Paper_Continuos_Monitoring_2012 - Microbiological Air Sampler
Paper_Continuos_Monitoring_2012 - Microbiological Air Sampler
Paper_Continuos_Monitoring_2012 - Microbiological Air Sampler
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A new Instrument for the Continuous Measure of <strong>Air</strong> Born<br />
Microorganisms in Isolators and RABS Systems<br />
Beat Glauser 1 , Hans Zingre 1 , Michael Hochstrasser 1 , Deborah Haefeli 2 and Lars Fieseler 2<br />
b.glauser@mbv.ch, h.zingre@mbv.ch, m.hochstrasser@mbv.ch ,<br />
lars.fieseler@zhaw.ch, haee@zhaw.ch<br />
1 MBV AG, Stäfa, Switzerland<br />
2 Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Institute of Food and Beverage Innovation, Wädenswil, Switzerland<br />
Abstract<br />
A combination of active sampling head instruments and passive settling plates is routinely used to monitor<br />
microorganisms in the air of isolators and RABS systems. While the collection efficiency of an active head<br />
is superior to a settling plate the drawback is the limited sampling time. Applying a newly designed<br />
sampling head the exposure of agar plates was extended from 10 min to up to 4 h during air sampling<br />
without changing the collection efficiency. Both, the water activity and the microbial growth, were analysed<br />
on exposed agar surfaces to prove that the new sample collection head allows efficient detection of air borne<br />
microorganisms.<br />
Key words: Continuous measurement, air sampling, active sampling, impaction principle, biological<br />
contamination, isolator, RABS, settle plate, SQS<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Determination of air quality in an isolator or RABS<br />
system (restricted access barrier system) is typically<br />
performed applying a combination of active<br />
sampling points and settling plates. The collection<br />
efficiency of the active sampling points is usually<br />
high. But due to the short sampling time this<br />
method is less suited for continuous analyses.<br />
Hence settling plates are generally used, because<br />
these can be exposed to the environment for several<br />
hours. The drawback is the low collection efficiency<br />
as well as the lower sensitivity for smaller particles.<br />
A longer active sampling period can be achieved by<br />
dividing the total volume into several smaller<br />
samples taken in regular intervals (Fig. 1). While<br />
this sequential sampling (SQS) is not fully<br />
continuous the interval can be extended to hours<br />
instead of minutes. As long as the agar remains<br />
covered behind the perforated lid no negative<br />
impact from drying could be detected over several<br />
hours (Bijlenga and Obrist, 2006).<br />
500<br />
400<br />
300<br />
200<br />
100 Time<br />
Figure 1. Sampling volume divided into five<br />
fractions.<br />
In this study we introduce a novel method for<br />
continuous active sampling for up to 4 h without<br />
changing the collection efficiency compared to<br />
standard active sampling heads.<br />
2. The Impaction principle<br />
The basis of active air sampling by the impaction<br />
principle was introduced by Anderson (Anderson,<br />
1958). It is based on the inertia of air borne<br />
particles: to pass through a restriction the air<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 1/7<br />
1. sampling<br />
pause<br />
2. sampling<br />
pause<br />
3. sampling<br />
pause<br />
4. sampling<br />
pause<br />
5. sampling
(including the air borne particles) speeds up. After<br />
the restriction the air path direction abruptly<br />
changes. While the air molecules can change their<br />
direction, heavier particles keep going straight and<br />
are captured on the agar surface (Fig. 2).<br />
Figure 2. <strong>Air</strong> sampling by the impaction principle.<br />
A measurement based on the impaction principle is<br />
defined by the flow rate and the measurement time.<br />
Hence the total volume sampled can be described<br />
as:<br />
volume � flowrate * time<br />
(1)<br />
The smaller the area of the restriction, the more the<br />
air is accelerated to pass through:<br />
flowrate<br />
airspeedrestricted � � vimpaction<br />
(2)<br />
area<br />
restricted<br />
The impaction speed defines the collection<br />
efficiency. The higher the impaction speed, the less<br />
mass is needed to have enough inertia to get<br />
captured leading to a wider range of sampled<br />
particle sizes.<br />
3. A new measurement setup<br />
For the new setup described here the sampling time<br />
should increase without changing the collection<br />
efficiency, e.g. the impaction speed, so that the<br />
