03.03.2013 Views

PIJAC Poised for Growth - Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council

PIJAC Poised for Growth - Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council

PIJAC Poised for Growth - Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4 <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

6 LEGISLATIVE<br />

WHAT’S INSIDE<br />

& HERPS:<br />

UPDATES<br />

&<br />

REGULATORY NEWS<br />

8 EDUCATION/<br />

CERTIFICATION NEWS<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> <strong>Poised</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Growth</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> the past several years, <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s<br />

Board of Directors has been<br />

working on a strategic plan <strong>for</strong><br />

the <strong>Council</strong>’s growth and future,<br />

including a transition of leadership.<br />

After 40 years of service to <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

and the pet industry, and with the lease<br />

ending at <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s current offices in his law<br />

firm, our Executive Vice President/General<br />

Counsel Marshall Meyers will begin reducing<br />

his workload and time commitment<br />

to <strong>PIJAC</strong> in 2010. This timing prompted<br />

the Board to <strong>for</strong>malize a four-year growth<br />

plan to ensure <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s ongoing independence<br />

and continuity. The plan is designed<br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>PIJAC</strong> to continue fulfilling its mission<br />

of promoting responsible pet ownership,<br />

fostering environmental stewardship, and<br />

ensuring the availability of pets.<br />

In developing the plan, the Board<br />

assessed how to rein<strong>for</strong>ce <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s position<br />

as the primary pet industry association<br />

dealing with live animal issues. This lead<br />

DID yoU NoTICE?<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> is testing a new tag line – Protecting <strong>Pet</strong>s & the<br />

<strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong>.<br />

What do you think? We want to hear from you. You can:<br />

n Go to www.pijac.org and fill out an<br />

online survey.<br />

n Send an email to Members@pijac.org<br />

Your opinion is important to us –<br />

thanks in advance<br />

<strong>for</strong> your input!<br />

PROTECTING PETS AND THE PET INDUSTRY<br />

PUBLISHED BY THE PET INDUSTRY JOINT ADVISORY COUNCIL • SUMMER 2008 • VOLUME 29 • NUMBER 2<br />

to the creation of a new staff position: a<br />

President who will train under Mr. Meyers<br />

<strong>for</strong> at least a year and eventually succeed<br />

Mr. Meyers, leading <strong>PIJAC</strong> into our next<br />

era. The plan also includes the expansion<br />

of key components to increase <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s<br />

capacity <strong>for</strong> handling an ever-increasing<br />

workload.<br />

The proposed timeline starts with the<br />

hiring of the President, who will be charged<br />

with two top priorities. The first is further<br />

expanding <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s funding and membership<br />

so additional staff can be hired, initially<br />

in Government Affairs, and then in<br />

other program areas. The second is relocating<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> to its own offices by the time<br />

the current lease ends in spring of 2010.<br />

To ensure stability during this transition<br />

period, the American <strong>Pet</strong> Products Manufacturers<br />

Association (APPMA), the <strong>Pet</strong><br />

<strong>Industry</strong> Distributors Association (PIDA)<br />

and the World Wide <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> Association<br />

(WWPIA) have each committed to<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>: WorkING <strong>for</strong> yoU<br />

We Go Where you Can't!<br />

The pet industry is a busy one! There are<br />

constantly meetings, conferences, conventions,<br />

symposia, hearings – the list goes<br />

on and on – that deal with issues important to<br />

our industry. <strong>PIJAC</strong> represents our industry<br />

at many of these events to ensure pets and<br />

the pet industry are protected. Here is a just a<br />

sample of the places <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s team has been in<br />

the last few months<br />

January 15 & 16: Marshall Meyers and<br />

Michael Maddox attended a Pennsylvania Dog<br />

Law <strong>Advisory</strong> Board meeting in Harrisburg, PA.<br />

continued on page 5<br />

help fund the new President’s position <strong>for</strong><br />

three years.<br />

The Government Affairs staff is slated<br />

to grow over three to four years with the<br />

addition of two to three junior Government<br />

Affairs Specialists. Each specialist,<br />

based in <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Washington, DC offices,<br />

will be responsible <strong>for</strong> one region of the<br />

country. This will allow the specialists to<br />

cultivate closer relationships with members<br />

of our industry as well as legislators and<br />

regulators, helping increase <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s presence<br />

and enrich our work at the state and<br />

local levels. As funding becomes available,<br />

more staff will be brought on to support<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>’s other programs and initiatives.<br />

