23.02.2013 Views

Krishna Nagalakshmi.pdf

Krishna Nagalakshmi.pdf

Krishna Nagalakshmi.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

STUDY OF FIBRINOGEN LEVELS AND ITS<br />

ASSOCIATION WITH GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND<br />

ALBUMIN EXCRETION RATE IN PATIENTS<br />

WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS<br />

By<br />

Dr. NAGALAKSHMI KRISHNA M.B.B.S<br />

A Dissertation submitted to<br />

The Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences<br />

Karnataka, Bangalore<br />

in partial fulfillment of the requirements<br />

for the degree of<br />

DOCTOR OF MEDICINE<br />

IN<br />

GENERAL MEDICINE<br />

Under the guidance of<br />

Dr. MOHAN GOUDAR, M.D.<br />

Professor<br />

DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL MEDICINE<br />

JSS MEDICAL COLLEGE<br />

MYSORE, KARNATAKA<br />

APRIL - 2010


RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES,<br />

KARNATAKA<br />

DECLARATION BY THE CANDIDATE<br />

I hereby declare that this dissertation entitled “STUDY OF FIBRINOGEN<br />

LEVELS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND<br />

ALBUMIN EXCRETION RATE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES<br />

MELLITUS” is a bonafide and genuine research work carried out by me under the<br />

guidance of Dr. MOHAN GOUDAR, M.D., Professor, Department of Medicine, JSS<br />

Medical College, Mysore.<br />

ii


CERTIFICATE BY THE GUIDE<br />

This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “STUDY OF FIBRINOGEN<br />

LEVELS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND<br />

ALBUMIN EXCRETION RATE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES<br />

MELLITUS” is a bonafide research work done by Dr. NAGALAKSHMI<br />

KRISHNA., under my guidance, in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the MD<br />

DEGREE IN MEDICINE.<br />

iii


ENDORSEMENT BY THE HOD, PRINCIPAL /<br />

HEAD OF THE INSTITUTION<br />

This is to certify that the dissertation entitled “STUDY OF FIBRINOGEN<br />

LEVELS AND ITS ASSOCIATION WITH GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND<br />

ALBUMIN EXCRETION RATE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES<br />

MELLITUS” is a bonafide research work done by Dr. NAGALAKSHMI<br />

KRISHNA., under the guidance of Dr. MOHAN GOUDAR., MD., Professor,<br />

Department of Medicine, JSS Medical College, Mysore.<br />

iv


COPYRIGHT<br />

Declaration by the candidate<br />

I hereby declare that the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences,<br />

Karnataka shall have the rights to preserve, use and disseminate this dissertation in<br />

print or electronic format for academic / research purpose.<br />

(c) Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Karnataka<br />

v


ACKNOWLEDGEMENT<br />

It is with glorious veneration and intense gratitude, I would like to thank my<br />

esteemed teacher Dr. Mohan Goudar M.D., Professor of Medicine, Department of<br />

Medicine, JSS Medical College, Mysore, whose valuable guidance and generous<br />

support facilitated me to accomplish this dissertation.<br />

These few lines can hardly do justice if I try to appraise my gratefulness,<br />

admiration and regards for Dr. K.A. Sudharshana Murthy, M.D., Professor and Head<br />

of the Department of Medicine, JSS Medical College, Mysore, for his exquisite<br />

propositions and expert counsel during my course. I am indebted to him for this<br />

endeavour and look forward for his guidance forever.<br />

I express my sincere thanks to Dr. H. Basavana Gowdappa, Principal and<br />

Ethical Committee Chairman and other members of Ethical Committee, J.S.S.<br />

Medical College for clearing my study.<br />

I am grateful to Dr.H.S.Devaraj, MD, Dr. B.J. Subhash Chandra, MD,<br />

Dr. Ravikumar Y.S MD for their guidance and help in completion of the thesis.<br />

It gives me immense pleasure to express my deep sense of gratitude and<br />

sincere thanks to Dr. Suresh Babu MD, Dr. Kiran MD., Dr. Srinath K.M MD.,<br />

Dr. M. BanuKumar MD., Dr. Narahari S, DNB, Dr. Shasidhara K.C, MD,<br />

Dr. M. Mahesh MD, Dr Adarsh, MD, Dr. Thippeswamy, MD, for their guidance and<br />

encouragement during my postgraduate course.<br />

vi


I express my thanks to all the Staff of Department of Medicine, JSS Medical<br />

College, Assistant Librarian K.P. Basavaraj and Library staff, JSS Medical<br />

College, Mysore, for their kind co-operation.<br />

I am extremely grateful to my father Mr. N. <strong>Krishna</strong> and my mother<br />

Mrs. Saraswathi for their prayers, support and guidance.<br />

I am extrememly grateful to my friend Sumit and appreciate his contribution<br />

and patience in helping me in preparing this dissertation.<br />

I express my thanks to Mr. Praveen Kumar, Proprietor, M/s. Softouch for<br />

their meticulous work in DTP.<br />

Finally I would like to thank Dr. Prabhakar for sharing his expertise at<br />

statistic and making it seem uncomplicated.<br />

I extend my sincere thanks to my Post-graduate Colleagues, and Friends, who<br />

had helped me in preparing this dissertation.<br />

I thank the almighty in helping me in completing this study.<br />

Last but not the least my heart felt thanks to all patients who formed this<br />

study group and co-operated wholeheartedly.<br />

Place : Mysore Dr. NAGALAKSHMI KRISHNA<br />

Date : Post Graduate Student<br />

Department of Medicine<br />

JSS Medical College, Mysore<br />

vii


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS<br />

ACE Angiotensin converting enzyme<br />

AGE Advanced glycation end products<br />

AMI Acute myocardial infarction<br />

BMI Body mass index<br />

CAD Coronary artery disease<br />

CHF Congestive heart failure<br />

CRP C-reactive protein<br />

CVD Cardiovascular disease<br />

DKA Diabetic ketoacidosis<br />

DM Diabetes mellitus<br />

ECM Extracellular matrix<br />

ESRD End stage renal disease<br />

FPG Fating plasma glucose<br />

GBM Glomerular basement membrane<br />

GDM Gestational diabetes mellitus<br />

GFR Glomerular filtration rate<br />

HbA1c Glycosylated haemoglobin<br />

HDL High density lipoprotein<br />

ICAM Intercellular adhesion molecule<br />

IFG Impaired fasting plasma glucose<br />

IGT Impaired glucose tolerance<br />

viii


IHD Ischaemic Heart disease<br />

IL Interleukin<br />

IMT Intima media thickness<br />

LDL Low density lipoprotein<br />

MA Microalbuminuria<br />

MCP Monocyte chemoattractant protein<br />

MI Myocardial infarction<br />

NO Nitrous oxide<br />

OCP Oral contraceptive pill<br />

OGTT Oral glucose tolerance test<br />

PAI Plasminogen activator inhibitor<br />

PDGF Platelet derived growth factor<br />

PVD Peripheral vascular disease<br />

STEMI ST elevation myocardial infarction<br />

TCH Total cholesterol<br />

TNF Tumour necrosis factor<br />

UAER Urine albumin excretion rate<br />

VCAM Vascular cell adhesion molecule<br />

VLDL Very low density lipoprotein<br />

ix


Background<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

Globally and nationally, Diabetes Mellitus with its complications has become<br />

the most important contemporary and challenging health problem. The prevalence of<br />

diabetes in India has shown an increasing trend in the last three decades and by 2025,<br />

it is estimated that approximately 79 million Indians will be diabetic.<br />

Persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus are at increased risk for cardiovascular<br />

related illness and death, but this excess risk is not completely explained by an<br />

increased prevalence of the major conventional cardiovascular risk factors such as<br />

smoking, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Fibrinogen may have a role in this<br />

excess risk.<br />

Objective<br />

1. To study the fibrinogen levels in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.<br />

2. To find the association of fibrinogen with glycemic control and albumin excretion<br />

rate in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in addition to assessing risk factors<br />

such as smoking, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia<br />

Methods<br />

50 patients who were diagnosed to have Diabetes mellitus based on WHO<br />

criteria and an equal no. of controls(non diabetics) were selected for the study. All<br />

patients in the study were informed about the procedures and consent was taken. The<br />

study design was analytical study. Plasma fibrinogen levels, HbA1c, urinary albumin<br />

x


excretion rate was assessed in addition to assessing risk factors such as smoking,<br />

hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia.<br />

Results<br />

In this study the mean age was 58.4 years. Fibrinogen levels slightly differed<br />

between men and women. It was observed that in diabetics the mean fibrinogen level<br />

was very high (396.64±164.73) compared to non diabetics (252.6±79.26).<br />

Maximum patients(20) had duration of diabetes more than 5 years with mean<br />

duration of 4.6 years. 54% had poor glycemic control. Microalbuminuria was present<br />

in 50% of cases. 40% of cases were hypertensives, 26% of cases were smokers, with<br />

a mean BMI of 24.6. 38% of cases had non proliferative diabetic retinopathy, 4%<br />

had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Lipid profiles were significantly abnormal in<br />

the cases (diabetics).<br />

Fibrinogen level was significantly correlated with HbA1c, urine albumin<br />

excretion measured by microalbuminuria.<br />

Fibrinogen level was also significantly correlated with age and other risk<br />

factors like duration of diabetes, elevated total cholesterol, higher triglycerides, and<br />

inversely with HDL . Fibrinogen level was significantly higher in patients with<br />

retinopathy.<br />

Multi-variant logistic regression analysis showed duration of diabetes, total<br />

cholesterol and microalbuminuria to be independent risk factors.<br />

Interpretation and Conclusion<br />

In this study patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus had a high prevalence of<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia. Fibrinogen level was significantly associated with hemoglobin<br />

xi


A1C value and albumin excretion rate measured by microalbuminuria. Clinic based<br />

studies have reported that plasma fibrinogen levels were higher in diabetic patients<br />

than in controls and in diabetic patients with microalbuminuria than in diabetic<br />

patients with normoalbuminuria.<br />

On the basis of the present study findings, it can be concluded that<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia could be a mechanism of the increased cardiovascular risk faced<br />

by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.<br />

Keywords : Type 2 diabetes mellitus; fibrinogen; HbA1c; microalbuminuria.<br />

xii


Sl.<br />

No.<br />

TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

1. INTRODUCTION 1<br />

2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 2<br />

3. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 3<br />

4. METHODOLOGY 53<br />

5. RESULTS 58<br />

6. DISCUSSION 78<br />

7. CONCLUSION 85<br />

8. SUMMARY 86<br />

9. BIBLIOGRAPHY 88<br />

10. ANNEXURES<br />

Page<br />

No.<br />

Proforma 106<br />

Master Chart 109<br />

Key to Master Chart 113<br />

xiii


Table<br />

No.<br />

LIST OF TABLES<br />

1 Prevalence of complications of type 2 diabetes in Indians 9<br />

2 Influences on fibrinogen levels 37<br />

3 Age distribution of cases 58<br />

4 Sex wise distribution of cases 59<br />

5 Distribution of diabetics based on duration of diabetes 60<br />

6 Distribution of BMI in diabetics 61<br />

7 Distribution of cases based on optic fundus examination 62<br />

8 Mean lipid levels in cases 63<br />

9 Mean fibrinogen levels in cases and controls 64<br />

10 Distribution of Cases & Controls according to fibrinogen levels 65<br />

11 Association of fibrinogen with age 66<br />

12 Association of fibrinogen with sex 68<br />

13 Association of fibrinogen with duration of diabetes 69<br />

14 Association of fibrinogen with HbA1C 70<br />

15 Association of fibrinogen with microalbuminuria 71<br />

16 Association of fibrinogen with hypertension 72<br />

17 Association of fibrinogen with smoking status 73<br />

18 Association of fibrinogen with BMI 74<br />

19 Association of fibrinogen with retinopathy 75<br />

20 Association of fibrinogen with lipid profile 76<br />

21 Studies comparing levels of fibrinogen with diabetes 79<br />

22 Studies comparing fibrinogen with HbA1C 80<br />

23 Studies comparing fibrinogen with microalbuminuria 81<br />

24 Studies comparing fibrinogen with hypertension 82<br />

25 Studies comparing fibrinogen with smoking status 82<br />

26 Studies comparing fibrinogen with retinopathy 83<br />

27 Studies comparing fibrinogen with lipid profile 84<br />

xiv<br />

Page<br />

Nos.


Chart<br />

No.<br />

LIST OF CHARTS<br />

1 Age distribution of cases 58<br />

2 Sex wise distribution of cases 59<br />

3 Proportion of patients in relation to duration of diabetes 60<br />

4 Distribution of patients in BMI groups 61<br />

5 Distribution of patients with retinopathy findings 62<br />

6 Mean lipid levels in cases 63<br />

7 Mean fibrinogen levels in cases and controls 64<br />

8 Association of fibrinogen with age 67<br />

9 Association of fibrinogen with sex 68<br />

10 Association of fibrinogen with duration of diabetes 69<br />

11 Association of fibrinogen with HbA1C 70<br />

12 Association of fibrinogen with microalbuminuria 71<br />

13 Association of fibrinogen with hypertension 72<br />

14 Association of fibrinogen with smoking status 73<br />

15 Association of fibrinogen with BMI 74<br />

16 Association of fibrinogen with retinopathy 75<br />

17 Association of fibrinogen with lipid profile 76<br />

xv<br />

Page<br />

Nos.


Figure<br />

No.<br />

LIST OF FIGURES<br />

1 Worldwide prevalence of diabetes mellitus 6<br />

2 Global prevalence of diabetes 6<br />

3 Relationship of diabetes-specific complication & glucose tolerance 11<br />

4 Antiatherogenic and proatherogenic effects of insulin 18<br />

5 Screening for microalbuminuria 28<br />

6 Three dimensional structure of fibrinogen 30<br />

7 Fibrinogen and thrombogenesis 41<br />

xvi<br />

Page<br />

Nos.


INTRODUCTION<br />

Diabetes mellitus is a major independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease.<br />

The increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality appears to relate to the<br />

synergism of hyperglycemia with other cardiovascular risk factors. 1<br />

Indian studies have documented a prevalence of 21.4% for CAD 2 , 26.9% for<br />

Microalbuminuria and 2.2% for nephropathy among patients with type-2DM. 3<br />

Chronic inflammation precedes the development of Type 2 diabetes which is<br />

now considered an inflammatory condition with insulin resistance. 4,5<br />

Type 2 diabetes is frequently associated with an acute phase reaction<br />

6 ,7<br />

suggestive of low grade inflammatory status.<br />

Risk factors for macrovascular disease in diabetic individuals include<br />

dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, reduced physical activity, and cigarette smoking.<br />

Additional risk factors more prevalent in the diabetic population include<br />

microalbuminuria, an elevation of serum creatinine, and abnormal platelet function. 1<br />

Patients with diabetes are also prone to arterial thrombosis due to persistently<br />

activated thrombogenic pathways and impaired fibrinolysis. The presence of high<br />

plasma levels of CRP and fibrinogen are predictive for vascular complications and<br />

cardiovascular death in patients with diabetes. 8<br />

This study was undertaken to evaluate the association of fibrinogen with<br />

glycemic control and albumin excretion rate in patients with type 2 Diabetes mellitus.<br />

1


AIMS AND OBJECTIVES<br />

1. To study the fibrinogen levels in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.<br />

2. To find the association of fibrinogen with glycemic control and albumin<br />

excretion rate in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in addition to assessing<br />

risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia.<br />

2


Diabetes mellitus<br />

REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of common metabolic disorders that share<br />

the phenotype of hyperglycemia. Factors contributing to hyperglycemia include<br />

reduced insulin secretion, decreased glucose utilization and increased glucose<br />

production. The metabolic abnormalities associated with DM cause secondary<br />

pathophysiologic changes in multiple organ systems. 1<br />

History<br />

Diabetes (madhumeha / prameha) is probably one of the well described<br />

disorders in Ancient India. The oldest reference to diabetes in Indian literature dates<br />

back to 4,500 years. The charaka samhitha explains about symptoms, complications<br />

and treatment of prameha. The treatment included diet, exercise and medicine. 14,15<br />

Classification<br />

An international expert committee under the sponsorship of American diabetic<br />

association, was established in 1995 and a classification in July 1997.<br />

DM is classified on the basis of pathogenic process that leads to<br />

hyperglycemia as follows: 12<br />

Etiologic Classification of Diabetes Mellitus<br />

I. Type 1 diabetes (beta cell destruction leading to absolute insulin deficiency)<br />

A. Immune-mediated<br />

B. Idiopathic<br />

3


II. Type 2 diabetes (may range from predominantly insulin resistance with relative<br />

insulin deficiency to a predominantly insulin secretory defect with insulin<br />

resistance)<br />

III. Other specific types of diabetes<br />

Genetic defects of cell function characterized by mutations in:<br />

1. Hepatocyte nuclear transcription factor (HNF) 4 (MODY 1)<br />

2. Glucokinase (MODY 2)<br />

3. HNF-1 (MODY 3)<br />

4. Insulin promoter factor-1 (IPF-1; MODY 4)<br />

5. HNF-1 (MODY 5)<br />

6. NeuroD1 (MODY 6)<br />

7. Mitochondrial DNA<br />

8. Subunits of ATP-sensitive potassium channel<br />

9. Proinsulin or insulin conversion<br />

B. Genetic defects in insulin action<br />

1. Type A insulin resistance<br />

2. Leprechaunism<br />

3. Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome<br />

4. Lipodystrophy syndromes<br />

C. Diseases of the exocrine pancreas - pancreatitis, pancreatectomy, neoplasia,<br />

cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis, fibrocalculous pancreatopathy, mutations in<br />

carboxyl ester lipase<br />

D. Endocrinopathies - acromegaly, Cushing's syndrome, glucagonoma,<br />

pheochromocytoma, hyperthyroidism, somatostatinoma, aldosteronoma<br />

4


E. Drug or chemical-induced - pentamidine, nicotinic acid, glucocorticoids,<br />

thyroid hormone, diazoxide, thiazides, phenytoin, interferon, protease<br />

inhibitors, clozapine<br />

F. Infections-congenital rubella, cytomegalovirus, coxsackie<br />

G. Uncommon forms of immune-mediated diabetes - "stiff-person" syndrome,<br />

anti-insulin receptor antibodies<br />

H. Other genetic syndromes sometimes associated with diabetes - Down's<br />

syndrome, Klinefelter's syndrome, Turner's syndrome, Wolfram's syndrome,<br />

Friedreich's ataxia, Huntington's chorea, Laurence-Moon-Biedl syndrome,<br />

myotonic dystrophy, porphyria, Prader-Willi syndrome<br />

IV. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)<br />

Note: MODY, maturity onset of diabetes of the young.<br />

Epidemiology of DM-2<br />

The world wide prevalence of diabetes has risen dramatically from 30 million<br />

cases in1985 to 177 million in 2000. 1<br />

by 2030. 13<br />

WHO estimates that > 360 million individuals will have diabetes world wide<br />

5


Fig. 1 : Worldwide prevalence of diabetes mellitus<br />

Fig 2 : Global diabetes prevalence<br />

6


In the United States 18.2 million people are affected by diabetes mellitus, of<br />

which approximately 1 million have type 1 diabetes and the rest mostly have type 2<br />

diabetes. 16<br />

Indian Scenario<br />

According to international diabetes federation, India leads the world in<br />

numbers of diabetics. In 2006, the total no. was 41 million and is projected to rise to<br />

