Cetaceans in Greece: Present status of knowledge
Cetaceans in Greece: Present status of knowledge
Cetaceans in Greece: Present status of knowledge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>:<br />
<strong>Present</strong> <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong><br />
Technical Report<br />
Initiative for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong><br />
Prepared by Dr. Alexandros Frantzis<br />
July 2009<br />
1
Suggested citation for this technical report<br />
Frantzis A. 2009. <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>: <strong>Present</strong> <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong>. Initiative for the Conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, Athens, <strong>Greece</strong>, 94 pp.<br />
Note regard<strong>in</strong>g this document<br />
This document, together with the ‘National Conservation Strategy and Action Plan for the<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>’ is the result <strong>of</strong> a collaboration between four non-governmental<br />
organisations – MOm, Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, Tethys Research Institute and WWF<br />
<strong>Greece</strong> – <strong>in</strong>tended to advance the conservation <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> through jo<strong>in</strong>t, coord<strong>in</strong>ated<br />
actions <strong>of</strong> its members. These organisations agreed that the goal <strong>of</strong> conserv<strong>in</strong>g cetaceans can be<br />
achieved more effectively through cooperative work than through isolated efforts.<br />
Note regard<strong>in</strong>g the draw<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> this document<br />
All cetacean draw<strong>in</strong>gs were made by Massimo Demma/ICRAM and k<strong>in</strong>dly <strong>of</strong>fered for the needs <strong>of</strong><br />
this report. No reproduction is allowed without prior written permission.<br />
Note on the property <strong>of</strong> data <strong>of</strong> this document<br />
This report conta<strong>in</strong>s unpublished data. Although proper citation <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the<br />
document is allowed, no reproduction, use or re-analysis <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al data are allowed without prior<br />
written authorization by the author.<br />
Cover photo<br />
Striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th.<br />
© A. Frantzis / Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute
Organisations support<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Initiative for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong><br />
MOm, The Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection <strong>of</strong> the Monk Seal<br />
Solomou 18<br />
10682 Athens<br />
<strong>Greece</strong><br />
Tel.: +30-210-5222888<br />
Website: http://www.mom.gr<br />
Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute<br />
Terpsichoris 21<br />
16671 Vouliagmeni<br />
<strong>Greece</strong><br />
Tel.: +30-210-8960108<br />
Website: http://www.pelagos<strong>in</strong>stitute.gr<br />
Tethys Research Institute<br />
c/o Acquario Civico<br />
Viale G.B. Gadio 2<br />
20121 Milano<br />
Italy<br />
Tel.: +39-0272001947<br />
Website: http://www.tethys.org<br />
WWF <strong>Greece</strong><br />
Filell<strong>in</strong>on 26<br />
10558 Athens<br />
<strong>Greece</strong><br />
Tel.: +30-210-3314893<br />
Website: http://www.wwf.gr<br />
1
CONTENTS<br />
ORIGIN AND SCOPE OF THIS REPORT 5<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7<br />
CETACEAN TERMINOLOGY AND COMMON NAMES IN GREEK 9<br />
METHODS AND DATASET 11<br />
INFORMATION FROM CETACEAN RECORDS 15<br />
SUMMARISED INFORMATION ON COMMONLY OCCURRING SPECIES 19<br />
CETACEAN SPECIES COMMONLY OCCURRING IN THE GREEK SEAS 21<br />
F<strong>in</strong> whale, Balaenoptera physalus (������������) 23<br />
Sperm whale, Physeter macrocephalus (���������) 27<br />
Cuvier’s beaked whale, Ziphius cavirostris (������) 31<br />
Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>, Grampus griseus (�������������) 35<br />
Common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, Tursiops truncatus (�����������) 39<br />
Striped dolph<strong>in</strong>, Stenella coeruleoalba (�����������) 43<br />
Short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>, Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis (����� �������) 47<br />
Harbour porpoise, Phocoena phocoena (�������) 53<br />
RARE CETACEAN SPECIES IN THE GREEK SEAS AND AROUND THEM 57<br />
Humpback whale, Megaptera novaeangliae (��������� �������) 59<br />
M<strong>in</strong>ke whale, Balaenoptera acutorostrata (������������) 61<br />
False killer whale, Pseudorca crassidens (��������) 63<br />
Beaked whales, Mesoplodon sp. (�������������) 65<br />
Rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong>, Steno bredanensis (���������� �������) 67<br />
FALSE REPORTS OF CETACEAN SPECIES IN THE GREEK SEAS 69<br />
WHAT IS KNOWN, WHAT REMAINS UNKNOWN 71<br />
ARE THE GREEK CETACEAN POPULATIONS DECLINING? 73<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 75<br />
LITERATURE CITED 76<br />
ANNEX I Distribution <strong>of</strong> search<strong>in</strong>g effort <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas 83<br />
ANNEX II Distribution maps <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs 84<br />
ANNEX III Additional references on the cetaceans <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas 93<br />
3
ORIGIN AND SCOPE OF THIS REPORT<br />
The Greek Seas host a large number <strong>of</strong> different cetacean species and constitute an<br />
important mar<strong>in</strong>e area with<strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Over the last decades there has been<br />
limited effort <strong>in</strong>vested <strong>in</strong> the study <strong>of</strong> cetacean species by various national and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
research and conservation groups. Current and past research activities have been focused<br />
<strong>in</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ct areas result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a patchy mosaic <strong>of</strong> our <strong>knowledge</strong> on cetaceans across <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
These studies provide strong evidence for the cont<strong>in</strong>uous decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the abundance <strong>of</strong><br />
cetacean species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g anthropogenic mortality, suggest<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
urgent need for conservation actions. The lack <strong>of</strong> substantial fund<strong>in</strong>g on a national scale<br />
basis, the failure <strong>of</strong> national and <strong>in</strong>ternational authorities to secure protection for cetaceans<br />
and the absence <strong>of</strong> jo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>itiatives among the various research and conservation cetacean<br />
expert groups has become a major obstacle <strong>in</strong> effectively address<strong>in</strong>g the cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
degradation <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystems and <strong>of</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> cetacean species <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
The present document represents the first and an important step towards a new jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
<strong>in</strong>itiative for the conservation <strong>of</strong> cetacean species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The new <strong>in</strong>itiative is a<br />
common effort between research groups, <strong>in</strong>stitutes, environmental NGOs and <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
experts dedicated for decades to the research and active conservation <strong>of</strong> the mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
environment and mar<strong>in</strong>e mammals. MOm/Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection <strong>of</strong><br />
the Monk Seal, Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, WWF-<strong>Greece</strong>, Tethys Research<br />
Institute and Dr. Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara comprise the core <strong>of</strong> the new <strong>in</strong>itiative,<br />
which was established to tackle the cetaceans issue. The participants <strong>of</strong> the new <strong>in</strong>itiative<br />
have planed a number <strong>of</strong> tasks for the forthcom<strong>in</strong>g future, first <strong>of</strong> which is the "Technical<br />
Report on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>: <strong>Present</strong> <strong>status</strong> and distribution”.<br />
This document, present<strong>in</strong>g the current <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> the cetaceans <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, will<br />
serve as the scientific basis upon which we will built the appropriate strategy for the<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> cetaceans throughout the country and will guide our common efforts to<br />
advance and ultimately achieve the common goal <strong>of</strong> ensur<strong>in</strong>g the recovery and long-term<br />
viability <strong>of</strong> whales, dolph<strong>in</strong>s and porpoises <strong>in</strong> Greek waters.<br />
On behalf <strong>of</strong> the participants <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>itiative,<br />
Dr. Spyros Kotomatas<br />
Director <strong>of</strong> MOm<br />
5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
From 1991 to 2008 data on the presence and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas<br />
have been systematically gathered <strong>in</strong> a database that - together with some older historical<br />
records - accounted for 1416 sight<strong>in</strong>gs and 1392 stranded animals. Data orig<strong>in</strong>ated from<br />
dedicated surveys, strand<strong>in</strong>g reports, opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs, scientific publications and<br />
published or unpublished photographic and video documentation. These data provide a<br />
solid overview on the species composition <strong>of</strong> the Greek cetacean fauna. Species diversity,<br />
underestimated <strong>in</strong> the past, is supported by the variety <strong>of</strong> habitats <strong>of</strong>f the Greek coasts.<br />
Eleven cetacean species have been identified with<strong>in</strong> the limits <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas (def<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
by the national borders and the encompassed <strong>in</strong>ternational waters). Six species are present<br />
year-round <strong>in</strong> all or many <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas: striped dolph<strong>in</strong> (Stenella coeruleoalba),<br />
common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> (Tursiops truncatus), short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> (Delph<strong>in</strong>us<br />
delphis), Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris), sperm whale (Physeter<br />
macrocephalus) and Risso's dolph<strong>in</strong> (Grampus griseus). Two species, the harbour porpoise<br />
(Phocoena phocoena) and the f<strong>in</strong> whale (Balaenoptera physalus), have been recorded<br />
locally <strong>in</strong> all seasons and at least the former is likely to be present year round; however,<br />
more data are required to understand patterns <strong>of</strong> seasonality <strong>in</strong> distribution and occurrence.<br />
The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g three species - humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), false killer whale<br />
(Pseudorca crassidens) and common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) - have<br />
rarely been recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. One more species (not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> our dataset) -<br />
the rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong> (Steno bredanensis) - was recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong>fshore waters <strong>in</strong><br />
proximity to the Greek Seas (central Ionian Sea).<br />
Six species have been erroneously <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the Greek cetacean fauna <strong>in</strong> the past, due to<br />
wrong assumptions, false identifications or lack <strong>of</strong> m<strong>in</strong>imal support<strong>in</strong>g evidence: white whale<br />
(Delph<strong>in</strong>apterus leuca), Sowerby's beaked whale (Mesoplodon bidens), Bla<strong>in</strong>ville's beaked<br />
whale (Mesoplodon densirostris), long-f<strong>in</strong>ned pilot whale (Globicephala melas), killer whale<br />
(Orc<strong>in</strong>us orca), and blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus).<br />
The cetacean species recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas can be divided <strong>in</strong> three major categories<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to their distribution. The striped dolph<strong>in</strong>, the common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, the<br />
sperm whale and the Cuvier’s beaked whale seem to be present <strong>in</strong> the entire range <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bathymetry/habitat that is considered typical for them. The short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>,<br />
the f<strong>in</strong> whale and the harbour porpoise have heterogeneous distributions with<strong>in</strong> their<br />
potential habitats. The Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> can be predictably found only <strong>in</strong> few areas, although<br />
its occasional occurrence was documented <strong>in</strong> most portions <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
7
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the distribution maps presented <strong>in</strong> this Report, the general geographic range <strong>of</strong><br />
each cetacean species is known with sufficient detail to allow some general conclusions or<br />
general comparisons with future data. However, gaps <strong>of</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong> still exist at the level <strong>of</strong><br />
local seas, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the entire Ionian Sea, west and south Hellenic Trench and<br />
Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th. Surveys <strong>in</strong> several areas <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea are acutely needed to map<br />
some species range with higher precision. S<strong>in</strong>ce sight<strong>in</strong>g data have been collected primarily<br />
(but not exclusively) dur<strong>in</strong>g the warm season, w<strong>in</strong>ter surveys are also necessary to detect<br />
possible movements and seasonal changes <strong>in</strong> the range <strong>of</strong> some cetacean species.<br />
Data regard<strong>in</strong>g ecology and feed<strong>in</strong>g habits, genetics and stock discreteness, life history,<br />
toxicology, histopathology, causes <strong>of</strong> death, biometry etc. are scarce and fragmentary.<br />
Limited <strong>in</strong>formation is available on anthropogenic threats and their relative importance per<br />
species. Such data are crucial for species conservation and for the management <strong>of</strong> human<br />
activities that have an impact on their populations. Although their collection is relatively easy<br />
and <strong>in</strong>expensive, the lack <strong>of</strong> a properly organised national strand<strong>in</strong>g network leaves a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cetacean carcasses un<strong>in</strong>spected, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> valuable <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, the most important gap <strong>of</strong> <strong>knowledge</strong> concerns the absolute abundance <strong>of</strong> each<br />
species population. With the exception <strong>of</strong> two small and local dolph<strong>in</strong> population units <strong>of</strong><br />
common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s, and <strong>of</strong> the sperm whales,<br />
not even rough estimates <strong>of</strong> abundances are available for any species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
Without such quantitative data, it is very difficult to adopt proper conservation policies and to<br />
monitor the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> any conservation measure at the national level.<br />
Although no population trends are available for any cetacean species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas,<br />
local studies, <strong>knowledge</strong> from other Mediterranean areas, evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g threats, as<br />
well as the apparently small size or uniqueness <strong>of</strong> several cetacean populations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas, all call for urgent conservation measures.<br />
As the local population units <strong>of</strong> four species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas that are considered<br />
“Endangered” (sperm whale, short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>, harbour porpoise) or “Data<br />
deficient” (Cuvier’s beaked whale), are likely among the most important <strong>in</strong> the entire<br />
Mediterranean Sea, ensur<strong>in</strong>g their long-term survival should be a national priority for the<br />
mar<strong>in</strong>e environment <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
8
CETACEAN TERMINOLOGY AND COMMON NAMES IN GREEK<br />
The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>correct term<strong>in</strong>ology to refer to cetacean species is still widespread <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
This is ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to <strong>in</strong>correct or literal translations <strong>of</strong> foreign documentaries and books with<br />
no scientific consultancy. Mislead<strong>in</strong>g common names are particularly widespread <strong>in</strong> the<br />
national media. This chapter <strong>in</strong>tends to contribute to the adoption <strong>of</strong> a consistent sciencebased<br />
term<strong>in</strong>ology.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the term<strong>in</strong>ology problems start from the <strong>in</strong>correct translation <strong>of</strong> the term ‘whale’ <strong>in</strong><br />
Greek as ‘�������’ (fala<strong>in</strong>a), although the correct translation is ‘�������’ (kitodes =<br />
cetacean). Unfortunately, the term ‘whale’ is used <strong>in</strong> English with two different mean<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Sensu lato it constitutes a synonym <strong>of</strong> the word ‘cetacean’, but sensu stricto it means ‘large<br />
cetacean’, which does not constitute a taxon and therefore adds to the confusion while<br />
translat<strong>in</strong>g from English to Greek. The term ‘whale’ sensu lato covers all whales, dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and porpoises. That’s why <strong>in</strong> English the dist<strong>in</strong>ction between ‘large whales’ and ‘small<br />
whales’ (sometimes <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g dolph<strong>in</strong>s) or ‘baleen whales’ (mysticetes = �����������) and<br />
‘toothed whales’ (odontocetes = ����������) are <strong>of</strong>ten used <strong>in</strong>stead <strong>of</strong> the general term<br />
‘whale’. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the above the correct translation <strong>of</strong> the term ‘whale’ (sensu lato) <strong>in</strong><br />
Greek is ‘�������’ and not ‘�������’. The word ‘�������’ should be used only for the<br />
translation <strong>of</strong> the terms ‘baleen whale’ (literally ‘����������� �������’) or ‘mysticete’. The<br />
commonly used Greek term ‘��������’ or ‘�������’ should also be avoided for the<br />
translation <strong>of</strong> ‘baleen’, s<strong>in</strong>ce the latter orig<strong>in</strong>ates from the Greek term ‘�������’ that passed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> as ‘balaena’ and later gave the term ‘baleen’ <strong>in</strong> English. The right word to use for the<br />
characteristic plates <strong>of</strong> whalebone <strong>in</strong> the mouth <strong>of</strong> mysticetes (baleens) is ‘��������‘. This<br />
term makes immediately the l<strong>in</strong>k between all the mysticetes or ‘��������’ and their<br />
taxonomic characteristic, which is the baleen or ‘��������’.<br />
For all the above mentioned reasons the translation <strong>of</strong> the term ‘toothed whale’ as<br />
‘����������� �������’ is <strong>in</strong>correct s<strong>in</strong>ce no cetacean exists that bears both teeth and<br />
baleens. Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, ‘baleen whale’ should not be translated as ‘������������ �������’, a<br />
term that constitutes a pleonasm, s<strong>in</strong>ce all whales bear baleens by def<strong>in</strong>ition.<br />
As a consequence <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>correct translation <strong>of</strong> the term ‘whale’, many odontocetes or even<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s were called ‘��������’ (baleen whales). Some <strong>of</strong> the most characteristic examples<br />
are the <strong>in</strong>correct translations <strong>of</strong> ‘killer whale’, ‘pilot whale’, ‘beaked whale’ and ‘sperm<br />
whale’, to ‘������� ���������’, ‘������� �������’, ‘������������’ and ‘�������������’,<br />
respectively. However, none <strong>of</strong> these species are ‘��������’ (baleen whales), s<strong>in</strong>ce they do<br />
9
not belong to the suborder <strong>of</strong> mysticetes. In addition the first two <strong>of</strong> them are dolph<strong>in</strong>s (i.e.<br />
belong to the odontocete family <strong>of</strong> delph<strong>in</strong>ids). The right common names for these species<br />
or families are ‘����’, ‘������������’, ‘����������’ and ‘���������’.<br />
The Greek common names <strong>of</strong> cetacean species used <strong>in</strong> this report are those proposed by<br />
Frantzis et al. 2003 and used <strong>in</strong> ACCOBAMS (2002) and IUCN (2006) documents. Greek<br />
name transcriptions <strong>in</strong> Lat<strong>in</strong> characters <strong>in</strong> parenthesis follow ELOT (1982). The symbols <strong>of</strong><br />
the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and tonic accents have been used to describe<br />
their pronunciation <strong>in</strong> Greek. For the reader who is not familiar with these symbols a few<br />
examples follow: i= see, ð= this, j= yours, �= r<strong>in</strong>g, x= Scottish loch. No English equivalents<br />
exist for the symbols ‘c’ and ‘�’. However the closest sounds for the use <strong>of</strong> ‘c’ are ‘kye’ <strong>in</strong><br />
fócena (harbour porpoise) and ‘kyee’ <strong>in</strong> c<strong>in</strong>ó ðelfíni (common dolph<strong>in</strong>). The sound <strong>of</strong> ‘�’ <strong>in</strong><br />
me�ápteri fálena (humpback whale) is between ‘g’ <strong>in</strong> the word ‘mega’ and ‘y’ <strong>in</strong> the word<br />
‘yes’.<br />
10
METHODS AND DATA USED<br />
The study area<br />
The Greek Seas <strong>in</strong>clude the east Ionian, the Aegean, the Cretan and the north-west<br />
Levant<strong>in</strong>e Seas as well as the northern Cretan Passage between Crete and North Africa.<br />
They occupy the northern part <strong>of</strong> the eastern Mediterranean (roughly between 35°-41°N and<br />
20°-30°E) and are characterised by: (a) pronounced oligotrophy <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> their range, (b)<br />
highly irregular and very long coastl<strong>in</strong>e (>15,000 km) that accounts for one third <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
Mediterranean coastl<strong>in</strong>e, (c) almost 10,000 islands and islets, (d) some extended plateaux<br />
and (e) steep underwater relief <strong>of</strong> depressions and trenches reach<strong>in</strong>g a maximum depth <strong>of</strong><br />
5121m south-west <strong>of</strong> the Peloponnese (Stergiou et al. 1997). This rich geomorphology<br />
(Figure 1) creates a variety <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e ecosystems and habitats for various cetacean species.<br />
Figure 1. Map <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas show<strong>in</strong>g their bathymetry and the locations mentioned <strong>in</strong> this report. 1:<br />
Lefkada Island, 2: Kefallonia, 3: South Evvoikos Gulf, 4: Gavdos Island, 5: Zakynthos Island, 6: Kalamos<br />
Island, 7: Mytil<strong>in</strong>i Island, 8: Kythira Island, 9: Rodos Island, 10: Karpathos Island, 11: Corfu Island, 12: Limnos<br />
Island, 13: Kyparissiakos Gulf, 14: Chios Island, 15: Bay <strong>of</strong> Tolo, 16: Skiathos Island, 17: Gerolimenas.<br />
11
Data collection<br />
Available cetacean records have been systematically gathered between 1991 and 2008 and<br />
<strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong> a database. Sources <strong>in</strong>cluded dedicated surveys, opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g reports from strand<strong>in</strong>g networks, published or unpublished photographic and video<br />
documentation <strong>of</strong> strand<strong>in</strong>gs or sight<strong>in</strong>gs, historical strand<strong>in</strong>gs published <strong>in</strong> the scientific<br />
literature and skeletal materials. All records presented <strong>in</strong> a previous published review<br />
(Frantzis et al. 2003), sight<strong>in</strong>gs from a published article on cetaceans <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea<br />
(Carpentieri et al. 1999), and confirmed first-hand sight<strong>in</strong>gs found <strong>in</strong> the literature have also<br />
been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the dataset. This dataset accounted for 2809 records; 1392 strand<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
1417 sight<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Surveys and sight<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
Twenty six dedicated surveys were conducted dur<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g, summer or autumn (but<br />
predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> the summer) <strong>of</strong> each year, from 1991 to 2008 by the research teams <strong>of</strong><br />
Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute (twenty two expeditions) and Tethys Research<br />
Institute (four expeditions). Surveys lasted from ten days up to three months and covered<br />
the Hellenic Trench, the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th and <strong>in</strong> a lesser degree the Myrtoon Sea and the sea<br />
area between the Northern Sporades Islands and the Chalkidiki Pen<strong>in</strong>sula (Figure 1).<br />
Ferries with standard routes were used as platforms <strong>of</strong> opportunity by Carpentieri et al.<br />
(1999) for their surveys <strong>in</strong> the Aegean and Cretan Seas. Conventional visual methods for<br />
detect<strong>in</strong>g cetaceans have been used dur<strong>in</strong>g the surveys. At least one experienced observer<br />
was cont<strong>in</strong>uously scann<strong>in</strong>g the sea surface 180° <strong>in</strong> front <strong>of</strong> the vessel. Observers used<br />
<strong>in</strong>termittently b<strong>in</strong>oculars and observations were <strong>in</strong>terrupted when sea surface conditions<br />
