Methodology - Hoor al-Ayn
Methodology - Hoor al-Ayn
Methodology - Hoor al-Ayn
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Reply to 1a.<br />
First lets read the words of Al-Haafidh Ibnu Katheer:<br />
In interpreting the verse:<br />
DO THEY THEN SEEK THE JUDGMENT OF (THE DAYS OF)<br />
IGNORANCE? 4/50<br />
He said: Allah(swt) rebukes those who leave Allah’s judgment, which<br />
contains <strong>al</strong>l that is good and just and forbids <strong>al</strong>l that is bad. They turn instead<br />
to the opinions, desires and laws laid down by men without any recourse to<br />
Allah’s Shariah. …And the TARTAR’S USED TO JUDGE ACCORDING<br />
TO THE LAWS LAID DOWN BY THEIR RULERS, TAKEN FROM<br />
THEIR KING GHENGHIS KHAN WHO PUT TOGETHER FOR THEM A<br />
LAW BOOK (YASA) EXTRACTED FROM DIFFERENT LAWS OF THE<br />
JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND THE RELIGION OF ISLAM AND OTHER<br />
SOURCES. It <strong>al</strong>so contained many laws and regulations taken solely from his<br />
own opinion and wishes which later became a system of law followed by the<br />
people and given precedence over the laws of Allah’s Book and the sunnah of<br />
his messenger (pbuh). Therefore WHOEVER DOES THAT IS A KAFIR<br />
WHO MUST BE FOUGHT UNTIL HE RETURNS TO THE LAW OF<br />
ALLAH AND HIS MESSANGER, AND DOES NOT GOVERN ON ANY<br />
MATTER EXCEPT BY THE LAW.<br />
Please note that the tartars never ruled according to Islam until they were<br />
beaten in the fin<strong>al</strong> battle of Shaqhab around 702AH.<br />
They were never considered as legitimate rulers who then latter deviated.<br />
Nor were they considered ahul bugah <strong>al</strong>-muta-awwileen i.e. misconceived<br />
rebels against the imam. Al-Fataawa 28/540-541<br />
Nor were they fought as kafir invaders.<br />
But they were fought because they didn’t implement the shariah.<br />
This can be clearly seen from the fatwa of ibn taymiyyah;<br />
Page14