Blood Diamond Curriculum Guide (PDF) - Amnesty International USA
Blood Diamond Curriculum Guide (PDF) - Amnesty International USA
Blood Diamond Curriculum Guide (PDF) - Amnesty International USA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CASE STUDY CONFLICT DIAMONDS: COTE D’IVOIRE<br />
IN SHORT<br />
OVERVIEW<br />
THE<br />
DIAMOND<br />
CONNECTION<br />
COTE D’IVOIRE<br />
Population: 17,654,843<br />
Resources: leading cocoa producer, diamonds, timber, oil<br />
Conflict: Extended armed civil conflict since 2002<br />
GNI per capita: US $840<br />
Corruption Rating: 151 of 163 countries (Higher scores are more corrupt)<br />
Life expectancy: 46.0 years<br />
In 2002, the “miracle of West Africa”, applauded for its peaceful history, erupted in violence with<br />
an army-led rebellion in the northern Muslim part of Cote D’Ivoire. The Ivorian conflict stemmed<br />
partly from anger among the northern population against pervasive discrimination by the<br />
predominately Christian controlled government in the South. Alassane Ouattara, a candidate<br />
favored by citizens in the North, was prohibited from running for president in the 2000 elections<br />
because of Article 35, a constitutional article stating that both parents of a presidential candidate<br />
must be Ivorian nationals. Many people in the north are not considered “true Ivorians” by the<br />
southern constituency because they share closer cultural and ethnic ties with countries to the<br />
north of Cote d’Ivoire, such as Mali. In addition to tensions over ethnicity, northern citizens were<br />
also concerned about their right to own property, a right they felt was threatened by the national<br />
government. Rebel groups in the North stated that they would not disarm until Article 35 had been<br />
amended, but the national government stated that the rebels should not be rewarded for taking up<br />
arms, and would not amend Article 35. The road to peace has been further complicated by the<br />
presence of UN peacekeeping forces. In October 2005, the UN passed a resolution to keep<br />
President Gbagbo in office for another year, due to the fact that the country was too fractured to<br />
hold democratic elections. The UN also appointed Prime Minister Charles Konan Banny to<br />
oversee the peace process, and dissolved the National Assembly, actions which generated riots<br />
against what was perceived by Gbagbo’s supporters as an impeachment of national sovereignty.<br />
As the conflict has escalated, so have the human rights abuses. Both sides are actively recruiting<br />
child soldiers, committing extrajudicial executions, and engaging in extortion and looting. The<br />
national government uses militia forces and hate media to incite violence, and the educational,<br />
healthcare, and judicial systems continue to deteriorate. Core issues of the conflict that have yet to<br />
be resolved include exploitation of ethnicity for political gain, competition over land and natural<br />
resources, and corruption.<br />
Both sides are exploiting natural resources to fund their sustained military campaigns. The<br />
national government is using proceeds from the sale of cocoa, the nation’s primary export, to fund<br />
the army, while rebel forces in the North are smuggling diamonds in exchange for money and<br />
supplies. A significant volume of conflict diamonds from rebel held areas in Cote d’Ivoire are<br />
entering the legitimate diamond trade. Despite the UN embargo prohibiting the sale of small arms<br />
to Cote d’Ivoire, loose legislation and loopholes have allowed significant amounts of small arms to<br />
be smuggled into the country. In December of 2005, the UN Security Council unanimously<br />
approved a resolution banning the import of rough diamonds from Cote d’Ivoire, renewing the<br />
existing arms embargo, and establishing a panel of experts to monitor the embargo on diamonds<br />
and arms.<br />
42