reached 3 Beauforts (appearance <strong>of</strong> the first white caps). Geographic coord<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sight<strong>in</strong>gs were recorded with the aid <strong>of</strong> a Global Position<strong>in</strong>g System (GPS). Only the <strong>in</strong>itial<br />
position <strong>of</strong> each sight<strong>in</strong>g was considered, disregard<strong>in</strong>g sight<strong>in</strong>g duration or group-size<br />
changes, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> plots <strong>of</strong> one spot per sight<strong>in</strong>g. M<strong>in</strong>imum distance from the closest coast<br />
and approximate bottom depth for all sight<strong>in</strong>gs were calculated a posteriori by GIS methods.<br />
In surveys along the Hellenic Trench, <strong>in</strong> the Northern Sporades – Chalkidiki area and<br />
Myrtoon Sea, jo<strong>in</strong>t acoustic and visual methods were used. In those cases a stereo towed<br />
hydrophone array allowed passive acoustic localisation <strong>of</strong> sperm whales. Published or k<strong>in</strong>dly<br />
<strong>of</strong>fered sight<strong>in</strong>g data from dedicated surveys <strong>of</strong> research teams that crossed the Greek<br />
Seas (ma<strong>in</strong>ly IFAW, GREC and Voyage <strong>of</strong> Odyssey) were also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the dataset.<br />
Opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs recorded up to the end <strong>of</strong> 2008 <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas have also been<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the database, only when supported by photos or videos that allowed an<br />
unbiased species identification.<br />
12
Sight<strong>in</strong>gs from the core study area <strong>of</strong> long-term studies on short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner east Ionian Sea (Bearzi et al. 2005, 2006) and<br />
the Amvrakikos Gulf (Bearzi et al. 2008a) have not been used, s<strong>in</strong>ce their high numbers<br />
would create a very significant geographical unbalance <strong>in</strong> the dataset.<br />
Caution is due to the <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs recorded per species (Table<br />
1) s<strong>in</strong>ce data <strong>in</strong>clude both opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs and results <strong>of</strong> dedicated surveys that used<br />
different methods (e.g. visual versus jo<strong>in</strong>t visual-acoustic surveys). Even more importantly,<br />
some areas have been surveyed <strong>in</strong>tensively or more systematically than others (Annex I,<br />
Figure 2); others have not been surveyed at all. As a result the number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs recorded<br />
per species is not directly <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> the relative sight<strong>in</strong>g frequencies <strong>in</strong> this study and the<br />
relative presence/absence on the maps is not directly <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> abundance.<br />
Strand<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
Strand<strong>in</strong>g data (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g float<strong>in</strong>g carcasses and <strong>in</strong>cidentally caught animals) were obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly through the national strand<strong>in</strong>g network established by the Hellenic Centre for Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Research <strong>in</strong> collaboration with the Port Police authorities. This network provided <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
to various recipients (m<strong>in</strong>istries, research centres and NGOs) dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 1991-2002.<br />
By 2002 the available <strong>in</strong>formation started be<strong>in</strong>g centralised at the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> the Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Merchandise (YEN) from where copies <strong>of</strong> all records were obta<strong>in</strong>ed regularly. The network's<br />
data cover the period September 1991 – December 2008, and derive from standardised<br />
forms filled by local Port Police authorities. This network can not keep track <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g events and the number <strong>of</strong> unreported strand<strong>in</strong>gs – some <strong>of</strong> which were<br />
<strong>in</strong>corporated to the dataset after becom<strong>in</strong>g known through sources other than the network -<br />
is not negligible, particularly <strong>in</strong> the early years and the period 2003-2004. The strand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
records used <strong>in</strong> this report orig<strong>in</strong>ated from two <strong>in</strong>dependent databases. The database <strong>of</strong><br />
Pelagos Cetcean Research Institute conta<strong>in</strong>ed 1263 records and the database <strong>of</strong> MOm<br />
(Hellenic Society for the Study and Protection <strong>of</strong> the Monk Seal) conta<strong>in</strong>ed 342 records. The<br />
two databases were merged and duplicates were elim<strong>in</strong>ated. Strand<strong>in</strong>g data refer to number<br />
<strong>of</strong> animals stranded and not to multiple strand<strong>in</strong>g events (strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> three or more<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals were rare and concerned ma<strong>in</strong>ly Cuvier’s beaked whales).<br />
The strand<strong>in</strong>g data presented here may underreport smaller species, while large whales<br />
(ma<strong>in</strong>ly f<strong>in</strong> whales and sperm whales, which are conspicuous and account for ‘exceptional’<br />
events) were more likely to be reported. S<strong>in</strong>ce Port Police and local veter<strong>in</strong>arians may not<br />
possess the expertise needed to correctly identify cetacean species, all <strong>in</strong>formation com<strong>in</strong>g<br />
13
from the network was <strong>in</strong>itially considered as suspect, except for the fact that a strand<strong>in</strong>g did<br />
occur. After be<strong>in</strong>g meticulously checked, strand<strong>in</strong>g reports were classified as ‘unidentified<br />
cetaceans’, ‘unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids’ (common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s, striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s or shortbeaked<br />
common dolph<strong>in</strong>s) or ‘unidentified small delph<strong>in</strong>ids’ (small dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> 2.5 m total<br />
length or less, <strong>in</strong> advanced decomposition, hav<strong>in</strong>g a rostrum and 35 or more teeth <strong>in</strong> one<br />
jaw, which could be either striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s or short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s) if the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> visual documents (photos or videos) or their quality could not allow for reliable<br />
species identification. It has to be noted that Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s are never reported by the Port<br />
Police as ‘dolph<strong>in</strong>s’ because <strong>of</strong> their different head shape, so they could not be part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids. Identification only took <strong>in</strong>to account species known to occur <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea (Reeves & Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006).<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the above mentioned procedure, species identification was possible <strong>in</strong> 47% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total strand<strong>in</strong>g records. Unidentified animals were almost exclusively common bottlenose<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s, striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s. This fact resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
important underestimation <strong>of</strong> the percentage <strong>of</strong> these species among identified strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
(Table 1). In order to overcome this problem and reach a better approximation <strong>of</strong> the real<br />
figures, we split the categories <strong>of</strong> a) ‘unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids’ to common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s accord<strong>in</strong>g to the ratio 207:138:52 found<br />
among 397 identified stranded dolph<strong>in</strong>s from 1996 to 2008 (Table 1), and b) ‘unidentified<br />
small delph<strong>in</strong>ids’ to striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
ratio 138:52 found among 190 identified stranded dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> these two species from 1996<br />
to 2008 (Table 1). This thirteen-year period was selected for two reasons: i) there were no<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs for each <strong>of</strong> these three dolph<strong>in</strong> species and for each year before 1996, ii) the<br />
ratio among these species’ strand<strong>in</strong>gs before 2006 was altered <strong>in</strong> favour <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
due to the Mediterranean morbillivirus epizootic, which peaked <strong>in</strong> 1992 <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> (Aguilar<br />
and Raga 1993, Cebrian 1995, Aguilar 2000). Except for calculat<strong>in</strong>g new percentages for<br />
the occurrence <strong>of</strong> the small delph<strong>in</strong>id species among strand<strong>in</strong>gs from 1996 to 2008 (Table<br />
1), the results <strong>of</strong> the above extrapolation were not used for any other purpose (e.g.<br />
distribution maps). Thirty eight old and historical strand<strong>in</strong>g records from the period 1840 -<br />
August 1991 were also <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the database s<strong>in</strong>ce they were accompanied by photos or<br />
cited <strong>in</strong> scientific references (De Heildreich 1878, Bauer 1978, K<strong>in</strong>zelbach 1986a, 1986b).<br />
The gender <strong>of</strong> stranded animals was <strong>in</strong>cluded only after direct exam<strong>in</strong>ation or when good<br />
photos <strong>of</strong> the genital area were available. Total lengths were reta<strong>in</strong>ed only if measured by<br />
specialists or by local authorities <strong>in</strong>structed by experienced cetologists.<br />
14
INFORMATION FROM CETACEAN RECORDS<br />
Recorded species<br />
Eleven cetacean species have been identified <strong>in</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1416 sight<strong>in</strong>gs and 1392 stranded<br />
animals recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas (Table 1). Six <strong>of</strong> these species were observed yearround<br />
<strong>in</strong> all or many <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas: striped dolph<strong>in</strong> (Stenella coeruleoalba), common<br />
bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> (Tursiops truncatus), short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> (Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis),<br />
Cuvier's beaked whale (Ziphius cavirostris), sperm whale (Physeter macrocephalus) and<br />
Risso's dolph<strong>in</strong> (Grampus griseus). A seventh species, the harbour porpoise (Phocoena<br />
phocoena), was also observed year-round, but due to the low number <strong>of</strong> records more data<br />
are needed to allow a def<strong>in</strong>itive confirmation <strong>of</strong> year-round presence. One more species, the<br />
f<strong>in</strong> whale (Balaenoptera physalus), has been recorded dur<strong>in</strong>g all seasons <strong>in</strong> both sight<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and strand<strong>in</strong>g data. However, based on the available <strong>in</strong>formation its presence <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>ter and<br />
spr<strong>in</strong>g may be either regular or occur<strong>in</strong>g exceptionally <strong>in</strong> some years only. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
three species - humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae), false killer whale (Pseudorca<br />
crassidens) and common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) - have rarely been<br />
recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
Table 1: Number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs and stranded animals per cetacean species. The unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids concern the<br />
species Tursiops truncatus, Stenella coeruleoalba and Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis. The unidentified small delph<strong>in</strong>ids<br />
concern the species S. coeruleoalba and D. delphis. Most <strong>of</strong> the unidentified cetaceans were probably specimens<br />
<strong>of</strong> Grampus griseus accord<strong>in</strong>g to the reported <strong>in</strong>formation, but no photos were available. For the estimation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
extrapolated results (marked with asterisks) <strong>in</strong> the last two columns, see methodology <strong>in</strong> section “Strand<strong>in</strong>g data”.<br />
Species Sight<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Total<br />
stranded<br />
animals<br />
1840-<br />
Aug. 1991<br />
Stranded animals<br />
Sept. 1991-<br />
2008<br />
1996-<br />
2008<br />
Extrapolated<br />
1996-2008<br />
1 Stenella coeruleoalba 523 197 2 195 14.4% 138 305* 31.2% *<br />
2 Tursiops truncatus 305 234 2 232 17.2% 207 439* 44.8% *<br />
3 Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis 140 55 - 55 4.1% 52 115* 11.7% *<br />
4 Ziphius cavirostris 70 100 18 82 6.1% 54 54 5.5%<br />
5 Physeter macrocephalus 300 26 7 19 1.4% 17 17 1.7%<br />
6 Grampus griseus 38 34 6 28 2.1% 22 22 2.2%<br />
7 Balaenoptera physalus 36 10 5 5 0.4% 5 5 0.5%<br />
8 Phocoena phocoena 1 15 - 15 1.1% 15 15 1.5%<br />
9 Pseudorca crassidens 1 1 - 1 0.1% - - -<br />
10 Megaptera novaeangliae 2 1 - 1 0.1% 1 1 0.1%<br />
11 Balaenoptera acutorostrata - 1 - 1 0.1% 1 1 0.1%<br />
Total identified 1416 674 40 634 46.9% 512 974* 99.5% *<br />
Unidentified cetaceans 7 - 7 0.5% 5 5 0.5%<br />
Unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids 684 - 684 50.6% 444 0* 0.0% *<br />
Unidentified small delph<strong>in</strong>ids 27 - 27 2.0% 18 0* 0.0% *<br />
Total 1416 1392 40 1352 100.0% 979 979 100.0%<br />
15
Distribution and effort<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> all available records (Figure 3, Annex II) provides a reasonably good<br />
coverage <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas and therefore, the geographic range given for each species is<br />
thought to represent a good approximation <strong>of</strong> the real figures. Nevertheless, much more<br />
effort is needed <strong>in</strong> order to obta<strong>in</strong> the precise distribution <strong>of</strong> each species. The absence <strong>of</strong><br />
sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> some geographical areas is <strong>in</strong> most cases the result <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> survey effort (e.g<br />
the central and eastern Aegean). However, <strong>in</strong> some particular areas (Patraikos Gulf and<br />
<strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea) the absence <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs more accurately reflects the scarcity <strong>of</strong> cetacean<br />
presence. Figure 2 <strong>in</strong> Annex I provides the distribution <strong>of</strong> the search<strong>in</strong>g effort so far and it is<br />
particularly useful <strong>in</strong> avoid<strong>in</strong>g mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> this report, as well as for<br />
plann<strong>in</strong>g future research effort.<br />
The cetacean species recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas can be divided <strong>in</strong> three major categories<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to their distribution: a) the striped dolph<strong>in</strong>, the common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, the<br />
sperm whale and the Cuvier’s beaked whale are or seem to be present <strong>in</strong> the entire range <strong>of</strong><br />
the bathymetry/habitat that is considered typical for them, b) the short-beaked common<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>, the f<strong>in</strong> whale and the harbour porpoise present heterogeneous distributions with<strong>in</strong><br />
their potential habitats, c) the Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> can be predictably found <strong>in</strong> a small number <strong>of</strong><br />
areas only, although its occurrence (as sight<strong>in</strong>gs or strand<strong>in</strong>gs) has been recorded <strong>in</strong> most<br />
geographical areas <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
Strand<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
Eleven species have been identified with<strong>in</strong> the strand<strong>in</strong>g record (Table 1). The percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> identified animals among 1352 strand<strong>in</strong>gs from 1991 to 2008 was 47%. As the vast<br />
majority (99%) <strong>of</strong> unidentified animals belonged almost exclusively to three delph<strong>in</strong>id<br />
species (common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s, striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s), their percentages among identified animals are underestimated. Extrapolated<br />
numbers for these three species (see methods <strong>in</strong> section “Strand<strong>in</strong>g data”) for the period<br />
1996-2008 are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 1. The common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> is the most common<br />
species among strand<strong>in</strong>gs (44.8%) followed by the striped dolph<strong>in</strong> (31.2%). Averages <strong>of</strong> ca.<br />
34 and 23 stranded animals per year were recorded for these two dolph<strong>in</strong> species,<br />
respectively. The short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> was found among strand<strong>in</strong>gs with an<br />
average rate <strong>of</strong> 9 stranded animals per year (11.7%). The occurrence <strong>of</strong> Cuvier’s beaked<br />
whale (5.5%) <strong>in</strong> the strand<strong>in</strong>g record accounted for about four animals per year, but when<br />
atypical mass strand<strong>in</strong>gs were excluded this number was about two per year. The Risso’s<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> (2.2%), the sperm whale (1.7%) and the harbour porpoise (1.5%) accounted for<br />
16
about 1 to 1.5 strand<strong>in</strong>gs per year. F<strong>in</strong>ally, the f<strong>in</strong> whale, the humpback whale and the<br />
common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale represented rare strand<strong>in</strong>g events (less than 0.5% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs each).<br />
Mass strand<strong>in</strong>gs were relatively rare. Twenty-n<strong>in</strong>e strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than one<br />
animal (couples, mass strand<strong>in</strong>gs sensu Geraci and Lounsbury 1993, or atypical mass<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs as described <strong>in</strong> Frantzis 1998) have been recorded dur<strong>in</strong>g the period September<br />
1991 – December 2008. Two previous mass strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> four Cuvier’s beaked whales<br />
each have been recorded <strong>in</strong> 1987 and 1988. In 31 strand<strong>in</strong>g events <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g more than one<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual, twelve cases (39%) concerned Cuvier’s beaked whales, four cases (13%)<br />
concerned striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s, one case concerned sperm whales, one case (entanglement)<br />
concerned striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and a Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>, one case concerned common bottlenose<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s and twelve cases (39%) concerned unidentified delph<strong>in</strong>ids.<br />
The atypical mass strand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> fourteen Cuvier’s beaked whales <strong>in</strong> 1996 was l<strong>in</strong>ked with the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> military sonar dur<strong>in</strong>g exercises (Frantzis 1998). Another atypical mass strand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong><br />
n<strong>in</strong>e Cuvier’s beaked whales <strong>in</strong> 1997 could also be due to similar causes (Frantzis 2003).<br />
At least <strong>in</strong> two cases striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and unidentified small delph<strong>in</strong>ids bore obvious<br />
anthropogenic wounds (<strong>in</strong>flicted by knives). In two other cases three dolph<strong>in</strong>s were found<br />
dead <strong>in</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g sites <strong>of</strong> the same coast dur<strong>in</strong>g the same day; an <strong>in</strong>dication that they<br />
were either killed <strong>in</strong>tentionally or by-caught. In the first case these were two short-beaked<br />
common dolph<strong>in</strong>s and one unidentified small delph<strong>in</strong>id. In the second case all three<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s were unidentified, but heir sizes (2.65, 2.80 and 2.90 m) suggest that they were<br />
probably common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s s<strong>in</strong>ce common dolph<strong>in</strong>s and striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s do not<br />
reach such lengths <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea (Notarbartolo di Sciara 1997, Aguilar 2000,<br />
Bompar 2000). All these cases concern strand<strong>in</strong>gs which <strong>in</strong>volved more than one <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
<strong>of</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong>s bear<strong>in</strong>g anthropogenic wounds. Many cases <strong>of</strong> s<strong>in</strong>gle dolph<strong>in</strong>s with signs <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>tentional kill<strong>in</strong>g have been reported, but most <strong>of</strong> them were impossible to confirm or reject<br />
due to the the low quality or the absence <strong>of</strong> photos.<br />
In at least two cases, striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s stranded alive and showed behavioural symptoms<br />
similar to those presented by dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>fected by the Mediterranean morbillivirus. No<br />
detailed data are available for the rest <strong>of</strong> strand<strong>in</strong>gs that <strong>in</strong>volved more than one <strong>in</strong>dividual.<br />
17
Sight<strong>in</strong>g data<br />
Ten cetacean species (all but the m<strong>in</strong>ke whale) have been sighted <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas (Table<br />
1). Two dolph<strong>in</strong> species, the striped dolph<strong>in</strong> (36.9%) and the common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
(21.6%) accounted for more than half <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>g records. Dedicated<br />
sperm whale surveys (jo<strong>in</strong>t acoustic and visual methods) resulted <strong>in</strong> a relatively high<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs for this species (21.1%). Sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> short-beaked common<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s and Cuvier’s beaked whales were less frequent (9.9 and 4.9%, respectively);<br />
sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whales and Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s were relatively rare (2.7 and 2.5%, respectively).<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> humpback whales, false killer whales and harbour porpoises were very<br />
rare and occurred twice for humpback whales (s<strong>in</strong>gle anumals) and once for the other two<br />
species. If we consider only the surveys made <strong>in</strong> the pelagic waters and near the cont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />
slope, the striped dolph<strong>in</strong> was the most frequently observed species, followed by the sperm<br />
whale, the Cuvier’s beaked whale, the Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> and the f<strong>in</strong> whale. Above the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf, the common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> was the most frequently observed species<br />
followed by the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>.<br />
18
SUMMARIZED INFORMATION FOR ALL COMMON SPECIES<br />
Table 2: Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation on the eight cetacean species that are regularly found <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. *Proposed IUCN Red List classification (Reeves & Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006)<br />
Details<br />
(<strong>in</strong> page)<br />
Greek<br />
Habitat IUCN Status<br />
common<br />
name Type Depth Distance<br />
Geographic distribution Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
Mediterranean* Globally<br />
from coasts<br />
English<br />
common<br />
name<br />
Species<br />
Data deficient Endangered 23<br />
Ship strikes <strong>in</strong><br />
the western<br />
Mediterranean<br />
<strong>Present</strong> <strong>in</strong> N Ionian Sea and<br />
especially from NW <strong>of</strong> Lefkada<br />
Island north up to N Corfu; at<br />
2.9 km<br />
(coastal)<br />
14.7 km<br />
(0.1-22.8 km)<br />
81 m (coastal)<br />
670 m<br />
(50-1337 m)<br />
Pelagic,<br />
occasionally<br />
coastal<br />
1 Balaenoptera physalus F<strong>in</strong> whale ������������<br />
Endangered Vulnerable 27<br />
Ship strikes<br />
Noise<br />
Plastic debris<br />
least occasionally <strong>in</strong> Saronikos<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong>ly along the Hellenic Trench<br />
from Kefallonia to E Rodos, also<br />
<strong>in</strong> deep bas<strong>in</strong>s/trenches <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Aegean Sea (Myrtoon, Cretan, N<br />
Ikarion, NW Aegean Sea)<br />
<strong>Present</strong> and locally (S Crete, W<br />
Lefkada) common all along the<br />
Hellenic Trench; present or<br />
common over steep depressions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Aegean (e.g. N. Sporades)<br />
Common <strong>in</strong> Myrtoon Sea south to<br />
NW Crete, present or common <strong>in</strong><br />
N. Sporades and Chalkidiki,<br />
present or rare or seasonal <strong>in</strong> all<br />
other Aegean and Ionian Seas<br />
<strong>Present</strong> <strong>in</strong> all coastal areas,<br />
straits, gulfs, and also between<br />
islands <strong>in</strong> the entire Ionian,<br />
Aegean and Cretan Seas with no<br />
exceptions.<br />
Common <strong>in</strong> all areas over depths<br />
>500 m (present <strong>in</strong> >200 m)<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th.<br />
Absent/vagrant <strong>in</strong> depths
CETACEAN SPECIES COMMONLY OCCURRING IN THE GREEK SEAS<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>gs by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
21
Balaenoptera physalus (L<strong>in</strong>naeus, 1758)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
F<strong>in</strong> whale<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Mysticeti (Μυστακοκήτη)<br />
