22.02.2013 Views

P010010-00-R - LIGO - California Institute of Technology

P010010-00-R - LIGO - California Institute of Technology

P010010-00-R - LIGO - California Institute of Technology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

21<br />

at the beamsplitter remains unchanged, and all <strong>of</strong> the light still goes back towards<br />

the laser. If the mirrors are moved differentially, the interference at the output is no<br />

longer perfectly destructive, and some light leaks out. For very small phase shifts,<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> light returning to the laser is effectively unchanged. This means that<br />

the dark fringe condition effectively diagonalizes the response <strong>of</strong> the detector into<br />

common and differential modes. No information about differential motion <strong>of</strong> the end<br />

mirrors goes back towards the laser, and likewise, no common mode information exits<br />

the output <strong>of</strong> the interferometer.<br />

When a mirror is added at the output, otherwise known as the “dark port,” dif-<br />

ferential signals are the only ones which sense its presence due to the diagonalization<br />

by the dark fringe. If the arms <strong>of</strong> the interferometer are equal, then the two equal but<br />

oppositely signed signals in the arms experience the same arm cavity, and after being<br />

summed at the beam splitter, the same signal cavity. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> analyzing<br />

the interferometer’s response to differential arm signals, the rather complicated con-<br />

figuration <strong>of</strong> Figure 2.1 can be reduced to the 3 mirror coupled cavity <strong>of</strong> Figure 2.2.<br />

The transmissivity <strong>of</strong> this configuration is given by Eq. (2.1).<br />

MET M MIT M MSEM<br />

Signal input<br />

φarm<br />

Figure 2.2: Equivalent three mirror coupled cavity for differentially modulated signals<br />

generated in the arms. The effect <strong>of</strong> losses in the beamsplitter, as well as in the ITM<br />

substrates, can be included in an effective signal mirror reflectivity and transmissivity,<br />

r ′ sem and t ′ sem.<br />

tcc(f) =<br />

BS<br />

φsec<br />

titmt ′ seme −i(2πf(τa+τs)+φdt)/2<br />

¡<br />

¡<br />

PD3<br />

1 − ritmretme −i2πfτa − ritmr ′ seme −i(2πfτs+φdt) + retmr ′ semAitme −i(2πf(τa+τs)+φdt)<br />

(2.1)<br />

The characteristic times τa = 2larm/c and τs = 2lsec/c are the round trip travel times<br />

in the arm and signal cavities. The quantity Aitm represents 1 minus the losses <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ITM coating. The frequency f is relative to a carrier frequency which is resonant in<br />

the arms, and <strong>of</strong>f-resonant in the signal cavity by the round-trip phase φdt, otherwise

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!