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.11%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.10%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.51% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.67%
41.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3810 - LAWRENCE COUNTY
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.35%
LEA
Rate
7.36%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3810 - LAWRENCE COUNTY
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3810 - LAWRENCE COUNTY
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.45%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
95.24%
— —
95.24%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3810 - LAWRENCE COUNTY
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3820 - NORTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3820 - NORTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3820 - NORTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
5.69%
6.50%
21.95%
65.85%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 83.33% N 90.31% 90.50% 76.34% N 90.82% 92.50% 91.67% N
66.58% 69.50% 87.80% Y 57.43% 60.50% 66.67% Y 76.69% 78.50% 96.75% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
17.89%
15.45%
42.28%
24.39%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
1.63%
1.63%
16.26%
80.49%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3820 - NORTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3820 - NORTHEAST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3840 - IMBODEN CHARTER SCHOOL DIST
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
30.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3840 - IMBODEN CHARTER SCHOOL DIST
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.94%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3840 - IMBODEN CHARTER SCHOOL DIST
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3840 - IMBODEN CHARTER SCHOOL DIST
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3840 - IMBODEN CHARTER SCHOOL DIST
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 3904 - LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.26%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.06%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.39% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
7.14%
22.22%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 3904 - LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.24%
LEA
Rate
10.08%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.88%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 3904 - LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 3904 - LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
1.64%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 3904 - LEE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
N
N/A
N
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4003 - STAR CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
65.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.97%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.68% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.95%
40.85%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4003 - STAR CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.03%
LEA
Rate
9.49%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.63%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4003 - STAR CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4003 - STAR CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4003 - STAR CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4101 - ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.65%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.63% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.93%
20.78%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4101 - ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.94%
LEA
Rate
7.84%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.31%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4101 - ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4101 - ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.12%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4101 - ASHDOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4102 - FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.52%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
9.68%
42.86%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4102 - FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
63.64%
LEA
Rate
3.03%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.52%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4102 - FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4102 - FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.22%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4102 - FOREMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4201 - BOONEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.57%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.47%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
Y
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.12%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.47%
39.83%
Y
Y
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4201 - BOONEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.57%
LEA
Rate
9.60%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4201 - BOONEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4201 - BOONEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.56%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4201 - BOONEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4202 - MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.25%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.56% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
17.14%
44.44%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4202 - MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.40%
LEA
Rate
5.26%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4202 - MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4202 - MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.31%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4202 - MAGAZINE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4203 - PARIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.76%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.67% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
30.65%
51.47%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4203 - PARIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
77.39%
LEA
Rate
3.48%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.87%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4203 - PARIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4203 - PARIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4203 - PARIS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4204 - SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.05%
36.84%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4204 - SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
75.56%
LEA
Rate
2.22%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4204 - SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4204 - SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.10%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4204 - SCRANTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4301 - LONOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
81.25%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.77%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.85%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.62% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.79%
42.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4301 - LONOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
51.05%
LEA
Rate
11.58%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.11%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4301 - LONOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4301 - LONOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4301 - LONOKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4302 - ENGLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
81.82%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.67%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.75%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.72% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.33%
38.36%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4302 - ENGLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
40.16%
LEA
Rate
17.32%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4302 - ENGLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4302 - ENGLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4302 - ENGLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4303 - CARLISLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.70%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.83%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.50%
47.62%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4303 - CARLISLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
76.74%
LEA
Rate
2.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4303 - CARLISLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4303 - CARLISLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4303 - CARLISLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4304 - CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
74.39%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.52%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.36%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.41% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
41.84%
53.21%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4304 - CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
50.21%
LEA
Rate
21.08%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.68%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4304 - CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4304 - CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4304 - CABOT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4401 - HUNTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
81.82%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.46%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.68%
44.14%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4401 - HUNTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.00%
LEA
Rate
13.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.67%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4401 - HUNTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4401 - HUNTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4401 - HUNTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
41.67%
LEA
Rate
41.67%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4501 - FLIPPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.17%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.08% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.43%
57.14%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4501 - FLIPPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.75%
LEA
Rate
13.21%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.94%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4501 - FLIPPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
40.00%
40.00%
20.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 75.00% N 90.82% 92.50% 75.00% N
66.58% 69.50% 60.00% N 57.43% 60.50% 60.00% N 76.69% 78.50% 60.00% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
20.00%
20.00%
40.00%
20.00%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
20.00%
20.00%
40.00%
20.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4501 - FLIPPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
97.22%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4501 - FLIPPIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4502 - YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.40%
31.51%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4502 - YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
45.45%
LEA
Rate
6.82%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4502 - YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4502 - YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
99.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4502 - YELLVILLE-SUMMIT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4602 - GENOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.23%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.03%
52.94%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4602 - GENOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
68.85%
LEA
Rate
8.20%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4602 - GENOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4602 - GENOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4602 - GENOA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4603 - FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.48% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.19%
40.63%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4603 - FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
69.64%
LEA
Rate
5.36%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4603 - FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4603 - FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4603 - FOUKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4605 - TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.78%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.52%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.09% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.87%
35.68%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4605 - TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.62%
LEA
Rate
15.96%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.06%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4605 - TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4605 - TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
98.21%
— —
98.21%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4605 - TEXARKANA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4701 - ARMOREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
17.86%