70 million by 2025. 17 The WHO estimates that the number of diabetics in India<br />

would increase to 80 million by 2030. 18<br />

Prior to 1970s several studies have documented the prevalence of Diabetes as<br />

less than 3% even in urban population. 20<br />

However several recent studies, like the National urban diabetes study<br />

(NUDS) in 2001, done in 6 large cities from different regions showed a prevalence of<br />

12.1%, in Hyderabad (16.6%), Chennai (13.5%), Bengaluru (12.4%), Kolkata<br />

(11.7%), New Delhi (11.6%), Mumbai (9.3%). 21<br />

The Amrita Diabetes and endocrine population survey (ADEPS), a community<br />

based cross sectional study done in urban areas of Ernakulam district of Kerala has<br />

revealed a very high prevalence of 19.5% . 22<br />

The Chennai urban rural epidemiology study CURES a recent, large scale<br />

study, done in Chennai using 26,001 individuals, reported an incidence of 15.5%<br />

using WHO criteria, while that of impaired glucose tolerance was 10.6%. The<br />

7


prevalence of type 2 DM had increased from 1989 to 1995 by 39.85% and between<br />

95-2000 by 16.3% and from 2000 to 2004 by 6.0%. Thus within a span of 14 years,<br />

the prevalence of diabetes increased by 72%. 23<br />

Urban – Rural differences in the prevalence of diabetes.<br />

The most disturbing facts in changing trends of diabetes in India, was a shift<br />

of onset to a younger age group including children 26 which was associated with<br />

excess fat and adiposity.<br />

The WHO ICMR national non communicable diseases risk factor<br />

surveillance done in 5 representative states in India, reported a prevalence of 7.3% in<br />

urban, 3.2% in periurban/slums and 3% in rural areas and overall prevalence of 4.3%.<br />

This study done on > 40,000 individuals, showed that the prevalence of diabetes in<br />

urban areas is more than double as in rural araeas 24.<br />

A study done in an urban population in south India using 678 people reported<br />

a prevalence of 21% in people aged above 40 years and the prevalence of diabetes<br />

was significantly higher in subjects whose income was above the mean. 25 The<br />

Chennai urban population study (CUPS) showed a prevalence of 12.4% in middle<br />

income group compared to 6.4% in lower income group. 27<br />

The CURES and CUPS have provided valuable data on the complications of<br />

type 2 diabetes in Indians (Table 1)<br />

8


Table 1 : Prevalence of complications of type 2 diabetes in Indians<br />

Type -2 DM Non diabetics<br />

CAD 21.4% 9.1%<br />

PVD 6.3% 2.7%<br />

The CURES reported an incidence of 17.6% for retinopathy 28. The prevalence<br />

of nephropathy was 2.2% and microalbuminuria26.9%.<br />

It is interesting to note that although the incidence of cardiovascular<br />

complication is higher compared to west, the prevalence of microvascular<br />

2, 29, 30<br />

complication appears to be lower than in Europeans.<br />

The rapid escalation in diabetes prevalence in recent times, may be attributed<br />

to changes in life style that has occurred in post independence India, especially in past<br />

two decades, these include easy availability of calorie rich foods, sedentary life style<br />

and decreased physical activities.<br />

In addition Asian Indians, are also genetically predisposed to type 2 DM, they<br />

have more visceral fat for any given BMI 31 , lower levels of adipokine, adiponectin.<br />

Studies on neonates reported that Indian babies are born smaller but relatively fatter<br />

compared to European babies. 32<br />

Thus apart from lifestyle factors, certain genetic factors also predispose Asian<br />

Indians to type 2 diabetes and related abnormalities.<br />

9


Epidemiologic Determinants and Risk Factors of Type 2 Diabetes<br />

• Genetic factors<br />

• Genetic markers, family history, “thrifty gene(s)”<br />

• Demographic characteristics<br />

• Sex, age, ethnicity<br />

• Behavioral and lifestyle-related risk factors<br />

• Obesity (including distribution of obesity and duration)<br />

• Physical inactivity<br />

• Diet<br />

• Stress<br />

• Westernization, urbanization, modernization<br />

• Metabolic determinants and intermediate risk categories of type 2 diabetes<br />

• Impaired glucose tolerance<br />

• Insulin resistance<br />

• Pregnancy-related determinants (parity, gestational diabetes, diabetes in<br />

offspring of women with diabetes during pregnancy, intrauterine malnutrition<br />

or over nutrition)<br />

Diagnostic criteria for DM-2<br />

The national diabetes data group and WHO have issued diagnostic criteria for<br />

DM, based on :<br />

a) spectrum of FPG and response to OGTT varies among normal individuals.<br />

b) DM is defined as the level of glycemia at which diabetes specific<br />

complications occur.<br />

c) Criteria for diagnosis of DM as advised by the American diabetic association<br />

in 2007 are as follows<br />

10


Criteria for the Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus<br />

a<br />

b<br />

c<br />

• Symptoms of diabetes plus random blood glucose concentration 11.1 mmol/L<br />

(200 mg/dL) a or<br />

• Fasting plasma glucose 7.0 mmol/L (126 mg/dL) b or<br />

• Two-hour plasma glucose 11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) during an oral glucose<br />

tolerance test c<br />

Random is defined as without regard to time since the last meal.<br />

Fasting is defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 h.<br />

The test should be performed using a glucose load containing the equivalent of<br />

75 g anhydrous glucose dissolved in water; not recommended for routine<br />

clinical use.<br />

The prevalence of retinopathy in comparison with FPG and 2 hr plasma<br />

34, 35<br />

glucose has been evaluated in two large studies.<br />

There is also association between FPG and 2 hr plasma glucose and macro<br />

vascular and cardiovascular disease. 36 Rates of disease were markedly increased at<br />

FPG> 125 or 2 hr plasma glucose > 140 mg/dl.<br />

The relationship between the blood glucose and risk of retinopathy sharply increase<br />

above the cut off values for diabetes as shown in several studies (figure below).<br />

Fig. 3 : Relationship of diabetes-specific complication and glucose tolerance<br />

11


Screening for type -2 diabetes<br />

It is estimated that up to 50% of 37 affected people remain undiagnosed and<br />

there is a time log of 5-7 yrs between onset of diabetes and diagnosis. 38<br />

The following is the summary of major recommendations for screening for<br />

type – 2 DM. 39<br />

Summary of Major Recommendations for Screening<br />

Recommendations 39<br />

Evaluation for type 2 diabetes should be performed within the health care<br />

setting. Patients should be screened at 3-year intervals beginning at age 45; testing<br />

should be considered at an earlier age or be carried out more frequently if diabetes<br />

risk factors are present.<br />

Diabetes risk factors include:<br />

• A family history of diabetes<br />

• overweight, defined as BMI >25 kg/m 2<br />

• habitual physical inactivity<br />

• belonging to high-risk ethnic or racial group<br />

• previously identified IFG or IGT<br />

• hypertension, dyslipidemia<br />

• history of GDM or delivery of a baby weighing >9 lb and<br />

• polycystic ovary syndrome.<br />

12


Complications of type2 diabetes mellitus 1<br />

Diabetes is characterized by acute and long-term complications: 1<br />

Acute complications<br />

Diabetic ketoacidosis<br />

Non ketotic hyperosmolar state<br />

Hypoglycemia<br />

Chronic complications of diabetes mellitus<br />

Microvasuclar complications<br />

1 Eye disease<br />

• Retinopathy (nonproliferative/ proliferative)<br />

• Macular edema<br />

• Cataracts<br />

2. Neuropathy<br />

• Sensory and motor (mono and polyneuropathy)<br />

• Autonomic<br />

3. Diabetic nephropathy<br />

Macrovascular complications<br />

1. Coronary artery disease<br />

2. Peripheral arterial disease<br />

3. Cerebrovascular disease<br />

13


Others<br />

1. GI-gastro paresis , diarrhea<br />

2. Genitourinary (uropathy /sexual dysfunction )<br />

3. Infections<br />

4. Cataract<br />

5. Glaucoma<br />

6. Periodontal disease<br />

All forms of diabetes, both inherited and acquired, are charecterised by hyper<br />

glycemia, a relative or absolute lack of insulin and the development of diabetes,<br />

specific microvascular pathology in retina, renal glomeruli and peripheral nerve.<br />

Diabetes is now the leading cause of new blindness in people 20 to 74 year of age and<br />

the leading cause of ESRD. 40 Patients with ESRD with DM-2 have life expectancy of<br />

3-4 years.<br />

Diabetes is also associated with accelerated atherosclerotic macrovascular<br />

disease involving heart, brain and lower extremities. The risk of cardiovascular events<br />

is increased 2-6 fold in subjects with diabetes.<br />

Overall, life expectancy is about 7-10 years shorter than for people without<br />

diabetes mellitus because of increased morbidity form diabetic complications 41 .<br />

Pathophysiologic features of microvascular complications:<br />

In the retina, glomerulus and vasavasorum, diabetes-specific macrovascular<br />

disease is characterized by similar pathophysiologic features. 40<br />

1. Requirement of intracellular hyperglycemia<br />

Hyperglycemia is the central initiating factor for all microvascular<br />

complications. Duration and magnitude of hyperglycemia are both strongly correlated<br />

with extent and rate of progression of microvascular disease.<br />

14


In the DCCT, for example type 1 diabetics whose intensive insulin therapy<br />

resulted in HbA1c levels 2% lower than those receiving conventional insulin therapy<br />

had a 76% lower incidence of retinopathy, a 54% lower incidence of nephropathy and<br />

60% reduction in neuropathy. 42<br />

2. Abnormal endothelial cell function<br />

Hyperglycemia causes abnormalities in blood flow and vascular permeability<br />

in retinal, glomerular and vasavasorum, probably by decreasing NO production and<br />

increased sensitivity to angiotensin II. 43<br />

3. Increased vessel wall protein accumulation<br />

The progressive narrowing and eventual occlusion of vascular lumina, may be<br />

attributed to elaboration of growth factors by pericytes and extra cellular matrix<br />

extravasation of growth factors and hypertension induced secretion of pathologic gene<br />

expression.<br />

4. Microvascular cell loss and vessel occlusion<br />

The progressive narrowing and occlusion in vascular lumina are accompanied<br />

by micro vascular cell loss: for example of Muller cells, ganglion cells in retina,<br />

podocyte loss in glomerulus, pericyte degeneration in vasavasorum. 44<br />

5 Development of microvascular complications during post hyperglycemic<br />

Euglycemia – Hyperglycemic memory<br />

This refers to persistent / progression of hyperglycemia induced microvascular<br />

alterations during subsequent periods of normal glucose homeostasis probably<br />

15


secondary to hyperglycemia induced prolonged and sometimes irreversible changes in<br />

long-lived intracellular molecules that persist.<br />

In the DCCT, the effects of former intensive and conventional therapy on the<br />

occurrence and severity of retinopathy and nephropathy were shown to persist for 4<br />

years after the DCCT, despite nearly identical HbA1C values during the 4-year<br />

followup. 45<br />

Genetic determinations of susceptibility to microvascular complication<br />

Different patients with similar duration and degree of hyperglycemia differ<br />

markedly in their susceptibility to microvascular complications. In the DCCT, familial<br />

clustering for retinopathy was seen with odds ratio of 5.4. 49<br />

Various genetic polymorphisms have been implicated. 46<br />

• 5’ insulin gene polymorphism<br />

• 92 m 23+ immunoglobulin allotype<br />

• ACE insertion /deletion polymorphism<br />

• HLA DQB1, O201/302<br />

• Aldose reductase genes.<br />

Pathophysiologic Features of macrovascular complications<br />

Macrovascular disease in diabetics resembles that in subjects without diabetes.<br />

However, subjects with diabetes have more rapidly progressive and extensive<br />

cardiovascular disease, greater incidence of multi vessel disease and a greater number<br />

of diseased vessel segments than non diabetic subjects. 47<br />

16


Although dyslipidemia and hypertension occur with greater frequency in type<br />

-2 diabetes, diabetes itself may confer 75% to 90% of excess risk of CAD in these<br />

patients. 48<br />

Atherosclerosis<br />

induces<br />

Atherosclerosis begins with endothelial dysfunction and injury 50 . This injury<br />

a) Secretion of chemokines such as monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 –MCP1<br />

b) Expression of endothelial adhesion molecules for leucocytes and platelets and<br />

enhance permeability of to lipoproteins and other plasma constituents. This<br />

leads to recruitment of monocyte macrophages to sub endothelial space and<br />

infiltration of plasma LDL, which binds to proteoglycan. LDL undergoes<br />

oxidation and is taken by macrophages.<br />

Activated macrophages and other leucocytes, as well as platelets, stimulates<br />

smooth muscle proliferation and elaboration of ECM leading to lesion filled with<br />

prothrombotic material with a fibrin cap.<br />

Rupture of this fibrin cap, causes thrombus formation, arterial occulsion 51 .<br />

Pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in diabetics :<br />

The pathogenesis appears to involve both insulin resistance and<br />

hyperglycemia.<br />

17


Fig. 4 : Insulin has both anti atherogenic and pro atherogenic effects<br />

Anti atherogenic effects of insulin. 52<br />

A. Stimulation of endothelial NO production which inhibits platelet aggregation and<br />

adhesion to the vascular wall.<br />

B. It also decreases expression chemoattractant protein MP 1 and surface adhesion<br />

molecule CD11/CD18 , p-selectin , VCAM-1 and ICAM-1<br />

C. It also reduces vascular permeability and decrease rate of oxidation of LDL<br />

D. Nitrous oxide inhibits proliferation of vascular smooth muscle also.<br />

Two major proatherogenic effects of insulin are<br />

1 Potentiation of PDGF induced smooth muscle proliferation<br />

2 Stimulation of PAI-1 production<br />

Pathway selective insulin resistance internal cells may contribute to diabetic<br />

atherosclerosis.<br />

18


Role of hyperglycemia<br />

Hyperglycemia also inhibits NO production, both in vivo and in vitro. It also<br />

increases PDGF induced smooth muscle cell proliferation and PAI-production 53 . It<br />

also causes increased expression of MCP-1, ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 and increased<br />

secretion of collagen TYPE 4 and fibrinectin.<br />

Both insulin and hyperglycemia also contributes to diabetic dyslipidemia.<br />

Insulin resistance<br />

Insulin resistance is associated with high VLDL, a low HDL and small dense<br />

LDL. Both small dense LDL and low HDL are each independent risk factors for<br />

macrovascular disease. This profile arises as a direct result of increased net free fatty<br />

acid release by insulin resistant adipocytes which stimulates VLDL secretion by<br />

hepatocytes, which depletes HDL and LDL of cholesterol ester. This reduces reverse<br />

cholesterol transport and contributes to formation of small dense LDL.<br />

Hyperglycemia contributes to diabetic dyslipidemia by causing delayed<br />

clearance of post prandial lipoproteins, resulting in elevated levels of atherogenic<br />

cholesterol enriched remnant particles.<br />

The UKPDS identified hyperglycemia as an important risk factor for<br />

macrovascular disease in type-2 diabetes and numerous correlation studies show that<br />

hyperglycemia is a continuous risk factor for macrovascular disease 54<br />

19


Molecular mechanism by which hyperglycemia can induce chronic<br />

complications are 40 :<br />

1. Increased intracellular glucose leads to the formation of AGE’s via non-<br />

enzymatic glycosylation of intra and extra cellular proteins. AGE’s can<br />

accelerate atherosclerosis, promote glomerular dysfunction and alter ECM<br />

function.<br />

2. Increased glucose metabolism via sorbitol pathway which alters redox<br />

potential, increases osmolality, generates free oxygen species.<br />

3. Increased formation of diacyl glycerol leading to activation of protein<br />

kinase- C<br />

4. Increase influx through hexosamine pathway which generates fructose -6<br />

phosphate, a substrate for oxygen linked glycosylation and proteoglycan<br />

production.<br />

Glycemic control and complications 1<br />

The DCCT provided definitive proof that reduction in chronic hyperglycemia<br />

can prevent early complications of Type -1 DM. In this study patients on intensive<br />

diabetic management group achieved a substantial lower hemoglobin A1 C (7.3%)<br />

than those in conventional treatment group (9.1%)<br />

This study demonstrated that improvement of glycemic control reduces NPDR<br />

and PDR (47%) microalbuminuria (39%), clinical nephropathy (54% reduction) and<br />

neuropathy (60% reduction).<br />

There was a non significant reduction in macrovascular events.<br />

20


This study predicted that with intensive management, there was 7.7 additional<br />

years of vision, 5.8 additional years free from ESRD, 5.6 years free from lower<br />

extremity complication. This translated into 15.3 years of life without microvascular<br />

or neurologic complication and 5.1 years of additional life expectancy.<br />

The UKPDS involved 5000 individuals with type 2 DM for > 10 yrs, showed<br />

that each point percentage reduction in HbA1C was associated with 35% reduction in<br />

microvascular complications. Improved glycemic control did not conclusively reduce<br />

CVD mortality but was associated with improvement in lipoprotein risk profiles 55 .<br />

This study also showed that moderate reduction in BP, is associated with reduced risk<br />

of DM – related death, stroke, microvascular complications, retinopathy and heart<br />

failure. 56,57<br />

CAD in type 2 DM<br />

Patients with DM have a greater prevalence of CAD, cardiomyopathy and<br />

congestive heart failure. 58<br />

The Framingham heart study has shown that cardiovascular mortality is twice<br />

in diabetic men and 4 times in diabetic women when compared to non diabetic<br />

patients. 59<br />

The relative risk of AMI is 50% higher in diabetic men and 150% more in<br />

diabetic women.<br />

Also CAD is more extensive (3 vessel) disease and more diffuse in a diabetic<br />

than in a non diabetic. Incidence of left main disease is more common in diabetic<br />

compared to non diabetic.<br />

21


women.<br />

Sudden death occurs 50% more in diabetic men and 300 % more in diabetic<br />

60, 61<br />

Also prevalence of silent MI is more in diabetic.<br />

The role of glycemic control in cardiovascular events is controversial.<br />

Framingham study revealed that reduction in risk of CAD in DM depends<br />

more on prevention and control of associated risk factors such as control of<br />

hypertension, obesity, correction of dyslipidemia, cessation of smoking than glycemic<br />

control. However glycemic control is associated with improvement in lipid profile.<br />

AMI in diabetics commonly presents with atypical symptoms such as<br />

breathlessness, nausea, vomiting and fatigue and absence of chest pain.<br />

The outcomes like mortality are poorer compared to non diabetics. 62<br />

The poorer outcomes may also be related to relative insulin deficiency and<br />

sympathetic overdrive, which might aggravate insulin deficiency. Hence is the need<br />

for strict glycemic control in AMI. 63<br />

DKA is encountered in 4% patients with AMI and carries a poorer prognosis<br />

(85%) mortality. 64<br />

The more common occurrence of MI during early morning hours in non<br />

diabetics is not seen in diabetics, where STEMI can occur evenly throughout the<br />

day. 65 Cardiac autonomic neuropathy in diabetic neuropathy might be related to<br />

severe cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in this population.<br />