Family: Balaenopteridae (Φαλαινοπτερίδες)<br />
Subfamily: Balaenopter<strong>in</strong>ae (Φαλαινοπτερίνες)<br />
Genus: Balaenoptera<br />
Species: Balaenoptera physalus<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Balaenoptera physalus<br />
Common Πτεροφάλαινα<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Pter<strong>of</strong>ála<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pronunciation: pter<strong>of</strong>álena<br />
EN f<strong>in</strong> whale AR (harcul chaii)<br />
FR rorqual commun TR uzun bal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ES rorcual común AL balene kokemadhe<br />
IT balenottera comune HR veliki kit<br />
DE F<strong>in</strong>nwal HE (livyatan matzui)<br />
PT baleia-comum ML baliena mbaðða<br />
Size<br />
The available <strong>in</strong>formation on body size <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whales <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean population, part <strong>of</strong><br />
which are those visit<strong>in</strong>g the Greek Seas, is com<strong>in</strong>g from 103 stranded specimens <strong>in</strong> the<br />
period 1798-1997 (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003). The maximum total length <strong>of</strong><br />
Mediterranean f<strong>in</strong> whales is above 20 m; probably somewhere between 21 and 23 m.<br />
Because almost all stranded whales that were ≥20 m were reported as “approximately 20 m”<br />
and most <strong>of</strong> them orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the 19 th century, no precise measurements <strong>of</strong> large<br />
specimens are available. The mean total length form strand<strong>in</strong>gs is 13.8 m. Females may be<br />
slightly larger than males and total length at birth is probably close to 5.2 m. The total length<br />
<strong>of</strong> measured f<strong>in</strong> whales that stranded along the Greek coasts range between 10-14.5 m, but<br />
skeletal rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> one specimen <strong>in</strong>dicate a total length <strong>of</strong> approximately 20 m.<br />
23
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 36 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whales recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, most <strong>of</strong> them (31)<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from the north Ionian Sea and Saronikos Gulf. Three <strong>of</strong> the sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner<br />
Ionian Sea concerned the same <strong>in</strong>dividual. The sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf were all made <strong>in</strong><br />
two different years with<strong>in</strong> periods that spanned five and two months. F<strong>in</strong> whale strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
are relatively rare <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> (ten <strong>in</strong> total) and only half <strong>of</strong> them have been recorded after<br />
1991 (Table 1).<br />
Geographic range<br />
The f<strong>in</strong> whale seems to be predictably present <strong>of</strong>f the northern Ionian Islands and<br />
particularly northwest <strong>of</strong> Lefkada Island. Four sight<strong>in</strong>gs and four strand<strong>in</strong>gs were recorded<br />
further to the south along the Hellenic Trench. F<strong>in</strong> whales seem to be rare <strong>in</strong> the Aegean<br />
Sea, but they were repeatedly reported <strong>in</strong> the Saronikos Gulf <strong>in</strong> 1998, 2006 (strand<strong>in</strong>g) and<br />
2008. F<strong>in</strong> whales may visit, regularly or occasionally, specific areas <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter or spr<strong>in</strong>g, when prey abundance may be suitable to their needs. S<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals and small groups <strong>of</strong> up to three or four f<strong>in</strong> whales were observed repeatedly <strong>in</strong><br />
Saronikos Gulf <strong>in</strong> the spr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 1998 and 2008, and one strand<strong>in</strong>g was recorded <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
2006. Exceptional near-coast observations were made <strong>in</strong> the western Mediterranean Sea<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g summer and autumn 1997, and were related to particular oceanographic conditions<br />
(Beaubrun et al. 1999; Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003). Apparently regular w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
presence (January to March) close to the coasts was reported <strong>in</strong> Lampedusa Island (Italy)<br />
and has been related to feed<strong>in</strong>g (Canese et al. 2006). Except for sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf,<br />
all other sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas come from the warm season from June to September<br />
when most <strong>of</strong> the search effort occurs. F<strong>in</strong> whales have been occasionally observed to<br />
wander <strong>in</strong> shallow coastal waters (south Peloponnese) or enclosed sea areas like the <strong>in</strong>ner<br />
eastern Ionian Sea. The s<strong>in</strong>gle presence <strong>of</strong> a f<strong>in</strong> whale <strong>in</strong> the closed Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th was a<br />
case <strong>of</strong> a wander<strong>in</strong>g animal that apparently died later <strong>in</strong> this gulf.<br />
Habitat<br />
F<strong>in</strong> whales <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean appear to be markedly pelagic. They are primarily observed<br />
<strong>in</strong> deep (over 2000 m) <strong>of</strong>fshore waters, although their occurrence over the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope<br />
or the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf is not unusual (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003). The mean water<br />
depth from 15 f<strong>in</strong> whale sight<strong>in</strong>gs made <strong>in</strong> the open Ionian Sea was only 670 m (sd=398)<br />
and the mean distance from the coasts was 14.7 km (sd=6.2). These values are certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />
underestimates <strong>of</strong> the real figures, s<strong>in</strong>ce they occurred while survey<strong>in</strong>g areas relatively close<br />
to the coasts. However, there are 17 sight<strong>in</strong>gs made <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Greek Ionian Sea, the<br />
south Peloponnese and Saronikos Gulf show<strong>in</strong>g presence <strong>in</strong> even shallower and more<br />
coastal waters over the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf or even <strong>in</strong> closed gulfs and bays. Their mean water<br />
depth and distance from the coasts are 81 m (sd=50) and 2.9 km (sd=2.8), respectively.<br />
This strong variability <strong>in</strong> habitat characteristics may be due to year-to-year differences <strong>in</strong><br />
oceanographic conditions and therefore, variable distributions and densities <strong>of</strong> the f<strong>in</strong><br />
whales’ pr<strong>in</strong>cipal prey <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003). It is<br />
noteworthy that all f<strong>in</strong> whale records <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf occurred <strong>in</strong> early spr<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> three<br />
different years. At least dur<strong>in</strong>g the last time (<strong>in</strong> 2008), the sight<strong>in</strong>gs co<strong>in</strong>cided with very high<br />
densities <strong>of</strong> krill <strong>in</strong> the gulf (personal observations).<br />
24
Abundance<br />
The f<strong>in</strong> whales that visit the Greek Seas seem to be a small part <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean f<strong>in</strong><br />
whale population and it is probably mean<strong>in</strong>gless to try to guess a size for the “Greek”<br />
population unit. Even if such a number could be estimated or guessed, it is reasonable to<br />
th<strong>in</strong>k that it would be variable from year to year, s<strong>in</strong>ce the known range <strong>of</strong> the species <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Ionian Sea is limited and its presence <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf or the entire Aegean Sea is<br />
apparently variable. There is no population estimation for the entire Mediterranean Sea,<br />
(Notarbartolo di Sciara & Panigada 2006). The best guess for the entire Mediterranean<br />
population would be <strong>in</strong> the low thousands, as an extrapolation from estimates <strong>of</strong> abundance<br />
for the western bas<strong>in</strong> that varied between roughly 1000 and 3500 animals (Forcada et al.<br />
1995, 1996). Probably few tens up to very few hundreds among them are found <strong>in</strong> or visit<br />
yearly the Greek Seas.<br />
Population trend<br />
The Mediterranean population trend is completely unknown and no time series <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>g<br />
frequencies exist for the f<strong>in</strong> whales visit<strong>in</strong>g the Greek Seas.<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
The seasonality <strong>of</strong> observations <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf may be suggestive <strong>of</strong> seasonal migrations<br />
that are well known for the Mediterranean f<strong>in</strong> whale population (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al.<br />
2003). There is no evidence <strong>in</strong> favour or aga<strong>in</strong>st a s<strong>in</strong>gle, panmictic population <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean or a metapopulation comprised <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> subunits.<br />
No genetic study has been made on f<strong>in</strong> whale from the Greek Seas. Genetic analyses<br />
showed that the Mediterranean f<strong>in</strong> whales are largely resident <strong>in</strong> the bas<strong>in</strong>, although limited<br />
but recurrent gene flow occurs through the Straits <strong>of</strong> Gibraltar (Bérubé et al. 1998, Palsbøll<br />
et al. 2004), and satellite tagg<strong>in</strong>g confirmed these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs (Gu<strong>in</strong>et et al. 2005).<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
No data are available from the Greek Seas and no neonates were found among strand<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to data from the western Mediterranean, the frequency <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> neonates<br />
is higher between September and January, with a peak <strong>in</strong> November, but births may occur<br />
throughout the year <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003).<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
Unknown <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, but the seasonal co<strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whales with concentrations<br />
<strong>of</strong> krill <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf (personal observations) and the observations <strong>of</strong> bright orange,<br />
football-sized float<strong>in</strong>g feces <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whales <strong>in</strong> the eastern Ionian Sea (Notarbartolo di Sciara et<br />
al. 2003) are both <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> krill feed<strong>in</strong>g. Krill is known to be the ma<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whale prey <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Ligurian-Corsican-Provençal Bas<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g summer, but feed<strong>in</strong>g on epipelagic fish may also<br />
occur <strong>in</strong> other locations <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2003).<br />
25
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
In the western Mediterranean ship strikes constitute the ma<strong>in</strong> known source <strong>of</strong><br />
anthropogenic mortality for f<strong>in</strong> whales. Shipp<strong>in</strong>g noise and vessel disturbance, particularly<br />
from the unregulated whale watch<strong>in</strong>g, is another source <strong>of</strong> concern (Notarbartolo di Sciara &<br />
Panigada 2006). No <strong>in</strong>formation is available on threats to f<strong>in</strong> whales <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Data Deficient’ (Notarbartolo di Sciara &<br />
Panigada 2006); listed as ‘Endangered’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
26
Physeter macrocephalus (L<strong>in</strong>naeus, 1758)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Sperm whale<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Physeteroidea (Φυσητηροειδή)<br />
Family: Physeteridae (Φυσητηρίδες)<br />
Genus: Physeter<br />
Species: Physeter macrocephalus<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Physeter macrocephalus<br />
Common Φυσητήρας<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Fysitíras<br />
Pronunciation: fysitíras<br />
EN sperm whale AR (anbar)<br />
FR cachalot TR kačalot<br />
ES cachalote AL kashalot<br />
IT capodoglio HR ulješura<br />
DE Pottwal HE (roshtan)<br />
PT cachalote ML gabdoll<br />
Size<br />
The largest female stranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> was 10.0 m long and the maximum total length<br />
measured acoustically (Gordon 1991) for female sperm whales is 9.1 m (Pelagos Cetacean<br />
Research Institute, unpublished data). The largest male measured acoustically was 14.6 m<br />
(Frantzis & Alexiadou 2008). However, the lower jaw bone <strong>of</strong> a stranded male <strong>in</strong>dicates a<br />
total length between 15.5 and 17.5 m (Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, unpublished<br />
data). The maximum total length recorded for Mediterranean female and male sperm whales<br />
is approximately 10.5 m and 17.3 m, respectively (Cagnolaro 1996, Centro Studi Cetacei<br />
1997). The smallest stranded animal <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> was 4.0 m long, and although its<br />
decomposition state did not allow a def<strong>in</strong>itive conclusion, it did not seem to be a neonate.<br />
Size at birth ranges globally for sperm whales between 3.5 and 4.5 m (Best et al. 1984).<br />
27
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 300 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> sperm whales recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, most <strong>of</strong> them (274)<br />
recorded along the Hellenic Trench, mostly <strong>in</strong> the framework <strong>of</strong> dedicated surveys <strong>in</strong> this<br />
area. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade sperm whale strand<strong>in</strong>gs occurred along the Greek coasts at the<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> approximately 1.5 whales per year. The total record <strong>in</strong>cludes 26 strand<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong>of</strong> which<br />
19 recorded after 1991 (Table 1).<br />
Geographic range<br />
The existence <strong>of</strong> a deep trench all around <strong>Greece</strong> (the Hellenic Trench) as well as smaller<br />
steep depressions and trenches <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea (Figure 1) make the Greek Seas an<br />
important habitat for sperm whales, both solitary males and social units. Sperm whales are<br />
present year-round along the Hellenic Trench, most sight<strong>in</strong>gs be<strong>in</strong>g recorded from SW<br />
Kefallonia Island south to W Peloponnese, W and S Crete. Their presence along the<br />
Hellenic Trench cont<strong>in</strong>ues north-eastern to Karpathos Island and E Rodos Island <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Levant<strong>in</strong>e Sea. Sperm whales can also occur <strong>in</strong> the Myrtoon Sea, Cretan Sea, N Ikarion Sea<br />
and all steep depressions <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea, particularly <strong>in</strong> the area between the Northern<br />
Sporades and the Chalkidiki Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. Several strand<strong>in</strong>gs and one sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the shallow<br />
Cyclades Islands area that has not been surveyed sufficiently yet <strong>in</strong>dicate that sperm whales<br />
may cross it while mov<strong>in</strong>g from one area <strong>of</strong> steep underwater relief to another. Sperm<br />
whales are also present <strong>in</strong> further <strong>of</strong>fshore waters <strong>of</strong>f the Hellenic Trench, although their<br />
abundance appears to decrease at greater distances from the trench (Frantzis et al. <strong>in</strong><br />
preparation).<br />
Habitat<br />
Sperm whales occupy both the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope and pelagic habitats <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas,<br />
although their abundance is higher along the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope (Frantzis et al. <strong>in</strong><br />
preparation). Occasionally, they may be found over the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf, s<strong>in</strong>ce they enter<br />
the Aegean Sea plateau to reach deep bas<strong>in</strong>s or trenches <strong>in</strong> the north Aegean. The mean<br />
water depth and distance from the coasts <strong>of</strong> 188 sperm whale sight<strong>in</strong>gs made along the<br />
Hellenic Trench was 1235 m (range 510-2933 m; sd=426) and 7.9 km (range 1.6-25.2 km;<br />
sd=4.9), respectively. These values may be representative only for sperm whales along the<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope, s<strong>in</strong>ce the available sight<strong>in</strong>gs far <strong>of</strong>fshore over the abyssal pla<strong>in</strong>s (pelagic<br />
habitat) are extremely few. The year-round presence <strong>of</strong> both mature males and social<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> females with young calves across the Hellenic Trench highlights the extraord<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> this habitat for the protection <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean population <strong>of</strong> this species.<br />
Abundance<br />
There is no estimate <strong>of</strong> abundance for the entire sperm whale population <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea, however, a guess <strong>of</strong> regional specialists place it closer to the mid<br />
hundreds than the few thousands (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2006). There is a recent<br />
estimation for the entire Ionian Sea (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational and Italian waters) that accounts<br />
for 62 <strong>in</strong>dividuals (Lewis et al. 2008). This may be an underestimate <strong>of</strong> the real figures s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
the relevant surveys did not consider the Hellenic Trench as a separate stratum, did not<br />
account for non-vocaliz<strong>in</strong>g animals (calves or rest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals) and may have<br />
28
underestimated the total number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals clustered <strong>in</strong> social units (the survey track just<br />
crossed them, without additional effort <strong>in</strong> count<strong>in</strong>g them with jo<strong>in</strong>t acoustic/visual methods),<br />
as ac<strong>knowledge</strong>d by the authors. Dur<strong>in</strong>g eleven years <strong>of</strong> research on sperm whales <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas, 166 <strong>in</strong>dividuals have been photo-identified so far, and the first rough<br />
estimations <strong>in</strong>dicate a total close to 200 <strong>in</strong>dividuals that live along or cross the Hellenic<br />
Trench (Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute unpublished data). Consider<strong>in</strong>g that some <strong>of</strong><br />
the <strong>in</strong>dividuals observed <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea were also photo-identified <strong>in</strong> the Hellenic<br />
Trench, the entire sub-population <strong>of</strong> sperm whales liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas is unlikely to<br />
exceed 300 animals.<br />
Population trend<br />
The population trend <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean sperm whales is not clearly known, but the available<br />
evidence and the high number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals removed by driftnet fisheries are consistent with<br />
the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> a marked decl<strong>in</strong>e (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2006). The Greek subpopulation<br />
is also thought to be decreas<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce the suspected mortality rate from only one<br />
anthropogenic cause, namely collisions with large vessels as <strong>in</strong>dicated by propeller marks<br />
on the body <strong>of</strong> stranded sperm whales, seems too high to be susta<strong>in</strong>able (Pelagos<br />
Cetacean Research Institute unpublished data).<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Resight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> photo-identified <strong>in</strong>dividuals on an almost yearly basis from 1998 to 2008<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicate that sperm whales are at least seasonally resident <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, and may<br />
spend many years <strong>of</strong> their life <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas or close to them (Frantzis et al. <strong>in</strong><br />
preparation). Occasional observations revealed that <strong>in</strong>dividuals “captured” photographically<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the summer/autumn season are also present along the Hellenic Trench dur<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
(Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, unpublished data). There are no data regard<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> isolation between the sperm whales <strong>of</strong> the eastern and western Mediterranean<br />
bas<strong>in</strong>s. It has to be noted that coda comparisons <strong>in</strong>dicated that such isolation is possible<br />
(Rendel et al. 2007). In addition, no photo-identification matches have been made so far<br />
between <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> the two bas<strong>in</strong>s (NAMSC, DELPHIS, CIRCE, Tethys Research<br />
Institute and Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute databases). Nevertheless, mt-DNA and<br />
microsatelite genetic comparisons have clearly shown that the Mediterranean sperm whale<br />
population differs significantly from the Atlantic one (Engelhaupt et al. submitted)<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
Observations <strong>of</strong> 9 newborns and 3 stranded young calves <strong>in</strong>dicate that most births occur<br />
from mid June to end <strong>of</strong> August with a peak <strong>in</strong> July, although some births may occur <strong>in</strong> late<br />
w<strong>in</strong>ter to early spr<strong>in</strong>g (Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute unpublished data).<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
Prey items <strong>in</strong> the stomach content <strong>of</strong> five sperm whales stranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> only <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
squids and squid rema<strong>in</strong>s (Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute unpublished data). One<br />
29
published stomach content conta<strong>in</strong>ed the rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> seven cephalopod species,<br />
Histioteuthis bonnellii be<strong>in</strong>g the dom<strong>in</strong>ant one (Roberts 2003).<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
Although mortality <strong>in</strong> pelagic driftnets appears to be the most likely cause <strong>of</strong> recent decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
for sperm whales at the Mediterranean level (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2006), ship strikes<br />
seem to be the most important threat for the species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Almost two out <strong>of</strong><br />
three sperm whales stranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> bear marks <strong>of</strong> collision with a large vessel (Pelagos<br />
Cetacean Research Institute, unpublished data). Ingested plastic debris (found <strong>in</strong> three <strong>of</strong><br />
five stomach contents; unpublished data) and underwater noise from seismic surveys,<br />
military operations, and illegal dynamite fish<strong>in</strong>g (still common <strong>in</strong> sperm whale habitat;<br />
Frantzis et al. 2003) are other sources <strong>of</strong> concern (Notarbartolo di Sciara & Gordon 1997).<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Endangered’ (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2006);<br />
listed as ‘Vulnerable’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
30
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Ziphius cavirostris G. Cuvier, 1823<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Ziphioidea (Ζιφιοειδή)<br />
Family: Ziphiidae (Ζιφιίδες)<br />
Subfamily: Ziphi<strong>in</strong>ae (Ζιφιίνες)<br />
Genus: Ziphius<br />
Species: Ziphius cavirostris<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Cuvier’s beaked whale<br />
Scientific name: Ziphius cavirostris<br />
Common Ζιφιός<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Zifiós<br />
Pronunciation: zifjós<br />
EN Cuvier’s beaked whale AR (zifius)<br />
FR ziphius TR Kuvier bal<strong>in</strong>asi<br />
ES zifio de Cuvier AL baleen me sqep<br />
IT zifio HR Cuvierov kit<br />
DE Cuvier schnabelwal HE (zifyus chalul chartom)<br />
PT zifio ML baliena ta’ Kuvjer<br />
Size<br />
Information on the body size <strong>of</strong> Cuvier’s beaked whales <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea orig<strong>in</strong>ates<br />
from stranded animals and clearly <strong>in</strong>dicates smaller sizes than those observed <strong>in</strong> the oceans<br />
where animals larger than 6 m are recorded. The average size for both sexes globally is 6 m<br />
and the largest reliably measured <strong>in</strong>dividual was 6.93 m accord<strong>in</strong>g to Heyn<strong>in</strong>g (1989).<br />
However, the largest Cuvier’s beaked whales recorded <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean were 7.6 m (a<br />
female; Cas<strong>in</strong>os & Vericad 1976) and 6.3 m (Duguy 1985). These measurements are much<br />
longer than the third and fourth longer available ones (5.8 and 5.70 m; Centro Studi Cetacei<br />
1995, 1996). The largest specimen measured <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> was a male 5.32 m long, bear<strong>in</strong>g<br />
erupted small teeth. The total length at birth globally is 2.7 m (Heyn<strong>in</strong>g 1989). However, a<br />
2.20 m <strong>in</strong>dividual stranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> does not seem to be an aborted fetus based on the<br />
available photos, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that size at birth may be smaller.<br />
31
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 70 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Cuvier’s beaked whales recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, mostly (66)<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Hellenic Trench. Cuvier’s beaked whale strand<strong>in</strong>gs (100 <strong>in</strong> total) and sight<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