29.03%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4701 - ARMOREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.83%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4701 - ARMOREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4701 - ARMOREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4701 - ARMOREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4702 - BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
47.73%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.38%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.88%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.91% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
10.65%
23.56%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4702 - BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
36.59%
LEA
Rate
10.89%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.84%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4702 - BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4702 - BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.04%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4702 - BLYTHEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4706 - SO. MISS. COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.92%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.97%
32.76%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4706 - SO. MISS. COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.63%
LEA
Rate
7.14%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.79%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4706 - SO. MISS. COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4706 - SO. MISS. COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4706 - SO. MISS. COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4708 - GOSNELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.82%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.29%
51.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4708 - GOSNELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
48.98%
LEA
Rate
15.65%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.72%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4708 - GOSNELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4708 - GOSNELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.52%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4708 - GOSNELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4712 - MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.92%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.72%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.82% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
34.72%
39.24%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4712 - MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.87%
LEA
Rate
5.92%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4712 - MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4712 - MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.72%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4712 - MANILA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
40.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4713 - OSCEOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
27.78%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.88%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
93.68%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
98.61% 95.00% 94.78% N
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.14%
23.58%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4713 - OSCEOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.20%
LEA
Rate
22.54%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
2.31%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4713 - OSCEOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4713 - OSCEOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4713 - OSCEOLA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4740 - OSCEOLA COMMUNICATION BUSINESS
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% 66.67% N
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4740 - OSCEOLA COMMUNICATION BUSINESS
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4740 - OSCEOLA COMMUNICATION BUSINESS
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4740 - OSCEOLA COMMUNICATION BUSINESS
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4740 - OSCEOLA COMMUNICATION BUSINESS
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4801 - BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.50%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.91%
28.85%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4801 - BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
36.46%
LEA
Rate
2.08%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
8.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4801 - BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4801 - BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.06%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4801 - BRINKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4802 - CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
44.44%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.71%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.73%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
2.50%
11.90%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4802 - CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
36.84%
LEA
Rate
10.53%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.95%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4802 - CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4802 - CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4802 - CLARENDON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 4901 - CADDO HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.67%
41.18%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4901 - CADDO HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
41.67%
LEA
Rate
5.95%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.19%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4901 - CADDO HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4901 - CADDO HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4901 - CADDO HILLS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 4902 - MOUNT IDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.27%
39.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 4902 - MOUNT IDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
80.95%
LEA
Rate
6.35%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.59%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 4902 - MOUNT IDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 4902 - MOUNT IDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 4902 - MOUNT IDA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5006 - PRESCOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.22%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.24%
28.17%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5006 - PRESCOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.59%
LEA
Rate
2.16%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.44%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5006 - PRESCOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5006 - PRESCOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5006 - PRESCOTT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5008 - NEVADA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
9.52%
36.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5008 - NEVADA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
48.89%
LEA
Rate
6.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.22%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5008 - NEVADA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5008 - NEVADA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.50%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5008 - NEVADA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5102 - JASPER SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.67%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.21%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.25% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
30.77%
42.59%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5102 - JASPER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
75.83%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5102 - JASPER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5102 - JASPER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
87.04%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5102 - JASPER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5106 - DEER/MT. JUDEA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.22%
38.71%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5106 - DEER/MT. JUDEA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
78.57%
LEA
Rate
1.43%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.43%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5106 - DEER/MT. JUDEA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5106 - DEER/MT. JUDEA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5106 - DEER/MT. JUDEA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5201 - BEARDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.67%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
11.54%
25.93%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5201 - BEARDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
70.37%
LEA
Rate
11.11%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5201 - BEARDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5201 - BEARDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.75%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5201 - BEARDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5204 - CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.88%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.50%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.28% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.08%
46.08%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5204 - CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
42.69%
LEA
Rate
16.21%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5204 - CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5204 - CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.06%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5204 - CAMDEN FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5205 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.33%
31.03%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5205 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
93.26%
LEA
Rate
2.25%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5205 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5205 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.81%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5205 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5206 - STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.83% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
4.17%
13.04%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5206 - STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
81.82%
LEA
Rate
3.03%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5206 - STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5206 - STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.22%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5206 - STEPHENS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5220 - SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5220 - SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5220 - SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
2.91%
14.53%
36.63%
45.93%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 94.62% Y 90.31% 90.50% 88.55% N 90.82% 92.50% 90.10% N
66.58% 69.50% 82.56% Y 57.43% 60.50% 55.81% N 76.69% 78.50% 85.47% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
11.05%
33.14%
52.33%
3.49%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
5.81%
8.72%
44.19%
41.28%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5220 - SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
88.51%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5220 - SOUTH CENTRAL SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5301 - EAST END SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
87.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.13%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.33%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.64%
35.71%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5301 - EAST END SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
48.28%
LEA
Rate
6.03%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.86%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5301 - EAST END SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5301 - EAST END SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.77%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5301 - EAST END SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5303 - PERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
81.82%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.28%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.81% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
42.47%
37.50%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5303 - PERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
50.00%
LEA
Rate
10.56%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.82%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5303 - PERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5303 - PERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.79%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5303 - PERRYVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5401 - BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
42.86%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.36%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 94.74% N
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.45%
28.85%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5401 - BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
26.97%
LEA
Rate