22


Microvascular complications<br />

1. Diabetic retinopathy<br />

Blindness is 25 times more common in diabetics than non diabetics. Several<br />

Indian studies have also showed a higher incidence of proliferative diabetic<br />

retinopathy, maculopathy and cataract compared to west. 66<br />

Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy.<br />

1. Duration of diabetes<br />

2. Blood glucose control 67,68<br />

3. Hypertension<br />

4. Genetic factor 69,70<br />

Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy are at an increased risk for<br />

IHD, diabetic nephropathy and CVA. 71<br />

Renal dysfunction in diabetics<br />

In India diabetic nephropathy is the commonest cause of ESRD.<br />

Diabetic nephropathy is clinically defined by the presence of persistent<br />

proteinuria of >500mg/day in a diabetic patient who has concomitant diabetic<br />

retinopathy and hypertension and in the absence of clinical or laboratory evidence of<br />

other kidney or renal tract disease. 40<br />

The presence of diabetic retinopathy is an important prerequisite because in its<br />

absence, albuminuria in a type 2 diabetic patient may be due to diabetic or non-<br />

diabetic glomeruloscelrosis. 72<br />

Diabetic nephropathy is the leading cause of renal failure worldwide. 73<br />

23


According to Shaw et al migrant Asian Indians had 40 times greater risk of<br />

developing ESRD when compared to Caucasians. 74<br />

Microalbuminuria has been found to be higher in Indian type -2 diabetics<br />

compared to European type – 2 DM (25-41% Vs26-27%) . 75<br />

Microalbuminuria 76<br />

The term microalbuminuria refers to urinary excretion of very small amounts<br />

of albumin 30-300 mg/day or 20-200 μgm/min or albumin creatinine ratio of<br />

30-300μgm/mg or mg/gm or first morning spot sample of urine not detectable by<br />

standard dipstick test for albumin, represents 1 st laboratory evidence of diabetic renal<br />

disease.<br />

The importance of microalbuminuria was first appreciated in early 1980s when<br />

2 groups in London and Denmark independently reported that it was predictive of<br />

later development of overt diabetic nephropathy and progressive renal failure.<br />

AER varies greatly and is affected by Hypertension.<br />

Exercise<br />

Fever<br />

Poor glycemic control<br />

CHF.<br />

Microalbuminuria is secondary to loss of negatively charged proteoglycans<br />

leading to loss of glomerular charge selecting properties and hemodynamic<br />

abnormalities.<br />

24


Microalbuminuria is thought to be a consequence of increased albumin<br />

leakage through the glomerular capillary wall as a result of increased<br />

a. Permeability of the wall or<br />

b. Increased intra glomerular pressure or both.<br />

Hyperglycemia and high BP are accepted risk factors for development of<br />

microalbuminuria. Both increase intra glomerular pressure. In addition hyperglycemia<br />

can alter the charge selectively of the glomerular capillary wall, thereby increasing the<br />

permeability. The presence of microalbuminuria implies dysfunction of the<br />

glomerular filtration barrier. Theoretically, this could result from damage to any of its<br />

layers, including the endothelial glycocalyx.<br />

In healthy kidney > 99% of filtered albumin is reabsorbed in the proximal<br />

tubules. In diabetes, not only is there increased glomerular protein passage but also<br />

there is an absence of compensatory increase in tubular reabsorption of albumin.<br />

Microalbuminuria: marker of endothelial dysfunction 87 and risk factor<br />

for atherosclerosis. 88-93<br />

The glycocalyx that fills the endothelial fenestrae seems to be important for<br />

glomerular size and charge selectively. Abnormalities in endothelial glycocalyx may<br />

contribute to microalbuminuria but also have been implicated in the pathogenesis of<br />

atherosclerosis, thus providing direct link between albuminuria and cardiovascular<br />

disease. 78 A recent animal study did suggest that endothelial glycocalyx loss is<br />

associated with increased permeability to macromolecules in coronary circulation. 77<br />

25


Atherothrombosis is understood as a process in which endothelial dysfunction<br />

and chronic low grade inflammation are important early events; this chronic low<br />

grade inflammation can be assessed by measurement of plasma levels of C-reactive<br />

proteins and cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF–α which is associated with the<br />

occurrence and progression of microalbuminuria and with risk for atherothrombotic<br />

disease. 79,80,81,50<br />

Study done by Sahay et al have shown that microalbuminuria is a marker of<br />

endothelial dysfunction.<br />

• Correlates with systolic hypertension<br />

• Associated with CAD, PVD<br />

• Risk of CAD is higher than ESRD<br />

• Associated with premature atherosclerosis<br />

• Abnormal lipid profile<br />

• Pronounced increased mortality.<br />

A cross sectional study in Western India by Jadav UM, Kadam NN showed<br />

the prevalence of CAD was higher among diabetic subjects with microalbuminuria as<br />

compared to those with normoalbuminuria (58% V/s 31.9%). 82<br />

Varghese A et al in 2001 observed an overall prevalence in microalbuminuria<br />

of 36.3% in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a centre in south India and<br />

observed that microalbuminuric patients had a significantly higher prevalence of<br />

ischemic heart disease compared with normoalbuminuric patients.<br />

26


The relation between urinary albumin excretion rate and vascular disease was<br />

studied in 187 subjects aged over 40 selected from 1084 cases attending diabetic<br />

screening project. CAD was found in 32.2% in subjects with AER of 20mcg /min or<br />

less and in 74% of patients above this. PVD was present in 9.7% of<br />

normoalbuminuric patients and 44% when AER was more than 20mcg /min.<br />

Studies done by Dinneen and Gerstein found that the prevalence of<br />

microalbuminuria in diabetic subjects ranged from 20-36% and was significantly<br />

associated with cardiovascular mortality. Microalbuminuria raised the overall odds<br />

ratio for death to 2.4 and CV mortality to 2 over those without microalbuminuria. 83<br />

Studies of subgroup of diabetic in Framingham heart study also showed<br />

proteinuria to be strong predictor of CAD.<br />

Screening for microalbuminuria 84<br />

Three methods are available for screening for microalbuminuria<br />

1. Albumin creatinine ratio (ACR) performed on the first urine sample of the day.<br />

2. 24 hour urine collection .<br />

3. Timed overnight urine collection.<br />

If assays for microalbuminuria are not readily available, screening with<br />

dipsticks for microalbuminuria may be carried out, since they show acceptable<br />

sensitivity (95%) and specificity (93%) when carried out by trained personal.<br />

27


Management of Microalbuminuria<br />

1) Lowering BP 76<br />

Fig. 5 : Screening for microalbuminuria<br />

This is of paramount importance, the only controversy is: BP targets and<br />

preferred agents. 85 Mogensen suggested that in MA phase retardation of use of AER<br />

would require mean arterial pressure of about 92 mm of mercury (125/75) however;<br />

this has not yet been validated in prospective intervention studies. ACE inhibitors are<br />

preferred over other anti hypertensives.<br />

2) Glycemic control 84<br />

Improved glycemic control reduces development of microalbuminuria in<br />

both types of diabetes. A 10 year study suggested that long term normoglycemia can<br />

reverse even structural renal damage.<br />

28


3) Dietary therapy<br />

Reduction of protein intake. To limit protein intake at the stage of MA to<br />

0.8 - 1g/kg/day and consider replacement of some animal proteins with vegetable<br />

sources.<br />

4) Smoking cessation<br />

Smoking should be discouraged in patients with microalbuminuria to retard<br />

progression of MA and to guard against cardio vascular disease. 76<br />

5) Lipid lowering drugs<br />

The sub study of Prevend intervention Trial 86 supported the usage of statins in<br />

microalbuminuric subjects with the metabolic syndrome to reduce the incidence of<br />

major adverse cardiac events. They used pravastatin 40 mg once a day dosage.<br />

29


FIBRINOGEN STRUCTURE AND PHYSIOLOGY<br />

Fibrinogen is a soluble glycoprotein found in the plasma, with a molecular<br />

weight of 340 KDa. 94 Fibrinogen was the first biological macromolecule visualized by<br />

electron microscopy. 95<br />

The fibrinogen molecule is a dimer consisting of two identical halves, each of<br />

which is composed of three non-identical polypeptides termed A α, B β and γ chains.<br />

The halves of the molecule are connected at the amino-terminal central domain<br />

(N -terminal) by five inter chain disulfide bonds linking the A α chains, the γ chains,<br />

and two pairs between A α 36 and B β 65 that link the A α chain to the B β chain.<br />

The two γ chains are linked in an anti-parallel manner and the three polypeptides of<br />

each half of the fibrinogen molecule are also connected by a series of disulfide<br />

bridges.<br />

Fig. 6 : Schematic representation of Three Dimensional structure of fibrinogen<br />

The A α chain consists of 610, the B β-chain of 461 and the γ-chain of 411<br />

amino acids. Attached to the γ-chains are four carbohydrate side chains, linked<br />

30


through N-acetylglucosamine to asparagine 52 of each gamma-chain and asparagine<br />

364 of each- B βChain: the A α chain does not contain carbohydrates 96 .The molecular<br />

masses of the A α, B β and γ chain including amino acid and carbohydrate<br />

components are 66, 54 and 48 kDa respectively. 96<br />

The overall molecule is an elongated 45nm structure that resolves into a<br />

central dimeric nodule and two peripheral nodules connected with the central nodule<br />

by a thin coiled segment.<br />

It is a trinodular particle with an overall length of 475Å, comprised of two<br />

roughly spherical nodules 65Å in diameter connected by thin threads of 8Å to 15Å in<br />

diameter to a central nodule 50Å in diameter. This structure, visualized by electron<br />

microscopy, is in agreement with results obtained by proteolytic cleavage of<br />

fibrinogen that is, with, plasmin, a process that yields a central dimeric fragment<br />

(Fragment E) and two peripheral monomeric fragments (Fragment D), corresponds to<br />

the central and peripheral nodules visualized by electron microscopy.<br />

MODEL OF HUMAN FIBRINOGEN AND FIBRIN 96<br />

Each half of the molecule is composed of three chains; A α, B β and γ. The<br />

amino terminal regions of the six chains are linked in the central domain (E domain)<br />

by disulfide bonds that form the dimer. In this region, fibrinopeptides A and B are<br />

cleaved from the A α, and B β chains respectively, by thrombin, which converts<br />

fibrinogen into fibrin monomer. The two nodular regions at the C-terminal<br />

(D-Domain) contain complementary binding sites for the central determinants<br />

exposed on release of the fibrinopeptides. Depicted in the figure are also segments of<br />

31


the fibrinogen molecule that bind tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), alpha 2<br />

antiplasmin, factor XIII and of thrombin (11 a) to fibrin. The c-terminal 7-Peptide or<br />

the RGD peptide of the c-terminal of the Aα-chain intervenes in the binding of<br />

fibrinogen with platelets and other cells.<br />

Bio synthesis and metabolism<br />

Gene regulation 95<br />

Human fibrinogen is the product of three closely linked genes, each specifying<br />

the primary structure of A α, Bβ and γ polypeptide chains, located as single copies<br />

within a 50-kilobase region of chromosome 4, bands q 23 to 32. Considerable<br />

homology among, the A α, B β and γ chain indicates that the fibrinogen genes evolved<br />

from a common ancestral gene through a series of duplications and inversions that<br />

began approximately 1 billion years ago.<br />

In normal individuals, the plasma half-life of fibrinogen is 3-5 days and with a<br />

fractional catabolic rate of 25% per day. Plasma fibrinogen is synthesized exclusively<br />

by the hepatocyte, with a steady-state synthetic rate of 1.7 to 5.0 g per day. The<br />

synthetic reserve is large, and upto 20-fold increase in production rates have been<br />

found in patients with peripheral consumption of fibrinogen. 96 Approximately 75% of<br />

the body's fibrinogen is present in the plasma, but it also is distributed in interstitial<br />

fluid and in lymph. Although there is evidence that thrombin and plasmin may play a<br />

role in the normal catabolism of fibrinogen, their overall contribution appears to be<br />

small. The presence of fibrinopeptide A in normal plasma suggests that invivo<br />

coagulation may contribute to catabolism of fibrinogen, which would account for only<br />

32


2-3 % of normal fibrinogen breakdown. Fibrinogen degradation products may have a<br />

specific role in the feedback regulation of fibrinogen synthesis.<br />

An additional fibrinogen pool exists in platelets. Although the megakaryocyte<br />

has been historically considered the site of A alpha, B beta and gamma chain gene<br />

expression and fibrinogen biosynthesis, the origin of megakaryocyte and platelet<br />

fibrinogen is thought to be due to α 1 b and β 3-mediated endocytosis of plasma<br />

fibrinogen and its subsequent storage in α granules. Several extrahepatic sites of<br />

fibrinogen synthesis have been identified, including human cervical, intestinal and<br />

lung carcinoma cells. It has been demonstrated that fibrinogen is assembled into the<br />

extracellular matrix in various cell types. This fibrinogen is conformationally altered<br />

to display the beta15-21 epitope thought to be exposed only to thrombin –generated<br />

fibrin. These data suggest matrix fibrinogen may function in cellular adhesive<br />

interactions or in the maintenance of structural integrity, particularly during<br />

inflammation and wound repair.<br />

Furthermore, Plasma Fibrinogen is also a prominent acute phase reactant 102<br />

The conversion of fibrinogen into an insoluble fibrin can be divided into three distinct<br />

phases:<br />

1. Enzymatic cleavage of fibrinopeptides by thrombin<br />

2. Fibrin polymerization<br />

3. Fibrin stabilization of covalent cross linking by factor Xllla .<br />

Fibrinogen plays a central role in the three major functional processes.<br />

33


coagulation.<br />

The conversion of soluble fibrinogen into insoluble fibrin during blood<br />

The localized assembly and activation of the fibrinolytic system on<br />

polymerized fibrin and binding to blood cells; such as platelets, white cells and<br />

endothelial cells to mediate the inflammatory response, hemostasis, tissue repair and<br />

angiogenesis.<br />

Although primarily recognized for its role in hemostasis, fibrinogen is also<br />

required for competent inflammatory cell reactions in vivo.<br />

Assay for plasma fibrinogen 97<br />

Several accurate methods are now available for the quantitative assay of<br />

plasma fibrinogen, a measurement of great clinical importance that should be<br />

available in all laboratories. Fibrinogen may be converted into fibrin, which is<br />

quantitated by gravimetric, nephelometric or chemical methods. An immunological<br />

method has also been described. Methods involving measurement of coagulable<br />

protein generally are the most reliable and usually serve as the reference standard for<br />

other methods.<br />

Kinetic techniques based on thrombin time, however are simple to perform<br />

and they have been widely adopted.<br />

Both gravimetric methods and those based on the thrombin time underestimate<br />

fibrinogen in the presence of high concentration of fibrin degradation product (FDP);<br />

technical modification designed to avoid these problems have been proposed . 98<br />

34


Sonic nephelometric methods appear to be minimally affected by FDP.<br />

Modified methods that eliminate interference by heparin as well as automated<br />

techniques have been described. Marked difference in fibrinogen level obtained by<br />

gravimetric and immunologic methods and those obtained by functional techniques<br />

are found in patients with inherited dysfibrinogenemias. Reference values to identify<br />

patients with dysfibrinogenemia have been reported.<br />

Thrombin time and related techniques<br />

When thrombin is added to plasma, the time required for clot formation is a<br />

measure of the rate at which fibrin forms. This test (plasma thrombin time) yields<br />

abnormal results when fibrinogen level is below 70-100 mg/dl but is unaffected by the<br />

levels of any of other coagulation factors. It is greatly prolonged by heparin.<br />

The thrombin time may also be prolonged by a qualitatively abnormal<br />

fibrinogen, elevated levels of fibrin-fibrinogen degradation products, certain<br />

paraproteins and hyperfibrinogenemia.<br />

The thrombin time and modification of these are technically simple, can be<br />

performed quickly and are valuable particularly in the diagnosis of DIC.<br />

The reptilase clotting time is similar to the thrombin time in principle, but<br />

coagulation induced by this enzyme which is prepared from snake venom is<br />

unaffected by the presence of heparin.<br />

35


Reference value for test of hemostasis and blood coagulation 99<br />

Test Normal range (±2 SD)<br />

Fibrinogen assay 150-350 mg/dl.<br />

Regional variations in plasma fibrinogen levels<br />

Several epidemiological studies have shown that normal plasma fibrinogen<br />

level ranges from 2.3 to 4.0 g/l, the method of measurement has a strong influence.<br />

Ernst has shown that those studies, which employed the standard method, based on<br />

thrombin coagulation time (Clauss assay) the mean plasma Fibrinogen varied from -<br />

2.1 to 3.1 g/l. This could be attributed to age or sex because only men were selected<br />

for this analysis and patient's ages were similar. This regional variations in the<br />

fibrinogen levels are due to undefined environmental factors and are unrelated to<br />

patients characteristics.<br />

Fibrinogen plays a vital role in number of pathophysiological processes in the<br />

body like: Inflammation, Atherogenesis, Thrombogenesis.<br />

Fibrinogen and inflammation<br />

The process of inflammation is primarily mediated by its interaction with<br />

leukocytes through the surface receptors of the latter termed "integrins". The two<br />

main receptors for fibrinogen on the surface of leukocytes include Mac I and alpha<br />

beta 2. Fibrinogen is also a ligand for intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAM-1) and<br />

enhances monocyte endothelial cell interaction. Fibrinogen upregulates and increases<br />

the concentration of ICAM- I proteins on the endothelial surface, resulting in<br />

increased adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells. Moreover the fibrinogen<br />

36


inding to ICAM-1 on endothelial cells also mediates the adhesion of platelets. The<br />

interaction of fibrinogen and cells expressing ICAM-1 is associated with cellular<br />

proliferation. Fibrinogen on binding to its integrin receptor on the surface of<br />

leukocytes also facilitates chemotactic response, thus playing a vital role in<br />

inflammation. Fibrinogen is also involved in the facilitation of both cell-cell<br />

interaction and interaction of cell and extracellular matrix such as collagen.<br />

Table 2 : Possible influences on plasma fibrinogen levels<br />

Factors associated with high fibrinogen Factors associated with low fibrinogen<br />

Black race White colour<br />

Male sex female sex<br />

Advanced age Young age<br />

Smoking Cessation of smoking<br />

Excess weight Weight reduction<br />

Elevated total Cholesterol Regular alcohol consumption<br />

Menopause Regular physical activity<br />

Low economic status Post-menopausal hormone substitution<br />

Physical inactivity Diet rich in n-6 or n-3 PUFA<br />

Oral contraceptive use<br />

Elevated total leucocyte count<br />

Stress<br />

Diet rich in carbohydrates<br />

CLASSIFICATION OF FIBRINOGEN ABNORMALITIES<br />

Fibrinogen abnormalities can be classified as congenital or acquired, with both<br />

groups manifesting quantitative defects (e.g. Afibrinogenemia, hypofibrinogenemia or<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia) or qualitative defects (e.g. Dysfibrinogenemia).<br />