results are comparable to previous burst<br />
measurements and the same pass criteria can be<br />
applied.<br />
3.1. Reduced flow rate<br />
According to (2) the impaction speed remains the<br />
same when the flow rate and the restricted area are<br />
reduced by the same factor. In the case of the<br />
proposed setup of the MAS-100 Iso NT ®<br />
Continuous the reduction factor is 12 or 24 while<br />
maintaining the impaction speed of the 6 th stage of<br />
an Anderson air sampler. The smaller the flow rate<br />
the longer is the sampling time (1).<br />
3.2. Rotating agar<br />
With a reduced number of aspiration holes the agar<br />
surface in direct contact with the air jets would be<br />
less than 1% of the total agar surface. This would<br />
lead to an excess water loss underneath the air jets<br />
reducing the survival rate of microorganisms at the<br />
area where they are actually collected. Therefore, a<br />
rotating agar dish similar to known slit samplers is<br />
used here. To identify the starting point of the<br />
measurement the rotation stops just before the 12<br />
o’clock position (Fig. 3).<br />
Figure 3. Surface coverage by the air jets.<br />
As a side effect of the rotation each collection is<br />
now time resolved; a microorganism growing at the<br />
“quarter past” position was captured after a quarter<br />
of the total measurement time had elapsed.<br />
3.3. Increased total sample volume<br />
The total measurement time can be extended by<br />
sampling more air. As this further reduces the water<br />
content of the agar, this parameter should be<br />
carefully examined (chapter 5).<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 2/7
4. The new instrument<br />
4.1. Sampling head<br />
A new developed active sampling head allows the<br />
rotation of the agar plates applied. It is designed for<br />
easy cleaning (Fig. 4) and optimized for a small<br />
form factor (Fig. 5).<br />
Figure 4. Easy cleanable surface of the sampling<br />
head.<br />
Figure 5. Compact head with rotating agar plate.<br />
4.2. D50 cut off value<br />
According to Nevalainen et al. (1993) the physical<br />
sampling efficiency for air samplers can be<br />
described by the size of particles they are able to<br />
collect. The d50 value represents the smallest<br />
particle size where half of the particles are still<br />
captured (3).<br />
d<br />
50<br />
9�Dh<br />
Stk50<br />
� (3)<br />
�UC<br />
Where � is the dynamic viscosity, Dh is the<br />
hydraulic diameter of the holes in the aspiration<br />
sieve, Stk50 is the Stokes number of the opening, �<br />
is the particle density, U is the impact velocity, and<br />
C is the Cunningham correction factor.<br />
For the round openings of the aspiration sieve the<br />
physical diameter is used for Dh and ¼ for Stk50.<br />
The particle density is assumed 1 g/cm 3 and the<br />
Cunningham correction factor was set to 1 (for<br />
particles > 1µm). For an environment with 1013hPa<br />
and 20°C the d50 value translates to 1.1µm (equal to<br />
the MAS-100 NT ® ). To keep this value constant the<br />
number of holes in the aspiration sieve were<br />
changed for different air flows (4, 8, 16 l/min) while<br />
the diameter of the holes remained the same.<br />
4.3. Pump unit<br />
The pump unit is similar to the proven design of the<br />
MAS-100 Iso NT ® . It handles the pump control and<br />
controls the agar rotation.<br />
5. Testing<br />
5.1. Comparison to the MAS-100 NT ®<br />
instrument<br />
The new method was compared to a standard<br />
instrument (MAS-100 NT ® ) sampling a burst of<br />
1000 l of ambient air at 100 l/min (10min). A<br />
second instrument (also MAS-100 NT ® ) sampled in<br />
SQS mode 1000 l in 10 fractions over 1, 2 and 4 h<br />
(also at 100 l/min). The continuous measurement<br />
sampled 1000 l at 16, 8 and 4 l/min with matching<br />
sampling heads so that for all measurements the<br />
impaction speed was 19.6 m/s and the d50 value<br />
1.1µm (same as the MAS-100 NT ® ). All<br />
instruments run at the same time in close proximity.<br />
Fig. 6 depicts that microbial growth is not affected<br />
by the new sampling head compared to established<br />
standards and the SQS measurement.<br />
The variations are mainly due to an uneven<br />
distribution of microorganisms in the ambient air so<br />
that the measurement time and the measurement<br />
duration influence the results.<br />
The shorter the measurement time becomes the<br />
smaller the averaging effect is and therefore a<br />
higher variation in the results can be observed. This<br />