3.37%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.12%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5401 - BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5401 - BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5401 - BARTON-LEXA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5403 - HELENA/ W.HELENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.35%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.54%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.83% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
15.32%
23.44%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5403 - HELENA/ W.HELENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
45.70%
LEA
Rate
19.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.45%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5403 - HELENA/ W.HELENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5403 - HELENA/ W.HELENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.90%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5403 - HELENA/ W.HELENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5404 - MARVELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
58.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.76%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.22% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
23.53%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5404 - MARVELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
19.61%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.92%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5404 - MARVELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5404 - MARVELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5404 - MARVELL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5420 - GREAT RIVERS CO-OP
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5420 - GREAT RIVERS CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5420 - GREAT RIVERS CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
1.84%
0.74%
15.07%
50.37%
31.99%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 96.22% Y 90.31% 90.50% 93.04% Y 90.82% 92.50% 96.45% Y
66.58% 69.50% 82.35% Y 57.43% 60.50% 70.22% Y 76.69% 78.50% 92.28% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
4.41%
1.47%
23.90%
54.78%
15.44%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 1.84%
0.37%
5.51%
54.41%
37.87%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5420 - GREAT RIVERS CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
68.42%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
99.84%
99.84%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5420 - GREAT RIVERS CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5440 - KIPP: DELTA COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
11.11%
36.36%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5440 - KIPP: DELTA COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
82.35%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5440 - KIPP: DELTA COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5440 - KIPP: DELTA COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5440 - KIPP: DELTA COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5502 - CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.49%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.48% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.09%
47.62%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5502 - CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.55%
LEA
Rate
4.55%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5502 - CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5502 - CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5502 - CENTERPOINT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5503 - KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.45%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.67%
23.08%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5503 - KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.67%
LEA
Rate
4.44%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5503 - KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5503 - KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5503 - KIRBY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5504 - SOUTH PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
77.78%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.28%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.85%
41.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5504 - SOUTH PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
74.76%
LEA
Rate
4.85%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.97%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5504 - SOUTH PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5504 - SOUTH PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5504 - SOUTH PIKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5602 - HARRISBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
92.31%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
8.70%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.03%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.26%
47.96%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5602 - HARRISBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
41.21%
LEA
Rate
10.91%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.21%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5602 - HARRISBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5602 - HARRISBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.55%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5602 - HARRISBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5604 - MARKED TREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.25% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.41%
35.19%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5604 - MARKED TREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
33.65%
LEA
Rate
24.04%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5604 - MARKED TREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5604 - MARKED TREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.48%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5604 - MARKED TREE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5605 - TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
74.07%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.81%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.32%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.33% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.69%
46.21%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5605 - TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.29%
LEA
Rate
20.97%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5605 - TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5605 - TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
99.34%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5605 - TRUMANN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5608 - EAST POINSETT CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
54.55%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.77%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
16.46%
40.54%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5608 - EAST POINSETT CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.70%
LEA
Rate
11.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5608 - EAST POINSETT CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5608 - EAST POINSETT CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.38%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5608 - EAST POINSETT CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5620 - CROWLEY'S RIDGE EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5620 - CROWLEY'S RIDGE EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5620 - CROWLEY'S RIDGE EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
1.94%
5.81%
43.87%
40.00%
8.39%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 91.55% Y 90.31% 90.50% 96.48% Y 90.82% 92.50% 94.07% Y
66.58% 69.50% 48.39% N 57.43% 60.50% 51.61% N 76.69% 78.50% 58.06% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
1.29%
1.94%
45.16%
43.23%
8.39%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 0.65%
4.52%
36.77%
45.16%
12.90%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5620 - CROWLEY'S RIDGE EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
76.92%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5620 - CROWLEY'S RIDGE EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5703 - MENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.21%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.47%
52.83%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5703 - MENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
79.38%
LEA
Rate
14.43%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5703 - MENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5703 - MENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.25%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5703 - MENA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
N
N/A
N
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5706 - OUACHITA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.78%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.88%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.62% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.33%
47.37%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5706 - OUACHITA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
72.15%
LEA
Rate
2.53%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.27%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5706 - OUACHITA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5706 - OUACHITA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5706 - OUACHITA RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5707 - COSSATOT RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.39%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 94.59% N
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
30.51%
57.35%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5707 - COSSATOT RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.41%
LEA
Rate
6.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5707 - COSSATOT RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5707 - COSSATOT RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5707 - COSSATOT RIVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5801 - ATKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.08%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.97%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.88% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
30.51%
43.86%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5801 - ATKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
41.35%
LEA
Rate
15.79%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5801 - ATKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5801 - ATKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
80.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5801 - ATKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5802 - DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
91.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.28%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.65%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
46.84%
48.89%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5802 - DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
69.82%
LEA
Rate
15.98%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5802 - DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5802 - DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.31%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5802 - DOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5803 - HECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
67.65%
48.78%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5803 - HECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.76%
LEA
Rate
27.85%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5803 - HECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5803 - HECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5803 - HECTOR SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5804 - POTTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.08%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
58.33%
71.88%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5804 - POTTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
68.66%
LEA
Rate
13.43%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5804 - POTTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5804 - POTTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
95.89%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5804 - POTTSVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 5805 - RUSSELLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
91.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.82%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.61%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.36% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
45.90%
64.39%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5805 - RUSSELLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
65.58%
LEA
Rate
19.69%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.51%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5805 - RUSSELLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5805 - RUSSELLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.21%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5805 - RUSSELLVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5901 - DES ARC SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.43%
46.34%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5901 - DES ARC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
49.35%
LEA
Rate
3.90%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
6.49%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5901 - DES ARC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5901 - DES ARC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.44%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5901 - DES ARC SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 5903 - HAZEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.51%