common <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas until recently (Table 1), but became suspiciously rare dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
last years. Cuvier’s beaked whales are the only cetacean species <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas found<br />
stranded <strong>in</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> 2-4 <strong>in</strong>dividuals due to either natural or anthropogenic causes. Cuvier’s<br />
beaked whales have mass stranded twice <strong>in</strong> high numbers (at least 14 and 9 <strong>in</strong>dividuals). At<br />
least one <strong>of</strong> these cases was due to the use <strong>of</strong> military sonar (Frantzis 1998, 2004).<br />
Geographic range<br />
In the Greek Seas Cuvier’s beaked whales seem to have a quite similar geographic range<br />
(with slight differences) to that <strong>of</strong> the sperm whale. Although present all along the Hellenic<br />
Trench from NW Corfu to E Rodos Island, the only known areas where this species can be<br />
predictably observed is the area <strong>of</strong> S Crete and W Lefkada. In addition, the Cuvier’s beaked<br />
whale seems to be present over steep depressions <strong>of</strong> the Aegean plateau (strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />
Chalkidiki, N Limnos, Ikarion Sea, S Milos Island and Karpathos Island), although<br />
observations are available only for the sea area north <strong>of</strong> the Northern Sporades and one for<br />
the Cretan Sea. It is not known if Cuvier’s beaked whales are also present further <strong>of</strong>fshore,<br />
over the abyssal pla<strong>in</strong>s, although this seems probable accord<strong>in</strong>g to other observations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
far <strong>of</strong>fshore Ionian (J. Forcada <strong>in</strong> litteris) and west Mediterranean Sea. Very few strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
were recorded away from steep depressions and deep trenches and no sight<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
made above the shallow waters <strong>of</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf and the enclosed gulfs, where the<br />
Cuvier’s beaked whales are apparently absent.<br />
Habitat<br />
The Cuvier’s beaked whales occupy the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope and possibly pelagic waters as<br />
well <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The mean water depth and distance from the coasts <strong>of</strong> 63 Cuvier’s<br />
beaked whale sight<strong>in</strong>gs made along the Hellenic Trench was 1066 m (range 491-2279 m;<br />
sd=343) and 8.6 km (range 2.1-26.5 km; sd=6.1), respectively. These values should be<br />
considered representative only for Cuvier’s beaked whales along the slope or above the<br />
Aegean plateau, s<strong>in</strong>ce there are no available sight<strong>in</strong>gs farther <strong>of</strong>fshore over abyssal pla<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Important Cuvier’s beaked whale habitat seem to exist <strong>in</strong> portions <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas that are<br />
among the very few areas known <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea where this species was or<br />
perhaps still is reasonably abundant (Frantzis et al. 2003, A. Cañadas, pers. comm.). Such<br />
habitats have a high conservation value for the Mediterranean population <strong>of</strong> this species,<br />
and therefore, would warrant conservation action.<br />
Abundance<br />
The available data do no allow estimat<strong>in</strong>g population abundance. Cuvier’s beaked whales<br />
are elusive animals difficult to observe or to detect acoustically. There are no population<br />
estimates anywhere <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
32
Population trend<br />
While abundance trends rema<strong>in</strong> unknown, a decrease <strong>in</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs (with no<br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> search effort) dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade raises concern over a possible population<br />
decl<strong>in</strong>e. Two mass strand<strong>in</strong>g events removed a relatively high number <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals (at least<br />
23) from local populations, but the total number <strong>of</strong> animals that died without reach<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
coasts may have been much higher. The impact at the population level seems important, but<br />
could potentially be even dramatic.<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
The strand<strong>in</strong>g records cover all months <strong>of</strong> the year and <strong>in</strong>dicate year-round presence <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas. No studies have been conducted to elucidate the degree <strong>of</strong> residency <strong>of</strong><br />
particular <strong>in</strong>dividuals or groups. Genetic studies on mt-DNA showed that the Mediterranean<br />
(represented by ten samples from <strong>Greece</strong> and two from Croatia) was highly dist<strong>in</strong>ct from the<br />
neighbour<strong>in</strong>g Eastern North Atlantic. Haplotype diversity was also lower <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean than <strong>in</strong> other regions, suggest<strong>in</strong>g that this population could be both isolated<br />
and relatively small. The eastern Mediterranean population, <strong>in</strong> particular, was suggested to<br />
represent a separate “evolutionarily significant unit” (Dalebout et al. 2005).<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
The smallest calf (2.20 m) found <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> stranded <strong>in</strong> late June. Four calves rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />
between 3.2 and 3.5 m were found stranded <strong>in</strong> November or early December. The only<br />
observation <strong>of</strong> a free-rang<strong>in</strong>g young calf occurred <strong>in</strong> July. These data (Pelagos Cetacean<br />
Research Institute, unpublished data) <strong>in</strong>dicate that most births should occur dur<strong>in</strong>g early or<br />
mid summer.<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
Based on the available stomach contents, Cuvier’s beaked whales feed exclusively or<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly on mesopelagic and bathypelagic squids. Only squid rema<strong>in</strong>s were found <strong>in</strong> seven<br />
stomachs <strong>of</strong> animals that mass stranded <strong>in</strong> the W Peloponnese (Hellenic Trench). The<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> a small number <strong>of</strong> squid beaks from these stomachs revealed the presence <strong>of</strong><br />
three species: Histioteuthis bonnellii, H. reversa and Octopoteuthis sicula (Lefkaditou &<br />
Poulopoulos 1998). These species are also prey items <strong>of</strong> sperm whales <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> (Roberts<br />
2003). Similarly, one more stomach from a stranded <strong>in</strong>dividual conta<strong>in</strong>ed only squid rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />
and a large number <strong>of</strong> squid beaks that rema<strong>in</strong> to be identified (A. Frantzis, unpublished<br />
data). Stomach contents from other Mediterranean areas also conta<strong>in</strong>ed only squid rema<strong>in</strong>s<br />
from n<strong>in</strong>e mesopelagic and bathypelagic species (Blanco et al. 1997).<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
The most important threat for this species is likely anthropogenic noise, responsible for<br />
significant mortality <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> and the Mediterranean Sea <strong>in</strong> general. Military sonars and<br />
possibly high-energy sounds from other anthropogenic sources have repeatedly resulted <strong>in</strong><br />
33
the strand<strong>in</strong>g and death <strong>of</strong> several Cuvier’s beaked whales (Frantzis 1998, Jepson et al.<br />
2003, Fernández et al. 2005). The impact <strong>of</strong> such mortality at the population level is<br />
uncerta<strong>in</strong>, but there is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g evidence <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that it may be localy important. Another<br />
source <strong>of</strong> concern is the <strong>in</strong>gestion <strong>of</strong> plastic debris by Cuvier’s beaked whales. Two stranded<br />
animals <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> had stomachs full <strong>of</strong> pieces <strong>of</strong> plastic bags.<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Data Deficient’ (Cañadas 2006); listed as<br />
‘Vulnerable’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
34
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Grampus griseus (G. Cuvier, 1812)<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Grampus<br />
Species: Grampus griseus<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
Scientific name: Grampus griseus<br />
Common Σταχτοδέλφινο<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Stachtodélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
Pronunciation: staxtoðélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
EN Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> AR (ghrambous)<br />
FR dauph<strong>in</strong> de Risso TR grampus<br />
ES calderón gris AL ;<br />
IT grampo HR dobri dup<strong>in</strong><br />
DE Rundkopfdelph<strong>in</strong> HE (grampus)<br />
PT grampo ML denfil griú<br />
Size<br />
The Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> is the largest dolph<strong>in</strong> species regularly occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The<br />
average total length form 20 stranded specimens measured <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> is 2.92 m (sd=0.45).<br />
The maximum total length is 3.30 m and the m<strong>in</strong>imum 1.73 m. The longest precisely<br />
measured known specimen <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea was 3.51 m (Centro Studi Cetacei<br />
1995). The average length world-wide is 3.5 m, the maximum is 4.09 m and length at birth<br />
ranges between 1.1 and 1.5 m, no differences be<strong>in</strong>g observed between sexes (Kruse et al.<br />
1999).<br />
35
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 38 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, ma<strong>in</strong>ly spread all<br />
over the Aegean Sea. All the sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th concern repeated observations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same two photo-identified <strong>in</strong>dividuals. Strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s are not rare <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Greece</strong>, although much less frequent than those <strong>of</strong> all other resident dolph<strong>in</strong> species (Table<br />
1). The 34 strand<strong>in</strong>gs reported here are spread homogeneously <strong>in</strong> the Ionian, Aegean and<br />
Cretan Seas.<br />
Geographic range<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> the recorded sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Greek<br />
Seas seems to be homogeneous and <strong>in</strong>dicates that the species may be present <strong>in</strong> all parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas. However, there is only one known area where Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s can be<br />
predictably found and this is the Myrtoon Sea south to the NW Crete. The sight<strong>in</strong>gs made <strong>in</strong><br />
SW Crete come from the years 1998 and 1999, but despite the cont<strong>in</strong>uous effort no other<br />
sight<strong>in</strong>gs were made <strong>in</strong> this area until the end <strong>of</strong> 2008. The sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th all<br />
come from the same two photo-identified <strong>in</strong>dividuals first observed <strong>in</strong> 1997 (Frantzis &<br />
Herz<strong>in</strong>g 2002). Two other areas where sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs have been recorded are the<br />
Northern Sporades and the sea area <strong>of</strong> the Chalkidiki Pen<strong>in</strong>sula. Surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, no Risso’s<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s have been observed <strong>in</strong> the Ionian Sea, despite <strong>in</strong>tense survey effort dur<strong>in</strong>g more<br />
than a decade. However, the species occurs <strong>in</strong> the area, s<strong>in</strong>ce n<strong>in</strong>e strand<strong>in</strong>gs (two <strong>of</strong> which<br />
were live animals) have been recorded from the N Corfu to S Peloponnese. Apparently the<br />
species is present <strong>in</strong> low numbers or out <strong>of</strong> the warm season, when all the survey effort is<br />
concentrated. Eight strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Ionian Sea have been recorded from the end <strong>of</strong><br />
September to late April, and one <strong>in</strong> June. Sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s have<br />
also been recorded <strong>in</strong> the relatively shallow area <strong>of</strong> the Cyclades Islands.<br />
Habitat<br />
Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s have been observed ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> the slope habitat, but also close to the coast<br />
and over the Aegean plateau, like <strong>in</strong> the Cyclades. This expla<strong>in</strong>s why the average depth <strong>of</strong><br />
observations is less than that <strong>of</strong> sperm whales and the Cuvier’s beaked whales. This is also<br />
due to the fact that the depressions <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea (where many <strong>of</strong> the sight<strong>in</strong>gs come<br />
from) have shallower depths than along the Hellenic Trench (where few observations are<br />
available for this species). The mean water depth and distance from the coasts <strong>of</strong> 37 Risso’s<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs is 737 m (range 165-171 m; sd=380) and 8.2 km (range 0.3-28.32 km;<br />
sd=5.8), respectively. It is probable that Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s are present farther <strong>of</strong>fshore, over<br />
the abyssal pla<strong>in</strong>s, at least <strong>in</strong> the Levant<strong>in</strong>e Sea (Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team 2007).<br />
In the western Mediterranean Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s show a preference for deep pelagic waters,<br />
<strong>in</strong> particular over steep shelf slopes and submar<strong>in</strong>e canyons (Gaspari and Natoli 2006,<br />
Azzel<strong>in</strong>o et al. 2008).<br />
Abundance<br />
There are no available data on the abundance <strong>of</strong> this species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g numbers <strong>in</strong>dicate that it is much less abundant than striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s and short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s, and probably more<br />
36
abundant than f<strong>in</strong> whales and harbour porpoises. No abundance estimates are available for<br />
the Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean, except for a small zone cover<strong>in</strong>g 32.000 km 2 <strong>of</strong>f<br />
the Valencian coasts <strong>in</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> (Gómez de Segura et al. 2006), where the estimate was 493<br />
animals. In all surveyed areas <strong>in</strong> the Western Mediterranean, encounter rates have been<br />
variable but generally low (i.e. 0.1-0.2 encounters per km; Gaspari and Natoli 2006).<br />
Population trend<br />
Population trends are unknown, both at the regional and local level.<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Information from strand<strong>in</strong>gs and sight<strong>in</strong>gs suggests that Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s may be present <strong>in</strong><br />
Greek waters year-round. However, they may be seasonal <strong>in</strong> the Ionian Sea, where<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g live animals) were recorded almost exclusively dur<strong>in</strong>g the cold months<br />
(end September – late April). Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea are genetically<br />
differentiated from those <strong>in</strong> the eastern Atlantic and some evidence exists <strong>of</strong> population<br />
structure with<strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean (Gaspari et al. 2006).<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
No data are available from the Greek Seas or the Mediterranean, and no neonates were<br />
<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the strand<strong>in</strong>g record. A young animal <strong>of</strong> 1.73 m stranded <strong>in</strong> late November and<br />
another, approximately 1.7 m long, stranded <strong>in</strong> late June. A calf was observed at sea <strong>in</strong> mid<br />
August.<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
The diet <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s is based on squid and occasional fish (Kruse et al. 1999). In two<br />
stomach contents from <strong>Greece</strong> there were several unidentified squids and squid rema<strong>in</strong>s,<br />
and one stomach conta<strong>in</strong>ed the entire skeleton <strong>of</strong> a largehead hairtail Trichiurus lepturus<br />
about 85-90 cm long. Only one squid beak was found <strong>in</strong> the stomach <strong>of</strong> a third Risso’s<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> that was apparently sick while observed for several days before it died and stranded.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
Entanglement <strong>in</strong> longl<strong>in</strong>es or nets was the cause <strong>of</strong> death for at least four stranded animals.<br />
Bycatch <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear has also been reported to occur elsewhere <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean<br />
(Gaspari and Natoli 2006). The stomach <strong>of</strong> one adult that stranded alive was full <strong>of</strong> plastic<br />
debris.<br />
37
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Data Deficient’ (Gaspari and Natoli 2006); listed<br />
as ‘Least Concern’ globally (Notarbartolo di Sciara et al. 2006, IUCN 2008).<br />
38
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821)<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Tursiops<br />
Species: Tursiops truncatus<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
Scientific name: Tursiops truncatus<br />
Common Ρινοδέλφινο<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: R<strong>in</strong>odélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
Pronunciation: r<strong>in</strong>oðélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
EN common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> AR (delph<strong>in</strong> kabir)<br />
FR grand dauph<strong>in</strong> TR afal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ES delfín mular AL delf<strong>in</strong> i madh<br />
IT tursiope HR dobri dup<strong>in</strong><br />
DE Grosser tümmler HE (dolph<strong>in</strong>an yam hatichon)<br />
PT roaz corv<strong>in</strong>eiro ML denfil geddumu qasir<br />
Size<br />
The common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> is the second largest dolph<strong>in</strong> species regularly occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the Greek Seas after the Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>. The average total length <strong>of</strong> 185 stranded<br />
specimens measured <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> is 2.44 m (sd=0.55). The maximum total lengths for males<br />
and females are 3.30 and 3.20 m respectively, and the m<strong>in</strong>imum is 1.10 m for a neonate<br />
bear<strong>in</strong>g fetal folds. The longest specimens <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea were a male 3.38 m<br />
(Universitat de Barcelona 1994) and a female also 3.38 m (Centro Studi Cetacei 1996). The<br />
maximum length world-wide is 3.81 m and length at birth ranges between 1.03 and 1.28 m<br />
(Wells & Scott 1999).<br />
39
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 305 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s spread all over the Greek Seas.<br />
This species is by far the most common cetacean <strong>in</strong> the strand<strong>in</strong>g record (Table 1), as<br />
almost half <strong>of</strong> all strand<strong>in</strong>gs (44.8% <strong>in</strong> the extrapolated data) belong to this species. The 234<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs are also spread quite homogeneously all over <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
Geographic range<br />
The distribution <strong>of</strong> the recorded sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />
the Greek Seas is homogeneous and shows that the species is present <strong>in</strong> most or all<br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas. It is present <strong>in</strong> all coastal areas, straits and gulfs, but also<br />
between islands <strong>in</strong> the entire Ionian, Aegean and Cretan Seas. The common bottlenose<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> is the only cetacean species present <strong>in</strong> the shallow and enclosed Amvrakikos Gulf<br />
with an important and possibly isolated population unit (Bearzi et al. 2008a), and it is also<br />
present <strong>in</strong> the North and South Evvoikos Gulfs (Zafeiropoulos & Merl<strong>in</strong>i 2001). It is also<br />
present along steep coasts with no cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf along the Hellenic Trench, although<br />
less common <strong>in</strong> comparison with shallow areas and plateaux.<br />
Habitat<br />
The common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> occupies the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, with<strong>in</strong> the<br />
200 m depth contour. It may be found far from the coasts <strong>in</strong> the Aegean plateau, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
depth may still be suitably low. It has also been observed a few times above the cont<strong>in</strong>ental<br />
slope. The average depth and distance from the coast <strong>of</strong> 303 common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
sight<strong>in</strong>gs is 121 m (range 1-1504 m; sd=233) and 3.0 km (range 0.0-26.0 km; sd=4.1),<br />
respectively. No <strong>of</strong>fshore observations have been made along the Hellenic Trench, with the<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle animal south <strong>of</strong> Crete. In several areas common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
share their habitat with short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Abundance<br />
The common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> is the cetacean species that is most commonly found <strong>in</strong><br />
Greek coastal waters and the second most abundant species after the striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
There is no abundance estimate for common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The<br />
absolute abundance <strong>of</strong> a local population unit <strong>of</strong> this species <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the Amvrakikos Gulf<br />
is 148 (Bearzi et al. 2008a).<br />
Population trend<br />
Population trends are unknown, but they are not expected to differ from the suspected<br />
Mediterranean population trend, which is negative (Bearzi et al. 2008c).<br />
40
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g data the common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> is present yearround<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Mediterranean common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s are genetically<br />
differentiated from those <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the contiguous eastern North Atlantic Ocean (Natoli et al.<br />
2005). Based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA analyses, discrete populations have been<br />
identified across the Black Sea and the Mediterranean Sea. Population structure was<br />
detected and the follow<strong>in</strong>g populations were identified: Black Sea, eastern Mediterranean,<br />
western Mediterranean, eastern North Atlantic. Significant genetic differentiation was<br />
observed between populations from the eastern and the western Mediterranean (Natoli et al.<br />
2005).<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
Strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> three newborns with fetal folds, 1.10-1.30 m long, and seven strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong><br />
newborns or young calves <strong>of</strong> 1.20-1.30 m <strong>in</strong>dicate that most births occur from April to early<br />
September. One calf 1.2 m long was found stranded at the end <strong>of</strong> November.<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
In Mediterranean coastal waters, bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s target primarily demersal prey.<br />
Reported prey items <strong>in</strong>clude demersal species such as European hake Merluccius<br />
merluccius, European conger Conger conger, red mullet Mullus barbatus, striped red mullet<br />
Mullus surmuletus, common cuttlefish Sepia <strong>of</strong>fic<strong>in</strong>alis, common octopus Octopus vulgaris<br />
and a variety <strong>of</strong> other bony fishes and mollusks (Bearzi et al. 2008c). However, epipelagic<br />
species <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g European pilchard Sard<strong>in</strong>a pilchardus and round sard<strong>in</strong>ella Sard<strong>in</strong>ella<br />
aurita are important prey for bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Amvrakikos Gulf (Bearzi et al.<br />
2008a), whilst those <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea predom<strong>in</strong>antly target demersal prey (Bearzi et<br />
al. 2005).<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
The two most important threats for this species <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> and the Mediterranean <strong>in</strong> general<br />
are: 1) the reduced availability <strong>of</strong> prey caused by overfish<strong>in</strong>g, and 2) <strong>in</strong>cidental mortality <strong>in</strong><br />
fish<strong>in</strong>g gear (Bearzi et al. 2008c). Intentional kill<strong>in</strong>g is still a cause <strong>of</strong> mortality <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, and<br />
therefore, a threat for the species, although it seems to occur less <strong>of</strong>ten than <strong>in</strong> the past<br />
decades. Another develop<strong>in</strong>g potential or real threat is the noise produced by Acoustic<br />
Harassment Devices or Acoustic Deterrent Devices (<strong>of</strong>ten called “p<strong>in</strong>gers”; see Bearzi et al.<br />
2008c). Massively sold to coastal artisanal fishermen and sea farm owners <strong>in</strong> order to<br />
mitigate the damage to their fish<strong>in</strong>g gears or cages, they may have exclusion effects on the<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s, which feed <strong>in</strong> the same coastal habitat that is harvested by humans.<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Vulnerable’ (Bearzi & Fortuna 2006); listed as<br />