Long-term goals are to substantially<br />

increase <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s membership, non-dues<br />

income, and involvement in the <strong>Council</strong> by<br />

industry leaders. An additional key objective<br />

is expanding and enriching projects<br />

and programs such as HabitattitudeTM , the<br />

continued on page 2


<strong>PIJAC</strong> <strong>Poised</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Growth</strong><br />

continued from page 1<br />

Bd-Free ‘Phibs campaign, the Practice Safe<br />

RHEX campaign, and the National Reptile<br />

Improvement Plan through grants and special<br />

contributions.<br />

JDG Associates has been retained to conduct<br />

an executive search <strong>for</strong> the President.<br />

The search committee includes <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s<br />

Executive Committee - Elwyn Segrest<br />

(Segrest Farms), Frank Koch (Natural Balance),<br />

Ruth Jeffers (Jeffers<strong>Pet</strong> – represent-<br />

recent years have seen an increasing number<br />

of ef<strong>for</strong>ts to include provisions in the<br />

Farm Bill that have the potential <strong>for</strong> impacting<br />

the pet trade, usually not in a favorable<br />

way. <strong>PIJAC</strong> has generally been successful<br />

in quashing these initiatives, and that was<br />

the case again with this year’s Farm Bill (the<br />

Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008).<br />

Two amendments threatening separate segments<br />

of the pet trade were tacked onto the<br />

Senate version of the bill. The first barred<br />

puppy imports and the second could have<br />

shut down much of the reptile trade.<br />

The ban on puppy imports was only a<br />

part of a larger bill that had been initiated in<br />

the last Congress (<strong>Pet</strong> Animal Welfare Act),<br />

against which <strong>PIJAC</strong> testified be<strong>for</strong>e a Senate<br />

subcommittee. In bringing these proposals<br />

back again, Senator Richard Durbin<br />

(D-IL) chose the Farm Bill as a vehicle,<br />

rather than seeking passage in stand-alone<br />

legislation. <strong>PIJAC</strong> was involved in negotiations<br />

on the proposal prior to its submission<br />

and, while opposing the import ban<br />

as a matter of principle, was particularly<br />

concerned about the impact it would have<br />

on the state of Hawaii, which imports the<br />

majority of the puppies pet stores sell there.<br />

Of various provisions coming out of the<br />

PAWS process that were sought by Senator<br />

Durbin, including a mechanism <strong>for</strong> thirdparty<br />

inspections under the Animal Welfare<br />

Act, only the import restrictions survived.<br />

Because puppies are generally not imported<br />

<strong>for</strong> pet store sale in the United States,<br />

the practical implication of this restriction<br />

was limited. The exception, however, is in<br />

Hawaii which, because it is a rabies-free<br />

state, is barred by law from bringing pup-<br />

ing WWPIA), and Jeff Sutherland (Central<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>) – as well as Joel Adamson (Seargent’s<br />

– representing APPMA), Roger Lambert<br />

(Lambriar), Jim Heim (Central Garden and<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>), and Bill Brant (Gourmet Rodent).<br />

In a letter to <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s membership<br />

announcing the launch of the search, Mr.<br />

Segrest noted, “<strong>PIJAC</strong> has kept us all in<br />

business <strong>for</strong> almost 40 years. The new<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> will continue this and grow, as<br />

our industry needs. Your Board is implementing<br />

a plan to carry <strong>PIJAC</strong> <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> successfully Protects <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> from<br />

farm Bill Amendments<br />

pies in from anywhere in the continental<br />

United States.<br />

As a result, Hawaii pet stores are compelled<br />

to import their puppies from other jurisdictions<br />

that are also certified as rabies-free. A<br />

general ban against imports of puppies under<br />

6 months of age (which is what the Durbin<br />

amendment provides) would have virtually<br />

shut down the sale of pet store puppies in the<br />

state, even thought the ostensible purpose of<br />

the amendment isn’t even served by Hawaii<br />

imports. As a result of <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s extensive negotiations<br />