40.91%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 5903 - HAZEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
51.28%
LEA
Rate
5.13%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.28%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 5903 - HAZEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 5903 - HAZEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 5903 - HAZEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 50.00% N
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6001 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.70%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.48%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.07% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.06%
33.65%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6001 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
50.44%
LEA
Rate
15.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
6.35%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6001 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6001 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
91.54%
— —
91.54%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6001 - LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6002 - N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
7.37%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.51%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.27% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.89%
23.78%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6002 - N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.10%
LEA
Rate
16.55%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
5.91%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6002 - N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6002 - N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
86.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6002 - N. LITTLE ROCK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6003 - PULASKI CO. SPEC. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
61.59%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.08%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.48% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.08%
35.10%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6003 - PULASKI CO. SPEC. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
52.84%
LEA
Rate
12.81%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
5.89%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6003 - PULASKI CO. SPEC. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6003 - PULASKI CO. SPEC. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.19%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
97.44%
— —
97.44%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6003 - PULASKI CO. SPEC. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6040 - ACADEMICS PLUS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.00%
21.05%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6040 - ACADEMICS PLUS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6040 - ACADEMICS PLUS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6040 - ACADEMICS PLUS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6040 - ACADEMICS PLUS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6041 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.29%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6041 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
92.31%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6041 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6041 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6041 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6042 - DREAMLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
0.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6042 - DREAMLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
32.00%
LEA
Rate
4.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6042 - DREAMLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6042 - DREAMLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6042 - DREAMLAND ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6043 - ARKANSAS VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
18.92%
24.32%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6043 - ARKANSAS VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6043 - ARKANSAS VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6043 - ARKANSAS VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6043 - ARKANSAS VIRTUAL CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6044 - COVENANT KEEPERS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
0.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6044 - COVENANT KEEPERS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
75.00%
LEA
Rate
8.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6044 - COVENANT KEEPERS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6044 - COVENANT KEEPERS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6044 - COVENANT KEEPERS CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6045 - eSTEM ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
54.55%
63.64%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6045 - eSTEM ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6045 - eSTEM ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6045 - eSTEM ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6045 - eSTEM ELEMENTARY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6046 - eSTEM MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
15.79%
33.33%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6046 - eSTEM MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6046 - eSTEM MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6046 - eSTEM MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6046 - eSTEM MIDDLE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6047 - eSTEM HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6047 - eSTEM HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6047 - eSTEM HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6047 - eSTEM HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
0.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6047 - eSTEM HIGH CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6048 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL - NLR
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
44.44%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6048 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL - NLR
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
77.78%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6048 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL - NLR
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6048 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL - NLR
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6048 - LISA ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL - NLR
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6049 - LITTLE ROCK PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
12.50%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6049 - LITTLE ROCK PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6049 - LITTLE ROCK PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6049 - LITTLE ROCK PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6049 - LITTLE ROCK PREPARATORY ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6050 - JACKSONVILLE LIGHT HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
36.36%
45.45%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6050 - JACKSONVILLE LIGHT HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
44.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6050 - JACKSONVILLE LIGHT HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6050 - JACKSONVILLE LIGHT HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6050 - JACKSONVILLE LIGHT HOUSE CHARTER SCHOOL
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6051 - URBAN COLLEGIATE PUBLIC CHARTER
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6051 - URBAN COLLEGIATE PUBLIC CHARTER
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6051 - URBAN COLLEGIATE PUBLIC CHARTER
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6051 - URBAN COLLEGIATE PUBLIC CHARTER
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6051 - URBAN COLLEGIATE PUBLIC CHARTER
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6091 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
78.26%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
98.61% 95.00% 78.57% N
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
42.42%
46.34%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6091 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6091 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
40.00%
40.00%
20.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 60.00% N 57.43% 60.50% 80.00% Y 76.69% 78.50% 60.00% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
20.00%
60.00%
20.00%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
40.00%
20.00%
40.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6091 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
79.17%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6091 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6092 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.94%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.39%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
13.11%
20.41%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6092 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6092 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
60.00%
40.00%
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 40.00% N 57.43% 60.50% 40.00% N 76.69% 78.50% 40.00% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
60.00%
40.00%
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
60.00%
40.00%
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6092 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
90.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6092 - AR SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6102 - MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
27.27%
36.36%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6102 - MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
47.73%
LEA
Rate
3.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6102 - MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6102 - MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.14%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6102 - MAYNARD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6103 - POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.03%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.11%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.17% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
46.46%
66.36%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6103 - POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.85%
LEA
Rate
12.79%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.94%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6103 - POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
16.00%
84.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 100.00% Y 90.31% 90.50% 95.83% Y 90.82% 92.50% 100.00% Y
66.58% 69.50% 100.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 96.00% Y 76.69% 78.50% 100.00% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
4.00%
— —
92.00%
4.00%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
16.00%
84.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6103 - POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
95.45%
94.12%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6103 - POCAHONTAS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6201 - FORREST CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
73.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.49%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.41%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.54% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
17.21%
28.19%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6201 - FORREST CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.20%
LEA
Rate
10.57%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.93%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6201 - FORREST CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6201 - FORREST CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.98%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
89.66%
— —
89.66%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6201 - FORREST CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6202 - HUGHES SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
10.71%
24.14%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6202 - HUGHES SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
39.29%
LEA
Rate
28.57%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6202 - HUGHES SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6202 - HUGHES SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6202 - HUGHES SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6205 - PALESTINE-WHEATLEY SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
5.00%
32.56%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6205 - PALESTINE-WHEATLEY SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
24.32%
LEA
Rate
5.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.35%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6205 - PALESTINE-WHEATLEY SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6205 - PALESTINE-WHEATLEY SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6205 - PALESTINE-WHEATLEY SCH. DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6301 - BAUXITE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
93.75%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.33%
32.89%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6301 - BAUXITE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.16%
LEA
Rate