‘Vulnerable’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
41
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Stenella coeruleoalba (Meyen, 1833)<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Stenella<br />
Species: Stenella coeruleoalba<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Striped dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
Scientific name: Stenella coeruleoalba<br />
Common Ζωνοδέλφινο<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Zonodélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
Pronunciation: zonoðélf<strong>in</strong>o<br />
EN striped dolph<strong>in</strong> AR (delf<strong>in</strong> azraq wa abyad)<br />
FR dauph<strong>in</strong> bleu et blanc TR çizgili yunus<br />
ES delfín listado AL ?<br />
IT stenella striata HR prugasti dup<strong>in</strong><br />
DE Blauweißer delf<strong>in</strong> HE (stenella mefuspeset)<br />
PT golf<strong>in</strong>ho riscado ML denfil geddumu qasir<br />
Size<br />
The body length <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s is generally shorter than <strong>in</strong> oceanic<br />
populations (reach<strong>in</strong>g 2.56 m). Males are slightly larger than females (Archer II & Perr<strong>in</strong><br />
1999, Aguilar 2000). The average length <strong>of</strong> 110 animals stranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> is 1.65 m<br />
(sd=0.39). The maximum length for males is 2.20 m and for females 2.15 m. In the<br />
Mediterranean, the longest specimen is a male 2.27 m long (Van Canneyt et al. 1998) and a<br />
female 2.25 m long (Duguy 1986). Higher reported values (2.4 to 2.8 m) should be<br />
considered dubious. Length at birth <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean has been reported as 0.90-0.95 m<br />
(Aguilar 1991). However, newborns <strong>of</strong> 0.80 m were recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> and other<br />
Mediterranean countries. Mediterranean striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s are thought to have the smallest<br />
size <strong>in</strong> the world (Aguilar 2000). A 0.79 m specimen was measured by Port Police<br />
authorities follow<strong>in</strong>g expert <strong>in</strong>structions.<br />
43
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There were 523 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s recorded all over the Greek Seas. This species<br />
is the second most common among strand<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 1), almost one third <strong>of</strong> all strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
(31.2% <strong>in</strong> the extrapolated data) belong<strong>in</strong>g to this species. The 197 strand<strong>in</strong>gs recorded are<br />
spread all over <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
Geographic range<br />
Striped dolph<strong>in</strong> records <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas suggest that the species is present <strong>in</strong> all deep<br />
(>500 m) and pelagic waters. It is present also at <strong>in</strong>termediate depths <strong>of</strong> 200-500 m.<br />
Although strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> this species were reported from shallow or enclosed gulfs (<strong>in</strong>ner<br />
Thermaikos, Pagasitikos, <strong>in</strong>ner Saronikos, <strong>in</strong>ner S Evvoikos) and shallow seas (Thracian<br />
Sea, <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea, Cyclades area), striped dolph<strong>in</strong> presence there is unlikely. Striped<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s have been observed rarely <strong>in</strong> coastal areas. Only two sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
occurred above the shallow waters <strong>of</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf <strong>in</strong> the area between Lefkada,<br />
Kefallonia and Zakynthos Islands and the ma<strong>in</strong>land (<strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea), which has been<br />
surveyed <strong>in</strong>tensively dur<strong>in</strong>g the last fifteen years. The only enclosed gulf where striped<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s regularly occur and seem to be resident or even isolated is the deep Gulf <strong>of</strong><br />
Cor<strong>in</strong>th, where they <strong>of</strong>ten form mixed groups with short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s and<br />
occasionally with Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s as well (Frantzis & Herz<strong>in</strong>g 2002).<br />
Habitat<br />
The striped dolph<strong>in</strong> occupies the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope and pelagic habitat <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas,<br />
and probably or potentially all waters beyond the 200 m contour. Exceptionally, it can be<br />
found over shallower waters (see Geographic range). It can also be found close to the coast<br />
wherever the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope is very steep and situated near the coastl<strong>in</strong>e, e.g. <strong>in</strong> the Gulf<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th and along the Hellenic Trench. The average depth and distance from the coast <strong>of</strong><br />
522 striped dolph<strong>in</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs is 1024 m (range 75-2920 m; sd=484) and 8.7 km (range 0.6-<br />
37.1 km; sd=5.8), respectively. As the occurrence <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s is likely to extend<br />
further <strong>of</strong>fshore, the average distance from the coast is certa<strong>in</strong>ly underestimated.<br />
Abundance<br />
The striped dolph<strong>in</strong> is apparently the most abundant species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, as it is <strong>in</strong><br />
the entire Mediterranean Sea (Forcada et al. 1994, Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team<br />
2007). An estimate <strong>of</strong> about 120,000 <strong>in</strong>dividuals was made for the western Mediterranean<br />
exclud<strong>in</strong>g the Tyrrhenian Sea <strong>in</strong> 1991 and 1992 (Forcada et al. 1994). There is no<br />
abundance estimate for striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas.<br />
Population trend<br />
Population trends <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas are completely unknown. The Mediterranean<br />
population trend was very negative <strong>in</strong> the last two decades and suspected <strong>of</strong> a 30%<br />
reduction <strong>in</strong> the last 60 years, but it is currently uncerta<strong>in</strong> (Aguilar 2006).<br />
44
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g data the striped dolph<strong>in</strong> is present year-round <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas. Morphological (Calzada and Aguilar 1995, Archer 1997) and genetic (García-<br />
Martínez et al. 1995) studies show that the Mediterranean and eastern North Atlantic<br />
populations are isolated from each other, with little or no gene flow across the Strait <strong>of</strong><br />
Gibraltar. Variation <strong>in</strong> body size with<strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean bas<strong>in</strong> is suggestive <strong>of</strong> population<br />
structure and/or restriction <strong>in</strong> gene flow among areas (Calzada and Aguilar 1995). The<br />
dispersal range is considered sufficiently limited among populations across the<br />
Mediterranean (and possibly between some <strong>in</strong>shore and <strong>of</strong>fshore populations) to make<br />
differentiation possible, especially between the eastern and western Mediterranean bas<strong>in</strong>s<br />
(Gaspari 2004).<br />
A particular case <strong>of</strong> isolation concerns the small population <strong>of</strong> very few hundreds <strong>of</strong> striped<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ner part <strong>of</strong> the enclosed Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th. This population seems to<br />
be isolated and represents a possibly unique case <strong>of</strong> a closed population <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> its relatively small size and its isolation, this population unit seems extremely<br />
fragile and should be considered a designatable unit on the basis <strong>of</strong> precaution.<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
Among the youngest stranded striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, four measured less than 0.90 m<br />
and stranded from mid July to late August, seven measured 0.92-0.97 m and stranded from<br />
mid July to late August, and one measured 0.93 m and stranded the 10 th <strong>of</strong> September.<br />
These dates suggest a peak <strong>of</strong> births by the end <strong>of</strong> July and beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> August and births<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ly occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> July and August. This apparent reproductive season appears to be a bit<br />
earlier than what has been reported for the western Mediterranean (Aguilar 1991, 2000).<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
The diet <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>cludes cephalopod species, fish and<br />
crustaceans, but cephalopods seem to be the usual prey with fish and crustaceans be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
more occasional (Würtz & Marrale 1991, Pulc<strong>in</strong>i et al. 1992, Blanco et al. 1995). Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
most common cephalopods <strong>in</strong>clude Todarodes sagittatus and Histioteuthis sp. Fish prey<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes both small epipelagic (e.g. Engraulis encrasicolous) and bathypelagic species (e.g.<br />
Myctophids). No stomach content analyses have been performed so far <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
The most important presumed threats for striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas <strong>in</strong>clude 1)<br />
chemical pollution, 2) <strong>in</strong>tentional kill<strong>in</strong>g and 3) entrapment <strong>in</strong> driftnets. Biomagnification <strong>of</strong><br />
xenobiotic compounds may be the most important threat. A die-<strong>of</strong>f devastated the<br />
Mediterranean population <strong>in</strong> 1990-1992. The primary cause <strong>of</strong> the die-<strong>of</strong>f was a morbillivirus<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection, but PCBs and other organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pollutants with potential for caus<strong>in</strong>g<br />
immunosuppressive effects were suggested to have triggered the event and/or enhanced its<br />
45
spread and lethality (Aguilar & Borrell 1994). Blubber concentrations <strong>of</strong> DDT and PCB, the<br />
two ma<strong>in</strong> organochlor<strong>in</strong>e pollutants, show a slowly decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trend <strong>in</strong> the last two decades<br />
(Aguilar & Borrell, 2005) but levels are still high. Intentional kill<strong>in</strong>g is still a cause <strong>of</strong> mortality<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, although less than <strong>in</strong> the past decades. Although fish<strong>in</strong>g gear damage<br />
and depredation predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong>volves common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s, fishermen <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas may not be able to discrim<strong>in</strong>ate among dolph<strong>in</strong> species kill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> retaliation may<br />
<strong>in</strong>volve other dolph<strong>in</strong> species <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s. Incidental mortality <strong>in</strong> pelagic<br />
gillnets (driftnets, ferrettare, thonailles etc.) are a major source <strong>of</strong> mortality all over the<br />
western Mediterranean, likely kill<strong>in</strong>g thousands <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s per year <strong>in</strong> several parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean (e.g. Aguilar 2006). Their use <strong>in</strong> waters surround<strong>in</strong>g the Greek Seas is<br />
relatively limited, and seems to concern predom<strong>in</strong>antly or exclusively boats belong<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
Italian and Turkish fish<strong>in</strong>g fleets. No Greek boats seem to be us<strong>in</strong>g these nets.<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation proposed as ‘Vulnerable’ (Aguilar 2006); listed as ‘Least<br />
Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
46
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis L<strong>in</strong>naeus, 1758<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Delph<strong>in</strong>us<br />
Species: Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Sort-beak common dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
Scientific name: Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis<br />
Common Κοινό δελφίνι<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: K<strong>in</strong>ó delfíni<br />
Pronunciation: c<strong>in</strong>ó ðelfíni<br />
EN short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> AR (delph<strong>in</strong> adi)<br />
FR dauph<strong>in</strong> commun TR tirtak<br />
ES delfín común AL delf<strong>in</strong> i zakonshem<br />
IT delf<strong>in</strong>o comune HR dup<strong>in</strong> zlocesti<br />
DE Geme<strong>in</strong>er delph<strong>in</strong> HE (dolph<strong>in</strong> muvhaq)<br />
PT golf<strong>in</strong>ho vulgar ML denfil<br />
Size<br />
Mediterranean short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s are smaller than some oceanic populations.<br />
Males are slightly larger than females (Murphy & Rogan 2006). The average total length <strong>of</strong><br />
32 stranded specimens measured <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> is 1.80 m (sd=0.37). The maximum total length<br />
was 2.27 m for a male. Two specimens were reported to be 2.30 m long but the precision <strong>of</strong><br />
these measurements cannot be confirmed. The m<strong>in</strong>imum length recorded is 1.07 m and a<br />
neonate was reported to be
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There are 140 sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> common dolph<strong>in</strong>s recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas (many sight<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
from long-term dedicated surveys <strong>in</strong> the northern <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea have not been <strong>in</strong>cluded).<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the sight<strong>in</strong>gs come from Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th (52) and the northern part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian<br />
Sea (23). This species is the third most common among strand<strong>in</strong>gs (11.7% <strong>in</strong> the<br />
extrapolated data) after the common bottlenose and the striped dolph<strong>in</strong> (Table 1). Most <strong>of</strong><br />
the 55 strand<strong>in</strong>gs have been recorded <strong>in</strong> areas where sight<strong>in</strong>gs are also available.<br />
Geographic range<br />
The short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s are present <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea and <strong>in</strong> the deeper<br />
waters <strong>of</strong> the eastern Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th. They are present and potentially common locally <strong>in</strong><br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the shallow waters (depth
a similar abundance. Short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s seem to be present <strong>in</strong> most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shallow (
Population trend<br />
Once one <strong>of</strong> the commonest species <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea, the short-beaked common<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> has experienced a generalised and major decrease <strong>in</strong> this region dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 30-<br />
40 years (Bearzi et al. 2003). Population trends for the Greek Seas are unknown. However,<br />
overfish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this species’ prey – the ma<strong>in</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> its rarefaction <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea<br />
(Bearzi et al. 2008b) – is a source <strong>of</strong> concern. Overish<strong>in</strong>g has caused a cont<strong>in</strong>uous decl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
<strong>of</strong> fish biomass <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 90s (Stergiou 2005, Stergiou et al. 2007,<br />
Machias et al. 2007). Therefore, the population trend is likely negative <strong>in</strong> many or most parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas. The rate <strong>of</strong> population decrease may vary from one area to another. In<br />
any case, if this rate is similar to the one recorded for the population unit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian<br />
Sea dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade (Bearzi et al. 2008b), then the species could rapidly disappear<br />
from the Greek Seas.<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g data the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> is present yearround<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Studies <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea support this hypothesis, s<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> the known <strong>in</strong>dividuals were regularly observed for many years (Bearzi et al.<br />
2008b). Recent genetic evidence (Natoli et al. 2008) <strong>in</strong>dicates a relatively high degree <strong>of</strong><br />
differentiation among short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean and shows that<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> this species <strong>in</strong> the eastern part <strong>of</strong> the bas<strong>in</strong>, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea, are<br />
largely isolated from the western Mediterranean population. Only one sample was available<br />
from the Aegean Sea, so no differentiation between the Ionian and the Aegean Sea could<br />
be ascerta<strong>in</strong>ed. However, distribution data suggest that geographic isolation between shortbeaked<br />
common dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the Ionian and Aegean Seas is very likely.<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
Only sparse <strong>in</strong>formation is available, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that births occur dur<strong>in</strong>g the warm season. A<br />
young lactat<strong>in</strong>g calf 1.07 m long was found stranded <strong>in</strong> mid October, and a large fetus was<br />
found <strong>in</strong> the womb <strong>of</strong> a stranded female at the end <strong>of</strong> May. F<strong>in</strong>ally, one dead newborn<br />
shorter than 1 m was found float<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> late September, while its presumed mother was try<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to keep it at surface (Politi pers comm.).<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
The available <strong>in</strong>formation on the forag<strong>in</strong>g ecology <strong>of</strong> common dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean<br />
<strong>in</strong>dicates relatively flexible feed<strong>in</strong>g habits, with a preference for epipelagic and mesopelagic<br />
fish, similar to what has been observed outside the bas<strong>in</strong> (Bearzi et al. 2003). The stomach<br />
contents from the western Mediterranean Sea <strong>in</strong>dicate a diet based primarily on shoal<strong>in</strong>g<br />
fish such as European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus, European pilchard Sard<strong>in</strong>a<br />
pilchardus, round sard<strong>in</strong>ella Sard<strong>in</strong>ella aurita and garpike Belone belone, but also on<br />
eurybathic cephalopod and crustacean species (Bearzi et al. 2003). In the waters <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea, shoal<strong>in</strong>g fish <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g anchovies and sard<strong>in</strong>es are the key prey<br />
(Clupeidae and Engraulidae account for 80% <strong>of</strong> the average diet accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bearzi et al.<br />
50
2008b). No <strong>in</strong>formation is available from the Aegean Sea and the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th. However,<br />
the habitat and behaviour <strong>of</strong> the few short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s that live <strong>in</strong> mixed pods<br />
with striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th <strong>in</strong>dicate that a diet primarily based on<br />
cephalopods is likely.<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
The threats most likely implicated <strong>in</strong> the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean short-beaked common<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s are diverse and <strong>in</strong>clude prey depletion, contam<strong>in</strong>ation by xenobiotics, direct kill<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
fishery bycatch and global climate change (Bearzi et al. 2003). However, the long-term study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian population unit suggested that the most important threat is prey depletion<br />
caused by overfish<strong>in</strong>g (Bearzi et al. 2008b). Unsusta<strong>in</strong>able fisheries exploitation result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
food-web and other damage are an ongo<strong>in</strong>g and possibly <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g threat for this and other<br />
cetacean species <strong>in</strong> Greek waters. Overfish<strong>in</strong>g has caused a cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the fish<br />
stock biomass <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 90s (Stergiou 2005, Stergiou et al. 2007),<br />
<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>’s key prey (Machias et al. 2007). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
the available <strong>in</strong>formation, it seems that two more threats for this species <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> are<br />
related to <strong>in</strong>teractions with fisheries. A short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> was found stranded<br />
with trammel nets around its head and lower jaws. Two more specimens that stranded <strong>in</strong> the<br />
N Aegean had marks probably orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from nets and a third one was found stranded with<br />
its flukes cut <strong>of</strong>f by a knife. At least once, two or three short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s were<br />
found stranded the same day <strong>in</strong> the Thracian Sea. This evidence <strong>in</strong>dicates that bycatch and<br />
possibly direct kill<strong>in</strong>g occur and constitute a threat. Direct, <strong>in</strong>tentional kill<strong>in</strong>g by some<br />
fishermen would not be a surprise, s<strong>in</strong>ce it occurs for common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s and<br />
striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s and most fishermen do not discrim<strong>in</strong>ate among dolph<strong>in</strong> species.<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Mediterranean subpopulation classified as ‘Endangered’ (Bearzi 2003); listed as ‘Least<br />
Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
51
Phocoena phocoena (L<strong>in</strong>naeus, 1758)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Harbour porpoise<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Phocoenidae (Φωκαινίδες)<br />
Genus: Phocoena<br />
Species: Phocoena phocoena<br />
Sub-species: Phocoena phocoena relicta Abel, 1905<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Phocoena phocoena<br />
Common Φώκαινα<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Fóka<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pronunciation: fócena<br />
EN harbour porpoise AR (khanzir al bahr)<br />
FR marsou<strong>in</strong> commun TR mutur<br />
ES marsopa común AL ?<br />
IT focena comune HR obalna pliskaviča<br />
DE Schwe<strong>in</strong>swal HE (foqena)<br />
PT boto ML denfil iswed<br />
Size<br />
The harbour porpoise is one <strong>of</strong> the smallest cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the world and <strong>in</strong> all populations<br />
females are consistently larger than males (Read 1999). The size <strong>of</strong> the Aegean<br />
(Mediterranean) harbour porpoise is thought to be the same <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea<br />
population, which is smaller than the Atlantic population (Rosel et al. 2003). The available<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation on body length is com<strong>in</strong>g from 13 stranded specimens (M. Koutrakis, pers.<br />
comm., Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, unpublished data). The total length <strong>of</strong> eight<br />
females was 1.03-1.57 m with an average <strong>of</strong> 1.35 m (sd=0.19). The total length <strong>of</strong> six males<br />
was 1.13-1.35 m with an average <strong>of</strong> 1.25 m (sd=0.08). A male 1.45 m long has recently<br />
stranded <strong>in</strong> the Turkish Aegean coasts (Güçlüsoy 2007). The maximum length worldwide is<br />
2.08 m for a female, while the length at birth is about 0.70 m (Read 1999).<br />
53
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
There is only one sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> harbour porpoises recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, but it has to be<br />
noted that no dedicated surveys have been conducted <strong>in</strong> the areas ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong>habited by this<br />
species (Thracian Sea and Thermaikos Gulf). The available <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
species comes from 15 strand<strong>in</strong>gs (Table 1); <strong>of</strong> which 13 were recorded <strong>in</strong> the northern<br />
Aegean Sea.<br />
Geographic range<br />
Until the mid 1990s the harbour porpoise was considered absent or ext<strong>in</strong>ct <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea (Frantzis et al. 2001). Its presence is now def<strong>in</strong>itely confirmed by 15<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs and one sight<strong>in</strong>g and it is limited to the northern part <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea. The<br />
harbour porpoise is absent from the rest <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean bas<strong>in</strong> and has been recorded<br />
exceptionally as a vagrant species close to the Gibraltar area (Frantzis et al. 2001). Until<br />
2006 all records <strong>of</strong> harbour porpoises concerned exclusively the northernmost part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Aegean Sea and particularly the Thracian Sea. S<strong>in</strong>ce 2006 three new strand<strong>in</strong>gs were<br />
reported further south, on both the west and east coasts <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea. In summer<br />
2006 a harbour porpoise stranded alive <strong>in</strong> N Evvoia, at about latitude 38°58’ (Pelagos<br />
