Brugen af sagkyndige i straffeprocessen The Use of ... - Juridisk Institut

Indholdsfortegnelse
1.Indledning ........................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.Kontakten til sagkyndige i straffesager ........................................................................................................... 5
2.1 Politiet/anklagemyndighedens kontakt til sagkyndige ............................................................................ 5
2.1.1 SKAT og revisorer .................................................................................................................................. 7
2.1.2 Bilsagkyndige ......................................................................................................................................... 9
2.1.3 Det Veterinære Sundhedsråd ................................................................................................................ 11
2.1.4 Lægefagligt personale og Retslægerådet .............................................................................................. 12
2.1.5 Retningsliner for politiets/anklagemyndighedens kontakt til sagkyndige ............................................ 13
2.2 Forsvarerens kontakt til sagkyndige ...................................................................................................... 14
2.2.1 Sagkyndig bistand ................................................................................................................................. 19
2.2.1.1 Revisionsbistand ........................................................................................................................... 21
2.2.1.2 Bistand fra bilsagkyndige ............................................................................................................. 21
2.2.1.3 Lægefaglig bistand ....................................................................................................................... 22
2.2.1.4 Generelle retningslinier for hvornår der ydes sagkyndig bistand ................................................. 23
2.2.2 Syn og Skøn .......................................................................................................................................... 24
2.2.3 Second opinion ..................................................................................................................................... 25
2.2.3.1 Bevisvurderingen af forsvarerens sagkyndige .............................................................................. 27
2.2.3.2 Delkonklusion vedrørende second opinion ................................................................................... 29
3. Omkostningerne ved brug af sagkyndige ..................................................................................................... 30
3.1 Politiets og anklagemyndighedens sagkyndige ..................................................................................... 30
3.2 Forsvarerens sagkyndige ....................................................................................................................... 30
4. Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention......................................................................................... 31
5. Praksis fra den Europæiske Menneskerettigheds Domstol ........................................................................... 33
5.1 Bönisch mod Østrig ............................................................................................................................... 33
5.2 Brandstetter mod Østrig ........................................................................................................................ 35
5.3 G.B. mod Frankrig ................................................................................................................................. 37
5.4 Dansk praksis sammenholdt med EMRK art. 6 .................................................................................... 39
5.4.1 Omkostninger ved brug af sagkyndige i forhold til EMRK .................................................................. 40
6. Konklusion ................................................................................................................................................... 40
6.1 Forsvarerens brug af sagkyndige ........................................................................................................... 41
6.2 Anklagemyndighedens brug af sagkyndige ........................................................................................... 43
6.3 Ligestilling set i forhold til EMRK art. 6? ............................................................................................ 44
Bilag A - Litteraturfortegnelse ......................................................................................................................... 45
Bilag B - Bøger ................................................................................................................................................. 45
Bilag C - Artikler .............................................................................................................................................. 46
Bilag D - Praksis oversigt ................................................................................................................................. 47
Bilag E - Praksis fra UfR .................................................................................................................................. 47
Bilag F - Praksis fra TfK .................................................................................................................................. 47
Bilag G - Praksis fra Fuldmægtigen ................................................................................................................. 47
Bilag H - Praksis fra TfS .................................................................................................................................. 47
Bilag I - Utrykte afgørelser ............................................................................................................................... 48
Bilag J - Domme fra EMD ............................................................................................................................... 48
RETTID 2011/Specialeafhandling 11 2