8.13%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.81%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6301 - BAUXITE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6301 - BAUXITE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6301 - BAUXITE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6302 - BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
74.47%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.24%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.85%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.63% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.35%
60.64%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6302 - BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.56%
LEA
Rate
13.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.68%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6302 - BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6302 - BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.85%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6302 - BENTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6303 - BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.58%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.44%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.05% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
43.76%
59.91%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6303 - BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
53.35%
LEA
Rate
16.13%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
3.46%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6303 - BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6303 - BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.22%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6303 - BRYANT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6304 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
62.50%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.45%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.57%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.40% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
7.69%
27.54%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6304 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
50.72%
LEA
Rate
3.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
9.42%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6304 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6304 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
78.13%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6304 - HARMONY GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
25.00%
LEA
Rate
25.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6401 - WALDRON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
70.83%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.17%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.24% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
13.08%
23.73%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6401 - WALDRON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.26%
LEA
Rate
1.60%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6401 - WALDRON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6401 - WALDRON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.96%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6401 - WALDRON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6502 - SEARCY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
76.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
28.89%
66.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6502 - SEARCY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
81.48%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.93%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6502 - SEARCY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
12.50%
— —
12.50%
50.00%
25.00%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
12.50%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 83.33% N 90.31% 90.50% 80.00% N 90.82% 92.50% 83.33% N
66.58% 69.50% 75.00% Y 57.43% 60.50% 62.50% Y 76.69% 78.50% 87.50% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
25.00%
25.00%
37.50%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 12.50%
— —
— —
62.50%
25.00%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6502 - SEARCY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
96.46%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6502 - SEARCY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6505 - OZARK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.21%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.47%
35.38%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6505 - OZARK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.37%
LEA
Rate
3.88%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6505 - OZARK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6505 - OZARK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6505 - OZARK MOUNTAIN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
10.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
LEA
Rate
60.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6601 - FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
79.51%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.79%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.61%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.90% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.10%
36.05%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6601 - FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.66%
LEA
Rate
21.28%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.58%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6601 - FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.61%
34.94%
43.37%
18.07%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 95.59% Y 90.31% 90.50% 90.54% Y 90.82% 92.50% 90.48% N
66.58% 69.50% 61.45% N 57.43% 60.50% 49.40% N 76.69% 78.50% 75.90% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
8.43%
42.17%
38.55%
10.84%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
7.23%
16.87%
51.81%
24.10%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6601 - FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
93.75%
92.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
99.70%
99.70%
99.70%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6601 - FORT SMITH SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6602 - GREENWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.82%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.58%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.89%
57.45%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6602 - GREENWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
76.63%
LEA
Rate
6.97%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.22%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6602 - GREENWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6602 - GREENWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
89.47%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
98.48%
— —
98.48%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6602 - GREENWOOD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6603 - HACKETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
10.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.45%
26.92%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6603 - HACKETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.54%
LEA
Rate
3.66%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6603 - HACKETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6603 - HACKETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
91.89%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6603 - HACKETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6604 - HARTFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.97%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.97% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.08%
26.92%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6604 - HARTFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.74%
LEA
Rate
11.48%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.64%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6604 - HARTFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6604 - HARTFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6604 - HARTFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6605 - LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
44.44%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
95.92%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 95.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.58%
41.30%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6605 - LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.56%
LEA
Rate
13.33%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.11%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6605 - LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6605 - LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.21%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6605 - LAVACA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6606 - MANSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
91.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.23%
31.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6606 - MANSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.96%
LEA
Rate
9.82%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6606 - MANSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6606 - MANSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6606 - MANSFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6701 - DEQUEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
78.95%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.96%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.94% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
37.08%
47.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6701 - DEQUEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
43.84%
LEA
Rate
10.84%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.48%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6701 - DEQUEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6701 - DEQUEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
99.15%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6701 - DEQUEEN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6703 - HORATIO SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.51%
39.53%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6703 - HORATIO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.95%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6703 - HORATIO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6703 - HORATIO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6703 - HORATIO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6720 - DEQUEEN/MENA EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6720 - DEQUEEN/MENA EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6720 - DEQUEEN/MENA EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
1.53%
19.08%
52.67%
26.72%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 97.92% Y 90.31% 90.50% 96.72% Y 90.82% 92.50% 97.65% Y
66.58% 69.50% 79.39% Y 57.43% 60.50% 53.44% N 76.69% 78.50% 92.37% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
3.05%
43.51%
46.56%
6.87%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
1.53%
6.11%
57.25%
35.11%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6720 - DEQUEEN/MENA EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
82.65%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6720 - DEQUEEN/MENA EDUCATIONAL CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6802 - CAVE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.72%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.50% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.16%
53.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6802 - CAVE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.55%
LEA
Rate
7.79%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.60%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6802 - CAVE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6802 - CAVE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
98.25%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6802 - CAVE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 6804 - HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.92% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.26%
47.62%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6804 - HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
68.82%
LEA
Rate
9.41%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.18%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6804 - HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6804 - HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.78%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6804 - HIGHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 6901 - MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.00%
42.86%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 6901 - MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.30%
LEA
Rate
20.18%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.35%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 6901 - MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 6901 - MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.47%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 6901 - MOUNTAIN VIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
14.29%
LEA
Rate
28.57%
LEA
Rate
28.57%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7001 - EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
72.22%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.90%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.78%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.82% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
37.74%
45.06%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7001 - EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
74.04%
LEA
Rate