37


Congenital Disorders Of Fibrinogen<br />

1. Afibrinogenemia and Hypofibrinogenemia<br />

2. Congenital dysfibrinogenemia<br />

Acquired abnormalities of fibrinogen<br />

1. Hyperfibrinogenemia<br />

2. Hypofibrinogenemia<br />

3. Dysfibrinogenemia<br />

HYPERFIBRINOGENEMIA<br />

Plasma fibrinogen levels increases significantly with age, with life style habits<br />

such as cigarette smoking and in certain pathologic conditions such as hypertension,<br />

obesity and diabetes mellitus.<br />

20-50% of fibrinogen levels may be genetically controlled, and these<br />

differences may reflect, in part, the ethnic groups that were examined. e.g.: High<br />

fibrinogen in normal individual manifesting with fibrinogen B beta gene<br />

polymorphism at 5'untranslated regions (-455 G/A, - 148 C/T) and BCLI in the<br />

region, fibrinogen as an acute phase reactant protein is sensitive to inflammatory<br />

responses. In this process, the release of interleukin-6 by macrophages leads to<br />

increase in transcription of the B beta gene, resulting in elevated levels of fibrinogen.<br />

The concentration of plasma fibrinogen has clinical implications, as indicated<br />

by several studies demonstrating that hyperfibrinogenemia is an independent risk<br />

factor in stroke and ischemic heart disease. 100<br />

38


Increase in plasma fibrinogen due to genetic polymorphism also seems to be<br />

associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. 96<br />

Fibrinogen levels are higher in patients with essential hypertension than in<br />

normotensive controls. Fibrinogen is also elevated in diabetic patients. The<br />

Framingham data revealed a correlation between blood sugar levels and fibrinogen.<br />

Fibrinogen is elevated in patients with type 2 hyperlipoproteinemia and familial<br />

hypercholesterolemia. Fibrinogen and plasma viscosity (strongly determined by<br />

fibrinogen concentration) are associated positively with total cholesterol, triglycerides<br />

and LDL and negatively associated with HDL.<br />

Given these relationships, it is not surprising that fibrinogen was among the<br />

first novel risk factors evaluated. Fibrinogen increases progressively with the extent of<br />

coronary atherosclerosis. Fibrinogen is increased in acute stroke and peripheral<br />

arterial occlusive diseases . 101<br />

Oral contraceptive use results in significant rise of plasma fibrinogen levels,<br />

an effect that seems to be strongest in OCPs with a high estrogen concentration.<br />

However, lower plasma viscosity and plasma fibrinogen are found in women<br />

on hormone replacement therapy (HRT). 94<br />

Genetic influences<br />

Genetic polymorphism account for some 20-51% of variations in fibrinogen<br />

levels, which support the view that fibrinogen, is a primary risk factor for<br />

atherothrombotic disorders rather than just a reflection of such disorder. Beta chain<br />

synthesis is the limiting step in production of mature fibrinogen. 102<br />

39


Van't Hooft et al 103 demonstrated that 455G/A and -854G/A polymorphism of<br />

the beta fibrinogen gene have a significant impact on the plasma fibrinogen<br />

concentration. The 455G/A mutation is the promoter region of the beta fibrinogen<br />

gene is one of the strongest genetic variations, associated with an increase in plasma<br />

fibrinogen in both genders in general population. 104<br />

Fibrinogen strongly affects hemostasis, blood rheology, platelet aggregation<br />

and endothelial function. Fibrinogen is the major determinant of plasma viscosity and<br />

induces reversible red cell aggregation. Both phenomena limit the fluidity of blood.<br />

The hemo rheologic consequences of hyperfibrinogenemia might act at various levels;<br />

by reducing flow, by predisposing to thrombosis, and by enhancing atherogenesis.<br />

105,106 Platelet hyperaggregation plays an accepted role in the genesis of an<br />

atherosclerotic lesion.<br />

Fibrinogen binds to receptors on the platelet membrane, which, in turn is a<br />

precondition for aggregation in vivo.<br />

Furthermore, fibrinogen is also integrated directly into arteriosclerotic<br />

vascular lesions, where it is converted to fibrin and fibrinogen degradation products; it<br />

binds low-density lipoproteins and sequesters more fibrinogen. Both fibrinogen and<br />

fibrinogen degradation products have been shown to stimulate smooth muscle cell<br />

proliferation 107 and migration. These effects suggest that fibrinogen is involved in the<br />

earliest stage of plaque formation. Fibrinogen contributes to cardiovascular disease<br />

by promoting thrombogenesis and atherogenesis.<br />

40


Fig. 7 : Fibrinogen and thrombogenesis<br />

INCREASES<br />

PROMOTES SMC<br />

VISCOSI1TY PROLIFERATION<br />

&<br />

MIGRATION<br />

SUBSTRATE FOR<br />

THROMBINN<br />

COAGULATION<br />

ASCADE<br />

PLATELET<br />

AGGREGATION<br />

Fibrinogen and thrombogenesis<br />

FIBRINOGEN<br />

FIBRIN BINDS TO<br />

LIPOPROTEIN &LDL<br />

&RETAINS THE LIPID<br />

MOIETY IN THE<br />

PLAQUE<br />

ACUTE PHASE<br />

PROTEIN<br />

BINDINGOF<br />

PLASMINOGEN<br />

TO ITS<br />

RECEPTOR<br />

MODULATES<br />

ENDOTHELIAL<br />

FUNCTION<br />

Thrombogenesis is regulated by a fine balance between the coagulation and<br />

fibrinolytic pathways. Subsequent to vessel wall trauma, tissue thromboplastin is<br />

released from the sub-endothelium, which in turn triggers the extrinsic pathway of<br />

41


coagulation by activating factor VII to VIIa. Contact of blood with foreign surface<br />

initiates the intrinsic pathway of coagulation, by activating factor XII to XIIa, as well<br />

as platelets.<br />

The final pathway of the coagulation cascade involves the activation of factors<br />

X to Xa and the subsequent activation of prothrombin to thrombin, which facilitates<br />

the cleavage of fibrinogen into fibrin monomers, which link to each other to form<br />

fibrin polymers and then, to form a stable fibrin clot.<br />

Fibrinogenesis is also involved in final common pathway of platelet<br />

aggregation, by cross-linking the platelets by binding to glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptor<br />

on the platelet surface. 108<br />

When vascular endothelium is injured, clot formation is instigated by<br />

expression of tissue factor and activation of platelets and the coagulation pathways.<br />

The pivotal reaction is transformation of prothrombin to thrombin with cleavage of<br />

fibrinogen to fibrin.<br />

Fibrinogen and atherogenesis<br />

Fibrinogen and its metabolites appear to cause endothelial damage and<br />

dysfunction. Many human atherosclerotic lesions, showing no evidence of fissure or<br />

ulceration, can contain a large amount of fibrin, which may either be in the form of<br />

mural thrombus on the intact surface of plaque, in layers within the fibrous cap, in<br />

lipid-rich core or diffusely distributed throughout the plaque. This phenomena is<br />

compounded by the decrease in arterial intimal fibrinolytic activity and plasminogen<br />

concentration observed in cardiovascular disease.<br />

42


It has been proposed that once in the arterial intima, fibrin stimulates cell<br />

proliferation by providing a scaffolding along which cells migrate, and by binding<br />

fibronectin, which stimulates cell migration and adhesion. Fibrin degradation<br />

products, which are present in the intima, may stimulate mitogenesis and collagen<br />

synthesis, attract leukocytes, and alter endothelial permeability and vascular tone. In<br />

the advanced plaque, fibrin itself may be involved in the tight binding of LDL and<br />

accumulation of lipid, resulting in the lipid core of atherosclerotic lesions. 94<br />

Atherogenic effects of fibrinogen may result from its interaction with some<br />

lipoproteins. In fact fibrinogen has been shown to modulate the atherogenic effects of<br />

lipoprotein (a) [Lp (a)] and to increase the risk of carotid atherosclerosis and stroke in<br />

patients with low levels of HDL .The association between fibrinogen and carotid<br />

artery disease has been shown to be particularly strong in the elderly. Moreover inter<br />

racial differences have been reported in the levels of fibrinogen, with black persons<br />

having higher levels than white persons and both groups having higher levels than<br />

Asian persons. 109<br />

Hyperfibrinogenemia is associated with a particular histologic composition of<br />

carotid plaques, which in turn may predispose to plaque rupture and thrombosis.<br />

Hyperfibrinogenemia independently of other risk factors, is associated with<br />

macrophage cap infiltration and a decrease in plaque cap thickness, which in turn are<br />

associated with carotid plaque rupture and thrombosis and are probably associated<br />

with the progression of a mature asymptomatic plaque into a symptomatic lesion. 110<br />

43


Fibrinogen appears to enhance atherogenesis directly by its conversion to<br />

fibrin which binds low density lipoprotein and stimulates proliferation of vascular<br />

smooth muscle.<br />

The relationship between inflammatory markers, insulin resistance and<br />

atherogenesis including CAD in type -2 Diabetes mellitus.<br />

Type 2 DM is considered a chronic inflammatory disease, with inflammation<br />

leading to both insulin resistance and contributing to complications of Type 2 DM. 111<br />

In the women’s health initiative study Pradhan AD et al undertook a<br />

prospective nested case – control study, to determine whether elevated levels of IL- 6<br />

and CRP are associated with development of type 2 DM in 27,628 women, over a<br />

period of 4 years. They found that, baseline level of IL-6 and CRP were significantly<br />

higher in those who developed diabetes compared to controls, concluding that higher<br />

levels of CRP and IL -1 predict diabetogenesis. 111<br />

Studies by Temellora and Kurletschiev et al involving German diabetics<br />

found that there is a strong correlation between sub-clinical inflammation markers<br />

fibrinogen, CRP and insulin resistance. 112<br />

In fact a group of polish investigators hypothesized, that metabolic syndrome<br />

be better named as immuno-metabolic syndrome. 113<br />

44


An Indian study done by Deepa R et al in Chennai in the CURES trial, showed<br />

that there is a positive correlation between inflammatory markers (CRD, IL-6,<br />

VCAM-1) with increasing degrees and glucose tolerance among Asian Indians. 114<br />

A Japanese study involving patients with CAD and ACS showed CRP is<br />

markedly elevated in patients with AMI compared to ACS. 115<br />

Studies by Ahmed J et al involving 81 newly diagnosed type-2 diabetics,<br />

where inflammatory markers CRP, Fibrinogen, TNF was estimated and carotid IMT<br />

was measured showed that inflammatory markers are associated with type 2 diabetes<br />

and CRP is correlated with CIMT. 116<br />

A study from Netherlands by Jager A et al showed a strong correlation<br />

between soluble VCAM-1 and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn study. 117<br />

A cross sectional data from a subgroup of patients from the Framingham<br />

study, was done by Pon KM et al and showed that the visceral and subcutaneous<br />

adipose tissue volume are cross sectionally related to the markers of inflammation. 118<br />

A Russian study by Doronina concluded that low molecular weight fibrinogen<br />

is strongly correlated with atherogenesis, manifests as CAD, CVA and PVD. 119<br />

Howard SC et al proposed that increasing age and poor glycemic control are<br />

associated with increasing fitrinogen and risk of CAD 120 and stroke. It has been<br />

claimed that inflammatory markers can be monitored cost effectively in patients with<br />

high risk and atherosclerosis. 121<br />

45


The association of fibrinogen with glycemic control and impaired renal function<br />

in Type -2 DM 122<br />

known. 111<br />

The association of markers of inflammation, dyslipidemia and ESRD is well<br />

Dyslipidemia and inflammation may promote renal disease via endothelial<br />

dysfunction in type-2 diabetes.<br />

The population based observational Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of<br />

Diabetic Retinopathy (WESDR) examined diabetic residents of Wisconsin over time<br />

using measurements of HbA1c and fundoscopy. The study revealed a striking<br />

association between incidence, progression of retinopathy, to macular edema and<br />

vision loss and the level of HbA1c at baseline.<br />

Both the WESDR and a study of type 2 diabetes in an ageing population<br />

(55-75 years old) showed that the relative risk of developing retinopathy increases as<br />

the level of HbA1c increases. Putative risk factors for diabetic retinopathy other than<br />

the level of glycemia, include hypertension, pregnancy, a family history of diabetic<br />

retinopathy, and possibly hypercholesterolemia, but probably not smoking.<br />

A cross sectional study from a subset of patients from Health Professional<br />

Follow up study involving 732 diabetic men, to examine the relation between renal<br />

function and markers of inflammation including CRP, fibrinogen, ICAM and VCAM<br />

and Lipid profile, was done by Julie lin et al in 2006.The GFR was estimated using<br />

MDRD equation. In men with GFR < 60 ml/min, fibrinogen, sTNFR-2 and VCAM,<br />

46


triglycerides were higher when compared to group with GFR > 90 ml/min. Patients<br />

with higher fibrinogen (OR-4.50) had increased odds for GFR < 60. No association<br />

between CRP and GFR was seen.<br />

The authors concluded that several modifiable inflammatory biomarkers are<br />

elevated in setting of moderate renal dysfunction in diabetics and may be the link<br />

between renal insufficiency and increased risk of cardiovascular events in this<br />

population. 123<br />

In the Cardiovascular Health Study Linda Fried et al studied the association<br />

between six inflammatory markers-CRP, fibrinogen, WBC count, factor VII,<br />

hemoglobin levels and albumin with renal function and creatinine in a follow up study<br />

over 7 years. There was a decline in GFR by 3ml/min/year in 58 individuals. Higher<br />

CRP (p


GBM thickening, suggesting a role for inflammation in the pathogenesis of diabetic<br />

nephropathy. 125<br />

The relation between fibrinogen in mild to moderate renal dysfunction was<br />

evaluated in DCCT by Klein RC et al. Elevated levels of fibrinogen have been<br />

associated with progression to overt nephropathy and higher 5- years mortality. 126,127<br />

This study reported that fibrinogen is associated with nephropathy especially in men<br />

but not with retinopathy.<br />

The association of mild to moderate renal dysfunction with inflammatory<br />

markers and the risk of cardiovascular events was studied in the Hoorn study which<br />

concluded that endothelial dysfunction was related to renal function and contributed<br />

to the excess CV mortality in population based cohort with mild renal<br />

insufficiency. 128,129<br />

In Brazil, Gomes MB studied the relationship between acute phase proteins<br />

and microalbuminuria in 64 type 2 diabetics without clinical evidence of<br />

macrovascular disease. They concluded that fibrinogen and acid glycoprotein were<br />

associated with microalbuminuria independent of cardiovascular disease. 130<br />

In an Italian study researchers studied association between inflammatory<br />

marker fibrinogen, hs CRP, VWF and early stages of microvascular complications in<br />

Type I diabetic patients without macrovascular complication. The researchers found a<br />

correlation between low grade inflammation and duration of hyperglycemia. 131<br />

48


Some studies 132 suggest the possibility of association of CRP and VCAM with<br />

elevated AER, but have disputed its role in elevated cardiovascular risk.<br />

Studies have also documented faster rates of decline in glomerular function in<br />

chronic kidney disease and might explain elevated cardiovascular risk. 133<br />

But the role of CRP and leptin have been shown not to be independent risk<br />

factor for non diabetic kidney disease in the MDRD study, underscoring the<br />

importance of inflammation in diabetic nephropathy. 134<br />

In a study involving diabetics and non diabetics undergoing hemodialysis<br />

inflammatory biomarkers along with other factors were associated with higher<br />

mortality in diabetics compared to non diabetics. 135<br />

In addition diabetic patients who smoke have a high chance of progressing to<br />

overt nephropathy compared to those who do not smoke. 136<br />

The relation between urinary albumin excretion rate and vascular disease was<br />

studied in 187 subjects aged over 40 selected from 1084 cases attending diabetic<br />

screening project. CAD was found in 32.2% in subjects with AER of 20μg /min or<br />

less and in 74% of patients above this. PVD was present in 9.7% of<br />

normoalbuminuric patients and 44% when AER was more than 20μg /min.<br />

49


The association of fibrinogen, CRP with UAER in both diabetic and non<br />

diabetic individuals suggests that chronic inflammation may thus be a potential link<br />

between microalbuminuria and macrovascular disease. 137<br />

Studies have shown a strong association between increased UAER, endothelial<br />

dysfunction, and chronic low grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes, to be strongly<br />

correlated with risk of death. 138<br />

In the HOPE (heart outcomes prevention evaluation) study, a cohort study<br />

conducted between 1994 and 1999, individuals aged 55 yrs or more with a history of<br />

CV disease or DM and at least 1 CV risk factor (n=3498) and a base line urine<br />

albumin / creatinine ratio measurement were included. Microalbuminuria was<br />

detected in 1140 of those with DM (32.6%) and 823 (14.8%) of those without DM at<br />

baseline. Microalbuminuria increased the adjusted relative risk of major CV events<br />

(RR, 1.83) 95% confidence interval, (1.64 -2.05), death (RR, 2.09; 95% CI,<br />

1.84-2.38) and hospitalization for congestive heart failure (RR 3.23; 95% C,<br />

2.54-4.10) and concluded that any degree of albuminuria is a risk factor for CV events<br />

in individuals with or without diabetes mellitus. The risk increases with the ACR,<br />

starting well below the microalbuminuria cut off and screening for albuminuria<br />

identifies people at high risk for CV events.<br />

A Japanese study showed a strong association between hs CRP and fibrinogen<br />

with diabetic microangiopathy, but no relation to carotid IMT as a marker of<br />

macroangiopathy. 139<br />

50


Therapeutic implications of inflammation in diabetic microangiopathy and<br />

macroangiopathy<br />

The effect of intensive insulin therapy vs standard treatment was studied in<br />

153 type 2 diabetic patients in Veterans Affairs Cooperative study in type 2 diabetes.<br />

The study found a potentially beneficial reduction in serum triglyceride levels and<br />

preservation of HDL and apoAl level how even it caused a transient elevation in<br />

plasma fibrinogen levels, a possible thrombogenic effect. 140<br />

Markers of endothelial dysfunction and concentration of pro inflammatory<br />

cytokine in type 2 DM are not influenced by improved glycemic control over 16<br />

weeks; but improved metabolic control could be attained with reduced concentration<br />

of CRP, concluded study by Yudkin JS et al. 141<br />

Studies have shown a strong inverse association of HMG coA reductase<br />

inhibitor Atorvastatin and inflammation marker including CRP and fibrinogen both<br />

in acute coronary syndromes and long term therapy with intensive therapy. 142,143<br />

Among antidiabetic agents thaizolidinediones have shown a strong anti-<br />

inflammatory action, with a fall in CRP, fibrinogen ICAM-1 and improvement in<br />