Cetacean Research Institute unpublished data). In October 2006 another specimen<br />
stranded <strong>in</strong> Urla (Turkish Aegean Sea) at 38°21’ <strong>of</strong> latitude (not represented on the<br />
distribution map; Güçlüsoy 2007). F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g 2008 a third specimen stranded <strong>in</strong><br />
Kavouri Vouliagmenis <strong>in</strong> Saronikos Gulf at about a latitude <strong>of</strong> 37°49’ (Pelagos Cetacean<br />
Research Institute unpublished data). This is the southernmost position ever recorded for<br />
the subspecies Phocoena phocoena relicta, i.e. some 460 km further south <strong>of</strong> its previous<br />
known range <strong>in</strong> the northern Aegean and the Thracian Sea. There is no easy explanation <strong>of</strong><br />
this appearance <strong>of</strong> harbour porpoises <strong>in</strong> southern and warmer seas, and it is unknown<br />
whether they <strong>in</strong>dicate southern limits for the true range <strong>of</strong> this species. Recent observations<br />
<strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the Çanakkale Straits (Güçlüsoy 2007, Tonay et al. 2009), both <strong>in</strong> its Aegean<br />
side and <strong>in</strong>side the straits, have shown that harbour porpoises found <strong>in</strong> the Aegean may<br />
have a cont<strong>in</strong>uous range with the harbour porpoises <strong>of</strong> the Marmara Sea.<br />
Habitat<br />
The harbour porpoises typically occupie the cont<strong>in</strong>ental shelf waters close to the coast and<br />
seem to prefer lower water temperatures than the average temperatures <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas<br />
(seldom found <strong>in</strong> waters warmer than 17°C; Read 1999). The s<strong>in</strong>gle sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Greek<br />
Seas clearly does not allow draw<strong>in</strong>g conclusions about the habitat preferences <strong>of</strong> harbour<br />
porpoises <strong>in</strong> this area. However, the location <strong>of</strong> strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong>dicates that the Thracian Sea<br />
encompasses the core area <strong>of</strong> its habitat. The Thracian Sea (as well as Thermaikos Gulf)<br />
has an extended plateau <strong>of</strong> shallow waters that present the lowest temperatures and<br />
sal<strong>in</strong>ities <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas (Poulos et al. 1997). The only sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> 6-10<br />
harbour porpoises occurred at about 100 m from shore (Frantzis et al. 2001). In the Black<br />
Sea, harbour porpoises occupy coastal waters up to 200 m deep, although they can also<br />
occur <strong>in</strong> deep <strong>of</strong>fshore waters (Birkun & Frantzis 2006).<br />
54
Abundance<br />
The population size <strong>of</strong> Aegean harbour porpoise is unknown, but likely small as <strong>in</strong>dicated by<br />
the limited geographic range and rarity <strong>of</strong> records.<br />
Population trend<br />
The population trend <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea subpopulation or population is unknown.<br />
Degree <strong>of</strong> residency and/or isolation<br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g data the harbour porpoises seem to be present yearround<br />
<strong>in</strong> the northern Aegean Sea. They have been recorded <strong>in</strong> all months <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
except April and September. Their small size for their age and genetic signature <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that they orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the Black Sea population (subspecies Phocoena phocoena relicta)<br />
rather than from the Atlantic, from which they have been reproductively isolated for<br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> years and have genetically and morphologically diverged (Rosel et al. 2003,<br />
Viaud-Mart<strong>in</strong>nez et al. 2007). It has been suggested that movements <strong>of</strong> porpoises out <strong>of</strong> the<br />
the Marmara Sea and <strong>in</strong>to the Mediterranean Sea may occur through the Dardanelles<br />
Straits (Rosel et al. 2003). Recent observations all along the Dardanelles Straits as well as<br />
at their exit <strong>in</strong>to the Aegean Sea have shown a cont<strong>in</strong>uous range (Güçlüsoy 2007, Tonay et<br />
al. 2009). The population <strong>of</strong> P. p. relicta, to which the Aegean harbour porpoises belongs,<br />
may consist <strong>of</strong> three or more subpopulations, e.g. the Azov Sea, northwestern Black Sea,<br />
Marmara Sea and northern Aegean Sea (Birkun & Frantzis 2006). However, further work is<br />
needed to determ<strong>in</strong>e whether the animals found <strong>in</strong> the northern Aegean Sea represent a<br />
separate subpopulation, and which is their degree <strong>of</strong> geographical and/or genetic isolation<br />
from the Black and Marmara Seas (Frantzis et al., 2001; Rosel et al., 2003). Despite the<br />
recently confirmed cont<strong>in</strong>uous range, the genetic analysis <strong>of</strong> six samples from the Aegean<br />
Sea showed that one <strong>of</strong> their two haplotypes was shared with the Black Sea, while another<br />
was unique. Unexpectedly, all three samples from the Sea <strong>of</strong> Marmara (located between the<br />
Aegean Sea and Black Sea) possessed a s<strong>in</strong>gle and unique haplotype.<br />
Seasonality <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
There is no available <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g the reproductive season <strong>of</strong> the Aegean harbour<br />
porpoises. Reproduction is seasonal <strong>in</strong> all studied populations <strong>of</strong> this species (Read 1999).<br />
In the UK and the Baltic Sea births occur primarily <strong>in</strong> June and July. In the western Atlantic<br />
(Bay <strong>of</strong> Fundy and Gulf <strong>of</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong>e) they occur <strong>in</strong> May (Read 1999).<br />
Feed<strong>in</strong>g habits<br />
The analysis <strong>of</strong> stomach contents <strong>of</strong> a few harbour porpoises sranded <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> is still<br />
pend<strong>in</strong>g. Anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus ponticus) is an important prey species for harbour<br />
porpoises <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea and Azov Sea populations dur<strong>in</strong>g the cold season. At least 14<br />
fish species have been recorded <strong>in</strong> stomach contents, <strong>of</strong> which four are considered<br />
55
important: anchovy, sprat (Sprattus sprattus phalaericus), whit<strong>in</strong>g (Merlangius merlangus<br />
eux<strong>in</strong>us) and gobies (Gobiidae) (Birkun & Frantzis 2006).<br />
Ma<strong>in</strong> threats<br />
There are no data other than from one specimen that was found with trammel nets around<br />
its pectoral f<strong>in</strong> (M. Koutrakis, pers. comm.). Bycatch is the most important threat globally and<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Black Sea, and it is one <strong>of</strong> the possible ma<strong>in</strong> threats for the Aegean population as<br />
well. Although no data exist, prey depletion result<strong>in</strong>g from overfish<strong>in</strong>g may be another<br />
important threat. F<strong>in</strong>ally, as Aegean harbour porpoises live at the southernmost limit <strong>of</strong> the<br />
range <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea population, and thus, at the highest temperatures they can afford<br />
(Poulos et al. 1997, Read 1999), climate change (already result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g sea surface<br />
temperatures <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea; V. Papathanasiou, pers. comm.) may be a serious threat<br />
for this population. Until 1983, unregulated hunt<strong>in</strong>g was the primary threat for the Black Sea<br />
population. At present, <strong>in</strong>cidental mortality <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g nets is the most serious threat there.<br />
Large-scale pelagic and small-scale coastal fisheries may also affect Black Sea harbour<br />
porpoises <strong>in</strong>directly by reduc<strong>in</strong>g their prey populations and degrad<strong>in</strong>g their habitat (Birkun &<br />
Frantzis 2006).<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
The Black Sea subpopulation (thought to also <strong>in</strong>clude Aegean Sea animals) is proposed as<br />
‘Endangered’ (Birkun & Frantzis 2006); listed as ‘Least Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
56
RARE CETACEAN SPECIES IN THE GREEK SEAS AND AROUND THEM<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>gs by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
57
Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Humpback whale<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Mysticeti (Μυστακοκήτη)<br />
Family: Balaenopteridae (Φαλαινοπτερίδες)<br />
Subfamily: Megapter<strong>in</strong>ae (Μεγαπτερίνες)<br />
Genus: Megaptera<br />
Species: Megaptera novaeangliae<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Megaptera novaeangliae<br />
Common Μεγάπτερη φάλαινα<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Megápteri fála<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pronunciation: meγápteri fálena<br />
EN humpback whale AR (hout ahdab)<br />
FR mégaptère TR kambur bal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ES yubarta AL ?<br />
IT megattera HR grbavi kit<br />
DE Buckelwal HE (livyatan gadol snapir)<br />
PT jubarte ML baliena tal-íwienah kbar<br />
General <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The humpback whale is an occasional visitor <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea, enter<strong>in</strong>g the region<br />
from the Strait <strong>of</strong> Gibraltar (Frantzis et al. 2004). The total length <strong>of</strong> mature <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
worldwide is 13.0 m for males and 13.9 m for females (maximum 14.8 and 15.5 m,<br />
respectively; an exceptional maximum <strong>of</strong> 17.4 m has been recorded <strong>in</strong> the southern<br />
hemisphere; the size at birth is 4.0-4.6 m) (Clapham 2000). There are 13 published records<br />
<strong>of</strong> humpback whales <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea (Frantzis et al. 2004, Notarbartolo di Sciara<br />
2006a). An additional animal was record <strong>in</strong> February 2009 <strong>of</strong>f Slovenia (T. Genov, pers.<br />
comm.). It is surpris<strong>in</strong>g that only six <strong>of</strong> the 14 records orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the western<br />
Mediterranean, which is closer to the Atlantic Ocean, while the other eight come from the<br />
eastern bas<strong>in</strong>. Eight records concerned sight<strong>in</strong>gs (couples <strong>in</strong> two cases), one was a<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g and five concerned entanglements <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear <strong>of</strong> whales that <strong>in</strong> all but one<br />
case died. Two sight<strong>in</strong>gs (<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian and Myrtoon Sea, respectively) and one<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g (follow<strong>in</strong>g entanglement <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear) occurred <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Twelve <strong>of</strong> 14<br />
59
observations were made s<strong>in</strong>ce 1990. All these whales were recorded thousands kilometers<br />
away from their usual feed<strong>in</strong>g and breed<strong>in</strong>g grounds, when they reached the Mediterranean<br />
Sea repeatedly dur<strong>in</strong>g the last years. This seems to be a new, grow<strong>in</strong>g trend, rather than an<br />
old phenomenon that went unnoticed dur<strong>in</strong>g the past (Frantzis et al. 2004). It is not known if<br />
the humpback whales that enter the Mediterranean are able to f<strong>in</strong>d their way back to the<br />
Atlantic Ocean, or if they stay <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea and die sooner or later. Frantzis et<br />
al. (2004) proposed as plausible explanations for the <strong>in</strong>creased number <strong>of</strong> humpback whales<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean the climate change and a spillover from an expand<strong>in</strong>g North Atlantic<br />
population comb<strong>in</strong>ed with the merely explorative nature <strong>of</strong> humpback whales. In all cases<br />
the high rate <strong>of</strong> entanglement <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear poses a serious threat for all <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>of</strong> this<br />
species that enter the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m contour<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Listed as ‘Least Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
60
Balaenoptera acutorostrata Lacépède, 1804<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Northern m<strong>in</strong>ke whale<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Mysticeti (Μυστακοκήτη)<br />
Family: Balaenopteridae (Φαλαινοπτερίδες)<br />
Subfamily: Balaenopter<strong>in</strong>ae (Φαλαινοπτερίνες)<br />
Genus: Balaenoptera<br />
Species: Balaenoptera acutorostrata<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Balaenoptera acutorostrata<br />
Common name: Βόρεια ρυγχοφάλαινα<br />
Transcription: Vória rynch<strong>of</strong>ála<strong>in</strong>a<br />
Pronunciation: vória riŋx<strong>of</strong>álena<br />
EN common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale AR (hout al m<strong>in</strong>k)<br />
FR petit rorqual TR ticari bal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ES rorcual aliblanco AL ?<br />
IT balenottera m<strong>in</strong>ore HR kljunasti kit<br />
DE Zwergf<strong>in</strong>nwal HE (livyatan gutz)<br />
PT baleia nana ML baliena ta’ geddumha ppuntat<br />
General <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale is an occasional visitor <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea enter<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
region from the Strait <strong>of</strong> Gibraltar (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006b). The average worldwide<br />
length <strong>of</strong> mature <strong>in</strong>dividuals is 8.5-8.8 m <strong>in</strong> females and 7.8-8.2 <strong>in</strong> males (Perr<strong>in</strong> & Brownell<br />
2009). The maximum length recorded is 9.2 m, and size at birth is 2.4-2.8 m (Notarbartolo di<br />
Sciara 1997). There are 26 records <strong>of</strong> common m<strong>in</strong>ke whales <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
Three concern sight<strong>in</strong>gs and all the others are captured or entagled animals and a few<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs. Twenty <strong>of</strong> the records occurred <strong>in</strong> the western and only five <strong>in</strong> the eastern<br />
Mediterranean, with one more recorded <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006b).<br />
There is only one record <strong>of</strong> a young (4.16 m) common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale found float<strong>in</strong>g dead<br />
close to Skiathos Island <strong>in</strong> May 2000 (Verriopoulou et al. 2001).<br />
61
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m contour<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Listed as ‘Least Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
62
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Pseudorca crassidens (Owen, 1846)<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Pseudorca<br />
Species: Pseudorca crassidens<br />
Relevant common names<br />
False killer whale<br />
Scientific name: Pseudorca crassidens<br />
Common Ψευδόρκα<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Psevdórka<br />
Pronunciation: psevðórka<br />
EN false killer whale AR (arqa mouzaïfa)<br />
FR fausse-orque TR yalanci katil bal<strong>in</strong>a<br />
ES falsa orca AL ?<br />
IT pseudorca HR crni dup<strong>in</strong><br />
DE Kle<strong>in</strong>er schwertwal HE (av-shen katlan)<br />
PT falsa orca ML psewdorka<br />
General <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The false killer whale is probably an occasional visitor enter<strong>in</strong>g the Mediterranean Sea from<br />
the Strait <strong>of</strong> Gibraltar (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006c). However, the number <strong>of</strong> recently<br />
documented occurrences <strong>of</strong> this species (especially <strong>in</strong> the eastern Mediterranean) <strong>in</strong>dicates<br />
that the presence <strong>of</strong> a resident small population <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean cannot be totally ruled<br />
out. The false killer whale is one <strong>of</strong> the largest members <strong>of</strong> the family Delph<strong>in</strong>idae, with adult<br />
males reach<strong>in</strong>g 6m and females 5 m (Baird 2009). The maximum length recorded for the<br />
two sexes is 6.10 m and 5.06 m, respectively. Newborns range between 1.6 m and 1.9 m<br />
(Odell & McClune 1999). There are 33 records <strong>of</strong> false killer whales <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean<br />
Sea; 16 <strong>in</strong> the western and 17 <strong>in</strong> the eastern bas<strong>in</strong>. N<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> them concern sight<strong>in</strong>gs, 15 are<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs and n<strong>in</strong>e are captured or entagled animals. Twelve records concerned large pods<br />
or couples (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006c, Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team 2007). There<br />
are two records from the Greek Seas. In 1992 a pod <strong>of</strong> seven or more <strong>in</strong>dividuals was<br />
63
photographed between Chios Island and Tsesme <strong>in</strong> Turkey. One year later a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual stranded <strong>in</strong> Argolikos Gulf (Frantzis et al. 2003). One live strand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Aegean<br />
Sea occurred <strong>in</strong> Urla Bay, along the Turkish coast, <strong>in</strong> 1995 (noted with a white square on the<br />
map; Öztürk & Öztürk 1998). It is <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g to note that the last five records outside <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Greece</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the easternmost part <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean and occurred yearly s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />
2003: four <strong>of</strong> them <strong>of</strong>f Israel (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006c) and one <strong>of</strong>f the east coast <strong>of</strong><br />
Cyprus (Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team 2007).<br />
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m contour<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Listed as ‘Data Deficient’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
64
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Mesoplodon sp.<br />
Beaked whale<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Ziphioidea (Ζιφιοειδή)<br />
Family: Ziphiidae (Ζιφιίδες)<br />
Subfamily: Hyperoodont<strong>in</strong>ae (Υπερωοδοντίνες)<br />
Genus: Mesoplodon<br />
Species: Mesoplodon sp.<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Scientific name: Mesoplodon sp.<br />
Common Μεσοπλόδοντας<br />
name:<br />
Transcription: Mesoplódontas<br />
Pronunciation: mesoplóðondas<br />
EN beaked whale AR (?)<br />
FR mésoplodon TR ?<br />
ES mesoplodon AL ?<br />
IT mesoplodonte HR ?<br />
DE Zweizahnwal HE (mesoplodon)<br />
PT baleia de bico ML ?<br />
General <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The beaked whales <strong>of</strong> the genus Mesoplodon are among the least known mammals on<br />
Earth. They are elusive animals, difficult to study and to identify at the species level when<br />
encountered at sea (Mead 1989). There are 14 recognised Mesoplodon species <strong>in</strong> the world<br />
(Mead 2009). They are all smaller than the most common ziphiid, the Cuvier’s beaked<br />
whale. The maximum lengths <strong>of</strong> 13 species range between 4.43 m and 5.64 m and the<br />
larger 14 th species reaches 6.15 m (Mead 1989). The genus Mesoplodon is vagrant <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006d). Two or three species have been<br />
recorded <strong>in</strong> five separate records. They concern the species M. densirostris, M. europaeus<br />
and possibly M. bidens. Four records come from the western Mediterranean (Notarbartolo di<br />
Sciara 2006d) and only one, more recent, from the north Levant<strong>in</strong>e Sea (Notarbartolo di<br />
Sciara 2009). On 9 January 2009 a live, adult female specimen <strong>of</strong> the genus Mesoplodon<br />
65
stranded <strong>in</strong> Fethiye, Turkey (see white square on the map) and left the coast after be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
rescued. The animal was about 5 m long and despite the good photos that are available, the<br />
species cannot be identified with certa<strong>in</strong>ty, although M. europaeus seems the most probable<br />
candidate (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2009). A dubious record <strong>of</strong> M. densirostris is available for<br />
the Ionian Sea. A group <strong>of</strong> four ziphiids was observed between the Mess<strong>in</strong>a Strait and<br />
Kefallonia Island (orange question mark on the map; J. Forcada <strong>in</strong> litteris). Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the<br />
available photos this could have been a mixed-species group <strong>of</strong> M. densirostris and Ziphius<br />
cavirostris, but the quality <strong>of</strong> the photos does not allow a def<strong>in</strong>itive identification.<br />
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
?<br />
□ : Strand<strong>in</strong>g ? : Possible sight<strong>in</strong>g : 200 m contour : 1000 m contour<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
All species <strong>of</strong> Mesoplodon are listed as ‘Data Deficient’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
66
Steno bredanensis (G. Cuvier <strong>in</strong> Lesson, 1828)<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g by Massimo Demma / ICRAM<br />
Taxonomy<br />
Order: Cetacea (Κητώδη)<br />
Suborder: Odontoceti (Οδοντοκήτη)<br />
Suprafamily: Delph<strong>in</strong>oidea (∆ελφινοειδή)<br />
Family: Delph<strong>in</strong>idae (∆ελφινίδες)<br />
Genus: Steno<br />
Species: Steno bredanensis<br />
Relevant common names<br />
Rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
Scientific name: Steno bredanensis<br />
Common name: Στενόρυγχο δελφίνι<br />
Transcription: Stenóryncho delfíni<br />
Pronunciation: stenóriŋxo ðelfíni<br />
EN rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong> AR (dolph<strong>in</strong> khech<strong>in</strong> el asnan)<br />
FR sténo TR kaba dişli yunus<br />
ES delfín de dientes rugosos AL ?<br />
IT steno HR grubozubi dup<strong>in</strong><br />
DE Rauzahndelf<strong>in</strong> HE (dolph<strong>in</strong> tlum-sh<strong>in</strong>aim)<br />
PT caldeirão ML denfil tat-tikki<br />
General <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
The rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong> is considered an occasional visitor enter<strong>in</strong>g the Mediterranean<br />
Sea from the Strait <strong>of</strong> Gibraltar (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006e). However, the number <strong>of</strong><br />
recently documented occurrences <strong>of</strong> schools <strong>of</strong> this species <strong>in</strong> the eastern Mediterranean<br />
and particularly <strong>of</strong>f Israel <strong>in</strong>dicates that the existence <strong>of</strong> a small resident population <strong>in</strong> the<br />
eastern Mediterranean seems to be <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly likely. Their maximum length worldwide is<br />
2.65 m and 2.55 m for males and females, respectively (Jefferson 2009). There are 18<br />
records <strong>of</strong> rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea (Notarbartolo di Sciara 2006e,<br />
Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team 2007, Gonzalvo 2009). It is worth not<strong>in</strong>g that only four <strong>of</strong><br />
these records orig<strong>in</strong>ate from the western portion <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean, closer to the Atlantic<br />
Ocean. The larger number (N=14) <strong>of</strong> records <strong>in</strong> the eastern Mediterranean and their<br />
persistence <strong>in</strong> time (from 1949 to 2009) supports the hypothesis that a small population<br />
occurs there. Five records concern sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> groups rang<strong>in</strong>g from 8 to160 <strong>in</strong>dividuals), six<br />
are strand<strong>in</strong>gs, five concern animals bycaught <strong>in</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g gear and three concern osteological<br />
67
material obta<strong>in</strong>ed under unknown circumstances. There is only one record <strong>in</strong> proximity to the<br />
Greek Seas and it concerns a group <strong>of</strong> eight animals observed <strong>in</strong> 2003 <strong>of</strong>f W Kefallonia<br />
Island (Lacey et al. 2005). Two more sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> areas neighbour<strong>in</strong>g to the Greek Seas<br />
were made <strong>of</strong>f N Cyprus and <strong>of</strong>f the Libyan coasts <strong>in</strong> 2007 (Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research<br />
Team 2007).<br />
Reported sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
○ : Sight<strong>in</strong>g : 200 m contour : 1000 m contour<br />
IUCN Red List classification<br />
Listed as ‘Least Concern’ globally (IUCN 2008).<br />
68
FALSE REPORTS OF CETACEAN SPECIES IN THE GREEK SEAS<br />
Apart from the species presented <strong>in</strong> this report as recorded <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas, some more<br />
cetacean species have appeared <strong>in</strong> scientific publications, conference proceed<strong>in</strong>gs, popular<br />
articles, <strong>of</strong>ficial state booklets or other documents. After check<strong>in</strong>g thoroughly the orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />
data <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> those cases, six more species were found to have been <strong>in</strong>correctly <strong>in</strong>cluded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Greek cetacean fauna <strong>in</strong> the past. These are: the Sowerby's beaked whale<br />
Mesoplodon bidens, the Bla<strong>in</strong>ville's beaked whale Mesoplodon densirostris, the long-f<strong>in</strong>ned<br />
pilot whale Globicephala melas, the white whale or beluga Delph<strong>in</strong>apterus leucas, the killer<br />
whale Orc<strong>in</strong>us orca and the blue whale Balaenoptera musculus. Below we provide details<br />
for each <strong>of</strong> those cases.<br />
The float<strong>in</strong>g carcass <strong>of</strong> a beaked whale was orig<strong>in</strong>ally reported as a Sowerby's beaked<br />
whale (Mesoplodon bidens; Poulopoulos 1989). In a later paper the same case was<br />