17.70%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7001 - EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7001 - EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7001 - EL DORADO SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7003 - JUNCTION CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.44%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.30% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.44%
45.45%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7003 - JUNCTION CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
72.22%
LEA
Rate
5.56%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7003 - JUNCTION CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7003 - JUNCTION CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7003 - JUNCTION CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7006 - NORPHLET SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.86%
26.47%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7006 - NORPHLET SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
85.19%
LEA
Rate
1.85%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7006 - NORPHLET SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7006 - NORPHLET SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7006 - NORPHLET SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7007 - PARKERS CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
47.73%
53.49%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7007 - PARKERS CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
55.74%
LEA
Rate
1.64%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7007 - PARKERS CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7007 - PARKERS CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7007 - PARKERS CHAPEL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7008 - SMACKOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.44%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 97.22% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
32.43%
27.27%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7008 - SMACKOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
63.01%
LEA
Rate
4.11%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7008 - SMACKOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7008 - SMACKOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7008 - SMACKOVER SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7009 - STRONG-HUTTIG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
20.69%
34.48%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7009 - STRONG-HUTTIG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
73.08%
LEA
Rate
9.62%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7009 - STRONG-HUTTIG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7009 - STRONG-HUTTIG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7009 - STRONG-HUTTIG SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7102 - CLINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
83.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.25%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.96% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.18%
52.22%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7102 - CLINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
71.01%
LEA
Rate
3.86%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.93%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7102 - CLINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7102 - CLINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7102 - CLINTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
14.29%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
LEA
Rate
57.14%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7104 - SHIRLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
80.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
23.81%
31.11%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7104 - SHIRLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
64.84%
LEA
Rate
13.19%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7104 - SHIRLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7104 - SHIRLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7104 - SHIRLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7105 - SOUTH SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
71.43%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
9.68%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
14.71%
37.50%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7105 - SOUTH SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
60.26%
LEA
Rate
3.85%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.28%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7105 - SOUTH SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7105 - SOUTH SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.02%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7105 - SOUTH SIDE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7201 - ELKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
6.06%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.67%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.75% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
21.13%
36.84%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7201 - ELKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.39%
LEA
Rate
11.28%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.50%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7201 - ELKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7201 - ELKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.62%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7201 - ELKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7202 - FARMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
84.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.94%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
26.40%
48.61%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7202 - FARMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
63.14%
LEA
Rate
8.63%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.96%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7202 - FARMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7202 - FARMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7202 - FARMINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7203 - FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
73.33%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.29%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.85%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.17% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
40.77%
52.26%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7203 - FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.63%
LEA
Rate
6.57%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7203 - FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7203 - FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.42%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7203 - FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
36.84%
LEA
Rate
52.63%
LEA
Rate
52.63%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7204 - GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
50.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
11.63%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.55%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 96.15% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
3.85%
13.04%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7204 - GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
47.37%
LEA
Rate
3.16%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
4.21%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7204 - GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7204 - GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
96.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7204 - GREENLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7205 - LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
85.71%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.23%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
17.50%
25.68%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7205 - LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
43.90%
LEA
Rate
7.32%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.83%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7205 - LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7205 - LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.67%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7205 - LINCOLN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7206 - PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
76.92%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.41%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
33.33%
57.26%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7206 - PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.98%
LEA
Rate
2.84%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.32%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7206 - PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7206 - PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7206 - PRAIRIE GROVE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7207 - SPRINGDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
67.62%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.87%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.38%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.21% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
35.64%
50.67%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7207 - SPRINGDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.84%
LEA
Rate
12.25%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
5.31%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7207 - SPRINGDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7207 - SPRINGDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
93.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
99.63%
— —
99.63%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7207 - SPRINGDALE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7208 - WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.85%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.67%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.81% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
25.35%
43.04%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7208 - WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
68.50%
LEA
Rate
7.09%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.36%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7208 - WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7208 - WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7208 - WEST FORK SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7221 - NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7221 - NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7221 - NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
7.73%
25.45%
18.18%
48.64%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 84.96% N 90.31% 90.50% 90.20% N 90.82% 92.50% 88.73% N
66.58% 69.50% 66.82% N 57.43% 60.50% 49.09% N 76.69% 78.50% 84.55% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
9.09%
41.82%
41.82%
7.27%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
3.64%
11.82%
16.82%
67.73%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7221 - NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
82.61%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
100.00%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 100.00% Y
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7221 - NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7301 - BALD KNOB SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
75.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.61%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.62%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.75% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
37.18%
48.68%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7301 - BALD KNOB SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
59.52%
LEA
Rate
17.26%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
1.79%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7301 - BALD KNOB SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7301 - BALD KNOB SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
92.86%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7301 - BALD KNOB SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
0.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7302 - BEEBE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
59.38%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.54%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.87% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.44%
49.79%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7302 - BEEBE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.46%
LEA
Rate
7.95%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.48%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7302 - BEEBE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7302 - BEEBE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7302 - BEEBE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7303 - BRADFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
38.46%
70.37%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7303 - BRADFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
76.67%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
8.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7303 - BRADFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7303 - BRADFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7303 - BRADFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7304 - WHITE CO. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
2.70%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.24%
41.18%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7304 - WHITE CO. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
67.74%
LEA
Rate
11.29%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.61%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7304 - WHITE CO. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7304 - WHITE CO. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7304 - WHITE CO. CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7307 - RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
