28.10.2013 Aufrufe

Cologne Economic History Paper 01-2007 - Universität zu Köln

Cologne Economic History Paper 01-2007 - Universität zu Köln

Cologne Economic History Paper 01-2007 - Universität zu Köln

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Sie wollen auch ein ePaper? Erhöhen Sie die Reichweite Ihrer Titel.

YUMPU macht aus Druck-PDFs automatisch weboptimierte ePaper, die Google liebt.

Toni Pierenkemper<br />

Friderizianischer Merkantilismus und preußische Industriepolitik in Oberschlesien 1740-1786<br />

Inhalt<br />

1. Ideen und Erfolge staatlicher Merkantilpolitik im Deutschland des 17. und 18. Jahrhunderts 3<br />

2. Wirtschaft und Wirtschaftspolitik in Schlesien 1740-1786 11<br />

3. Preußische Industriepolitik in Oberschlesien 1740-1786 20<br />

Zitierte Literatur 29<br />

Mercantilism in the Reign of Frederick II and Prussian Industrial Politics in Upper Silesia 1740-1786<br />

In late 18 th century Prussia, the conditions were laied down that were to form the basis of the economic upturn<br />

of the 19 th century. This period of transition was marked by a break with the former “mercantilist” or<br />

“camerialist” system as it is termed in its specific German form of promotion of trade and industry by the state<br />

in the 18 th century. It was not mercantilist policy but its avoidance that contributed considerably to the success<br />

of industrialisation beginning the late 18 th century.<br />

The Prussian political economy in the middle of the 18 th century, labelled ‘Friederician Mercantilism’ according<br />

to Frederick II (1740-1786), is addressed in the context of the international mercantilist system (France<br />

and England). The traditional view of German economic history is that “Friederician Mercantilism” laied down<br />

the conditions for industrial development in the 19 th century. The results of this paper are different: The mercantilist<br />

sytem impeded development and, combined with the King’s obstinacy in adhering to the system, did<br />

nothing to help pave the way for development into a modern industrial nation.<br />

This is demonstrated using the example of the newly acquired Silesian province (1740), which was in no<br />

good economic state in the mid-18 th century; and the first decades subsequent to Prussia’s acquisition were<br />

marked by the belligerent circumstances associated with its takeover. Later, “Friederician Mercantilism” only<br />

made a limited contribution to the transformation of Silesia into a modern industrial region. In spite of an active<br />

trade policy, the measures implemented by the Prussians in order to boost industry proved to be misdirected:<br />

financial, trade, and industrial policies emerged as irrelevant or even disadavantageous to the Silesian<br />

province. This was even more so the case for the Upper Silesian coal mining district, which was, over<br />

the course of the 19 th century, to grow into a powerful industrial centre. The new Prussian administration<br />

completely underestimated this area’s potential for development. In the 1770s there was a broad discussion<br />

of the economic situation in Upper Silesia that resulted in state activity in the domain of the Upper Silesian<br />

iron industry. However, it was shaped by the state’s military and fiscal interests. “Friederician Mercantilism”<br />

had no perspective for economic development and it was only with the death of Frederick II in 1786 that the<br />

potentiality of Prussia’s and Upper Silesia’s development into a modern economiy characacterised by free<br />

enterprise emerged.

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!