presented as Bla<strong>in</strong>ville's beaked whale (Mesoplodon densirostris; pers. comm. by G.<br />
Poulopoulos <strong>in</strong> Cebrian and Papaconstant<strong>in</strong>ou 1992) and later it was identified aga<strong>in</strong> as<br />
Sowerby's beaked whale (Mesoplodon bidens; Frantzis et al. 2003) accord<strong>in</strong>g to the early<br />
published descriptions from <strong>in</strong> situ observations and the available low quality photos <strong>in</strong> the<br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al paper (Poulopoulos 1989). The recent discovery <strong>of</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>al photos showed that<br />
the descriptions did not correspond to reality, s<strong>in</strong>ce this animal was clearly a Cuvier’s<br />
beaked whale. Orig<strong>in</strong>al photos from another stranded cetacean showed that this was a false<br />
killer whale despite the strand<strong>in</strong>g form filled by local authorities that reported a stranded<br />
long-f<strong>in</strong>ned pilot whale (Androukaki and Tounta, 1994). Due to a wrong assumption the<br />
white whale (Delph<strong>in</strong>apterus leucas) was referred to as accidental species <strong>in</strong> the Greek<br />
Seas (Cebrian and Papaconstant<strong>in</strong>ou, 1992). The authors thought that a specimen found<br />
wander<strong>in</strong>g along the coasts <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea had previously crossed the Aegean Sea;<br />
however, later it became known that the whale had escaped from an Ukra<strong>in</strong>ian delph<strong>in</strong>arium<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Black Sea. The blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) <strong>in</strong>correctly appeared <strong>in</strong> editions,<br />
leaflets and posters <strong>of</strong> some public services, based on a s<strong>in</strong>gle fisherman’s report referr<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to a ‘30 m long whale’. McBrearty et al. (1986) mentioned a sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a lone killer whale<br />
(Orc<strong>in</strong>us orca) <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea and a sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> long-f<strong>in</strong>ned pilot whales (Globicephala<br />
melas) <strong>in</strong> southern <strong>Greece</strong>. One more killer whale sight<strong>in</strong>g from the Aegean Sea exists <strong>in</strong><br />
the literature as personal communication from McBrearty (Hammond and Lockyer, 1988).<br />
We looked for McBrearty’s orig<strong>in</strong>al data, but we learned that he let colleagues know that he<br />
destroyed them some decades ago after he wrote his paper (P. Evans, pers. comm.).<br />
Anyway, these data orig<strong>in</strong>ated from <strong>in</strong>dividual observers who were not specialists (i.e.<br />
fishermen, yachtsmen, capta<strong>in</strong>s, etc.), and species identifications were <strong>of</strong>ten reta<strong>in</strong>ed even<br />
69
without support<strong>in</strong>g photographic documents (McBrearty et al., 1986; P. Evans, pers.<br />
comm.). Long-f<strong>in</strong>ned pilot whale and killer whale sight<strong>in</strong>gs have been reported several times<br />
from amateurs, but whenever photos or videos were available they turned out to be<br />
misidentifications (ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s). No records <strong>of</strong> pilot and killer whales were<br />
accompanied by support<strong>in</strong>g evidence, although the accidental occurrence <strong>of</strong> these two<br />
species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas cannot be ruled out.<br />
70
WHAT IS KNOWN, WHAT REMAINS UNKNOWN<br />
There is solid data regard<strong>in</strong>g the species composition <strong>of</strong> the Greek cetacean fauna. Eight<br />
species are present <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas; almost all year round, with two <strong>of</strong> them (harbour<br />
porpoise, f<strong>in</strong> whale) requir<strong>in</strong>g some further data to consolidate the possible seasonality <strong>of</strong><br />
their occurrence. Three more species are occasional visitors and have rarely been recorded<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. F<strong>in</strong>ally, rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>habit occasionally or permanently the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore waters <strong>of</strong> the eastern Mediterranean and have been recorded <strong>in</strong> relative proximity<br />
to the Greek Seas. Current <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>in</strong>dicates that the local populations units <strong>of</strong> four<br />
species - sperm whales, Cuvier’s beaked whales, short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s, harbour<br />
porpoises - <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas are among the most important <strong>in</strong> the entire Mediterranean<br />
Sea. The last <strong>of</strong> these species does not <strong>in</strong>habit any other part <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea<br />
than the Thracian and northern Aegean Seas.<br />
The general geographic range <strong>of</strong> most cetacean species can be <strong>in</strong>ferred with a satisfactory<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> precision from the distribution maps presented <strong>in</strong> this report, <strong>in</strong> a way that general<br />
conclusions or general comparisons with future data are possible. However, gaps <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>knowledge</strong> still exist at the level <strong>of</strong> local seas, with the exception <strong>of</strong> the Greek Ionian Sea,<br />
the west and south Hellenic Trench and the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th. Surveys <strong>in</strong> several areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Aegean Sea are needed to understand the extent <strong>of</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> several species with<br />
higher precision. S<strong>in</strong>ce sight<strong>in</strong>g data are com<strong>in</strong>g ma<strong>in</strong>ly from the warm season, w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
surveys are also necessary to detect seasonal changes <strong>in</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> some species.<br />
Data regard<strong>in</strong>g ecology and feed<strong>in</strong>g habits, genetics and stock discreteness, life history,<br />
toxicology, histopathology, causes <strong>of</strong> death, biometry etc. are scarce and fragmentary. In<br />
addition, limited <strong>in</strong>formation is available on anthropogenic threats and their relative<br />
importance per species. Such data and <strong>in</strong>formation are crucial for species conservation and<br />
for the management <strong>of</strong> human activities that have an impact on their populations. Although<br />
their collection is relatively easy and <strong>of</strong> low cost <strong>in</strong> comparison to open sea surveys and<br />
other methods, the lack <strong>of</strong> a properly organized national strand<strong>in</strong>g network leaves a large<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cetacean carcasses un<strong>in</strong>spected, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> valuable <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
The most important <strong>knowledge</strong> gap concerns the absolute abundance <strong>of</strong> each cetacean<br />
population. With the exception <strong>of</strong> one very small common dolph<strong>in</strong> population unit <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner<br />
Ionian Sea, one isolated bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> population unit <strong>in</strong> Amvrakikos Gulf, and the<br />
sperm whales along the Hellenic Trench, we have not even rough estimations <strong>of</strong> absolute<br />
71
abundances for any species <strong>in</strong> the entire Greek Seas. Research aimed to produce<br />
abundance estimates and trends is <strong>of</strong> high priority.<br />
Cetacean conservation demands the careful design and application <strong>of</strong> management<br />
measures for each species that will guarantee the survival <strong>of</strong> a population large and healthy<br />
enough to prosper. At present, however, there is no possibility <strong>of</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
any management measure, except for a very few areas, due to the unknown abundance<br />
and <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> most populations. Although there has been progress <strong>in</strong> our <strong>knowledge</strong> on<br />
cetaceans <strong>in</strong>habit<strong>in</strong>g the Greek Seas dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 15 years, we are still far from<br />
understand<strong>in</strong>g the complexity <strong>of</strong> their ecology, and <strong>in</strong> most cases we rema<strong>in</strong> unable to<br />
monitor their <strong>status</strong>. Given the gaps <strong>in</strong> the current <strong>knowledge</strong> regard<strong>in</strong>g cetacean<br />
populations <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, there is still a lot <strong>of</strong> scientific work needed so that conservation<br />
efforts can start to be effective at the national level.<br />
72
ARE THE GREEK CETACEAN POPULATIONS DECLINING?<br />
The data <strong>of</strong> this report and previous studies have shown that eight cetacean species <strong>in</strong>habit<br />
the Greek Seas. Crucial data on the abundance and the population <strong>status</strong> and trend <strong>of</strong><br />
these species at the national level are not available. However, <strong>in</strong>formation from portions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Greek Seas and the rest <strong>of</strong> the Mediterranean Sea suggest that most cetacean species<br />
populations are likely to be decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, some even at alarm<strong>in</strong>g rates.<br />
Perhaps the most reveal<strong>in</strong>g example is that <strong>of</strong> the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>. Once one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the commonest species <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea, common dolph<strong>in</strong>s have experienced a<br />
generalised and major decrease <strong>in</strong> this region dur<strong>in</strong>g the last 30-40 years (Bearzi et al.<br />
2003). At least <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea, overfish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> this species’ prey has caused its<br />
dramatic rarefaction (Bearzi et al. 2008b). Overfish<strong>in</strong>g is known to occur <strong>in</strong> many other parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas, with a cont<strong>in</strong>uous decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> fish biomass s<strong>in</strong>ce the mid 90s (Stergiou<br />
2005, Stergiou et al. 2007, Machias et al. 2007). As a result, depletion <strong>of</strong> key cetacean prey<br />
can be expected. While the rate <strong>of</strong> population decrease may vary from one area to another,<br />
the alarm<strong>in</strong>gly rapid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> common dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ner Ionian Sea (Bearzi et al.<br />
2008b) suggests that important cetacean populations can rapidly disappear from the Greek<br />
Seas.<br />
Prey depletion is one <strong>of</strong> the threats that may drive the apparently small population unit <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Aegean harbour porpoises to decl<strong>in</strong>e and potentially to ext<strong>in</strong>ction. In the north Aegean this<br />
species lives at the limit <strong>of</strong> the highest temperatures it can afford (Poulos et al. 1997, Read<br />
1999); therefore, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g sea surface temperatures <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea (V.<br />
Papathanasiou, pers. comm.) may threaten its survival.<br />
The population <strong>of</strong> sperm whales <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas is also very small (Pelagos Cetacean<br />
Research Institute, unpublished data). Populations <strong>of</strong> a few hundreds <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals may<br />
disappear even by natural changes <strong>in</strong> their environment. In the case <strong>of</strong> sperm whales <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Greece</strong>, mortality caused by ship strikes alone seems unsusta<strong>in</strong>able, and further threatens<br />
this small population (Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, unpublished data). Ingetsion <strong>of</strong><br />
plastic debris is yet another anthropogenic cause <strong>of</strong> mortality.<br />
The population trend for common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s and striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the Greek<br />
Seas are unlikely to differ significantly from trends <strong>in</strong> the whole Mediterranean region. Such<br />
trends are thought to be negative for bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Bearzi et al. 2008c), and was very<br />
negative <strong>in</strong> the last two decades, but currently uncerta<strong>in</strong> for striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Aguilar 2006).<br />
73
A drastic decrease <strong>in</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> Cuvier’s beaked whales along the Hellenic<br />
Trench (with no reduction <strong>in</strong> search effort) dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade raises concern over a<br />
possible population decl<strong>in</strong>e. Two mass strand<strong>in</strong>g events removed a relatively high number <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>dividuals (at least 23) from local populations, but the total number <strong>of</strong> animals that died<br />
without reach<strong>in</strong>g the coasts may have been much higher. The impact <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> military<br />
sonar along the Hellenic Trench seems important at the population level (Frantzis 1998,<br />
2004), and may have dramatic consequences.<br />
The Mediterranean population <strong>of</strong> five out <strong>of</strong> eight cetacean species that <strong>in</strong>habit the Greek<br />
Seas are considered as “Endangered” (sperm whale, common dolph<strong>in</strong>, harbour porpoise),<br />
or “Vulnerable” (common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>, striped dolph<strong>in</strong>; Reeves & Notarbartolo di<br />
Sciara 2006). As the local population units <strong>of</strong> four species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas (sperm whale,<br />
Cuvier’s beaked whale, short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> and harbour porpoise) are likely<br />
among the most important (<strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>g frequencies, habitat, reproduction,<br />
uniqueness etc.) <strong>in</strong> the entire Mediterranean Sea, ensur<strong>in</strong>g their long-term survival is<br />
mandatory.<br />
Although no population trends are available for any cetacean species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas,<br />
local studies, <strong>knowledge</strong> from other Mediterranean areas, evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g threats, as<br />
well as the apparently small size or uniqueness <strong>of</strong> several cetacean populations <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Greek Seas, all call for urgent conservation measures.<br />
74
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Many thanks to several research centres, organisations and persons that have <strong>of</strong>fered<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g and sight<strong>in</strong>g data, namely the Hellenic Centre for Mar<strong>in</strong>e Research (<strong>Greece</strong>) and<br />
particularly Dr. Papakonstant<strong>in</strong>ou, Dr. Panayotidis, Dr. Mariol<strong>in</strong>a Cors<strong>in</strong>i-Foka and Dr.<br />
Marianna Giannoulaki, Fisheries Research Institute (Kavala) and particularly Dr. Manos<br />
Koutrakis, Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, MOm (Hellenic Society for the Study and<br />
Protection <strong>of</strong> the Monk Seal), Tethys Research Institute, WWF <strong>Greece</strong>, Greenpeace<br />
<strong>Greece</strong>, GREC (Group de Recherche sur les Cétacés, France), IFAW (International Fund<br />
for Animal Welfare), Ocean Alliance (Mediterranean Voyage <strong>of</strong> the Odyssey), Michael<br />
White, Manolis Bardanis (Naxos Div<strong>in</strong>g Centre), Sotiris Diamantis (Mystic Blue), Giannis<br />
Gavalas, Aristidis Valoukas, Stelios Gial<strong>in</strong>akis and a long list <strong>of</strong> friends, colleagues and<br />
supporters <strong>of</strong> the Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute, who contributed documented<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>gs or opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs. Gratitude is expressed to the Greek Port Police<br />
authorities that have collaborated <strong>in</strong> the strand<strong>in</strong>g network and to the Port Police Directorate<br />
<strong>of</strong> the M<strong>in</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> Mercantile Mar<strong>in</strong>e, Aegean and Island Policy that <strong>of</strong>fered access to their<br />
archives. Many thanks to Voula Alexiadou for ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g and updat<strong>in</strong>g the sight<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
strand<strong>in</strong>g database <strong>of</strong> the Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute and to Popi Gikopoulou,<br />
who estimated depths and distances from the coast. Special thanks to an anonymous donor<br />
and the Blue Planet Shipp<strong>in</strong>g Ltd for provid<strong>in</strong>g the R/V Nereis for the surveys <strong>of</strong> the Pelagos<br />
Cetacean Research Institute. Many thanks to Voula Alexiadou, Giorgos Paximadis, Popi<br />
Gikopoulou, Natalia Tsoukalas, Pantelis Ki<strong>of</strong>entzis, Makis Pagidas, Olga Nikolaou, Gilda<br />
Hassidis, Evi Tsougiopoulou and all the ecovolunteers who supported the fieldwork <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute dur<strong>in</strong>g dedicated surveys or necropsies <strong>of</strong> stranded<br />
animals. Dr. Giovanni Bearzi, Dr. Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara and MOm helped improve<br />
this report with many constructive comments.<br />
75
LITERATURE CITED<br />
Aguilar A. 1991. Calv<strong>in</strong>g and early mortality <strong>in</strong> the western Mediterranean striped dolph<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Stenella coeruleoalba. Can. J. Zool. 69: 1408-1412.<br />
Aguilar A. 2000. Population biology, conservation threats, and <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean<br />
striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Stenella coeruleoalba). J. Cetacean Res. Manage. 2(1): 17-26.<br />
Aguilar A. 2006. Striped dolph<strong>in</strong> Stenella coeruleoalba (Mediterranean subpopulation). Pp.<br />
57-63 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for<br />
Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Aguilar A., Borrell A. 1994. Abnormally high polychlor<strong>in</strong>ated biphenyl levels <strong>in</strong> striped<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Stenella coeruleoalba) affected by the 1990-1992 Mediterranean epizootic. Sci.<br />
Total Environ. 154(2-3):237-47.<br />
Aguilar A., Borrell A. 2005. DDT and PCB reduction <strong>in</strong> the western Mediterranean <strong>in</strong> 1987-<br />
2002, as shown by levels <strong>in</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong>s. Mar. Environ. Res. 59(4):391-404.<br />
Androukaki E., Tounta E. 1994. A study <strong>of</strong> the distribution and pathology <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Greece</strong>. In European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> – 8 (P.G.H. Evans, ed.), European Cetacean<br />
Society, Cambridge, pp. 203-205.<br />
Archer II F.I., Perr<strong>in</strong> W.F. 1999. Stenella coeruleoalba. Mammalian Species 603: 1-9.<br />
Azzell<strong>in</strong>o A., Gaspari S., Airoldi S., Nani B. 2008. Habitat use and preferences <strong>of</strong> cetaceans<br />
along the cont<strong>in</strong>ental slope and the adjacent pelagic waters <strong>in</strong> the western Ligurian Sea.<br />
Deep-Sea Research I 55: 296-323.<br />
Baird R.W. 2009 False killer whale Pseudorca crassidens. In Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Mammals, Second Edition (W.F. Perr<strong>in</strong>, B. Wursig, J.G.M. Thewissen eds), Academic<br />
Press, London, pp. 405-406.<br />
Bauer K. 1978. Cuvier’s Schnabelwal Ziphius cavirostris Cuvier 1823 im östlichen<br />
Mittelmeer. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 81: 267-272.<br />
Bearzi G., Reeves R., Notarbartolo-di-Sciara G., Politi E., Canadas A., Frantzis A., Mussi B.<br />
2003. Ecology, <strong>status</strong> and conservation <strong>of</strong> short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s Delph<strong>in</strong>us<br />
delphis <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Mammal Rev. 33(3): 224-252.<br />
Bearzi G. 2003. Short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis (Mediterranean<br />
subpopulation). In: IUCN 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species.<br />
<br />
Bearzi G., Politi E., Agazzi S., Bruno S., Costa M. Bonizzoni S. 2005. Occurrence and<br />
present <strong>status</strong> <strong>of</strong> coastal dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis and Tursiops truncatus) <strong>in</strong> the eastern<br />
Ionian Sea. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15: 243–257.<br />
Bearzi G., Fortuna M. C. 2006. Common bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> Tursiops truncatus<br />
(Mediterranean subpopulation). Pp. 64-73 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G.<br />
(compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and<br />
Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
76
Bearzi G., Politi E., Agazzi S., Azzell<strong>in</strong>o A. 2006. Prey depletion caused by overfish<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> mar<strong>in</strong>e megafauna <strong>in</strong> eastern Ionian Sea coastal waters (central<br />
Mediterranean). Biol. Cons. 127: 373-338.<br />
Bearzi G., Agazzi S., Bonizzoni S., Costa M., Azzel<strong>in</strong>o A. 2008a. Dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> a bottle:<br />
abundance, residency patterns and conservation <strong>of</strong> bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s Tursiops truncatus<br />
<strong>in</strong> the semi-closed eutrophic Amvrakikos Gulf, <strong>Greece</strong>. Aquatic Conserv. 18: 130-146.<br />
Bearzi G., Agazzi S., Gonzalvo J., Costa M., Bonizzoni S., Politi E., Pirroddi C., Reeves R.R.<br />
2008b. Overfish<strong>in</strong>g and the disappearance <strong>of</strong> short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s from western<br />
<strong>Greece</strong>. Endang. Species. Res. 5: 1-12<br />
Bearzi G., Fortuna C. M., Reeves R. R. 2008c. Ecology and conservation <strong>of</strong> common<br />
bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s Tursiops truncatus <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Mammal Rev. 39(2): 92-<br />
123.<br />
Best P. B., Canham P. A. S., MacLeod N 1984. Patterns <strong>of</strong> reproduction <strong>in</strong> sperm whales,<br />
Physeter macrocephalus. Rep. <strong>in</strong>t. Whal. Commn. (special issue)6: 51-79.<br />
Birkun A. Jr., Frantzis A., 2006. Harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena relicta (Black Sea<br />
subspecies). Pp. 39-47 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The<br />
<strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre<br />
for Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Blanco C., Aznar J., Raga J.A. 1995. Cephalopods <strong>in</strong> the diet <strong>of</strong> Stenella coeruleoalba<br />
(Meyen, 1833) from the western Mediterranean dur<strong>in</strong>g an epizootic <strong>in</strong> 1990. J. Zool., Lond.<br />
237:151-8.<br />
Blanco C., Salomon O., Raga, J. A. 1997. Stomach contents <strong>of</strong> Ziphius cavirostris stranded<br />
on the western Mediterranean coast. Eur. Res. <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 11:13.<br />
Cagnolaro 1996. Pr<strong>of</strong>ilo sistematico e tipologico delle raccolte di cetacei attuali nei musei<br />
italiani. Museologia Scientifica 13 (Suppl.): 193-212.<br />
Calzada N., Aguilar A. 1995. Geographical variation <strong>of</strong> body size <strong>in</strong> Western Mediterranean<br />
striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Stenella coeruleoalba). Z. Saugetierkd. 60:257-64.<br />
Canadas A. 2006. Cuvier’s beaked whale Ziphius cavirostris (Mediterranean subpopulation).<br />
Pp. 83-90 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for<br />
Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Carpentieri P., Cors<strong>in</strong>i M., Mar<strong>in</strong>i L. 1999. Contribute to the <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> the presence and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. Mus. Civ. St. Nat. Milano<br />
140(1): 65-75.<br />
Cas<strong>in</strong>os A., Vericad J.-R. 1976. The cetaceans <strong>of</strong> the Spanish coast: a survey. Mammalia<br />
40(2):267-289.<br />
Cebrian D., Papaconstant<strong>in</strong>ou C. 1992. Distribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>, 1990-1992.<br />
Rapp. Comm. <strong>in</strong>t. Mer Médit., 33, 287-288.<br />
Centro Studi Cetacei 1995. Cetacei spiaggiati lungo le coste italiane. VII. Rendiconto 1992<br />
(Mammalia). Atti. Soc. It. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano, 134(2): 285-298.<br />
77
Centro Studi Cetacei 1996. Cetacei spiaggiati lungo le coste italiane. VIII. Rendiconto 1993<br />
(Mammalia). Atti. Soc. It. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano, 135(2): 437-450.<br />
Centro Studi Cetacei 1996. Cetacei spiaggiati lungo le coste italiane. IX. Rendiconto 1994<br />
(Mammalia). Atti. Soc. It. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano, 135(2): 451-462.<br />
Centro Studi Cetacei 1997. Cetacei spiaggiati lungo le coste italiane. XI. Rendiconto 1996<br />
(Mammalia). Atti. Soc. It. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano, 137(1-2): 135-147.<br />
Centro Studi Cetacei 2001. Cetacei spiaggiati lungo le coste italiane. XI. Rendiconto 1996<br />
(Mammalia). Atti. Soc. It. Sci. nat. Museo civ. Stor. Nat. Milano, 141(2): 353-365.<br />
De Heildreich T. 1878. La faune de Grèce. Imprimerie de la Philocalie, Athens, <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
Duguy, R. 1986. Rapport annuel sur le cétacés et p<strong>in</strong>nipèdes trouvés sur le côtes de<br />
France. XVI - Année 1986. Ann. Soc. Sci. nat. Charente-Maritime, 7(5):617-639.<br />
Clapham P.J. 2000. The humpback whale. Seasonal Feed<strong>in</strong>g and Breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a Baleen<br />
Whale. In Cetacean Societies. Field Studies <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and Whales (J. Mann, R.C. Connor,<br />
P.L. Tyack & H. Whitehead eds), The University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 173-196.<br />
ELOT 1982. Hellenic Standard ELOT 743. Standard for conversion <strong>of</strong> Greek alphabet <strong>in</strong>to<br />