with Senator Durbin, as well as intensive<br />

lobbying of members of Congress, an<br />

exemption <strong>for</strong> Hawaii imports was developed<br />

and inserted into the bill. This exemption survived<br />

the conference committee, and the ban<br />

in the final bill does not apply to the “lawful<br />

importation of a dog into the state of Hawaii<br />

from the British Isles, Australia, Guam, or<br />

New Zealand in compliance with the applicable<br />

regulations of the State of Hawaii and<br />

the other requirements of this section.”<br />

Another Farm Bill initiative, intended to<br />

facilitate a repeal of the ban on selling turtles<br />

under 4 inches in carapace length, was crafted<br />

in such a way that it would likely have<br />

brought about a prohibition on the sale of<br />

myriad reptile species while doing nothing to<br />

legalize turtle sales. This amendment, mandating<br />

a determination as to the “prevalence<br />

of salmonella in each species of reptile and<br />

amphibian sold legally as a pet in the United<br />

States” would have had the effect of creating<br />

a ban on countless species. Indeed, had the<br />

measure passed in the final version of the<br />

Farm Bill, the Food and Drug Administration<br />

may have been required by law to ban the<br />

sale of virtually every pet reptile species in<br />

another 40 years. And the first, critical<br />

step is to put a person in place to lead the<br />

charge into <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s next era while respecting<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>’s rich history.”<br />

Announcements were also sent to members<br />

of the trade press, partner associations,<br />

and were posted on <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s website.<br />

Please visit www.pijac.org to read the<br />

press release and position announcement.<br />

Updates regarding the progress of the<br />

search will be posted on <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s website as<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation becomes available.n<br />

the country. <strong>PIJAC</strong> was successful in having<br />

this amendment stricken from the conference<br />

report, and it was not part of the final version<br />

of the bill passed by Congress.<br />

Because of his opposition to certain provisions<br />

of the Farm Bill, President Bush vetoed<br />

that legislation. But with majorities of 316 to<br />

108 in the House of Representatives and 82<br />

to 13 in the Senate, that veto was easily overridden<br />

and the measure enacted into law. n<br />

Meyers Testifies<br />

on the Nonnative<br />

Wildlife Invasion<br />

Prevention Act<br />

Del. Madeleine Z. Borallo (D-Guam)<br />

introduced the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion<br />

Prevention Act (H.R. 6311) in the U.S.<br />

House of Representatives on June 19. The<br />

bill as it’s written has major implications <strong>for</strong><br />

the pet industry.<br />

The bill calls <strong>for</strong> creating approved<br />

(“clean list”) and prohibited (“black list”)<br />

lists of non-native species, which has the<br />

potential to shut down any industry dealing<br />

with non-native species. It also sets the<br />

stage <strong>for</strong> more legislation aimed at limiting<br />

the trade of non-native species. With<br />

the likely addition of amendments, <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

anticipates there will be additional meetings<br />

and hearings surrounding this complex<br />

issue. This debate will continue into the<br />

next session of Congress.<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Executive Vice President/General<br />

Counsel Marshall Meyers testified on<br />

behalf of the pet industry at a hearing of<br />

the House Natural Resources Committee,<br />

Subcommittee on Fisheries, Wildlife, and<br />

Oceans. The only other witnesses repre-<br />

2 <strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008


<strong>Pet</strong> Trade Pathway Toolkit: A Call<br />

<strong>for</strong> Contributors & sponsors<br />

Invasive species (harmful non-native organisms) are one of the<br />

major threats to native wildlife and habitats. The pet/aquaria<br />

trade has been identified as a substantial source of potentially<br />

invasive species; escaped or released pets and aquaria species can<br />

predate upon, compete with, or spread diseases and parasites to<br />

native wildlife. Aquaria dumping and water gardening can also be<br />

sources of invasive plants. The greatest risks of deliberate release<br />

of unwanted pets and aquaria species are likely associated with:<br />

n Consumers (pet owners, rather than commercial operations);<br />

n Non-regulated direct sales – such as sales through the internet<br />

and newspapers, hobbyist shows, flea markets, etc;<br />

n <strong>Pet</strong>s that are free or inexpensive;<br />

n Species which grow large, reproduce easily and in large numbers<br />

in captivity, have specialized dietary or other husbandry<br />

requirements, and have aggressive temperaments;<br />

and<br />

n Species ecologically suited to the geographic<br />

region in which they are maintained<br />

as pets.<br />

In order to minimize the invasion risk of the<br />

“pet/aquaria trade pathway,” member countries<br />

of the Convention on Biological Diversity<br />

(CBD) recently adopted a decision (May 2008)<br />

to collate case studies of best management<br />

practices that industries, governments, and<br />

others are taking to prevent the release, escape,<br />

and establishment of <strong>for</strong>mer pets and aquaria<br />

species. The CBD explicitly recognized <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

