20.02.2013 Views

Modelling of speleothems failure in the Hotton cave - Netherlands ...

Modelling of speleothems failure in the Hotton cave - Netherlands ...

Modelling of speleothems failure in the Hotton cave - Netherlands ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

While <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous case <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> gravity <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> broken part from <strong>the</strong> speleo<strong>the</strong>m was considered<br />

at mid-height, ano<strong>the</strong>r case was envisaged with <strong>the</strong><br />

centre <strong>of</strong> gravity at αH from bottom. α is a non-dimensional<br />

parameter, rang<strong>in</strong>g from zero (<strong>failure</strong> section<br />

level) to one (top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> speleo<strong>the</strong>m). This position<br />

affects <strong>the</strong> value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bend<strong>in</strong>g moment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>failure</strong> section when <strong>the</strong> speleo<strong>the</strong>m is submitted to a<br />

ground movement.<br />

Failure<br />

section<br />

Ground<br />

motion<br />

H<br />

F = ma<br />

Fig. 6. Elevation view <strong>of</strong> a speleo<strong>the</strong>m and model.<br />

D<br />

Du<br />

Measured diameter Resistance + geometry<br />

Fig. 7. Failure section and cross section models.<br />

αH<br />

Dmean<br />

Local geometrical imperfections can lead to some<br />

stress concentrations. The value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stress concentration<br />

factor ψ, ratio between <strong>the</strong> maximum stress<br />

σ max and <strong>the</strong> mean stress σ m, depends on <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong><br />

notch. We will not consider <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> an already <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

crack, for which ψ can be as high as 10 or 20,<br />

but simply <strong>the</strong> notch effect correspond<strong>in</strong>g to an irregular<br />

surface aspect which is commonly observed. It is<br />

similar to a semicircular notch (<strong>of</strong> radius ρ) hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> shape shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 8, for which tension tests<br />

on mortar specimens have <strong>in</strong>dicated a value around 2<br />

[Massonnet 1962].<br />

Consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> stress concentration factor, <strong>the</strong><br />

new position <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>ertia forces and <strong>the</strong> two different<br />

diameters D u and D mean <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cross section, it is<br />

possible to rewrite <strong>the</strong> formulas (2) and (3):<br />

Mru<br />

σ u = ψ<br />

I<br />

4<br />

= ψFαH<br />

3<br />

πru<br />

= ψma<br />

2 2<br />

H rmean<br />

*<br />

= 4αρ ψa<br />

3 g<br />

r<br />

u<br />

+<br />

*<br />

g<br />

4αH<br />

πr<br />

3<br />

u<br />

(4)<br />

(5)<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ground accelerations that leads to<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>failure</strong> <strong>of</strong> a speleo<strong>the</strong>m obta<strong>in</strong>ed with <strong>the</strong> two different<br />

models is :<br />

(6)<br />

The diameter variation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sections along <strong>the</strong><br />

speleo<strong>the</strong>m can reasonably be estimated from 20% to<br />

30%. The diameter which is taken <strong>in</strong>to account to<br />

evaluate <strong>the</strong> resistance can vary about 10% around<br />

<strong>the</strong> measured value. And <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resultant <strong>in</strong>ertia<br />

force can be estimated to be between 0.3H and<br />

0.7H.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> formula (6), we obta<strong>in</strong> a ratio<br />

Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account <strong>the</strong> geometry uncerta<strong>in</strong>ties<br />

and a possible stress concentration, <strong>the</strong> accelerations<br />

needed to break <strong>the</strong> <strong>speleo<strong>the</strong>ms</strong> by flexion can thus<br />

decrease to values between 0.3 m/s 2 and 100 m/s 2 .<br />

Conclusions<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> conclusion <strong>of</strong> our mechanical tests and<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g results is that horizontal acceleration values<br />

needed to break <strong>the</strong> <strong>speleo<strong>the</strong>ms</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hotton</strong> <strong>cave</strong><br />

are very scattered from 0.03 g to 10 g. Even if low accelerations<br />

were detected, globally <strong>the</strong> values are<br />

much higher than <strong>the</strong> peak ground acceleration expected<br />

from earthquakes. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>failure</strong> happens due<br />

320 Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands Journal <strong>of</strong> Geosciences / Geologie en Mijnbouw / 80(3-4) 2001<br />

ρ<br />

P<br />

σmax<br />

n<br />

P<br />

ρ<br />

σm<br />

3<br />

Du<br />

2<br />

mean<br />

* 1<br />

1<br />

ag =<br />

σ<br />

8<br />

2<br />

αρD<br />

H ψ<br />

a<br />

*<br />

g<br />

a<br />

a<br />

g<br />

*<br />

g<br />

a<br />

g<br />

⎛ Du<br />

⎞<br />

⎜ ⎟<br />

0.<br />

5 ⎝ D 1<br />

=<br />

⎠<br />

α<br />

2<br />

⎛ D ⎞ ψ<br />

mean<br />

⎜ ⎟<br />

⎝ D ⎠<br />

0.<br />

5<br />

=<br />

0.<br />

7<br />

Fig. 8. Shape <strong>of</strong> notch considered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> fatigue<br />

model<br />

3<br />

3 ( 0.<br />

9)<br />

1 1<br />

= .<br />

2 ( 1.<br />

3)<br />

2 6.<br />

5<br />

u

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!