HDL and adiponectin when compared with sulfonylureas. 144,145,146<br />

In obese PCOS women with IGT, Metformin reduced levels of CRP, hyper<br />

insulinemia and cardiovascular risk concluded study by Velija-Asimi Z. 147<br />

51


Treatment with Aspirin, Ticlopidine and other antiplatelet drug is associated<br />

with 10-25% reduction in fibrinogen levels and improvement in vascular<br />

pathology. 148<br />

These studies report that plasma fibrinogen as an inflammatory marker is not<br />

only associated with macrovascular complications, but also with microvascular<br />

disease in type 2 diabetes.<br />

Hence this study was undertaken to evaluate the association of plasma<br />

fibrinogen with glycemic control and urine albumin excretion rate in type 2 diabetes<br />

patients.<br />

52


Source of Data<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to J.S.S. Hospital, Mysore<br />

during the study period from November 2007 to August 2009, fulfilling the inclusion<br />

and exclusion criteria as cases and controls.<br />

Method of collection of data<br />

This was an analytical study. Data for the proposed study was collected in a<br />

pre-tested proforma meeting the objectives of the study. A detailed history and<br />

clinical examination was done pertaining to various risk factors. The patients were<br />

investigated further according to protocol to evaluate the risk factors.<br />

Cases were selected as patients with Diabetes Mellitus who were either<br />

recently detected based on WHO criteria or patients who were on antidiabetic agents<br />

for type 2 diabetes mellitus admitted to the department of medicine in J.S.S.Hospital<br />

during the study period.<br />

Controls were selected from patients admitted to J.S.S.Hospital in<br />

departments of medicine, orthopedics, ophthalmology etc. with no history of DM or<br />

HTN or IHD who were age and sex matched to the cases.<br />

Those patients who gave written consent for the study and fulfilled the<br />

inclusion and exclusion criteria were included.<br />

53


Sample size : (50 cases and 50 controls). The present study involved a total of 100<br />

patients of which 50 were taken as cases(diabetics) and the other 50 as controls(non<br />

diabetics) according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria.<br />

Inclusion criteria<br />

• Cases of Diabetes Mellitus based on WHO criteria.<br />

• Known cases of diabetes mellitus on treatment.<br />

Exclusion criteria<br />

• Type 1 diabetes mellitus.<br />

• Patients with chronic infections, renal disease, endocrine disease, malignancy.<br />

• Patients on warfarin, steroids, hormone replacement therapy.<br />

Following parameters were studied<br />

A. Obesity<br />

Individuals were classified as obese or non obese based on<br />

Body mass index – BMI<br />

BMI = weight (kgs)/height (meters) 2<br />

BMI greater than 30 were considered obese<br />

B. Hypertension<br />

Known hypertensives on treatment or newly detected hypertension according<br />

to JNC VII criteria<br />

C. Ocular fundus examination<br />

54


Ocular fundus was examined by ophthalmologist & diabetic retinopathy was<br />

classified as:<br />

None - normal fundus examination<br />

Non proliferative diabetic retionopathy – NPDR<br />

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy- PDR<br />

D. Diabetes mellitus<br />

A diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was made if patient met the criteria for<br />

diabetes by the ADA 2007 or the patient was already on anti diabetic agents<br />

for management.<br />

E. Dyslipidemia<br />

Fasting blood sample collected for lipid profile, total cholesterol, HDL &<br />

triglycerides were directly assessed by standard enzymatic methods.<br />

LDL cholesterol was estimated using Freidwald’s equation:<br />

LDL cholesterol = Total cholesterol – HDL – triglycerides/5<br />

According to National cholesterol education program (NCEP) ATP III<br />

guidelines patients were considered to have dyslipidemia when<br />

• Total cholesterol >200mg%<br />

• HDL 130mg%<br />

• Triglycerides > 150mg%<br />

55


F. Plasma Fibrinogen level<br />

Plasma fibrinogen was estimated by coagulation method done by Sysmex 560<br />

series.<br />

G. Urine albumin excretion<br />

UAE was measured by microalbuminuria which was detected by Micral test II<br />

strips and was considered positive if there was a colour change. This test is an<br />

immunological, semi quantitative determination of microalbuminuria. In this,<br />

a freshly voided early morning urine sample is collected. The strip is dipped in<br />

urine sample for 5 sec up to in between the two black strips, later withdrawn<br />

and the colour is read after 1 min.<br />

H. Other investigations done<br />

Haemoglobin<br />

Total leukocyte count<br />

Differential leukocyte count<br />

ESR<br />

HbA1c<br />

Blood urea,serum creatinine<br />

Urine analysis<br />

ECG<br />

Chest X-ray<br />

56


STATISTICAL METHODS APPLIED<br />

The analysis of the data was carried out in various parts:<br />

1. In the first part the mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels in cases<br />

and controls was estimated.<br />

2. In the second part univariate analysis was carried out to study the differences<br />

in mean level among the factors. The Pearson correlation coefficient was<br />

estimated for each of the variables. The students T test was carried out if two<br />

groups were considered in the variable. For more than 2 groups analysis of<br />

variance (ANOVA) was adopted.<br />

3. In the third part multiple linear regression was adopted to identify the<br />

independent factors from among the factors observed to have significance in<br />

the univariate analysis.<br />

The SPSS software No.13 was utilized for the analysis.<br />

57


A. Age distribution of cases in the study<br />

RESULTS<br />

Table 3 : Frequency of cases in various age groups<br />

Age (Years) Frequency (%)<br />

40-50 13 (26%)<br />

51-60 15 (30%)<br />

61-70 19 (38%)<br />

71-80 3 (6%)<br />

Total 50<br />

Graph 1 : Graph showing number of patients in various age groups<br />

number of patients<br />

The maximum number of cases were in the age group of 61-70 years (38%).<br />

Mean age in the present study was 58.4 years.<br />

58


B. Sex wise distribution of the cases<br />

Table 4 : Sex wise distribution of the cases<br />

Sex Frequency (%)<br />

Male 27 (54%)<br />

Female 23 (46%)<br />

Total 50<br />

Graph 2: Pie chart showing Sex wise distribution of the cases<br />

Males comprised 54% of the study group while females comprised 46%.<br />

59


C. Duration of Diabetes<br />

Table 5 : Frequency of diabetics based on duration of diabetes<br />

Duration Frequency<br />

< 1 year 13 (26%)<br />

1-5 years 17 (34%)<br />

> 5 years 20 (40%)<br />

Graph 3: Pie chart showing proportion of patients in<br />

relation to duration of diabetes<br />

The duration of diabetes in maximum no of cases in this study was more than<br />

5 years with a mean duration of 4.6 years. 4 cases were recently detected and the<br />

longest duration was 15 years.<br />

60


D. Body mass index (BMI)<br />

In the present study, the distribution of BMI in diabetics was as follows<br />

Table 6: No. of patients in BMI groups<br />

BMI Frequency (%)<br />

18-25 30 (60%)<br />

26-30 19 (38%)<br />

>30 1 (2%)<br />

Graph 4 : Graph showing number of patients in BMI groups<br />

number of patients<br />

It was seen that 38% of diabetics were overweight with 1 case being obese.<br />

61


E. Optic fundus finding<br />

In this study, patients were classified based on optic fundus examination<br />

� Normal<br />

� Non proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

� Proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

Table 7 : Frequency of cases based on optic fundus examination<br />

Fundus Frequency(%)<br />

WNL 29(58%)<br />

NPDR 19(38%)<br />

PDR 2(4%)<br />

Graph 5 : Graph showing No. of pateints with retinopathy findings<br />

number of patients<br />

Fundus<br />

38% of cases had NPDR while 4% of cases had PDR.<br />

62


F. Lipid profile levels<br />

The mean lipid profile among the cases in this study was as follows.<br />

Table 8 : Mean Total cholesterol, LDL, HDL and triglyceride levels<br />

mean lipid levels in mg/dl<br />

Type Mean<br />

Total Cholesterol 208.28 mg/dl<br />

HDL 39.82 mg/dl<br />

LDL 131.80 mg/dl<br />

Triglycerides 183.18 mg/dl<br />

Graph 6 : Graph showing mean lipid levels<br />

63


Analysis Was Carried Out To Study The Fibrinogen Level Among Diabetics and<br />

Non Diabetics and Also Other Factors Associated<br />

1. Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels in diabetics and non<br />

diabetics.<br />

Table 9: Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels in cases (diabetics)<br />

and controls (non diabetics)<br />

Cases<br />

N Mean S.d<br />

(diabetics) 50 396.64 164.73<br />

Controls<br />

(non-diabetics) 50 252.6 79.26<br />

P


(396.64±164.73) compared to non diabetics (252.6± 79.26) which was found to be<br />

very highly significant.<br />

Also, the distribution of diabetics and non diabetics was tabulated by grouping<br />

the fibrinogen levels (Table 10). It was observed that above 500mg/dl of fibrinogen<br />

level, no non diabetics were observed whereas 13 cases (26%) were observed in<br />

diabetics.<br />

Table 10 : Distribution of Cases and Controls according to fibrinogen levels<br />

Fibrinogen (mg/dl) Cases Controls Total<br />

100-200<br />

6<br />

28.60%<br />

15<br />

71.40%<br />

21<br />

100.00%<br />

201-300<br />

11<br />

37.90%<br />

18<br />

62.10%<br />

29<br />

100.00%<br />

301-400<br />

10<br />

38.50%<br />

16<br />

61.50%<br />

26<br />

100.00%<br />

401-500<br />

10<br />

90.90%<br />

1<br />

9.10%<br />

11<br />

100.00%<br />

501-600<br />

7<br />

100.00%<br />

0<br />

0.00%<br />

7<br />

100.00%<br />

601-700<br />

3<br />

100.00%<br />

0<br />

0.00%<br />

3<br />

100.00%<br />

701-800<br />

3<br />

100.00%<br />

0<br />

0.00%<br />

3<br />

100.00%<br />

Total 50 50 100<br />

65


The present study is planned to study the association of fibrinogen with Glycemic<br />

Control and Albumin excretion rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in<br />

addition to assessing risk factors such as smoking, Hypertension, obesity,<br />

dyslipidemia.<br />

2. Univariate Analysis was carried out to study the differences in mean level<br />

among the factors. The Pearson correlation coefficient was estimated for each<br />

of the variable. The students T test was carried out if 2 groups are considered<br />

in the variable. For more than 2 groups Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was<br />

adopted. The results are as follows.<br />

a) Age and Fibrinogen<br />

Table 11 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen<br />

levels according to age groups<br />

Age groups N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

40-50 13 272.00 121.483<br />

51-60 15 435.20 149.029<br />

61-70 19 446.21 165.655<br />

71-80 3 430.00 191.572<br />

Total 50 396.64 164.730<br />

Pearson’s correlation coefficient =0 .197 (p


Mean fibrinogen levels in mg/dl<br />

Graph 8 : Graph Showing mean fibrinogen levels<br />

in different patient age groups<br />

It was seen that fibrinogen levels showed an increasing trend with age, this was<br />

statistically significant. The Pearson correlation coefficient also showed significance (0.197)<br />

67


) Sex and fibrinogen<br />

Table 12 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels according to sex<br />

Sex N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

Male 27 461.33 141.700<br />

Female 23 320.70 159.825<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.139, p>0.05<br />

sex<br />

Graph 9 : Graph showing mean Fibrinogen levels according to<br />

Mean fibrinogen levels in mg/dl<br />

The mean fibrinogen levels were higher in males when compared to females.<br />

However it was not statistically significant. The Pearson’s coefficient correlation was<br />

0.139 which was also not significant.<br />

68


C. Duration of Diabetes and Fibrinogen<br />

Table 13 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen<br />

level according to duration of diabetes<br />

Duration N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

< 1 year 13 270.62 120.093<br />

1-5 years 17 360.00 128.355<br />

> 5 years 20 509.70 146.549<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.482, p 5yrs duration had high mean fibrinogen level<br />

(509.70mg/dl) when compared to the duration


D. HbA1c (Glycemic control) and Fibrinogen<br />

Based on HbA1c, 2 groups were obtained i.e. those with adequate glycemic<br />

control (6%), the mean fibrinogen level<br />

in each of these groups was calculated.<br />

Table 14 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels<br />

according to HbA1c groups<br />

HBA1C N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

< 6% 23 (46%) 308.22 131.107<br />

> 6% 27(54%) 471.96 154.235<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.622, p 6% had a higher mean<br />

fibrinogen level (471.96) compared to diabetics with HbA1c


found to be very highly significant. The Pearson correlation coefficient was also very<br />

high (0.622).<br />

E. Urine albumin excretion rate (Microalbuminuria) and fibrinogen<br />

Based on urine albumin excretion rate patients are classified as with<br />

microalbuminuria and without.<br />

Table 15 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen in patients with<br />

microalbuminuria<br />

Microalbuminuria N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

Present 25 520.56 116.292<br />

Absent 25 272.72 99.434<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = -.647, p


F. Hypertension<br />

In the present study 20 cases (40%) of total 50 cases were hypertensive and<br />

remaining 30 cases were normotensive. The mean fibrinogen levels in hypertensives<br />

and normotensive groups were as follows:<br />

Table 16 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen levels<br />

in hypertensives and normotensives<br />

N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

Hypertensives 20 (40%) 423.50 196.536<br />

Normotensives 30(60%) 378.73 140.408<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = -.267, p>0.05<br />

Hypertension was observed in 40% of the cases with diabetes. The mean<br />

fibrinogen level between hypertensives and normotensives was observed to be not<br />

significant. The pearson correlation coefficient was -.267 which was also not<br />

significant.<br />

Graph 13 : Graph comparing fibrinogen levels with Hypertension<br />

73


G. Smoking and relation to fibrinogen levels<br />

In the present study 13 out of 50 cases (26%) were smokers and 37 out of 50<br />

cases (74%) were non smokers.<br />

Table 17: The mean fibrinogen levels in smokers and non smokers are as follows<br />

N Mean Std. Deviation<br />

Smokers 13(26%) 398.46 99.150<br />

Non smokers 37 (74%) 396.00 183.458<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = -.138 p>0.05<br />

No significant difference in mean fibrinogen level was observed between<br />

smokers and non smokers<br />

Graph 14 : Graph showing mean fibrinogen levels in smokers and non smokers<br />

Mean fibrinogen levels in mg/dl<br />

74


H. Body mass index (BMI)<br />

Table 18 : Mean and standard deviation of fibrinogen level according to BMI<br />

BMI Mean Standard deviation<br />

18-25 403 1.955<br />

26-30 396.2 1.792<br />

>30 210 246<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = .076, p>0.05<br />

Graph 15 : Graph showing mean fibrinogen levels according to BMI<br />

When mean fibrinogen level was compared with respect to BMI, Pearson<br />

correlation coefficient was 0.076, p value was


I. Optic fundus finding<br />

Table 19: Mean fibrinogen levels in patients with diabetic retinopathy<br />

Fundus Examination Mean Fibrinogen<br />

WNL 302.83 mg/dl<br />

NPDR 522.11 mg/dl<br />

PDR 565.00 mg/dl<br />

Pearson correlation coefficient = .689, p


J. Fibrinogen and Lipid profile<br />

Based on lipid profile levels, patients were grouped into two groups.<br />

For Total cholesterol 200mg/dl<br />

LDL Cholesterol 130mg/dl<br />

HDL Cholesterol >40 and 40


It was observed that in lipid profiles total cholesterol, HDL and Triglycerides<br />

had significant difference in the 2 groups presented in table 20.<br />

3. The multiple linear regression was adopted to identify the independent<br />

factors from among the factors observed to have significance in the<br />

univariate analysis. The independent factors were duration of diabetes, total<br />

cholesterol and microalbuminuria.<br />

The SPSS software No.13 was utilized for the analysis.<br />

78


DISCUSSION<br />

Fifty patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and 50 controls (non diabetics)<br />

were studied. It was found that patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus had an elevated<br />

prevalence of hyperfibrinogenemia and that in diabetics plasma fibrinogen level was<br />

associated with HbA1C and albumin excretion rate. Higher fibrinogen levels were<br />

observed in diabetics with longer duration, patients with increasing age, poor<br />

glycemic control, dyslipedimia, presence of retinopathy and microalbuminuria.<br />

As discussed previously fibrinogen as a prothrombotic marker can be affected<br />

by various markers.<br />

In this study significantly higher fibrinogen levels were found in patients with<br />

• Those with longer duration of diabetes (p


A) Association of fibrinogen with diabetes<br />

Several studies have shown significantly higher levels of fibrinogen in<br />

diabetics compared to non diabetic population. 122,149,152<br />

Table 21: Studies comparing levels of fibrinogen with diabetes<br />

Study Mean fibrinogen levels(mg/dl)<br />

Bruno G et al 122<br />

Lee AJ et al The Scottish Heart Study 149<br />

360<br />

Diabetic Men =246<br />

Women=244<br />

Mistry P et al 152 Cases =521.5<br />

Controls=478.9<br />

P


In the present study it was found that the mean fibrinogen levels were higher in<br />

males(461.33 mg/dl) when compared to females(320.70mg/dl), however it was not<br />

statistically significant.<br />

D) Association of fibrinogen with HbA1c (glycemic control)<br />

Hyperfibrinogenemia in diabetes has been reported to be caused by an<br />

increased synthesis of fibrinogen that is not compensated for by a proportional<br />

increase in clearance of fibrinogen. These abnormalities have been associated with<br />

insulin deficiency and have been corrected with insulin, 153 suggesting that<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia is an expression of poor glycemic control. It has been reported 154<br />

that fibrinopeptide A (a peptide that is released from fibrinogen when it is<br />

transformed into fibrin) is positively related to blood glucose. In a study done by<br />

Bruno G et al 122 fibrinogen level was significantly associated with hemoglobin A1c<br />

value. Another study by Ceriello A 155 suggested that hyperfibrinogenemia is one way<br />

by which hyperglycemia activates coagulation. Therefore, both epidemiologic and<br />

clinical findings support the hypothesis that poor glycemic control may lead to<br />

thrombophilia, a condition that might be involved in the increased cardiovascular risk<br />

in patients with diabetes.<br />

Table 22 : Studies comparing fibrinogen with HbA1C<br />

Study Relation between fibrinogen in patient with glycemic<br />

control (HbA1C)<br />

Bruno G et al 122<br />

Adequate glycemic control group = 344 mg/dl<br />

Patients with poor glycemic control = 380 mg/dl :<br />

p


In the present study it was observed that the mean fibrinogen level was higher<br />

in patients with poor glycemic control which is in tune with the study done by Bruno<br />

G et al 122<br />

E. Microalbuminuria and fibrinogen levels<br />

Fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in patients who had<br />

microalbuminuria compared to those with no proteinuria (p


E) Association of fibrinogen with hypertension<br />

Higher levels of fibrinogen were seen in patients with hypertensive patients<br />

compared to normotensives in studies by Lee AJ et al 149 and Mistry P et al. 152<br />

Table 24 : Studies comparing Hypertension and fibrinogen levels<br />

Lee AJ et al The Scottish<br />

Heart Study<br />

Author Mean fibrinogen in<br />

hypertensives<br />

Men=239<br />

Women=238<br />

Mistry P et al Cases =554<br />

Present study 423.5±196.5<br />

Mean fibrinogen in<br />

normotensives<br />

Men =227<br />

Women=231<br />

Controls =443<br />

378.7±140.4<br />

In the present study higher levels of fibrinogen were seen in hypertensive<br />

patients compared to normotensives, however it was not statistically significant<br />

