01.03.2013 Views

INSIGHT & INSPIRATION FROM APHA’S 2012 MIDYEAR MEETING

INSIGHT & INSPIRATION FROM APHA’S 2012 MIDYEAR MEETING

INSIGHT & INSPIRATION FROM APHA’S 2012 MIDYEAR MEETING

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32<br />

Survive All In This Friends Prevention, Strategies<br />

& Thrive Together For Health Opportunity & Equity for Health<br />

Fortunately, the ACA recognizes this connection via the Prevention and Public Health Fund.<br />

Still, the fund remains somewhat controversial, Mays said, because we don’t have a lot of sound<br />

evidence on the return on investments in public health. Mays and his colleagues are gathering<br />

that evidence, however, and here’s what they’ve found.<br />

Communities with higher public health spending saw larger reductions in preventable mortality<br />

measures, such as cancer, heart disease, diabetes and infant mortality. Also, communities at<br />

the bottom levels of per capita public health spending have the highest levels of per capita medical<br />

spending. The findings illustrate the real health returns associated with growing investments<br />

in local public health as well as the chance to offset medical costs. Mays projected that<br />

the additional federal spending authorized via the Prevention and Public Health Fund works out<br />

to about a 1.2 percent increase in public health spending in communities over 10 years. Every<br />

new dollar in federal public health spending will get back about 87 cents in Medicare spending<br />

over a decade — “that’s a fairly sizeable economic impact suggesting that, yes, public health<br />

spending can be useful in reigning in medical cost growth,” Mays told attendees.<br />

Such federal spending can also avert nearly 180 preventable deaths in an average community,<br />

resulting in about 1,800 life years gained. Public health, he said, “is a good buy.”<br />

“We’re certainly just at the tip of the iceberg in terms of our current research technology for<br />

estimating these benefits,” Mays said. “But we think this, in part, shows us what’s possible<br />

not only with expanded investment in public health, but also what’s possible with expanded<br />

research into helping us look at the benefits and return from investments in the public health<br />

system.”<br />

From session 3003, Public Health Funding: Why Should They Care?, June 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!