21.02.2013 Views

Riding a Tiger without Being Eaten - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

Riding a Tiger without Being Eaten - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

Riding a Tiger without Being Eaten - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138<br />

employers and anyone who uses analysts’ research and recommendations to make<br />

investment decisions. Analysts who follow a particular company longer produce<br />

more accurate forecasts (Clement, Koonce & Lopez, 2007). Learning from past<br />

experience seems to be an important part of forecasting, particularly when taskspecific<br />

experience is considered. Clement et al. (2007) found that analysts who<br />

obtained experience with corporate downsizing and restructuring issues increased<br />

their forecast accuracy by some 8 per cent annually for every year of experience on<br />

companies they follow.<br />

In their article ‘Who Herds?’, Bernhardt et al. (2006) define herding bias as part of a<br />

broader context, writing that (p. 658):<br />

A forecast is unbiased if it corresponds to the analyst’s best estimate of<br />

earnings given all available information, i.e., if it corresponds to the mean<br />

or median of the analyst’s posterior distribution over earnings. In its most<br />

basic form, herding amounts to biasing a forecast away from an analyst’s<br />

best estimate, toward the consensus forecast of earlier analysts; while antiherding<br />

amounts to biasing a forecast away from that consensus.<br />

It is very possible that analysts do herd, in the sense that they may ignore their own<br />

private knowledge/information to follow the rest of the pack. A number of archival<br />

studies, often using mathematical models, provide insight into analyst herding<br />

behaviour. And various studies show that confident analysts are more likely to issue<br />

bold forecasts (Ramnath et al. 2008). Hirshleifer notes, ‘Investors and managers are<br />

often accused of irrationally converging in their actions and beliefs, perhaps because<br />

of a ‘herd instinct’ or from a contagious emotional response to stressful events’<br />

(Hirshleifer & Teoh, 2001). In particular, this last reference to stressful events is<br />

interesting in the context of our research. 2<br />

Investors may herd (converge in behaviour), or cascade (ignore their private<br />

information signals), in deciding whether to participate in the market, what securities<br />

to trade, and whether to buy or sell. Both analysts as well as investors may herd<br />

when deciding what securities to invest in. Analysts may also herd in their forecasts<br />

2 See, for example, Business Week (1998) on ‘Why Investors Stampede: And why the potential for damage is greater than ever,’ or the<br />

advertisement by Scudder Investments in Forbes (10/29/01) with the heading, ‘MILLIONS of very fast, slightly MISINFORMED sheep. Now that’s<br />

opportunity.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!