and the Global Invasive Species Programme<br />

(GISP) as leaders in this process. Thus, the two<br />

organizations are now working together to<br />

develop a toolkit of regulatory and non-regulatory<br />

measures to minimize the introduction<br />

of animals, plants, pathogens, and parasites via<br />

the “pet/aquaria trade pathway.”<br />

Photo by Jamie K. ReaseR<br />

sented the Department of Interior and a<br />

number of state agencies.<br />

Marshall noted the pet industry’s ongoing<br />

concerns about invasive species, and<br />

called attention to the industry’s long history<br />

of proactively addressing the issue. His<br />

testimony focused on the bill’s oversimplified<br />

approach to a very complex problem<br />

and recommended more funding support<br />

and utilizing tools already in place. He<br />

also warned of the risk of slipping into a<br />

crisis mentality when dealing with invasive<br />

issues. Marshall closed his testimony by<br />

offering to work with the Subcommittee<br />

“in crafting more realistic legislation that<br />

will serve the public and affected industry<br />

alike….” Please see the Legislative & Regulatory<br />

News section on page 6 <strong>for</strong> more<br />

details of the bill and <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s testimony.<br />

A <strong>PIJAC</strong> <strong>Pet</strong>Alert summarizing the<br />

issue, its possible impact, and recommended<br />

action has been distributed, and can<br />

be found on the Breaking News page at<br />

www.pijac.org. Marshall’s testimony can<br />

be found in the Government Affairs section<br />

of www.pijac.org under Testimony. If<br />

you have questions or concerns regarding<br />

this bill, please contact Marshall by e-mail<br />

(mmeyers@pijac.org) or by phone (202-<br />

452-1525). n<br />

The final product will be modeled after the comprehensive<br />

GISP Toolkit (Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit <strong>for</strong> Best Prevention<br />

and Management Practices; www.gisp.org) and made available<br />

in multiple <strong>for</strong>mats: executive summary (PDF and print)<br />

and as a complete publication (PDF and print-on-demand).<br />

Examples of case studies are available at http://www.pijac.org<br />

(click on Invasives Toolkit).<br />

At this time, <strong>PIJAC</strong> is seeking:<br />

n Additional case studies of relevant regulatory and non-regulatory<br />

measures from around the world.<br />

n Financial sponsors to assist in the development, design, and<br />

distribution of the toolkit. All sponsors will be acknowledged in<br />

the publication by name and logo.<br />

The budget <strong>for</strong> the project is approximately $75,000. <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

is pleased to announce that the first co-sponsor, <strong>PIJAC</strong> Canada,<br />

had donated $5,000.<br />

For further in<strong>for</strong>mation or to contribute to the project, contact:<br />

Dr. Jamie K. Reaser, <strong>PIJAC</strong> Senior Science and Policy<br />

Advisor: pijacscience@nelsoncable.com. n<br />

Burmese pythons, such as this one, have become established in the Florida Everglades.<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008 3


<strong>PIJAC</strong> and Herps:<br />

UPDATEs<br />

BD-FREE ‘PHIBS<br />

since the campaign was launched in<br />

November 2007, the primary focus has<br />

been on fundraising. <strong>PIJAC</strong> has received a<br />

pledge of $6,000 from the <strong>Pet</strong> Care Trust to<br />

develop a website and associated campaign<br />

materials <strong>for</strong> the Bd-Free ‘Phibs campaign.<br />

An additional $480.00 was contributed by<br />

REPTILES Magazine in exchange <strong>for</strong> an<br />

article written on the amphibian pathogen<br />

and the campaign (see: http://www.<br />

reptilechannel.com/reptile-magazines/reptiles-magazine/may-2008/under-fire.aspx).<br />

APPMA will trademark the campaign logo<br />

as an in-kind contribution. In<strong>for</strong>mation on<br />

the campaign is currently available on the<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> website at: www.pijac.org (click on<br />

