22.02.2013 Views

TYPAR® VS TYVEK® - Huttig Building Products

TYPAR® VS TYVEK® - Huttig Building Products

TYPAR® VS TYVEK® - Huttig Building Products

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>TYPAR®</strong><br />

<strong>VS</strong> <strong>TYVEK®</strong><br />

The facts and figures you need to make an informed decision.<br />

There’s plenty of information (and misinformation) fl oating around<br />

as it relates to weather-resistant barriers. As you can guess, Tyvek ®<br />

makes a lot of claims as to the superiority of their product, but many<br />

of their claims are just misleading.<br />

Typar ® is a polypropylene nonwoven breathable weather membrane.<br />

Its technologically advanced design reduces the risk of moisture<br />

damage and mold growth in the wall cavity unlike any other product<br />

on the market, and the facts support it.<br />

FACT: Typar delivers the best balance of water holdout<br />

and breathability.<br />

• Yes, Tyvek delivers higher raw numbers for breathability—<br />

it’s the balance of the water holdout and breathability that’s most<br />

important. Tyvek claims that higher is better, which is not the case<br />

in this particular instance.<br />

• Typar technical experts insist that the true measure of a<br />

housewrap’s effectiveness is the combined performance of<br />

water holdout and breathability (perm rating). Typar offers the<br />

best balance in the industry, which helps prevent moisture—<br />

and the problems associated with moisture—in wall cavities.<br />

• If breathability is too low, moisture vapor will not be able to<br />

escape from the walls. If breathability is too high, moisture vapor<br />

will be able to escape, but the housewrap’s ability to block water<br />

from the outside decreases. Typar delivers a perm rating of 11.7,<br />

which falls within the ideal range of 10–20.<br />

Based on published<br />

results according<br />

to AATC-127 testing.<br />

Based on published<br />

results according to<br />

ASTM D-5733 testing.<br />

measured in perms<br />

Based on published results<br />

according to ASTM E-96-95<br />

Procedure A testing.<br />

*Source: Fiberweb, Inc.


FACT: Typar’s tear strength is 5 times that of Tyvek’s.<br />

Tyvek would like you to believe that their product stands up to the rigors of the jobsite better than Typar.<br />

But the facts prove Typar delivers tear strength that’s five times that of Tyvek. Grab strength is the preferred<br />

testing method for tear strength, and Typar performs at more than twice the industry standard. This helps better<br />

protect the integrity of your weather protection system, which keeps moisture from entering your wall cavity.<br />

FACT: Tyvek has poor surfactant resistance. Typar holds up better over time.<br />

Conveniently enough, Tyvek doesn’t even mention surfactant resistance in its literature. That’s because it’s another<br />

area where their product falls short. Once the siding is up and final inspection is complete, housewrap still needs to<br />

perform. Soaps from powerwashing and oils from cedar siding can degrade many housewraps. Tests prove that soap<br />

degrades the surface of Tyvek. And once there’s a hole in the barrier, water can easily penetrate the wall cavity,<br />

which can lead to all sorts of problems. Typar will not degrade over time, which helps keep your wall cavities dry.<br />

FACT: Typar’s UV exposure rating is 50% longer than Tyvek’s.<br />

Ultraviolet stability is vital to the performance of a weather barrier before it’s covered. Even limited exposure to<br />

ultraviolet rays causes other weather barriers to deteriorate. UV inhibitors in Typar weather barriers’ coatings<br />

and fibers provide the ultimate UV protection. In field and lab tests, Typar offers 180 days of UV protection<br />

compared with Tyvek’s 120 days.<br />

Properties Typar ® Tyvek ®* What it means<br />

Water Penetration >800 cm 280 cm Both products pass minimum requirements<br />

MVT 11.7 perms 58 perms Tyvek is outside ideal rating between 10–20<br />

Trap Tear 33/33 lbs 6/6 lbs Typar is 5X stronger than Tyvek<br />

UV Exposure Rating 180 days 120 days Typar offers 50% longer UV protection<br />

*DuPont published performance specifications<br />

Based on published results<br />

for tear strength according to<br />

ASTM D-5733-99 testing.<br />

Now that you know the differences, which housewrap would you choose? The best known,<br />

or the best performing housewrap system? Choose Typar.<br />

For more information, call 800.284.2780 or visit www.typar.com<br />

<strong>Building</strong> Wraps • Flashings • Construction Tape • Roof Wrap • Landscape <strong>Products</strong> • Geotextiles<br />

Made in the U.S.A.<br />

Fiberweb, Inc.<br />

70 Old Hickory Blvd.<br />

Old Hickory, TN 37138 USA<br />

1-800-284-2780 • Fax: 615-847-7068<br />

www.typar.com © 2009 Fiberweb, Inc.<br />

Typar ® , Typar ® Weather Protection System, Typar ® HouseWrap, Typar ® Peel & Stick Flashing with Quick-Peel, Typar ® Flashing Flex and Typar ® Construction Tape are registered trademarks of Fiberweb, Inc.<br />

Typar ® MetroWrap , Typar ® StormWrap, and Typar Flashing RA are trademarks of Fiberweb, Inc.<br />

TYVEK is a registered trademark of E.I. DuPont.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!