Lat<strong>in</strong>. Hellenic Organisation for Standardisation, Athens, pp. 7.<br />
Forcada J., Aguilar A., Hammond P.S., Pastor X., Aguilar R. 1994. Distribution and numbers<br />
<strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the western Mediterranean Sea after the 1990 epizootic outbreak. Mar.<br />
Mammal Sci. 10(2):137-50.<br />
Frantzis A., 1998. Does acoustic test<strong>in</strong>g strand whales? Nature, 392: 29.<br />
Frantzis A., 2004. The first mass strand<strong>in</strong>g that was associated with the use <strong>of</strong> active sonar<br />
(Kyparissiakos Gulf, <strong>Greece</strong>, 1996). In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the workshop: "Active sonar and<br />
cetaceans ". 8 March 2003, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria. ECS newsletter 42 (special isssue):<br />
pp. 14-20.<br />
Frantzis A., Gordon J., Hassidis G., Komnenou A. 2001. The enigma <strong>of</strong> harbor porpoise<br />
presence <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Mammal Sci. 17(4): 937-943.<br />
Frantzis A., Herz<strong>in</strong>g D., 2002. Mixed-species associations <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Stenella<br />
coeruleoalba), short beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis) and Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
(Grampus griseus) <strong>in</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th (<strong>Greece</strong>, Mediterranean Sea). Aquatic Mammals<br />
28(2): 188-197.<br />
Frantzis A., Alexiadou P., Paximadis G., Politi E., Gannier A., Cors<strong>in</strong>i-Foka M., 2003.<br />
Current <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> the cetacean fauna <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Cetacean<br />
Research Management 5(3): 219-232.<br />
Frantzis A., Nikolaou O., Bompar J-M., Cammedda A., 2004. Humpback whale (Megaptera<br />
novaeangliae) occurrence <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Cetacean Research<br />
Management 6(1): 25-28.<br />
Gannier A. 2005. Summer distribution and relative abundance <strong>of</strong> Delph<strong>in</strong>ids <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea. Rev. Écol. (Terre Vie) 60: 223-238.<br />
78
García-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez J., Barrio E., Raga J.A, Latorre A. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA variability <strong>of</strong><br />
striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Stenella coeruleoalba) <strong>in</strong> the Spanish Mediterranean waters. Mar. Mammal<br />
Sci. 11(2):182-99.<br />
Gaspari S., Natoli A. 2006. Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong> Grampus griseus (Mediterranean subpopulation).<br />
Pp. 29-33 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for<br />
Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Gaspari S., Azzel<strong>in</strong>o A., Airoldi S., Hoelzel R.A. 2007. Social k<strong>in</strong> associations and genetic<br />
structur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong> populations (Stenella coeruleoalba) <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea.<br />
Molecular Ecology, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03295.x<br />
Gomez de Segura A., Crespo E.A., Pedraza S.N., Hammond P.S., Raga J.A. 2006<br />
Abundance <strong>of</strong> small cetaceans <strong>in</strong> waters <strong>of</strong> the central Spanish Mediterranean. Mar. Biol.<br />
150:149–160.<br />
Gonzalvo J. 2009. Tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g activities <strong>in</strong> Libanon and Syria. FINS 4(2): 16-17.<br />
Gordon J.C.D. 1991. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a method for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the length <strong>of</strong> sperm whales<br />
Physeter catodon from their vocalizations. J. Zool. 224, 301–314.<br />
Güçlüsoy H. 2007. The first confirmed report <strong>of</strong> the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena)<br />
<strong>in</strong> the Turkish Aegean Sea. JMBA2 – Biodiversity records. pp. 2 (published on-l<strong>in</strong>e).<br />
Hammond P.S., Lockyer C. 1988. Distribution <strong>of</strong> killer whales <strong>in</strong> the eastern North Atlantic.<br />
Rit Fiskideildar 11:24-41.<br />
IUCN 2008. 2008 IUCN Red List <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species, www.iucnredlist.org.<br />
Jefferson T.A. 2009 Rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong> Steno bredanensis. In Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Mammals, Second Edition (W.F. Perr<strong>in</strong>, B. Wursig, J.G.M. Thewissen eds), Academic<br />
Press, London, pp. 990-992.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>zelbach, R 1986a. The sperm whale, Physeter macrocephalus, <strong>in</strong> the Eastern<br />
Mediterranean Sea. Zool. Middle East, 1:17-19.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>zelbach, R 1986b.- First record <strong>of</strong> Risso’s dolph<strong>in</strong>, Grampus griseus, <strong>in</strong> the Eastern<br />
Mediterranean Sea. Zool. Middle East, 1:19-21.<br />
Kruse, S., Caldwell, D.K. and Caldwell, M.C. 1999. Risso’s Dolph<strong>in</strong> Grampus griseus (G.<br />
Cuvier, 1812). pp. 183-212. In: S.H. Ridgway and R. Harrison (eds.) Handbook <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Mammals Volume 6: The Second Book <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and the Porpoises. Academic Press,<br />
London. i-xix+ pp. 486.<br />
Lacey C., Lewis T., Moscrop, A. 2005. Sight<strong>in</strong>gs made dur<strong>in</strong>g surveys <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean Sea<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2003 and 2004 <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an unusual encounter with rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Steno<br />
bredanensis) <strong>in</strong> the Ionian Sea. In: 19th Ann. Conf. <strong>of</strong> ECS Abstract book, La Rochelle, April<br />
2005. p. 113.<br />
Machias A., Giannoulaki M., Somarakis S., Siapatis A. 2007. Small pelagics fish. In:<br />
Papaconstant<strong>in</strong>ou C, Zenetos A, Vassilopoulou V, Tserpes G (eds) State <strong>of</strong> Hellenic<br />
fisheries. Hellenic Center Mar Res, Athens, pp. 192–207.<br />
79
McBrearty D.A., Message M.A., K<strong>in</strong>g G.A. 1986. Observations on small cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the<br />
north-east Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea: 1978-1982. In Research on dolph<strong>in</strong>s<br />
(M.M. Bryden & R. Harisson eds), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 225-249.<br />
Marchessaux D. 1980. A review <strong>of</strong> the current <strong>knowledge</strong> <strong>of</strong> the cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Eastern<br />
Mediterranean Sea. Vie Mar., 2, 59-66.<br />
Mead J.G. 1989. Beaked Whales <strong>of</strong> the Genus Mesoplodon. In Handbook <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />
Mammals, River Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and the Larger Toothed Whales (S.H. Ridgway & R. Harrison<br />
eds), 4, Academic Press, London, pp. 340-430.<br />
Mead J.G. 2009 Beaked whales, Overview, Ziphiidae. In Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals,<br />
Second Edition (W.F. Perr<strong>in</strong>, B. Wursig, J.G.M. Thewissen eds), Academic Press, London,<br />
pp. 94-97.<br />
Murphy S., Rogan E. 2006 External morphology <strong>of</strong> the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong>,<br />
Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis: growth, allometric relationships and sexual dimorphism. Acta Zoologica<br />
(Stockholm) 87: 315-329.<br />
Natoli A., Birkun A., Aguilar A., Lopez A., Hoelzel A.R. 2005 Habitat structure and the<br />
dispersal <strong>of</strong> male and female bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Tursiops truncatus). Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Royal Society B 272: 1217–1226.<br />
Natoli A., Cañadas A., Vaquero C., Politi E., Fernandez-Navarro P., Hoelzel A.R. 2008<br />
Conservation genetics <strong>of</strong> the short-beaked common dolph<strong>in</strong> (Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea and <strong>in</strong> the eastern North Atlantic Ocean. Conservation Genetics. doi:<br />
10.1007/s10592-007-9481-1.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006a. Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Pp. 96-97 <strong>in</strong><br />
Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean<br />
Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006b. Common m<strong>in</strong>ke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata. Pp. 92-<br />
95 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for<br />
Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006c. False killer whale Pseudorca crassidens. Pp. 102-105 <strong>in</strong><br />
Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean<br />
Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006d. Beaked whales belong<strong>in</strong>g to the genus Mesoplodon. Pp.<br />
120-122 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for<br />
Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006e. Rough-toothed dolph<strong>in</strong> Steno bredanensis. Pp. 106-108 <strong>in</strong><br />
Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean<br />
Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2009. Strand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a rare beaked whale <strong>in</strong> Turkey. FINS 4(2):15-16<br />
80
Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Demma M. 1997. Guida dei Mammiferi Mar<strong>in</strong>i del Mediterraneo.<br />
Franco Muzzio Editore, Padova, pp. 264.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Zanardelli M., Jahoda M., Airoldi S. 2003. The f<strong>in</strong> whale<br />
Balaenoptera physalus (L. 1758) <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean Sea. Mammal Review 33(2):105-150.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Panigada S. 2006. F<strong>in</strong> whale Balaenoptera physalus<br />
(Mediterranean subpopulation). Pp. 11-15 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G.<br />
(compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea and<br />
Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Notarbartolo di Sciara G., Frantzis A., Bearzi G., Reeves R.R. 2006. Sperm whale Physeter<br />
macrocephalus (Mediterranean subpopulation). Pp. 45-56 <strong>in</strong> Reeves R., Notarbartolo di<br />
Sciara G. (compilers and editors). The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Black Sea<br />
and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga, Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp.<br />
137.<br />
Odell D.K., McClune K.M. 1999. False Killer Whale Pseudorca crassidens (Owen, 1846). In<br />
Handbook <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals, The Second Book <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and the Porpoises (S.H.<br />
Ridgway & R. Harrison eds), 6, Academic Press, London, pp. 213-243.<br />
Öztürk B., Öztürk A.A. 1998. Cetacean strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Aegean coasts <strong>of</strong> Turkey. Rapport<br />
de la Commission International pour l’Exploration Scientific de la Mer Méditerranée 35: 476-<br />
477.<br />
Pelagos Cetacean Research Institute. Unpublished data from strand<strong>in</strong>gs (1993-2007) and<br />
surveys (1998-2007) along the Hellenic Trench and the Aegean Sea.<br />
Perr<strong>in</strong> W.F., Brownell Jr. R.L. 2009 M<strong>in</strong>ke whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata and B.<br />
bonaerensis. In Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals, Second Edition (W.F. Perr<strong>in</strong>, B. Wursig,<br />
J.G.M. Thewissen eds), Academic Press, London, pp. 733-735.<br />
Poulopoulos J. 1989. A Sowerby’s whale discovered <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Nature, Bull.<br />
Hellenic Soc. Protect. Nature 44/45:7-9 and 46. [In Greek with English abstract]<br />
Poulos S.E., Drakopoulos P.G., Coll<strong>in</strong>s M.B. 1997. Seasonal variability <strong>in</strong> sea surface<br />
oceanographic conditions <strong>in</strong> the Aegean Sea (Eastern Mediterranean): an overview. J Mar<br />
Syst 13:1225–1244.<br />
Pulc<strong>in</strong>i M., Carl<strong>in</strong>i R., Wurtz M. 1992. Stomach contents <strong>of</strong> striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s Stenella<br />
coeruleoalba (Meyen, 1933) from the south-central Thyrrhenian coast. Eur. Res. <strong>Cetaceans</strong><br />
6:194-195.<br />
Read J.A. 1999. Harbour Porpoise Phocoena phocoena (L<strong>in</strong>naeus, 1758). In Handbook <strong>of</strong><br />
Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals, The Second Book <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and the Porpoises (S.H. Ridgway & R.<br />
Harrison eds), 6, Academic Press, London, pp. 323-355.<br />
Reeves R., Notarbartolo di Sciara G. 2006. The <strong>status</strong> and distribution <strong>of</strong> cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Black Sea and Mediterranean Sea. IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Malaga,<br />
Spa<strong>in</strong>, pp. 137.<br />
Roberts S.M. 2003. Exam<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> the stomach contents from a Mediterranean sperm<br />
whale found south <strong>of</strong> Crete, <strong>Greece</strong>. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K., 83:667-6705.<br />
81
Rosel P.E., Frantzis A., Lockyer C., Komnenou A. 2003. Source <strong>of</strong> Aegean Sea harbour<br />
porpoises. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 247: 257-261.<br />
Song <strong>of</strong> the Whale Research Team 2007. Some Results <strong>of</strong> Cetacean Surveys between<br />
2003 and 2007 <strong>in</strong> the Mediterranean’s Western and Eastern Bas<strong>in</strong>s. ACCOBAMS Third<br />
Meet<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the Contract<strong>in</strong>g Parties, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 22-25 October 2007, ACCOBAMS-<br />
MOP3/2007/Inf16, pp. 22.<br />
Stergiou K.I. 2005 Fisheries impact on trophic levels: longterm trends <strong>in</strong> Hellenic waters. In:<br />
Papathanassiou E, Zenetos A (eds) State <strong>of</strong> the Hellenic mar<strong>in</strong>e environment. Hellenic<br />
Center Mar Res, Athens, pp. 326–329<br />
Stergiou K.I., Moutopoulos D.K., Tsikliras A.C. 2007 Spatial and temporal variability <strong>in</strong><br />
Hellenic mar<strong>in</strong>e fisheries land<strong>in</strong>gs. In: Papaconstant<strong>in</strong>ou C, Zenetos A, Vassilopoulou V,<br />
Tserpes G (eds) State <strong>of</strong> Hellenic fisheries. Hellenic Center Mar. Res., Athens, pp. 141–150.<br />
Tonay A.M., Dede A., Öztürk A.A., Öztürk B. 2009. Cetacean strand<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the Turkish<br />
Straits Systems (TSS) and the northern Aegean Sea coast <strong>of</strong> Turkey dur<strong>in</strong>g 1999-2008. In<br />
23 rd Annual Conference <strong>of</strong> the European Cetacean Society Abstract Book, p. 123.<br />
Universitat de Barcelona 1994. Inventario de cetáceos Mediterráneos Ibéricos: <strong>status</strong> y<br />
problemas de conservación. Memoria f<strong>in</strong>al (Ref.: 114575). ICONA (Instituto Nacional para la<br />
Conservación de la Naturaleza), M<strong>in</strong>isterio de Medio Ambiente, pp. 89.<br />
Van Canneyt O., Leniere A., Collet, A. 1999. Synthèse sur les Mammifères Mar<strong>in</strong>s échoués<br />
sur le Littoral Français en 1998. CRMM - Institut de la Mer et du Littoral, La Rochelle,<br />
France, pp. 34.<br />
Verriopoulou, A., Tounta, E. and Dendr<strong>in</strong>os, P. 2001. First report <strong>of</strong> a m<strong>in</strong>ke whale<br />
(Balaenoptera acutorostrata Lacépède, 1804) <strong>in</strong> Hellenic waters. Aquat. Mamm. 27(2):137-<br />
139.<br />
Viaud-Mart<strong>in</strong>nez K.A., Mart<strong>in</strong>nez Vergara M., Gol'd<strong>in</strong> P.E., Ridoux V., Ozturk A.A., Ozturk<br />
B., Rosel P.E., Frantzis A., Komnenou A., Bohonak A.J. 2007. Morphological and genetic<br />
differentiation <strong>of</strong> the Black Sea harbour porpoise Phocoena phocoena. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.<br />
338: 281-294.<br />
Watk<strong>in</strong>s W.A., Tyack P., Moore K., Notarbartolo-di-Sciara G. 1987. Steno bredanensis <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Mam. Sci., 3(1): 78-82.<br />
Wells R.S., Scott M.D. 1999. Bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong> Tursiops truncatus (Montagu, 1821). In<br />
Handbook <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals, The Second Book <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and Porpoises (S.H. Ridgway<br />
& R. Harrison eds), 6, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 137-182.<br />
Würtz M., Marrale D. 1991. Age and sex composition <strong>of</strong> stripped dolph<strong>in</strong> die-<strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Western Mediterranean. In European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> – 5 (P.G.H. Evans ed.),<br />
European Cetacean Society, Cambridge, pp. 62-64.<br />
Zafeiropoulos D., Merl<strong>in</strong>i L. 2003. A comparative study <strong>of</strong> bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong>s (Tursiops<br />
truncatus) <strong>in</strong> South and North Evoikos Gulfs. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the 8 th International<br />
Conference on the Environmental Science and Technology, Lemnos, <strong>Greece</strong>, 8-10<br />
September 2003, Vol. B, pp. 921-925.<br />
82
ANNEX I: Distribution <strong>of</strong> search<strong>in</strong>g effort <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas<br />
The follow<strong>in</strong>g map provides an approximate figure <strong>of</strong> the effort that has been dedicated by<br />
various research teams <strong>in</strong> search<strong>in</strong>g cetaceans <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The <strong>in</strong>formation was<br />
gathered from published studies or unpublished results that have been contributed to the<br />
dataset <strong>of</strong> this report. The vast majority (more than 95%) <strong>of</strong> the results <strong>of</strong> the total effort <strong>in</strong><br />
terms <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs appears on the sight<strong>in</strong>g and strand<strong>in</strong>g distribution maps <strong>of</strong> Annex II.<br />
Sight<strong>in</strong>gs recorded out <strong>of</strong> the areas to which effort has been dedicated, orig<strong>in</strong>ate from<br />
opportunistic observations.<br />
Figure 2. Distribution <strong>of</strong> search<strong>in</strong>g effort <strong>of</strong> dedicated cetacean surveys conducted by various research teams <strong>in</strong><br />
the Greek Seas. Black color represents regular and <strong>in</strong>tensive effort <strong>in</strong> the framework <strong>of</strong> long-term research<br />
programs. Dark grey color represents areas that have been surveyed at least three times, irregularly <strong>in</strong> time. Light<br />
grey color represents areas that have been surveyed sporadically and less than three times. Light blue areas<br />
have not been surveyed at all. All sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g these areas (see Annex II) comes from<br />
opportunistic observations.<br />
83
ANNEX II: Distribution maps <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
Important Note: Caution is due to the <strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs recorded per<br />
species as it appears <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g maps. They represent only the distribution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> each species <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. Data <strong>in</strong>clude both opportunistic sight<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />
results <strong>of</strong> dedicated surveys that used different methods. Even more importantly, some<br />
areas have been surveyed <strong>in</strong>tensively or more systematically than others (Figure 2 <strong>in</strong> Annex<br />
I) and some areas have not been surveyed at all. As a result the number <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
recorded per species cannot be used to <strong>in</strong>fer abundance or relative sight<strong>in</strong>g frequencies<br />
<strong>of</strong> different species.<br />
Figure 3. Distribution <strong>of</strong> all identified cetacean strand<strong>in</strong>g (■) and sight<strong>in</strong>g (●) records <strong>in</strong> the Greek Seas. The high<br />
density <strong>of</strong> sight<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> some areas is due to higher effort there, particularly <strong>in</strong> the Hellenic Trench, Gulf <strong>of</strong> Cor<strong>in</strong>th,<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the Cretan Sea and Karpathos Island, and to a lesser degree Myrtoon Sea and Northern Sporades-<br />
Chalkidiki). Please refer to Annex I <strong>in</strong> order to avoid a mis<strong>in</strong>terpretation <strong>of</strong> this figure.<br />
84
Balaenoptera physalus<br />
FIN WHALE<br />
(Πτεροφάλαινα)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
85
Physeter macrocephalus<br />
SPERM WHALE<br />
(Φυσητήρας)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
86
Ziphius cavirostris<br />
CUVIER’S BEAKED WHALE<br />
(Ζιφιός)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
87
Grampus griseus<br />
RISSO’S DOLPHIN<br />
(Σταχτοδέλφινο)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
88
Tursiops truncatus<br />
COMMON BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN<br />
(Ρινοδέλφινο)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
89
Stenella coeruleoalba<br />
STRIPED DOLPHIN<br />
(Ζωνοδέλφινο)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
90
Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis<br />
SHORT-BEAKED COMMON DOLPHIN<br />
(Κοινό δελφίνι)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
91
Phocoena phocoena<br />
HARBOUR PORPOISE<br />
(Φώκαινα)<br />
● : Sight<strong>in</strong>gs ■ : Strand<strong>in</strong>gs : 200 m contour : 1000 m<br />
92
ANNEX III: Additional references on the cetaceans <strong>of</strong> the Greek Seas<br />
Note: The follow<strong>in</strong>g list <strong>of</strong> references is not complete. Other references on the Greek cetaceans may<br />
have been left un<strong>in</strong>tentionally out <strong>of</strong> this list.<br />
Angelici F.M., Mar<strong>in</strong>i L. 1992. Sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis (Cetacea, odontoceti) <strong>in</strong> the<br />
Otranto channel (southern Adriatic sea and northern Ionian sea). Hystrix 4(1): 91-93.<br />
Giacoma C., Papale E., Azzol<strong>in</strong> M. 2009. Exceptional <strong>in</strong>shore presence <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong> whale over the<br />
northern Ionian cont<strong>in</strong>ental platform. 23rd Conference <strong>of</strong> the European Cetacean Society,<br />
Istanbul, Turkey, March 2009. Abstract Book, pp. 102-103.<br />
Casale M., Milani C., Kallianiotis A. 1999. Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary survey on the <strong>in</strong>teractions between<br />
local populations <strong>of</strong> Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis and Tursiops truncatus and coastal fishery <strong>in</strong> northeastern<br />
Aegean Sea (<strong>Greece</strong>). European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 13: 100.<br />
Drougas A., Komnenou A., Fatsea H., Poulopoulos Y., Liori R. 2001. Cetacean diversity <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>Greece</strong>: 1945-2001 sight<strong>in</strong>gs and strand<strong>in</strong>gs databank. 14 th Biennial Conference on the<br />
Biology <strong>of</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e Mammals, Vancouver, Canada.<br />
K<strong>in</strong>zelbach, R 1985. Der Cuvier-Schnabelwal (Ziphius cavirostris) im östlichen Mittelmeer.<br />
Sonderdruck aus Z. f. Säugetierkunde Bd. 50, H. 5: 314-316.<br />
Mar<strong>in</strong>i L., Carpentieri P., Consiglio C. 1995. Presence and distribution <strong>of</strong> the cetological<br />
fauna <strong>of</strong> the Aegean Sea: prelim<strong>in</strong>ary results. European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 9: 99-101.<br />
Mitra S., Koutrakis E., Clark T., Milani C. 2004. Cetacean <strong>in</strong>teraction with small scale coastal<br />
fisheries: implications for conservation and damage limitation. <strong>in</strong> the Northern Aegean,<br />
<strong>Greece</strong>. European Research on Cetacean 15: 172-176.<br />
Mardikis I., Podiadis V., Verriopoulos G. 1999. High sight<strong>in</strong>g frequency <strong>of</strong> the pelagic<br />
species, striped dolph<strong>in</strong> Stenella coeruleoalba, <strong>in</strong> a closed sea area. European Research on<br />
<strong>Cetaceans</strong> 13: 244-247.<br />
Mardikis I., Podiadis V., Verriopoulos G. 2000. High sight<strong>in</strong>g frequency <strong>of</strong> the pelagic striped<br />
dolph<strong>in</strong> Stenella coeruleoalba <strong>in</strong> a closed sea area. European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 14:<br />
375-379.<br />
Pirounakis K., Kaloupi S., Moschonas S, Mourelatos Y., Tselentis L., Vouts<strong>in</strong>as N.,<br />
Vouts<strong>in</strong>as V., Panou A. 1999. <strong>Cetaceans</strong> <strong>in</strong> the Eastern Ionian Sea: Results <strong>of</strong> an<br />
observers’ network. Contributions to the Zoogeography and Ecology <strong>of</strong> the Eastern<br />
Mediterranean Region Vol. 1, pp. 429-434.<br />
Podiadis V. et al. 2003. The striped dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Kor<strong>in</strong>th, 1996-2002 a<br />
comparative study. 17th Conference <strong>of</strong> the European Cetacean Society, Las Palmas de<br />
Gran Canaria, March 2003. Abstract Book, p. 263<br />
Poullopoulos Y., Drougas A., Komnenou N. 1999. First documented sight<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a wounded<br />
harbour porpoise <strong>in</strong> Mediterranean Sea. A unique case <strong>of</strong> successful rehabilitation.<br />
European Research on <strong>Cetaceans</strong> 13: 442.<br />
93
Pulc<strong>in</strong>i M., Mecozzi M., Virno Lamberti C., Bergamasco C. 1996. Application <strong>of</strong> multivariate<br />
statistical techniques on a community <strong>of</strong> common dolph<strong>in</strong>s Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis <strong>in</strong> the Ionian<br />
Islands <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>. European Research on Cetacean 9: 150-152.<br />
Pulc<strong>in</strong>i M., Mecozzi M., Virno Lamberti C., Bergamasco C. 1999. Behaviour and Ecology <strong>of</strong><br />
Delph<strong>in</strong>us delphis around the Ionian Island <strong>of</strong> <strong>Greece</strong>. European Research on Cetacean 12:<br />
170-173.<br />
Siori I., Hatzidimitriou E., Payiatas G. 2001. Study and Conservation <strong>of</strong> Dolph<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Greece</strong> -<br />
Amvrakikos Gulf. Report Summary. WWF <strong>Greece</strong>, pp. 5.<br />
Zafiropoulos D., Verriopoulos G., Merl<strong>in</strong>i L. 1999. Geographical distribution <strong>of</strong> small<br />
cetaceans <strong>in</strong> several Greek coastal areas. European Research on Cetacean 13: 282-284.<br />
Zafiropoulos D., Merl<strong>in</strong>i L. 2001. Research and conservation <strong>of</strong> a resident bottlenose dolph<strong>in</strong><br />
population <strong>in</strong> Amvrakikos Gulf. 7th International Conference on Environmental Science and<br />
Technology, Ermoupolis, Syros island, <strong>Greece</strong>.<br />
94