(p value > 0.05)<br />

F) Smoking status and relation to fibrinogen levels<br />

No relation was seen between fibrinogen levels and smoking status. This is in<br />

contrast to several studies which report higher fibrinogen levels in smokers.<br />

Table 25 : Studies comparing fibrinogen levels in smokers and non smokers<br />

Study Mean fibrinogen<br />

in smokers<br />

Mean fibrinogen<br />

in non smokers<br />

P value<br />

Mistry P et al 515.8±77 443.4±99 0.05–not<br />

significant<br />

A meta analysis by Ernst et al 150 showed a significantly higher levels in<br />

smokers compared to non smokers.<br />

82


The non association between smoking status and fibrinogen levels in the<br />

present study might be due to the fact that the number of smokers in the present study<br />

was small (n=13)<br />

H) Fibrinogen and retinopathy<br />

Fibrinogen levels were significantly higher in patients with diabetic<br />

retinopathy. Patients with non proliferative diabetic retinopathy had significantly<br />

higher levels of fibrinogen compared to those with normal optic fundus (p


Study<br />

Gothenger risk,<br />

incidence and<br />

prevalence study<br />

Caerphilly &<br />

Speedwell<br />

collaborative<br />

heart study<br />

Table 27: Studies comparing Lipid profile and fibrinogen levels<br />

Relation of<br />

fibrinogen to<br />

total<br />

cholesterol<br />

R=0.124<br />

P


� This is a hospital based small study of a short duration.<br />

85


CONCLUSION<br />

In this study patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus had a high prevalence of<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia. Higher fibrinogen levels was associated with increasing age,<br />

longer duration of diabetes, dyslipidemia and presence of retinopathy.<br />

Fibrinogen level was significantly associated with hemoglobin A1C value and<br />

albumin excretion rate measured by microalbuminuria. Clinic based studies have<br />

reported that plasma fibrinogen levels were higher in diabetic patients with<br />

microalbuminuria than in diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria. Because<br />

microalbuminuria has been recognized as a powerful predictor of cardiovascular<br />

related illness and death, fibrinogen level may be considered a potential additional<br />

risk factor in patients with diabetes which suggests that fibrinogen may be involved in<br />

the increased cardiovascular risk of patients with diabetes mellitus.<br />

On the basis of the present study findings, it can be concluded that<br />

hyperfibrinogenemia could be a mechanism of the increased cardiovascular risk faced<br />

by patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.<br />

85


SUMMARY<br />

• In this study 50 patients with type 2 diabetes were studied and compared with 50<br />

age and sex matched controls in relation to fibrinogen levels. The association of<br />

fibrinogen with glycemic control and albumin excretion rate in patients with Type<br />

2 Diabetes Mellitus in addition to assessing risk factors such as smoking,<br />

hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia was also studied.<br />

• The maximum number of cases were in the age group of 61-70 years(38%), with<br />

mean age of 58.4 years.<br />

• Males comprised 54% of the study while females comprised 46%.<br />

• It was obsereved that in diabetics the mean fibrinogen level was very high<br />

(396.64±164.73) compared to non diabetics (252.6±79.26) which was found to be<br />

very highly significant (p value


was131.80 mg/dl, mean HDL 39.82mg/dl, and mean triglyceride was<br />

183.18mg/dl.<br />

• Fibrinogen level was significantly correlated with HbA1c (p


BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

1. Alvin C. Powers. Diabetes Mellitus. In: Kasper, Braunwald et al. Editors.<br />

Harrisons principles of internal medicine, 17 th Edition. USA : McGraw Hill.<br />

P2275-2310<br />

2. Mohan V, Deepa R, Rani SS, Premalatha G, et al. The Chennai Urban<br />

Population Study (CUPS) – prevalence of CAD & its relationship to lipids in a<br />

selected population in south India. J Am Coll Of Cardiology 2001; 38: 682-7.<br />

3. Ranjit UI, Rema M, Pradeepa R, Deepa M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for<br />

diabetic nephropathy in an urban Indian population-the Chennai Urban Rural<br />

Epidemiological Study-CURES. Diabetes care 2007; 8: 2019-24.<br />

4. Festa A, D’ Agostino R Jr, Tracy RP, Haffner SM. Elevated levels of acute –<br />

phase proteins and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 predict the development of<br />

type 2 Diabetes: the insulin resistance atherosclerosis study. Diabetes 2002 Apr;<br />

Vol 51, 1131-7<br />

5. Manson JE, Pradhan AD, Rifai N, et al. CRP, IL-6 and risk of developing type<br />

2DM. JAMA 2001; 286: 327-336.<br />

6. Pickup JC, Crook MA, Is type 2 diabetes a disease of immune system?<br />

Diabetologia 1998; 41: 1241-1248.<br />

7. Pickup JC, Maltock MB, Burt D. NIDDM as a inflammatory disease :<br />

Association of acute phase reactants and interleukin 6 with metabolic syndrome<br />

X- Diabetologia 1997; 40: 1286-1289.<br />

8. Coppola G, Corrado E, Muratori I, Tantillo R, Vitale G, Lo loca L, et al.<br />

Increased levels of C-reactive protein and fibrinogen influence the risk of<br />

vascular events in patients with NIDDM. Int J Cardiol 2006; 106: 16-20.<br />

88


9. Jager A, van Hinsberh VW, Kostence PJ, et al. Von willebrand factor ,CRP and<br />

5 year mortality in diabetic and non diabetic subjects: The Hoorn study<br />

Arterioscl Throm Vasc Biol 1999; 19: 3071-3078.<br />

10. Twisk JW, Gall MA, Stehouwer CD, et al. Increased urinary albumin excretion,<br />

endothelial dysfunction, and chronic low grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes:<br />

progressive inter related and independently associated with risk of death.<br />

Diabetes 2002; 51: 1157-1165.<br />

11. Saraheimo M, Teppo AM, Forsblom C, et al. Diabetic nephropathy is associated<br />

with low grade inflammation in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetalogia 2003; 46:<br />

1402-1407.<br />

12. American Diabetic Association: clinical practice recommondations 2007:<br />

Diabetes care 2007; 27: 1047:S-4.<br />

13. Diabetes action now : An initiative of WHO & international diabetes federation<br />

2004. Diabetes care 2004; 27: 1047.<br />

14. Parivallal T. Diabetes in ancient India-in type 2 diabetes in south Asians-<br />

epidemiology, risk factors and prevention Mohan V, Gundu HR Rao (eds).<br />

15. Shah VK. Diabetes in Indian medicine Jai <strong>Krishna</strong> das ayurved series 2 nd ed no<br />

83: 2001.<br />

16. Umesh Masharani. Diabetes mellitus in Current Med Diag and Treatment 2008,<br />

Stephen McPhee, MA Papadakis et al(eds).<br />

17. Sicree R, Shaw J, Zimmet P. Diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance, in<br />

diabetes atlas. International diabetes federation.3 rd ed p15-103, 2006.<br />

18. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes<br />

mellitus:Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes care<br />

2004; 27: 1047-53.<br />

89


19. Sandeep S, Mohan V. Changing trends in epidemiology of diabetes –medicine<br />

update 2008, p133.<br />

20. Ahuja MMS. Epidemiological studies on diabetes mellitus in India in: Ahuja<br />

MMS Epidemiology of diabetes in developing countries Interprint New Delhi<br />

1979, 29-38.<br />

21. Ramachandran A, Snehalatha C, Kapur A, Vijay Y, et al. Diabetes<br />

epidemiology study group –DESI ,high prevalence of diabetes &impaired<br />

glucose tolerance in India –national urban diabetes survey. Diabetologia 2001;<br />

44: 1094-101.<br />

22. Menon VU, Kumar KV, Gilchrist A, et al. Prevalence of known and undetected<br />

diabetes and associated risk factors in central Kerala. ADEPS Diabetes rev Clin<br />

Practice 2006; 74: 289-294.<br />

23. Mohan V, Deepa M, Deepa R, et al. Secular trends in the prevalence of diabetes<br />

and glucose tolerance in urban south India. CURES-17, Diabetologia 2006; 49:<br />

1175-1178.<br />

24. Risk factor surveillance for non communicable diseases :the multi risk ICMR –<br />

WHO collaborative initiative<br />

25. Ramachandran A, Jali MV, Mohan V, et al. High prevalence of diabetes in an<br />

urban population in south India. Br. Med J 1988; 297: 587-90.<br />

26. Misra A, Vikram NK, Arya S, et al. High prevalence of insulin resistance in post<br />

pubertal Asian Indian children is associated with adverse truncal obesity fat<br />

patterning, abdominal obesity and excess body fat. Int.J Obes.Rel.Met Disorders<br />

2004; 2008: 1217-1226.<br />

27. Shantirani CS, Rema M, Deepa R, et al. The Chennai Urban Population Study –<br />

methodological details. Intl J Diab Dev Countries 1999; 19: 149-155.<br />

90


28. Rema M, Prem Kumar S, Anitha B, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in<br />

urban India. The CURES Eye study. J Inv Ophthal vic Sci 2005; 46: 2328-33.<br />

29. Mohan V, Ravikumar R, Shantirani S, et al. Intima Media thickness on the<br />

carotid artery in south Indian diabetic and non diabetic subjects–CUPS.<br />

Diabetologia 2000; 43: 494-09.<br />

30. Smith SR, Svetkey LP, Dennis VW. Racial differences in the incidence and<br />

progression of renal diseases. Kidney Int 1991; 40: 815-822.<br />

31. Raji A ,Seely EW, Arky RA, et al. Body fat distribution and insulin resistance<br />

in healthy Asian Indians and Caucasians. J Clin Endo Metab 2001; 86: 5366-71.<br />

32. Yajnik CS, Fall CH, Coyaji KJ, et al. Neonatal anthropometry :the thin fat<br />

Indian baby–the Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. Int J Obes Relat Metab<br />

Disorders 2003; 27: 173-80.<br />

33. American diabetes association 2002. Diabetes care 2002; 25(S1,S5): 520.<br />

34. McCance DR, Hanson RL, Charles MA. Comparison of tests for glycosylated<br />

hemoglobin and fasting and two hour plasma glucose concentration as<br />

diagnostic methods for diabetes. BMJ 1994; 308: 1323-1328.<br />

35. Engelgan MM, Thompson JJ, Herman WH, Comparison of fasting 2hour<br />

glucose and HbA1c levels for diagnosing diabetes-Diagnosing criteria and<br />

performance re visited. Diabetes care 1997; 20: 785-791.<br />

36. Charles MA, Shipley MJ, Rose G, et al. Risk factors for diabetes in white<br />

population : Paris prospective study. Diabetes care 1991; 40: 796-799.<br />

37. Harris MI, Hadden WC, Knowler WC,Bennett PH. Prevalence of diabetes and<br />

impaired glucose tolerance and plasma glucose levels in U.S. population aged<br />

20–74 yr. Diabetes 1987; 36: 523–534.<br />

91


38. Harris MI. Undiagnosed NIDDM: clinical and public health issues. Diabetes<br />

Care 1993; 16: 642–652.<br />

39. John B. Buse, Kenneth S. Polonsky, and Charles F. Burant-type 2 Diabetes in<br />

Williams text book of endocrinology 10 th ed.<br />

40. Michael Brownlee, Lloyd P, Aiello et al. Complications of diabetes mellitus in<br />

Williams text book of endocrinology.<br />

41. Skyler J. Diabetic complications: the importance of glucose control. Endocrinol<br />

Metab Clin North Am 1996; 25: 243-254.<br />

42. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and<br />

progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus:<br />

the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med<br />

1993; 329: 977–986.<br />

43. Shore AC, Tooks JE. Microvascular complication and hemodynamic<br />

disturbances in diabetes –Pickup J, Williams g text book of diabetes vol1.<br />

44. Giannini C, Dyck PJ. Basement membrane reduplication and pericyte<br />

degeneration precede development of diabetic polyneuropathy and are<br />

associated with its severity. Ann Neurol 1995; 37: 498–504.<br />

45. Retinopathy and nephropathy in patients with type 1 diabetes four years after a<br />

trial of intensive therapy. The Diabetes Control and Complications<br />

Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Research<br />

Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 381-389.<br />

46. Stewart LL, Field LL, Ross S, McArthur RG. Genetic risk factors in diabetic<br />

retinopathy. Diabetologia 1993; 36: 1293–1298.<br />

92


47. Granger CB, Califf RM, Young S. Outcome of patients with diabetes mellitus<br />

and acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents. The<br />

Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (TAMI) Study Group. J<br />

Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 36: 1293-1298.<br />

48. Fuller JH, Shipley MJ, Rose G, et al. Coronary heart disease and impaired<br />

glucose tolerance ; the Witherall study. Lancet 1980; 1373-1376.<br />

49. Clustering of long-term complications in families with diabetes in the diabetes<br />

control and complications trial. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial<br />

Research Group. Diabetes 1997; 46: 1829-1839.<br />

50. Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:<br />

115–126.<br />

51. D Agastino RB, Russel MW, Huse DM, et al. Primary &subsequent coronary<br />

risk appraisal-New results from the Framingham heart study. In Am Heart J<br />

2000; 139: 272-281.<br />

52. Hsuch WA, Law RE. Cardiovascular risk continuum, implications of insulin<br />

resistance and diabetes. Am J Med 1998; 105: 4s-14s.<br />

53. Williams SB, Goldfine AB, Timimi FK, et al. Acute hyperglycemia attenuates<br />

endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans in vivo. Circulation 1998; 97:<br />

1695–1701.<br />

54. Gerstein HC. Is glucose a continuous risk factor for cardiovascular mortality?<br />

Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 659–660.<br />

55. Effect of intensive blood glucose control with metformin on complications in<br />

overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellius-UKPDS –UKPDS study group.<br />

Lancet 1998; 352(9131): 854-65.<br />

93


56. Effect of Atenolol and Captopril in reducing risk of macrovascular and<br />

microvascular complication in type 2 DM –UKPDS 39 –UKPDS study group.<br />

BMJ 1998; 317: 713-720.<br />

57. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an<br />

angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in<br />

high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 145–153.<br />

58. Kannel WB, Mc Gee DI. Diabetes and glucose tolerance as risk factors for<br />

CVDs. The Framingham heart study. Diabetes Care 1979; 2: 120-131.<br />

59. Garcia MJ, McNamara PM, Gordon T, Kannel WB, et al. Morbidity and<br />

mortality in type 2 DM in the Framingham population. Diabetes 1974; 23: 103-<br />

16.<br />

60. Raheja BS. Heart disease in diabetes –etiopathogenesis. JAPI 1980; 28: 81-90.<br />

61. Sainani GS, Sainani Rajesh, Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Current<br />

concepts in diabetes mellitus : ed - GS Sainani 1993; 73:87.<br />

62. Solar N, Bennet M, Pentecost B, et al. MI in diabetes mellitus. Q J Med 1975;<br />

175: 125-32.<br />

63. Sainani GS, Rajesh Sainani. Diabetes and coronary artery disease, Chap 45 in<br />

postgraduate med vol 18 :2004.<br />

64. Czyzk A, Krowlesky A, Szabioskar et al. Symptomatic MI without chest pain:<br />

prevalence and clinical course. Am J Cardiol 1977; 40: 498-503.<br />

65. Tanaka J, Fujta M, Fudo T, et al. Modification of circadian variation of<br />

symptom onset on AMI in diabetes mellitus. Coronary artery disease 1995; 6:<br />

241-44.<br />

66. Ricky A, Sharma MA. Diabetic eye disease in Southern India. Community Eye<br />

Health 1996; 9: 20-56.<br />

94


67. DCCT research group. The effect of intensive insulin treatment of diabetes on<br />

the development and progression of long term complications in IDDM. NEJM<br />

1993; 329: 977-986.<br />

68. DCCT research group. Progression of retinopathy in intensive Vs conventional<br />

treatment in DCCT. Ophthalmology 1995; 102: 647-661.<br />

69. Khidir H, Graham AH, Rema M, et al. An association in NIDDM subjects<br />

between susceptibility to retinopathy and TNF polymorphism. Human<br />

Immunology 1996; 44-54.<br />

70. Hawrami K, Mohan R, Mohan V, Hilamn GA. A genetic study of retinopathy in<br />

south Indian type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 1991; 75: 758-762.<br />

71. Pettiti OB, Bhatt H. Retinopathy as a risk factor for non embolic stroke in<br />

diabetic subjects. Stroke 1995; 26: 593-596.<br />

72. Parving HH. Prevalence and course of albuminuria in NIDDM. Kidney Int<br />

1992; 41(4): 758-62.<br />

73. Jitendra Singh. Evaluation of diabetic nephropathy: clinical recommendations<br />

in Medicine update vol 17 :2007:ed. RK Singhal.<br />

74. Chandie Shaw PK, Vanden brouke JP, Tjandra YI, et al. Increased ESRD in<br />

Asian Indian immigrants in Netherlands. Diabetologia 2002; 45: 337-41.<br />

75. Ghai R, Singh Verma NP, Goel A, et al. Microalbuminuria in NIDDM and<br />

essential hypertension. JAPI 1994; 42: 771-774.<br />

76. Jotideb Mukhopadhyay. Clinical implications of microalbuminuria, medicine<br />

update 2004; 14: 401-409.<br />

77. Nieuwdrop M, Meuwese MC, Vink H, Hoekstra JB, Kastelein JJP, Stroes ES,<br />

The endothelial glycocalix. A potential barrier between health and vascular<br />

disease. Cur Opin Lipidol 2005; 16: 507-510.<br />

95


78. Deckert T. Feldt Rasmussen B. Borch Johnson K. Jensen T, Kofoed.<br />

Enevoldsen A: Albuminuria reflects widespread vascular damage. The steno<br />

hypothesis. Diabetologia 1989; 32: 219-226.<br />

79. Van Hinsbergh VW, Kostene PJ, Jager A, Emesis JJ, Nijpels G, et al.<br />

C-reactive protein are associated with elevated urinary albumin excretion but do<br />

not explain its link with cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol<br />

2002; 22: 593-598.<br />

80. Gall MA, Twisk JW, Stehouwer CDA, Knudsen E, Emesis JJ. Parving HH.<br />

Increased urinary albumin excretion, endothelial dysfunction and chronic low<br />

grade inflammation in Type 2 diabetes: progressive, interrelated and<br />

independently associated with death. Diabetes 2002; 51: 1157-1165.<br />

81. Schram MT, Chaturvedi N, Schalwijk CG, Fuller JH, Stehouwer CDA, the<br />

Eurodiab prospective complications study group, Markers of inflammation are<br />

associated with micro vascular complications. The eurodiab prospective<br />

complications study, Diabetologia 48: 370- 378; 2005.<br />

82. UM Jadhav, NN Kadam. Association of microalbuminuria and carotid Intima<br />

media thickness and coronary artery disease – A cross sectional study in<br />

Western India. JAPI; 2002: 50: 1124-1129.<br />

83. Dinneen SF,Gerstein HC: The association of Microalbuminuria and mortality in<br />

non–insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a systematic overview of the literature.<br />

Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:1413–1418.<br />

84. American Diabetes association “Nephropathy in diabetes (position statement)<br />

diabetes care 2004, 27 (1): 79-83.<br />

96


85. Taco B M monster, Wilbert MT. Janssen, Paul E de Jong and holkje T.W. De<br />

Jong Van den Berg for the prevend study group. The impact of antihypertensive<br />

drug groups on urinary albumin excretion in a non diabetic population. J Clin<br />

Pharmacol, 53; 31-36.<br />

86. Geluk CA, Asselbergs FW, Hillege HL, Stephan J.L. Bakker, Paul E. de Jong,<br />

Felix Zijlstra et al. Impact of statins in microalbuminuric subjects with the<br />

metabolic syndrome a sub study of the Prevend. Intervention trial. European<br />

Heart Journal 2005; 26: 1314-1320.<br />

87. Sahay BK. Indian diabetes guide lines 2002. JAPI 2002; 50: 329.<br />

88. Krowlesky AS, Warvan JH, Rand LI, et al. Epidemiologic approach to etiology<br />

of type 1 DM and its complications. NEJM 1998; 339: 229-234.<br />

89. Mykkanen L, Zacccaro DJ, O’ Leary DH et al. Microalbuminuria and carotid<br />

artery intima media thickness in non diabetic and NIDDM subjects. The insulin<br />

resistance atherosclerosis study (IRAS). Stroke 1997; 28: 1710-1716.<br />

90. Ishimura M, Shoji T, Emoto T, et al. Renal insufficiency accelerates<br />

atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 DM. Am J Kid Dis 2001; 38: 186-90.<br />

91. Gerstein HC, Mann JFE, Yi Q, et al. (HOPE study investigators). Albuminuria<br />

and risk of cardiovascular events death &heart failure in diabetics & non<br />

diabetics. JAMA 2001; 286: 421-426.<br />

92. Kogt, Chan JC , Chow C, et al. Triglycerides ,albuminuria, &blood pressure are<br />

the major compications of non fatal cardiovascular disease in Chinese type 2<br />

diabetics. Acta Diabetologica 2003; 40(2): 80-84.<br />

97


93. Picca M, Agozzino F, Pelosi G. Influence of Microalbuminuria on LV geometry<br />

and function in hypertensive patients with type2 DM. Italian Heart J Jan 4(1):<br />

48-52.<br />

94. Kamath S, Lip GYH. Fibrinogen: Biochemistry, epidemiology and<br />

determinants. Q J Med 2003; 96: 771-729.<br />

95. Robert W. Colman, Jack Hirsh, Victor J. Marder, Alexander W. Clowes, James<br />

N. George. Hemostasis and thrombosis. Basic Principles and Clinical Practice.<br />

4th ed, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2001: pp 203-220.<br />

96. Ronald Hoffman, Edward J. Benz Jr, Sanford J. Shattil, Bruce Furic, Harvey J.<br />

Cohen, Leslie E. Silberstein et al. Hematology-Basic Principles and Practice.4 th<br />

ed; ELSEVIER Churchill Livingstone, 2005; 2097-2119.<br />

97. Richard Lee G, John Foerster, John Lukens, Frixos Paraskevas, John P. Greer,<br />

et al. Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology, 10 th ed, Williams and Wilkins, 1999;<br />

Vol. 2: pp 1567-1568.<br />

98. Alvinq BM, Bell WR. Methods for correcting inhibitory effects of fibrinogen<br />

degradation products in fibrinogen determination. Thromb Res 1976; 99(l); 1-8.<br />

99. Sherrie L. Perkins. Normal blood and bone marrow values in humans. Richard<br />

Lee G, John Foerster, John Lukens, Frixos Paraskevas, John P. Greer, Georcf-<br />

M. Rodgers (eds). Wintrobe's Clinical Hematology 10 th ed, I 999;Williams<br />

and Wilkins; p 2748.<br />

100. Meade TW, Mellows S, Brozovic M, Miller JG, Chakraborti KR, North WRS et<br />

al . Haemostatic function and ischaemic heart disease: Principal results of the<br />

Northwick Park Heart Study. Lancet 1986; 2: 533-537.<br />

98


101. Zipes P. Douglas, Peter Libby, Robert 0. Bonow, Euglene Braunwald.<br />

Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 7 th ed,<br />

SAUNDERS Elsevier, 2005: p 951.<br />

102. Yu S, Sher B, Kudryk B, Redman CM. Fibrinogen precursors: Order of<br />

assembly of fibrinogen chains. J Biol Chem 1984; 259: 10574-81.<br />

103. Van't Hooft FM, Von Bahr SJ, Silveira A, Iliadou A, Eriksson P, Hamsten A.<br />

Two common, functional polymorphisms in the promoter region of the beta<br />

fibrinogen gene contribute to regulation of plasma fibrinogen concentration.<br />

Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol 1999; 19(12): 3063-3070.<br />

104. Green F, Hamsten A, Blomback M, Humphries S. The role of beta-fibrinogen<br />

genotype in determining plasma fibrinogen levels in young survivors of<br />

myocardial infarction and healthy controls from Sweden. Thromb Haemost<br />

1993; 70(6): 915-920.<br />

105. Ernst E, Welhniayr T, Schmid M, Baumann M, Matrai A. Cardiovascular risk<br />

factors and hemorheology, physical fitness, stress and obesity. Atherosclerosis<br />

1986; 59 (3): 263-269.<br />

106. Koenig W, Ernst E. The possible role of hemorrheology in<br />

atherothrombogenesis. Atherosclerosis 1992; 94: 93-107.<br />

107. David Tanne, Michael Benderly, Uri Goldbourst, Valentina Boyko, Daniel<br />

Brunner, et al. A prospective study of plasma fibrinogen levels and the risk of<br />

stroke among participants in the bezafibrate infarction prevention study. Am J<br />

Med 2001; 11 1: 457-463.<br />

108. Cahill M, Mistry R, Barnett DB. The human platelet fibrinogen receptor:<br />

Clinical, therapeutic significance. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1992; 33: 3-9.<br />

99


109. Marco R. Ditullio and Shunichl Homma. Atherosclerotic disease of the proximal<br />

aorta. Mohr JP, Dennis W. Choi, James C. Grotta, Bryce Weir, Philip Wolf<br />

(eds). Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, 4"' ed,Churchill<br />

Livingstone, 2004: 670.<br />

110. Carr S, Farb A, Pearce WH, Virmani R, Yao JS. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture<br />

in symptomatic carotid artery. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23(5): 755-765.<br />

111. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, et al. CRP, IL-6 and risk of developing type 2 diabetes<br />

mellitus. JAMA 2001; 286: 327-34.<br />

112. Temelkova KT, Siegert G, Bergamann S, et al. Subclinical inflammation is<br />

strongly related to insulin resistance but not to impaired insulin secretion in a<br />

high risk population for diabetes. Metabolism 2002; 51(6): 743-9.<br />

113. Wysocki J, Skoczynski S, Strozik A, et al. Metabolic or immunometabolic<br />

syndrome? Wiad Lek 2005; 58(1-2): 124-7 .<br />

114. Deepa R, Velmurugan K, Arvind K, et al. Serum levels of interleukin 6,<br />

C-reactive protein, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, and monocyte<br />

chemotactic protein 1 in relation to insulin resistance and glucose intolerance--<br />

the Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiology Study (CURES). Metabolism 2006;<br />

55(9): 1232-8.<br />

115. Auer J, Berent R, Lassnig E, Eber B. C-reactive protein and coronary artery<br />

disease. Jpn Heart J 2002; 43(6): 607-19.<br />

116. Ahmad J, Ahmned F, Siddiqui MA, et al. Inflammatory markers, insulin<br />

resistance and carotid intima-media thickness in North-Indian type 2 diabetic<br />

subjects. JAPI 2007;55: 693-99.<br />

100


117. Jager A, van Hinsbergh VW, Kostense PJ, et al. Increased levels of soluble<br />

vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 are associated with risk of cardiovascular<br />

mortality in type 2 diabetes: the Hoorn study. Diabetes 2000; 49(3): 485-91.<br />

118. Pou KM, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, et al. Visceral and subcutaneous adipose<br />

tissue volumes are cross-sectionally related to markers of inflammation and<br />

oxidative stress: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007; 116(11):<br />

1234-41.<br />

119. Doronina AM, Lipinskiĭ B, Bokarev IN. Fibrinogen and its role in atherogenesis<br />

in diabetes mellitus. Klin Med (Mosk) 2007; 85(7): 52-5.<br />

120. Howard SC, Algra A, Rothwell PM. Cerebrovascular Cohort Studies<br />

Collaboration- Effect of age and glycaemic control on the association between<br />

fibrinogen and risk of acute coronary events after transient ischaemic attack or<br />

stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008; 25(1-2): 136-43.<br />

121. Athyros VG, Kakafika AI, Karagiannis A, Mikhailidis DP. Do we need to<br />

consider inflammatory markers when we treat atherosclerotic disease?<br />

Atherosclerosis 2008.<br />

122. Graziella Bruno, Paolo Cavallo Perin, Giu seppe Bargero, Milena Borra, Nicola<br />

D’Errico, Gianfranco Pagano. Association of Fibrinogen with Glycemic control<br />

and Albumin Excretion Rate in patients with NIDDM. Ann Inten Med 1996;<br />

125: 653-57.<br />

123. Julie Lin, Frank B Hu, Eric B, Rimm et al. The association of serum lipids and<br />

inflammatory biomarkers with renal function in men with type 2 DM. Kidney<br />

Int 2006; 69(2): 336-342.<br />

124. Linda Fried, Cam Solomon, Michael Shlipak, et al. Inflammatory and<br />

prothrombotic risk markers and the progression of renal disease in elderly<br />

individuals. J Am Soc Nephrology 2004; 15: 3184-3191.<br />

101


125. Michelle Dalla Vestra, Michelle Mussap, Pietro Gellina, et al. Acute phase<br />

markers of inflammation and Glomerular structure in patients with type 2 DM. J<br />

Am Soc Nephrol 2005; 16: 578-572.<br />

126. Klein RL, Hunter SJ, Jenkins AJ, Zheng D, et al. Fibrinogen is marker for<br />

nephropathy and peripheral vascular disease in type 1 DM : Studies of<br />

fibrinogen gene polymorphism in DCCT /EDK cohort. Diabetes Care 2003; 26:<br />

1439-1448.<br />

127. Brunog, Merletti F, Biggeri A, et al. Progression to overt nephropathy in type 2<br />

DM :The Casale Monferrato Study. Diabetes care 2003; 26: 2150-2155.<br />

128. Frank Stamhttp://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/18/5/892 -<br />

FNC1#FNC1, Coen van Guldener, Annemarie Becker, et al. Endothelial<br />

dysfunction contributes to renal function associated cardiovascular mortality in a<br />

population with mild renal insufficiency: The Hoorn Study. J Am Coll Nephrol<br />

2006; 17: 537-545.<br />

129. Frank Stamhttp://ndt.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/18/5/892 -<br />

FNC1#FNC1, Coen van Guldener, Casper G, et al. Impaired renal function is<br />

associated with markers of endothelial dysfunction and increased inflammatory<br />

activity Nephrol Dial Transplant 2003; 18: 892-898.<br />

130. Gomes MB, Nogueira VG. Acute-phase proteins and microalbuminuria among<br />

patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004; 66(1): 31-9.<br />

131. Targher G, Bertolini L, Zoppini G. Increased plasma markers of inflammation<br />

and endothelial dysfunction and their association with microvascular<br />

complications in Type 1 diabetic patients without clinically manifest<br />

macroangiopathy. Diabet Med 2005; 22(8): 999-1004.<br />

102


132. Jager A, van Hinsbergh VW, Kostense PJ, et al. C-reactive protein and soluble<br />

vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 are associated with elevated urinary albumin<br />

excretion but do not explain its link with cardiovascular risk. Arterioscler<br />

Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22(4): 593-8.<br />

133. Tonelli M, Sacks F, Pfeffer M, et al. Biomarkers of inflammation and<br />

progression of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2005; 68(1): 237-45.<br />

134. Sarnak MJ, Poindexter A, Wang SR, et al. Serum C-reactive protein and leptin<br />

as predictors of kidney disease progression in the Modification of Diet in Renal<br />

Disease Study. Kidney Int 2002; 62(6): 2208-15.<br />

135. Hocher B, Ziebig R, Altermann C, et al. Different impact of biomarkers as<br />

mortality predictors among diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing<br />

hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14(9): 2329-37.<br />

136. Baggio B, Budakovic A, Dalla Vestra M. Effects of cigarette smoking on<br />

glomerular structure and function in type 2 diabetic patients. J Am Soc Nephrol.<br />

2002; 13(11): 2730-6.<br />

137. Festa A, D'Agostino R, Howard G, et al. Inflammation and microalbuminuria in<br />

nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects: The Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis<br />

Study. Kidney Int 2000; 58(4): 1703-10.<br />

138. Stehouwer CD, Gall MA, Twisk JW, et al. Increased urinary albumin excretion,<br />

endothelial dysfunction, and chronic low-grade inflammation in type 2 diabetes:<br />

progressive, interrelated, and independently associated with risk of death.<br />

Diabetes. 2002; 51(4): 1157-65.<br />

139. Takebayashi K, Suetsugu M, Matsutomo R, et al. Correlation of high-sensitivity<br />

C-reactive protein and plasma fibrinogen with individual complications in<br />

patients with type 2 diabetes. South Med J 2006; 99(1): 23-7.<br />

103


140. Emanuele N, Azad N, Abraira C, et al. Effect of intensive glycemic control on<br />

fibrinogen, lipids, and lipoproteins: Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Type<br />

II Diabetes Mellitus. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158(22): 2485-90.<br />

141. Yudkin JS, Panahloo A, Stehouwer C, et al. The influence of improved<br />

glycaemic control with insulin and sulphonylureas on acute phase and<br />

endothelial markers in Type II diabetic subjects. Diabetologia 2000; 43(9):<br />

1099-106.<br />

142. Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Schoenhagen P, et al. Statin therapy, LDL cholesterol,<br />

C-reactive protein, and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(1):<br />

29-38.<br />

143. Macin SM, Perna ER, Farías EF, et al. Atorvastatin has an important acute anti-<br />

inflammatory effect in patients with acute coronary syndrome: results of a<br />

randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Am Heart J 2005; 149(3):<br />

451-7.<br />

144. Pfützner A, Marx N, Lübben G, et al. Improvement of cardiovascular risk<br />

markers by pioglitazone is independent from glycemic control: results from the<br />

pioneer study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45(12): 1925-31.<br />

145. Buckingham RE. Thiazolidinediones: Pleiotropic drugs with potent anti-<br />

inflammatory properties for tissue protection. Diabetologia. 2007; 50(2): 250-8.<br />

146. Sidhu JS, Cowan D, Kaski JC. The effects of rosiglitazone, a peroxisome<br />

proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist, on markers of endothelial cell<br />

activation, C-reactive protein, and fibrinogen levels in non-diabetic coronary<br />

artery disease patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003; 42(10): 1757-63.<br />

147. Velija-Asimi Z. C-reactive protein in obese PCOS women and the effect of<br />

metformin therapy. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2007; 7(1): 90-3.<br />

104


148. Mazoyer E, Ripoll L, Boisseau MR, et al. How does ticlopidine treatment lower<br />

plasma fibrinogen? Thromb Res 1994; 75(3): 361-70.<br />

149. Amanda J. Lee, Gordon DO Lowe, Mark Woodword, et al. Fibrinogen in<br />

relation to personal history of hypertension, diabetes, stroke, intermittent<br />

claudication, coronary heart disease and family history. The Scottish Heart<br />

Health Study. Br Heart J 1993; 69: 338-342.<br />

150. Edzard Ernst, Karl Ludwig Resch. Fibrinogen as cardiovascular risk factor : A<br />

meta analysis and review of literature. Annals of Internal medicine 1993; 118:<br />

956-963.<br />

151. Streja D, Cressey P, Rabkin SW.Associations between inflammatory markers,<br />

traditional risk factors, and complications in patients with type 2 diabetes<br />

mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 2003; 17(3): 120-127.<br />

152. Mistry P, Chawla KP, Jaiswal P. Plasma fibrinogen levels in stroke. J of post<br />

Grad Med 1990; 36: 1-4.<br />

153. De Feo P, Gaisano MG, Haymond MW. Differential effects of insulin<br />

deficiency on albumin and fibrinogen synthesis in humans. J Clin Invest 1991;<br />

88: 833-40.<br />

154. Ceriello A. Hemostatic abnormalities in diabetes mellitus: consequence of<br />

hyperglycemia. Nutrition, metabolism, and Cardiovascular diseases 1995; 5:<br />

237-40.<br />

155. Ceriello A, Taboga C, Giacomello R, Falleti E, De Stasio G, Motz S, et al.<br />

Fibrinogen plasma levels as a marker of thrombin activation in diabetes.<br />

Diabetes 1994; 43: 430-2.<br />

105


156. Knobl P, Schnack C, Prager R, Griesmacher A, et al. Thrombogenic factors are<br />

related to urinary albumin excretion rate in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.<br />

Diabetologia 1993; 36: 1045-50.<br />

157. Mattock MB, Keen H, Murrells TJ, Scott GS, et al. Coronary heart disease and<br />

urinary albumin excretion rate in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetologia 1988;<br />