is especially true for the standard measurement time<br />
of 10 min.<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 3/7
Figure 6. Comparison of microbial growth applying<br />
different sampling instruments.<br />
5.2. Water content of agar plates<br />
As discussed above the walk-away time can be<br />
expanded by sampling more air but this further<br />
reduces the water activity of the agar plates.<br />
Most Gram-negative bacteria require a water<br />
activity aw = 0.97-0.96. However, many other<br />
bacteria can still grow at aw = 0.95-0.91 while some<br />
yeasts can tolerate aw = 0.65-0.60. Below this<br />
threshold the survival rate of any vegetative<br />
microbial cell is dramatically affected.<br />
Using the new sampling head the water activity was<br />
determined before and after the collection of<br />
different air volumes, respectively (Fig. 7).<br />
Figure 7. Sampling points for the determination of<br />
the water activity. A: sample point before air<br />
collection; B-D: sample points after air collection.<br />
Each area of an agar plate used was analysed in<br />
triplicates. Because the agar samples had to be<br />
removed from every plate for the analysis,<br />
measurements of the base line (A) were performed<br />
using independent plates from the same batch so<br />
that the airflow was not disturbed from the missing<br />
piece of agar. The analyses revealed moderate<br />
reduction of the water activity for runs applying<br />
1000 l and 2000 l. When 3000 l were sampled the<br />
water activity of the agar was aw = 0.96. Sampling<br />
4000 l resulted in aw < 0.6.<br />
Figure 8. Water activity (aw) after sampling<br />
different volumes of air (average of point b, c and d<br />
(Fig 7)).<br />
There was no significant difference in the water<br />
activity between sampling areas b, c and d.<br />
Therefore, it can be concluded that the main factor<br />
for drying is the accelerated air jet underneath the<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 4/7
aspiration hole. Slow flowing air did not<br />
significantly contribute to the drying effect for the<br />
first 4 h. This finding is also supported in a study<br />
about the SQS measurement mode (Bijlenga and<br />
Obrist, 2006).<br />
Due to the asymmetric placement of the exhaust all<br />
air exits toward the outer rim of the plate. To<br />
examine a possible build up effect a second analysis<br />
with more sampling areas was conducted (Fig. 9).<br />
Figure 9. Additional sampling points for the<br />
determination of the water activity.<br />
Rather than excess water loss at the outer regions of<br />
the agar plate (b, d, f) slightly lower water contents<br />
were monitored at the center of the agar plate (c, g,<br />
e) (Tab. 1). This is probably due to a higher air<br />
volume to surface ratio at the center.<br />
Table 1. Water activity at the sampling points a-g.<br />
The equidistant spacing of the aspiration holes was<br />
changed for later tests. The space between two holes<br />
now increased towards the center to achieve a more<br />
homogenous distribution.<br />
5.3. Microorganisms used<br />
To monitor microbial growth experiments were<br />
conducted applying Gram-positive (Staphylococcus<br />
aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis)<br />
and Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas<br />
aeruginosa and Acinetobacter lwoffii). For all tests<br />
20 ml TSA agar plates were used (Oxoid, Art. Nr:<br />
PO5012A).<br />
5.4. Test setup<br />
Maintaining a constant level of evenly distributed<br />
and viable microorganisms suspended in air is<br />
rather difficult. Therefore bacteria were placed onto<br />
the sampling plates using a 45 pin replicator tool<br />
and donor plates (Fig. 10).<br />
Figure 10. Pin replicator tool for bacterial transfer<br />
onto the sampling plates.<br />
To simulate a capture at the beginning of the<br />
sampling period the test agar was inoculated and<br />
placed into the sampling head which was operated<br />
in a biosafety flow cabinet. To simulate a capture at<br />
the end of the measurement the process was<br />
reversed. First the defined amount of clean air was<br />
sampled in the biosafety flow cabinet and then the<br />
agar was inoculated using the pin replicator tool.<br />
The agar plates were incubated at 30°-37°C and<br />
bacterial counts were enumerated after 24 h and<br />
48 h of incubation, respectively. Acinetobacter<br />
lwoffii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Micrococcus<br />
luteus were incubated at 30°C, Staphylococcus<br />
aureus and Bacillus subtilis at 37°C. In Fig. 11 an<br />
