19.02.2013 Views

October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte

October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte

October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 Greater <strong>Charlotte</strong> Awakening<strong>Charlotte</strong>.com<br />

globalbriefs<br />

Food Fight<br />

No More Hidden GMOs<br />

California voters face a<br />

food-protection milestone<br />

this November when<br />

Proposition 37, a citizens’<br />

initiative, appears on their<br />

ballots. If it passes, California<br />

will be the first state to<br />

require labeling of a wide<br />

range of foods containing<br />

genetically engineered (GE)<br />

ingredients.<br />

Determined to defeat<br />

this first-ever initiative,<br />

some of the nation’s largest<br />

biotech and agribusiness<br />

companies have<br />

poured millions of dollars<br />

into negative advertising.<br />

Even more alarming is that<br />

much of the money comes<br />

from sources most shoppers would not suspect. “Consumers<br />

might be surprised to find out that brands hiding under<br />

‘natural’ façades are in fact owned by multi-billion-dollar<br />

corporations that are contributing bushel baskets of cash<br />

to defeating Proposition 37,” says <strong>Charlotte</strong> Vallaeys, director<br />

of Farm and Food Policy at The Cornucopia Institute,<br />

a nonprofit dedicated to supporting sustainable, organic<br />

agriculture via research, investigation and education.<br />

According to Cornucopia, recent polls indicate that<br />

nearly 70 percent of California citizens support informational<br />

labeling. Proponents of Proposition 37 have contributed<br />

$3 million—a number dwarfed by the $23 million<br />

bursting from biotech and food manufacturer coffers to<br />

fight the measure.<br />

The California vote is crucial because many companies<br />

will find it more expensive to produce foods with<br />

GE labels for California while creating a different product<br />

line of foods for the rest of the nation. “Just as we’ve<br />

observed in Europe, where labeling of food containing<br />

genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is mandatory, we<br />

fully expect that when given a choice, consumers will<br />

choose organic or non-GMO products,” said Cornucopia<br />

Co-Director Mark A. Kastel.<br />

To help consumers identify and support organic<br />

brands whose corporate owners have contributed to<br />

Proposition 37 and avoid product lines committed to its<br />

defeat, Cornucopia has compiled an online guide and is<br />

sponsoring a petition.<br />

Learn more and take action at Cornucopia.org/<strong>2012</strong>/08/<br />

prop37.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!