October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte
October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte
October 2012 Issue - Natural Awakenings Magazine Charlotte
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
14 Greater <strong>Charlotte</strong> Awakening<strong>Charlotte</strong>.com<br />
globalbriefs<br />
Food Fight<br />
No More Hidden GMOs<br />
California voters face a<br />
food-protection milestone<br />
this November when<br />
Proposition 37, a citizens’<br />
initiative, appears on their<br />
ballots. If it passes, California<br />
will be the first state to<br />
require labeling of a wide<br />
range of foods containing<br />
genetically engineered (GE)<br />
ingredients.<br />
Determined to defeat<br />
this first-ever initiative,<br />
some of the nation’s largest<br />
biotech and agribusiness<br />
companies have<br />
poured millions of dollars<br />
into negative advertising.<br />
Even more alarming is that<br />
much of the money comes<br />
from sources most shoppers would not suspect. “Consumers<br />
might be surprised to find out that brands hiding under<br />
‘natural’ façades are in fact owned by multi-billion-dollar<br />
corporations that are contributing bushel baskets of cash<br />
to defeating Proposition 37,” says <strong>Charlotte</strong> Vallaeys, director<br />
of Farm and Food Policy at The Cornucopia Institute,<br />
a nonprofit dedicated to supporting sustainable, organic<br />
agriculture via research, investigation and education.<br />
According to Cornucopia, recent polls indicate that<br />
nearly 70 percent of California citizens support informational<br />
labeling. Proponents of Proposition 37 have contributed<br />
$3 million—a number dwarfed by the $23 million<br />
bursting from biotech and food manufacturer coffers to<br />
fight the measure.<br />
The California vote is crucial because many companies<br />
will find it more expensive to produce foods with<br />
GE labels for California while creating a different product<br />
line of foods for the rest of the nation. “Just as we’ve<br />
observed in Europe, where labeling of food containing<br />
genetically modified organisms (GMOs) is mandatory, we<br />
fully expect that when given a choice, consumers will<br />
choose organic or non-GMO products,” said Cornucopia<br />
Co-Director Mark A. Kastel.<br />
To help consumers identify and support organic<br />
brands whose corporate owners have contributed to<br />
Proposition 37 and avoid product lines committed to its<br />
defeat, Cornucopia has compiled an online guide and is<br />
sponsoring a petition.<br />
Learn more and take action at Cornucopia.org/<strong>2012</strong>/08/<br />
prop37.