Bd-Free ‘Phibs).<br />

NoTICE of INqUIry oN BoAs,<br />

PyTHoNs, AND ANACoNDAs<br />

In January the US Fish and Wildlife Service<br />

released a Notice of Inquiry (NOI)<br />

through the Federal Register, calling <strong>for</strong><br />

biological and socio-economic data on three<br />

genera of large constrictors: Boas, Pythons,<br />

and Eunectes (Anaconda). The NOI was a<br />

direct response to a petition by the Florida<br />

South Water Management District to list<br />

the Burmese python as injurious wildlife<br />

under the Lacey Act. Between the time the<br />

NOI was released and responses were due<br />

(April 30th), <strong>PIJAC</strong> worked closely with the<br />

reptile and amphibian community to: 1)<br />

clarify the purpose of an NOI (as opposed to<br />

a proposed rule); 2) encourage constructive<br />

responses to the NOI by snake breeders,<br />

dealers, and keepers; and 3) solicit relevant<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s use in preparing its<br />

submission. REPTILES Magazine published<br />

an interview between Marshall Meyers and<br />

USFWS staff, <strong>PIJAC</strong> Members (Thanks Bob<br />

Ashley and Brian Potter!) hosted a listening<br />

session <strong>for</strong> snake breeders/retailers and<br />

keepers in Chicago, and ReptilesTV pub-<br />

lished an on-line video including interviews<br />

with Bill Brant and Jamie Reaser. <strong>PIJAC</strong> is<br />

working on scientific publications relevant<br />

to the NOI and will continue to interface<br />

with the USFWS as they review the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

they have already received. For a<br />

copy of <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s submission, visit the <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

website and click on “Herp Info.”<br />

HABITATTITUDE <br />

P IJAC<br />

recently launched a new component<br />

to the Habitattitude campaign<br />

– with a focus on reptiles and amphibians.<br />

The new logo is available <strong>for</strong> viewing<br />

at www.pijac.org (click on Habitattitude).<br />

After aquatic animals and plants, reptiles<br />

and amphibians (and their parasites and<br />

pathogens) pose the greatest risk of becoming<br />

invasive species in the US (especially<br />

southern states) through the pet trade<br />

pathway. <strong>PIJAC</strong> anticipates that these<br />

taxonomic groups will be coming under<br />

more regulatory scrutiny in the future.<br />

The Habitattitude and Bd-Free ‘Phibs campaigns<br />

provide a means <strong>for</strong> reducing the<br />

unwanted pet releases and encouraging<br />

policy makers to find non-regulatory solutions<br />

where feasible. On June 3rd, Marshall<br />

Meyers and Jamie Reaser met with<br />

high level Department of Interior staff to<br />

initiate the process of establishing a <strong>PIJAC</strong>-<br />

DOI Memorandum of Understanding on<br />

the campaign, as well as opportunities <strong>for</strong><br />

a <strong>for</strong>mal “herp component” launch later<br />

this year.<br />

NATIoNAL rEPTILE IMProvEMENT PLAN<br />

(NrIP)<br />

on June 3rd and 4th, <strong>PIJAC</strong> hosted a<br />

working group of experts from the<br />

reptile and amphibian trade and veterinary<br />

medicine to review NRIP with a view<br />

toward making it more: 1) applicable to<br />

hobbyists as well as commercial enterprises,<br />

2) user friendly, 3) comprehensive (while<br />

maintaining a focus on health and safety<br />

issues), and 4) timely (in terms of technical<br />

updates and regulatory concerns). The<br />

group was extremely productive and will<br />

be working closely with <strong>PIJAC</strong> to ensure<br />

the program’s success through greater visibility,<br />

credibility, and inclusiveness. <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

hopes to have a revised version of the Plan<br />

available by the end of the summer <strong>for</strong><br />

review and comment by <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Governmental<br />

Affairs Committee and the initial<br />

group of people who worked on the original<br />

NRIP document.n<br />

WWPIA steps Up to<br />

support <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

P IJAC has been representing the pet<br />

industry on live animal issues <strong>for</strong><br />

almost 40 years, relying heavily on membership<br />

dues to keep the organization<br />

going. A lot has<br />

happened in 40<br />

years, and membership<br />

numbers have<br />

reflected changes<br />

in our industry.<br />

To bolster <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s<br />

membership and<br />

financial support,<br />

the World Wide <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> Association<br />