72.73%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.90% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
29.73%
31.25%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7307 - RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
56.67%
LEA
Rate
8.89%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
2.22%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7307 - RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7307 - RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
94.55%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7307 - RIVERVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7309 - PANGBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.91%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.57%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
44.44%
46.88%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7309 - PANGBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
61.33%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
5.33%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7309 - PANGBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7309 - PANGBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7309 - PANGBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7310 - ROSE BUD SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
4.62%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.21%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.04% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
24.07%
52.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7310 - ROSE BUD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
66.02%
LEA
Rate
0.97%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7310 - ROSE BUD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7310 - ROSE BUD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7310 - ROSE BUD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7311 - SEARCY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
72.41%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.87%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
99.53%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 99.07% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
46.63%
57.44%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7311 - SEARCY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
43.80%
LEA
Rate
9.49%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
5.84%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7311 - SEARCY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7311 - SEARCY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
97.20%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7311 - SEARCY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7320 - WILBUR D. MILLS EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N/A 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7320 - WILBUR D. MILLS EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
N/A
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7320 - WILBUR D. MILLS EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
9.05%
11.56%
45.73%
33.67%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 86.36% N 90.31% 90.50% 89.00% N 90.82% 92.50% 90.43% N
66.58% 69.50% 79.40% Y 57.43% 60.50% 84.42% Y 76.69% 78.50% 89.95% Y
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
5.53%
10.05%
34.67%
49.75%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
4.52%
5.53%
37.19%
52.76%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7320 - WILBUR D. MILLS EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
94.29%
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
99.77%
99.77%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
N/A
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7320 - WILBUR D. MILLS EDUCATION SERVICE CO-OP
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
N/A
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7401 - AUGUSTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
3.51%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
97.87%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
9.30%
45.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7401 - AUGUSTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
62.35%
LEA
Rate
10.59%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.53%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7401 - AUGUSTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7401 - AUGUSTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7401 - AUGUSTA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
Y
Y
25.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7403 - MCCRORY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
77.78%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
5.45%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
19.61%
32.65%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7403 - MCCRORY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.00%
LEA
Rate
11.00%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
1.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7403 - MCCRORY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7403 - MCCRORY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7403 - MCCRORY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

LEA: 7503 - DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
88.89%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.67%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.31%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.39% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
31.58%
51.67%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7503 - DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
57.98%
LEA
Rate
10.92%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
3.36%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7503 - DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7503 - DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
92.31%
— —
92.31%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7503 - DANVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7504 - DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
73.68%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
1.72%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
98.63%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.73% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
57.35%
63.27%
N
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7504 - DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
46.42%
LEA
Rate
22.26%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
LEA
Rate
0.75%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7504 - DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7504 - DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
90.99%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7504 - DARDANELLE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7509 - WESTERN YELL CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
90.00%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Y
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
0.00%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall N 17.15% 6.25%
NA
N
N
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
96.61%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 98.21% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
34.00%
48.00%
NA
NA
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7509 - WESTERN YELL CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
54.32%
LEA
Rate
1.23%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7509 - WESTERN YELL CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7509 - WESTERN YELL CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7509 - WESTERN YELL CO. SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 7510 - TWO RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
66.67%
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
7.59%
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall Y 17.15% 6.25%
N
Y
Y
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
98.61% 95.00% 100.00% Y
Y
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
22.99%
45.78%
Y
N
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 7510 - TWO RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
58.99%
LEA
Rate
10.67%
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
0.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 7510 - TWO RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% — — N/A 90.31% 90.50% — — N/A 90.82% 92.50% — — N/A
66.58% 69.50% — — N/A 57.43% 60.50% — — N/A 76.69% 78.50% — — N/A
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
— —
— —
— —
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% — —
— —
— —
— —
— —
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 7510 - TWO RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
87.50%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
LEA
Rate
100.00%
— —
100.00%
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Y
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% - - N/A
Y
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 7510 - TWO RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 100.00% Y
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
Y
N/A
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5

ARKANSAS SPECIAL EDUCATION
DISTRICT ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT
2010/11 School Year
Publication Date: March 2012
Each State must have in place a State Performance Plan (SPP) to evaluate the State's efforts to meet the requirements and
purposes of the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The SPP is a six-year plan, which
describes Arkansas's performance on 20 indicators. The Office of Special Education Programs in the U. S. Department of
Education requires that States report annually to the public on the performance of each local education agency (LEA) on 14 of
20 indicators as compared with targets established by the State in the SPP. Arkansas will report indicators 1 through 14 and
20 for each LEA serving children with disabilities (CWD). Any LEA not meeting targets on compliance indicators (0% for
Indicators 4B, 09 & 10 and 100% for Indicators 11, 12, 13, and 20) are non-compliant with IDEA.
There are no report changes for the 2010/11 school year profile; However, it is important to recognize that: .
1. Indicator 01 (Graduation) is reported a year in arrear (2009/10 graduates) and is based on a four-year cohort. This
means the rate is a measure of students who entered in ninth grade and graduate in four years. The calculation is a
requirement under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA).
2. Indicator 02 (Drop out) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of students who dropped out in
the 2009/10 school year. The Indicator 02 data are aligned with the Common Core of Data (CCD) requirements for
grades 7-12.
3. Indicator 04A and 4B (Suspension/Expulsion) is reported a year in arrear. This means the rate is a measure of
students who had out-of-school suspensions and/or expulsions totaling more than 10 days.
For a complete description of all the Indicators, please visit the special education website at
http://arksped.k12.ar.us/sections/policy.html
LEA: 9150 - DHS: DIVISION of DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES
Indicator 01: Graduation Rates (2009/10 school year) Indicator 02: Dropout Rates (2009/10 school year)
Percent of youth
with IEPs
graduating from
high school with a
regular diploma
State
Rate
State
Target
75.76% 85.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
NA
Percent of
youth with
IEPs dropping
out of high
school
State
Rate
Indicator 03: Assessment on Statewide Benchmark Exam (grades 3-8, 11)
A) Adequate Yearly Progress
n=40
Literacy
Mathematics
Met Disability Subgroup "n"
for Reporting Purposes (Y/N)
State Target for % of Districts Meeting
AYP for Disability Subgroup
State
Target
3.06% 4.20%
LEA
Rate
— —
% of Districts Meeting AYP
for Disability Subgroup
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA(Y/N)
Overall 17.15% 6.25%
N/A
Note: For a district to qualify as having a disability subgroup it must have a minimum of 40 (n=40) students with disabilities in a school building.
B) Participation
Participation Rate: # of
CWD Tested ÷ # of CWD
Enrolled in grades tested.
Participation Rate: Literacy
Participation Rate: Math
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
98.78%
State
Target
95.00%
LEA
Rate
— —
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
98.61% 95.00% — — N/A
C) Performance Proficiency
Percent of CWD Scoring
Proficient or Above
Proficiency Rate: Literacy
Proficiency Rate:
Mathematics
16.00%
16.00%
State
Rate
31.49%
44.86%
State
Target
45.22%
51.14%
LEA
Rate
— —
— —
N/A
N/A
Target
Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
N/A
Page 1 of 5

LEA: 9150 - DHS: DIVISION of DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES
Indicator 04: Out-of-School Suspensions and Expulsions (2009/10 school year)
A) Suspension/Expulsion
Percent difference of CWD with out-of- school suspensions and
expulsions totaling greater than 10 days in a school year as
compared to the same data for general education students in
the district.
B) Suspension/Expulsion by Race and Ethnicity
Percent of districts that have: (a) a significant discrepancy, by race or
ethnicity, in the rate of suspensions and expulsions of greater than 10
days in a school year for children with IEPs; and (b) policies,
procedures or practices that contribute to the significant discrepancy
and do not comply with requirements relating to the development
and implementation of IEPs, the use of positive behavioral
interventions and supports, and procedural safeguards.
Indicator 05: School Age (5-21) Least Restrictive Environment
A) In the Regular Class 80% or more of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class 80%
or more of the day.
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
B) In the Regular Class less than 40% of the day
Percent of CWD with
IEPs receiving instruction
in the regular class less
than 60% of the day.