31: 82-7.<br />

106


PROFORMA<br />

STUDY OF FIBRINOGEN LEVELS AND ITS ASSOCIATION<br />

WITH GLYCEMIC CONTROL AND ALBUMIN EXCRETION<br />

RATE IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS<br />

1.GENERAL INFORMATION :<br />

a. Name<br />

b. Age<br />

c. Gender<br />

d. Occupation<br />

e. Inpatient number<br />

f. Date of admission<br />

2. CHIEF COMPLAINTS:<br />

3. PAST HISTORY:<br />

Diabetes mellitus Yes/No Duration- On treatment- Yes/No<br />

Hypertension Yes/No Duration- On treatment- Yes/No<br />

Dyslipidemia Yes/No Duration- On treatment- Yes/No<br />

Ischemic heart disease Yes/No Duration- On treatment- Yes/No<br />

Cerebrovascular accident Yes/No<br />

Thyroid disorder Yes/No<br />

Liver disease Yes/No<br />

Renal disease Yes/No<br />

4. FAMILY HISTORY:<br />

Diabetes mellitus Yes/No<br />

Hypertension Yes/No<br />

Dyslipidemia Yes/No<br />

Ischemic heart disease Yes/No<br />

106


5. DRUG HISTORY :<br />

NSAID’s Yes/No<br />

Steroids Yes/No<br />

Oral anticoagulants Yes/No<br />

Hormone replacement therapy Yes/No<br />

6. PERSONAL HISTORY:<br />

Smoking Yes/No<br />

Alcoholism Yes/No<br />

Diet Veg/Non veg<br />

7 . General Physical Examination:<br />

Height : ______ cms BMI : _____ kg/m 2<br />

Weight : ______ kgs<br />

Pulse : ____ /min<br />

Blood Pressure : _____ mm Hg<br />

Peripheral pulses : felt/not felt<br />

8. Systemic Examination :<br />

Respiratory system :<br />

Cardiovascular system :<br />

Abdominal system :<br />

Central nervous system :<br />

9. Investigations :<br />

Hb: ____ gm%<br />

TC : ____ cells/cumm<br />

DC : N __ L __ M __ E __<br />

107


ESR: ____ at 1 hr<br />

RBS : ____ mg/dl<br />

FBS : ____ mg/dl<br />

PPBS : ____ mg/dl<br />

HbA1C : ___ %<br />

Blood urea : ____ mg/dl<br />

Serum creatinine: ____ mg/dl<br />

Urine routine :<br />

Fasting lipid profile : Total cholesterol : ___ mg/dl<br />

HDL : ___ mg/dl<br />

LDL : ___mg/dl<br />

VLDL : ___ mg/dl<br />

TG : ___mg/dl<br />

Plasma Fibrinogen : ____ mg/dl<br />

Microalbuminuria : Present/Absent<br />

Fundus examination : Normal / NPDR / PDR<br />

ECG :<br />

Chest X-ray :<br />

108


Sl.<br />

No<br />

Name AGE Sex DM-<br />

Dur<br />

Anti-<br />

DM<br />

MASTER CHART<br />

CASES<br />

HTN SM BP BMI Fundus Hb% TC ESR RBS HbA1c Blood<br />

urea<br />

Serum<br />

creatinine<br />

FIB TCH HDL LDL TG MA<br />

1 BASAVA 56 M 7 1 1 2 140/90 23 WNL 13.2 8900 15 283 8.0 36 1.3 646 230 40 142 240 1<br />

2 GOWRAMMA 45 F 1 1 1 2 160/90 24 WNL 13.1 5400 50 245 5.4 22 0.9 165 187 52 105 148 2<br />

3 AKKAYAMMA 60 F 5 1 1 2 130/80 23 NPDR 12.1 7800 20 270 8.5 38 1.4 650 224 37 109 389 1<br />

4 SIDDEGOWDA 63 M 10 1 2 2 120/80 24 NPDR 14 7900 30 312 10.4 34 1.3 760 280 32 206 212 1<br />

5 SIDDARAO 70 M 12 1 2 2 120/80 21 WNL 13.2 6100 25 180 5.2 24 1.0 180 150 40 74 180 2<br />

6 RANGANATH 65 M 8 1 2 2 130/80 22 WNL 13.1 7200 40 248 8.4 28 1.2 350 212 35 137 200 1<br />

7 MARIYAPPA 65 M 6 1 2 1 140/90 26 WNL 14 9600 30 221 5.2 25 0.9 330 213 38 146 143 2<br />

8 EREGOWDA 51 M 3 1 1 1 160/80 26 NPDR 14 7400 45 243 7.5 32 1.1 380 240 41 163 180 1<br />

9 NEELAMMA 45 F ND 2 2 2 140/90 24 WNL 14 9200 40 300 5.2 36 0.8 270 240 32 178 150 2<br />

10 JAYALAKSHMI 58 F 1 1 1 2 160/90 24 WNL 12 8400 40 367 5.6 18 0.8 152 130 40 60 150 2<br />

11 BASAPPA 70 M 5 1 2 1 120/80 27 NPDR 10.2 17700 76 280 8.4 28 0.7 370 220 25 149 230 1<br />

12 ESHWAR 52 M 1 1 2 1 136/90 26 WNL 14 8900 50 486 9.6 20 0.8 460 194 47 78 345 2<br />

13 NAGARAJU 53 M 3 1 1 2 170/100 24 NPDR 12 4400 10 422 8.4 45 1.5 460 233 51 115 334 1<br />

14 VENKATA 49 M 2 1 2 1 130/80 22 WNL 13 7100 30 152 8.0 40 1.3 490 150 30 90 150 1<br />

15 SUMA 45 F 1 1 2 2 130/80 25 WNL 13 8000 20 250 5.2 26 0.6 260 238 27 168 214 2<br />

16 SRINIVAS 62 M 1 1 2 1 130/80 23 WNL 14 5600 10 178 5.0 27 0.8 320 202 46 128 140 2<br />

17 PARVATHAMMA 68 F 10 1 1 2 150/90 26 NPDR 10.2 8900 40 214 6.8 38 1.2 460 169 48 65 278 1<br />

18 NARAYAN 68 M 5 1 2 2 130/80 26 NPDR 8.7 7000 10 246 5.8 42 1.3 510 200 32 136 160 1<br />

19 PUTTASOMAPPA 63 M 15 1 1 2 170/100 25 NPDR 12 6900 30 205 7.2 38 1.4 750 250 35 173 210 1<br />

20 LINGEGOWDA 67 M 10 1 2 1 160/90 26 NPDR 11 6500 35 238 8.0 36 1.3 570 240 40 164 180 1<br />

21 GIRIJAMMA 48 F 1 1 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 11.2 8000 60 424 5.8 27 1.0 190 168 23 127 90 2<br />

22 MALLEGOWDA 63 M 3 1 2 1 120/80 26 WNL 14 10600 40 183 5.2 33 0.6 310 130 40 58 160 2<br />

23 NINGAMMA 50 F 0.25 1 2 2 130/80 24 NPDR 13.5 7900 20 291 5.6 28 0.8 572 242 30 170 210 2<br />

24 KALAMMA 50 F ND 2 2 2 120/80 26 WNL 10.8 8400 10 497 6.2 16 1.0 250 190 45 118 135 2<br />

25 NANJAMMA 68 F 9 1 1 2 150/90 26 NPDR 9 4200 30 315 7.2 41 1.3 718 240 38 170 160 1<br />

109


26 JAYAMMA 50 F ND 2 1 2 140/80 23 WNL 10.6 7600 20 263 7.4 22 1.1 195 260 42 186 162 2<br />

27 PADMA 65 F 3 1 2 2 130/70 23 WNL 12 7800 40 225 5.2 34 0.8 370 190 42 126 110 2<br />

28 PUTTARAJEGOWDA 72 M 7 1 1 2 150/90 23 NPDR 12 10100 30 320 9.0 40 1.2 560 198 39 120 197 1<br />

29 PARVATHAMMA 53 F 2 1 2 2 130/80 31 WNL 11 6000 20 245 5.8 31 0.9 210 220 38 160 110 2<br />

30 KANTHAMMA 50 F 0.5 1 2 2 120/80 27 WNL 12 6000 10 210 5.4 18 0.7 240 249 40 188 105 2<br />

31 BEEREGOWDA 55 M 6 1 1 2 160/80 25 WNL 13 8600 30 268 5.8 34 1.1 580 230 38 158 170 1<br />

32 SAVITHRAMMA 50 F 1 1 1 2 170/80 23 WNL 12 8000 20 230 6.4 24 1.3 210 185 40 124 105 2<br />

33 MAHADEVAPPA 60 M 5 1 2 1 130/80 27 NPDR 12 6300 20 210 8.4 32 1.5 470 182 49 94 195 1<br />

34 MARISWAMY 68 M 3 1 2 1 130/80 26 WNL 10 8100 10 206 5.4 29 0.9 210 268 42 197 145 2<br />

35 MADEGOWDA 52 M 7 1 1 2 140/80 21 PDR 12 8000 20 172 7.4 46 1.5 610 221 48 146 136 1<br />

36 SANNAIAH 68 M 3 1 1 1 160/80 26 WNL 11 11600 20 267 5.4 22 1.0 370 196 40 126 148 2<br />

37 VENKATESH 62 M 7 1 1 2 130/80 23 NPDR 13 5600 20 321 7.6 38 1.1 430 251 40 174 184 1<br />

38 BASAVARAJ 51 M 3 1 2 1 120/80 25 WNL 14 13000 30 186 5.4 21 0.7 380 220 45 147 140 2<br />

39 SINGEGOWDA 75 M 10 1 2 1 170/80 28 PDR 10 7300 20 261 7.6 35 1.6 520 162 42 78 210 1<br />

40 JAMIARA JAN 45 F ND 2 1 2 140/80 26 WNL 10 9100 10 210 10.4 26 0.8 234 188 42 110 180 2<br />

41 SIDDEGOWDA 62 M 8 1 2 2 130/80 27 NPDR 15 9000 45 210 8.0 41 1.4 470 195 45 83 335 1<br />

42 GOVINDEGOWDA 56 M 6 1 1 2 160/80 23 NPDR 15 7800 20 290 8.0 44 1.3 440 178 42 114 109 1<br />

43 MAHADEV 65 M 10 1 2 2 120/80 24 NPDR 11 9000 30 320 5.4 36 1.0 530 222 48 138 182 1<br />

44 VIDYA 44 F 2 1 1 2 150/80 23 WNL 12.7 6800 10 190 5.6 22 1.1 180 206 32 126 241 2<br />

45 KAMALAMMA 60 F 7 1 2 2 130/90 22 WNL 10.9 9000 20 320 8.2 32 1.1 470 212 46 126 200 1<br />

46 PARVATHAMMA 70 F 7 1 2 2 120/80 24 NPDR 10 8300 30 213 6.8 36 0.9 430 197 46 121 151 1<br />

47 GOWRAMMA 55 F 3 1 2 2 130/80 26 WNL 13 8500 30 17 5.0 25 1.0 270 176 48 98 148 2<br />

48 SHARADAMMA 60 F 6 1 2 2 140/90 27 NPDR 10 9500 20 240 7.4 38 1.3 390 207 40 117 248 1<br />

49 JANAKI 75 F 4 1 2 2 120/80 23 WNL 14 9300 20 210 5.2 36 0.9 210 212 34 153 127 2<br />

50 VANAJAMMA 45 F 2 1 1 2 150/90 22 WNL 14 10000 20 230 5.8 27 0.6 280 217 39 151 133 2<br />

110


Sl.<br />

No<br />

Name AGE Sex DM-<br />

Dur<br />

Anti-<br />

DM<br />

CONTROLS<br />

HTN SM BP BMI Fundus Hb% TC ESR RBS HbA1c Blood<br />

urea<br />

Serum<br />

creatinine<br />

FIB TCH HDL LDL TG MA<br />

1 SOMASHEKHAR 56 M 0 2 2 2 130/90 23 WNL 12.2 4900 25 96 4.0 22 0.8 216 122 38 48 178 2<br />

2 GURUMALLAMMA 45 F 0 2 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 11.1 5400 40 98 4.2 34 1.0 324 154 40 85 145 2<br />

3 MAHADEVAMMA 60 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 23 WNL 12.1 7600 25 102 5.0 23 1.2 224 112 42 33 185 2<br />

4 BORAIAH 63 M 0 2 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 14 5900 35 124 3.8 25 1.0 187 167 44 98 125 2<br />

5 NANJAPPA 70 M 0 2 2 2 120/90 21 WNL 13.6 7100 25 132 4.4 18 0.8 375 183 45 103 174 2<br />

6 GOVINDEGOWDA 65 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 22 WNL 13.4 7100 40 108 4.6 32 0.7 124 157 42 78 184 2<br />

7 RAMANAIKA 65 M 0 2 2 2 140/90 25 WNL 14 6600 30 78 5.0 28 0.6 324 143 43 65 175 2<br />

8 NARASIMHA 51 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 26 WNL 14 5400 35 112 4.0 23 1.0 128 187 38 129 102 2<br />

9 SUNDRAMMA 45 F 0 2 2 2 140/90 24 WNL 14 4200 40 135 4.2 22 1.1 248 201 46 135 98 2<br />

10 LAKSHMAMMA 58 F 0 2 2 2 120/90 24 WNL 11 6400 30 96 4.6 18 1.2 234 122 40 57 125 2<br />

11 VENKATEGOWDA 70 M 0 2 2 1 120/80 23 WNL 12 7700 35 125 3.8 34 1.2 420 210 45 139 132 2<br />

12 RAMACHANDRA 52 M 0 2 2 2 136/90 26 WNL 14 8100 50 135 4.6 32 0.8 145 154 47 70 184 2<br />

13 KUMARASWAMY 53 M 0 2 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 12 4400 10 95 4.2 30 0.9 165 176 48 105 115 2<br />

14 SWAMIGOWDA 49 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 22 WNL 12 7100 30 106 3.8 20 1.1 258 182 42 104 182 2<br />

15 NANJAMMA 45 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 25 WNL 11 5000 10 128 4.2 21 1.0 326 195 40 126 145 2<br />

16 EREGOWDA 62 M 0 2 2 1 130/80 23 WNL 14 5600 10 88 4.6 25 0.7 112 122 47 36 195 2<br />

17 SUBBAMMA 68 F 0 2 2 2 140/90 22 WNL 10 6200 40 114 4.4 36 0.9 245 154 42 88 120 2<br />

18 MARAIAH 68 M 0 2 2 1 130/80 23 WNL 13 7000 20 121 4.4 32 0.7 312 176 50 103 116 2<br />

19 SUBBAIAH 63 M 0 2 2 2 150/90 25 WNL 12 6000 30 105 4.2 26 0.9 148 138 48 71 97 2<br />

20 MALLAPPA 67 M 0 2 2 2 140/90 26 WNL 13 6500 35 79 4.6 28 1.1 188 136 46 65 125 2<br />

21 SUKANYA 48 F 0 2 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 11 8000 40 104 4.8 21 1.2 286 187 43 112 161 2<br />

22 MADAPPA 63 M 0 2 2 2 120/80 26 WNL 14 5600 40 123 4.2 18 0.9 380 126 42 58 130 2<br />

23 LAKSHMAMMA 50 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 24 WNL 13.5 5900 20 132 3.8 25 1.0 254 152 48 73 153 2<br />

24 SHANTHA 50 F 0 2 2 2 120/80 26 WNL 10.8 6400 10 108 4.6 20 1.2 264 169 43 98 140 2<br />

25 GOWRAMMA 68 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 26 WNL 10 4200 30 76 4.2 24 0.6 318 173 44 93 180 2<br />

111


26 SUVARNAMMA 50 F 0 2 2 2 140/80 23 WNL 10.6 6600 20 98 4.4 30 0.8 284 146 45 73 138 2<br />

27 CHIKKAMMA 65 F 0 2 2 2 120/70 23 WNL 12 7200 40 102 4.8 40 1.3 168 184 48 103 163 2<br />

28 JAVARAPPA 72 M 0 2 2 1 140/90 23 WNL 12 8100 30 124 4.2 32 1.0 390 204 40 134 150 2<br />

29 RAJAMMA 53 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 23 WNL 11 6000 20 131 4.6 22 1.1 224 168 42 88 188 2<br />

30 KEMPAMMA 50 F 0 2 2 2 120/80 27 WNL 12 6000 10 105 4.4 26 1.0 340 152 48 79 125 2<br />

31 MADEGOWDA 55 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 25 WNL 13 5600 30 121 4.4 34 0.9 264 169 46 86 186 2<br />

32 PREMA 50 F 0 2 2 2 140/80 23 WNL 12 6000 20 106 3.8 20 0.6 196 135 47 56 160 2<br />

33 SAMPIGAIAH 60 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 21 WNL 12 6300 20 99 4.6 18 0.9 226 179 49 92 192 2<br />

34 MANJEGOWDA 68 M 0 2 2 2 120/80 26 WNL 10 8100 10 112 4.4 22 1.2 134 163 48 82 165 2<br />

35 MAHADEVAPPA 52 M 0 2 2 2 140/80 21 WNL 12 8000 20 125 4.2 20 0.8 324 157 44 73 198 2<br />

36 KRISHNEGOWDA 68 M 0 2 2 1 120/80 26 WNL 11 7600 20 132 4.6 32 0.7 220 186 42 119 125 2<br />

37 SANNAPPA 62 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 23 WNL 13 5600 40 124 4.8 30 1.1 360 138 48 67 115 2<br />

38 RAMAKRISHNA 51 M 0 2 2 2 120/80 25 WNL 14 5000 30 97 4.0 20 1.3 194 154 44 89 107 2<br />

39 PUTTASWAMY 75 M 0 2 2 2 140/80 23 WNL 10 6300 20 96 4.2 24 0.9 245 134 42 68 120 2<br />

40 CHIKKATHAYAMMA 45 F 0 2 2 2 140/80 26 WNL 10 6100 10 112 4.2 30 0.7 318 154 40 77 185 2<br />

41 RAJEGOWDA 62 M 0 2 2 1 130/80 24 WNL 14 7000 45 133 3.8 25 1.2 326 178 42 116 99 2<br />

42 MADAIAH 56 M 0 2 2 2 130/80 23 WNL 14 6800 20 86 4.2 18 0.7 128 198 48 133 85 2<br />

43 VEERAPPA 65 M 0 2 2 2 140/90 24 WNL 11 7000 30 128 4.6 36 1.1 188 154 46 77 156 2<br />

44 DEVAMMA 44 F 0 2 2 2 140/80 23 WNL 12.2 5800 10 88 4.8 26 1.0 248 126 48 61 85 2<br />

45 CHIKKATHAYAMMA 60 F 0 2 2 2 130/90 22 WNL 11 4000 20 125 4.2 21 0.8 192 163 42 97 120 2<br />

46 MALLAMMA 70 F 0 2 2 2 120/80 24 WNL 10 8300 30 115 4.6 20 0.6 365 178 48 97 165 2<br />

47 ANNAMARY 55 F 0 2 2 2 130/80 26 WNL 13 8500 30 100 4.8 28 1.1 224 192 42 122 141 2<br />

48 JAVANAMMA 60 F 0 2 2 2 140/90 26 WNL 10 5500 20 96 5.0 26 1.0 315 162 40 98 120 2<br />

49 KALAMMA 75 F 0 2 2 2 140/80 23 WNL 14 6300 20 102 4.4 22 0.9 228 167 42 87 188 2<br />

50 MAHADEVAMMA 45 F 0 2 2 2 140/90 22 WNL 14 7000 20 124 4.0 20 0.8 324 132 47 59 132 2<br />

112


KEY TO MASTER CHART<br />

Sl. No. Serial number<br />

M/F Male/Female<br />

DM-Dur Duration of diabetes (in years)<br />

ND – Newly detected<br />

Anti-DM Anti diabetic treatment<br />

1 – on Insulin/OHA<br />

2 – not on treatment<br />

HTN Hypertension<br />

1 – hypertensive<br />

2 – normotensive<br />

SM Smoking status<br />

1 – smoker<br />

2 – non smoker<br />

BP Blood pressure<br />

BMI Body mass index<br />

Fundus WNL – normal<br />

Hb% Haemoglobin<br />

TC Total count<br />

NPDR – non proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

PDR – proliferative diabetic retinopathy<br />

ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate<br />

RBS Random blood sugar<br />

HbA1c Glycosylated haemoglobin<br />

113


FIB Fibrinogen<br />

TCH Total cholesterol<br />

HDL High density lipoprotein<br />

LDL Low density lipoprotein<br />

TG Triglyceride<br />

MA Microalbuminuria<br />

1 – present, 2 – absent<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!