inoculated agar plate is shown after incubation.<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 5/7
Figure 11. Test agar plate after 48 h of incubation<br />
and grown deposited colonies.<br />
5.5. Results<br />
The pin replicator consists of 45 pins in total. The<br />
survivalrate was calculated as the percentage of<br />
grown colonies (4).<br />
colonies<br />
pins<br />
counted<br />
survivalrate� (4)<br />
total<br />
5.6. Maximum volume<br />
A first question was if the maximum acceptable<br />
volume of air, which did not dramatically reduce the<br />
water activity also supported growth of selected<br />
microorganisms.<br />
Figure 12. Survival rate after 48 h; inoculation<br />
before air sampling.<br />
Fig. 12 illustrates that bacteria responded differently<br />
to the total air volume applied. In general no<br />
adverse effect was evident for an air volume of<br />
2000 l. Application of 3000 l revealed that growth<br />
of Acinetobacter lwoffii was slightly affected, while<br />
growth of the other bacterial species used was not<br />
altered. After 4000 l all three bacteria species<br />
showed a reduction in growth. Taken together<br />
2000 l of sampling air volume can be safely applied<br />
to monitor bacterial contamination in air.<br />
5.7. Inoculation of test agar plates at the<br />
beginning vs. the end of a sampling period<br />
A second question was if microbial growth depends<br />
on whether a bacterial cell was present at the<br />
beginning or if it was collected just before the end<br />
of the sampling period. If the bacteria were<br />
transferred before the air flow started colonies<br />
appeared slightly slower at 2000 l air flows after<br />
24 h (Fig. 13). However, after 48 h of incubation<br />
colonies remained equal in size (Fig 14).<br />
Figure 13. Survival rate after 24 h of incubation;<br />
inoculation before air sampling.<br />
Figure 14. Survival rate after 48 h of incubation;<br />
inoculation before air sampling.<br />
If the bacteria were transferred after the collection<br />
of air the effect was still present but less<br />
pronounced (Fig. 15, 16).<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 6/7
Figure 15. Survival rate after 24 h of incubation;<br />
inoculation after air sampling.<br />
Figure 16. Survival rate after 48 h of incubation;<br />
inoculation after air sampling.<br />
These results demonstrate that the survival rate<br />
remains equal from the beginning to the end of the<br />
sampling period.<br />
5.8. Influence of total sampling time<br />
Applying a 4 l/min head the measurement time<br />
becomes a considerable factor: 4 h are needed to<br />
sample 1000 l; 8 h for 2000 l and 12 h for 3000 l. In<br />
contrast to the 8 l/min and 16 l/min measurement<br />
the water activity was significantly reduced if an air<br />
volume of 2000 l or more was applied (Fig. 17).<br />
Figure 17. Water activity of test agar plates at a<br />
flow rate of 4 l/min.<br />
Hence Micrococcus luteus and Acinetobacter lwoffii<br />
exhibited a clear decline in the survival rate at<br />
2000 l air flow (8 h sampling time) and<br />
Pseudomonas aeruginosa exhibited limited growth<br />
at 3000 l air flow (12 h sampling time) (Fig. 18).<br />
Figure 18. Survival rate after 48 h of incubation at<br />
an air flow rate of 4l/min.; inoculation before air<br />
sampling.<br />
6. Conclusions<br />
Continuous measurements of up to 4 hours and an<br />
air volume of up to 2000 l can be achieved with the<br />
same collection efficacy as todays burst<br />
measurements. This allows the construction of air<br />
samplers with the same walk away time as settling<br />
plates combined with all the benefits of an active<br />
measurement.<br />
References<br />
Anderson, V. (1958): New sampler for the<br />
collection, sizing and enumeration of viable<br />
airborne particles, U.S. Army Chemical Corps<br />
Proving Ground, Dugway, Utah, U.S.A.<br />
Bijlenga, R., Obrist D. (2006): A comparative<br />
study of two different Microbial <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />
Methods: Conventional and Sequential Sampling,<br />
Laboratory of Applied Microbiology / University of<br />
Applied Sciences of Geneva (EIG), Switzerland<br />
Nevalainen A, Willeke K, Liebhaber F, Pastuszka J,<br />
Burge H, Henningson E. Bioaerosol sampling. In:<br />
Willeke K, Baron PA, eds. Aerosol Measurement:<br />
Principles, Techniques and Applications. New<br />
York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1993: 471-492.<br />
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
A new Method for Continuous Measurement; B.Glauser, MBV AG page 7/7