53.87% 59.77%
State
Rate
State
Target
12.42% 12.51%
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
C) Other Settings outside the regular class
Percent of CWD with IEPs served in
public or private separate schools,
residential placements, or
homebound/hospital placements.
State
Rate
State
Target
2.80% 2.56%
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
100.00%
Target Met
by LEA(Y/N)
Indicator 06: Early Childhood (3-5) Least Restrictive Environment
A) Regular Early Childhood Program
Percent of children (aged 3 through 5) with IEPs attending a regular
early childhood program and receiving the majority of special
education and related services in the regular early childhood program
Allowable
Difference

LEA: 9150 - DHS: DIVISION of DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES
Indicator 07: Preschool (3-5) Outcomes
a) Percent of preschool CWD
children who did not
improve functioning.
b) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved but whose
functioning remained below
same age peers.
c) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved at a level
nearer to same aged peers.
d) Percent of preschool CWD
who improved functioning to
reach a level comparable to
same age peers.
e) Percent of preschool CWD
children who maintain
functioning at a level
comparable to same aged
peers.
Summary
Statements
1) Of those preschool
children who entered
the preschool program
below age expectations
in each Outcome, the
percent who
substantially increased
their rate of growth by
the time they turned 6
years of age or exited
the program.
2) The percent of
preschool children who
were functioning
within age expectations
in each Outcome by the
time they turned 6
years of age or exited
A) Positive Social -Emotional
Skills*
State
Rate
A) Positive Social -
Emotional Skills
(Including social
relationships)
State
Rate
2.14%
5.31%
25.97%
38.22%
28.36%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
3.54%
7.30%
51.07%
34.12%
3.86%
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills
(Including early language/
communication and early literacy)
B) Acquisition and Use of
Knowledge and Skills **
State
Rate
1.75%
6.59%
34.23%
43.51%
13.92%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
C) Use of Appropriate Behaviors
to Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
State
Target
LEA
Rate
Target
Met by
LEA(Y/N)
89.61% 90.50% 88.72% N 90.31% 90.50% 88.52% N 90.82% 92.50% 90.48% N
66.58% 69.50% 38.02% N 57.43% 60.50% 34.37% N 76.69% 78.50% 50.59% N
NOTE: * Including social relationships ** Including early language/ communication and early literacy
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
LEA
Rate
3.65%
7.40%
54.51%
30.69%
3.65%
C) Use of
Appropriate
Behaviors to
Meet Their Needs
State
Rate
4.51%
17.34%
41.72%
34.97%
LEA
Rate
1.46% 2.47%
6.33%
40.56%
43.03%
7.51%
Page 3 of 5

LEA: 9150 - DHS: DIVISION of DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES
Indicator 08: Parent Involvement
Percent of surveyed
parents who reported
school facilitated parent
involvement as a means
of improving services
and results for children
with disabilities.
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
90.47%
95.05%
Indicator 09: Disproportionality - Eligibility
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in special education and
related services that is a result of
inappropriate identification (e.g.
monitoring data, review of policies,
practices, and procedures under 618(d),
etc.).
State
Rate
State
Target
88.00%
96.00%
State
Target
0.00% 0.00%
LEA
Rate
88.64%
100.00%
Indicator 10: Disproportionality-Child with a Disability
Disproportionate representation of racial
and ethnic groups in specific disability
categories that is a result of inappropriate
identification (e.g. monitoring data, review
of policies, practices, and procedures under
618(d), etc.).
Indicator 11: Child Find
Percent of children with
parental consent to evaluate
who are evaluated within
the State established timeline
of 60 days.
Overall
(3-21)
Early Childhood
(3-5)
School Age
(5-21)
State
Rate
0.00%
Indicator 12: Early Childhood Transition
Percent of children referred by Part C prior to
age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and
who have an IEP developed and implemented
by their third birthday.
Note: - - denotes not applicable
State
Rate
99.41%
99.70%
98.97%
State
Rate
State
Target
0.00%
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N/A
LEA
Rate
99.10%
99.10%
— —
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Y
Y
Note: The target for Indicator 09 is to have zero percent
(0%) of districts identified as having disproportionate
representation as a result of inappropriate
identification in eligibility.
Note: The target for Indicator 10 is to have zero
percent (0%) of districts identified as having
disproportionate representation as a result of
inappropriate identification in a disability
category.
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
N
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
99.21% 100.00% 99.01% N
N
Note: * Indicates a zero reponse rate for the
district.
Page 4 of 5

LEA: 9150 - DHS: DIVISION of DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES SERVICES
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
Percent of youth with disabilities aged 16 and
up with an IEP that includes coordinated,
measurable, annual IEP goals and transition
services that will reasonably enable the student
to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 14: Post-School Outcomes
A. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education within one year of leaving high
school.
State
Rate
State
Target
Note: Data for this Indicator is from the on-site monitoring of LEAs for the given year.
B. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or competitively employed
within one year of leaving high school.
C. Percent of youth enrolled in higher
education or in some other postsecondary
education or training program; or
competitively employed or in some other
employment within one year of leaving
high school.
State
Rate
Indicator 20: Reported Data-Timely and Accurate*
District submitted
required data elements
on or before due dates;
made revisions within
the alloted reveiw
periods.
Accurate and Timely
Data Submission
Overall (3-21)
Early Childhood (3-5)
School Age (5-21)
State
Target
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
State
Target
LEA
Rate
LEA
Rate
Target Met by
LEA (Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
*Data reviewed for timely and accurate submissions included all APSCN cycle data except for personnel
Note: - - denotes not applicable
96.19 100.00 — — N/A
14.53
State
Rate
49.42
State
Rate
54.07
13.00
State
Target
49.00
State
Target
60.00
N
N
Y
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
LEA
Rate
— —
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Target Met
by LEA
(Y/N)
N/A
Page 5 of 5