(WWPIA) has launched a “Membership<br />

Match” program. Through the program,<br />

WWPIA will match each new <strong>PIJAC</strong> membership<br />

with a financial contribution made<br />

on behalf of the new member. Through<br />

the first quarter of 2008, WWPIA donated<br />

$12,000 to match 92 new <strong>PIJAC</strong> members.<br />

“As an avid supporter of <strong>PIJAC</strong>, the<br />

Board of Directors of the World Wide <strong>Pet</strong><br />

<strong>Industry</strong> Association, Inc. unanimously<br />

voted that the organization needed<br />

greater support from the industry,” stated<br />

Doug Poindexter, President of WWPIA.<br />

“<strong>PIJAC</strong>’s ef<strong>for</strong>ts are vital to our trade and<br />

require support from both manufacturers<br />

and retailers to remain a leader in representing<br />

the interests of animal welfare.<br />

Our “Membership Match” program was<br />

created to enhance WWPIA’s longstanding<br />

financial commitment to the organization<br />

while also providing a plat<strong>for</strong>m designed<br />

to increase the <strong>PIJAC</strong> membership base.”<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Marshall Meyers added, “This<br />

is another example of WWPIA’s long-term<br />

and significant support of the important<br />

role <strong>PIJAC</strong> plays in our industry.”<br />

In addition to the matching program,<br />

WWPIA has increased their own annual<br />

dues to <strong>PIJAC</strong> by 15% and has committed<br />

to an additional contribution of<br />

$50,000 per year <strong>for</strong> three years to support<br />

the Director of Membership position<br />

and membership development programs.<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> thanks WWPIA <strong>for</strong> initiating<br />

the “Membership Match” program, and<br />

<strong>for</strong> their unceasing support.n<br />

4 <strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008


We Go Where you Can't!<br />

continued from page 1<br />

January 17: Michael attended a meeting<br />

on Capitol Hill in Sen. Richard Durbin's<br />

(D-Illinois) office on legislation to amend<br />

the Animal Welfare Act.<br />

February 17-22: Jamie Reaser and Marshall<br />

attended a meeting of the Subsidiary<br />

Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological<br />

Advice (SBSTTA) of the Convention<br />

on Biological Diversity (CBD) in Rome.<br />

February 25: Marshall met with representatives<br />

from Homeland Security to discuss<br />

invasive species concerns.<br />

February 27 & 28: Marshall participated<br />

in a meeting in Austin, TX hosted by<br />

the ASPCA regarding puppies and shelter<br />

issues.<br />

February 29: Marshall participated in<br />

a web conference panel, hosted by Kingsnake.com,<br />

to discuss the U.S. Fish and<br />

Wildlife Notice of Inquiry (NOI) regarding<br />

large constrictors.<br />

March 2-6: Marshall participated in a<br />

live animal transport meeting of the International<br />

Air Transport Association (IATA)<br />

at the World Cargo Symposium in Rome,<br />

Italy.<br />

March 20: Michael testified at a hearing<br />

about proposed mandatory spay-neuter<br />

legislation in Annapolis, MD.<br />

March 25: Jamie and Marshall participated<br />

in conference calls involving the<br />

Department of Interior regarding gathering<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation on large constrictors <strong>for</strong> the<br />

NOI.<br />

March 31–April 2: Marshall was in<br />

London <strong>for</strong> the IATA Live Animals and Perishables<br />

Board meeting to review changes<br />

to shipping standards.<br />

April 3 & 4: Michael attended a meeting<br />

in New Holland, PA on Dog Law rulemaking.<br />

April 9-11: Jamie was at the University<br />

of Notre Dame <strong>for</strong> an experts workshop on<br />

the pre-screening of live animal imports.<br />

Hosted by the CBD, among others.<br />

April 19-25: Marshall attended the<br />

CITES (Convention on International Trade<br />

in Endangered Species) Animals Committee<br />

meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.<br />

April 28: Marshall met with Senator Bill<br />

Nelson’s office (D-Florida) to discuss invasive<br />

species and constrictor issues.<br />

May 12 & 13: Michael met with legislators<br />

in Albany, NY on multiple bills, including<br />

legislation to ban "puppy mills".<br />

May 18-27: Jamie and Marshall attended<br />

the Convention on Biological Diversity’s<br />

9th Conference of the Parties, Bonn, Germany.<br />

Please see the "<strong>Pet</strong> Trade Pathway<br />

Toolkit" article on page 3.<br />

May 22-25: Marshall and Jamie attended<br />

Interzoo, Nuremburg, Germany. Marshall<br />

received the Ornamental Fish International<br />

Award 2008 <strong>for</strong> his 38 years of service to<br />

the pet industry.<br />

June 3: Jamie and Marshall met with<br />

Paul Hoffman, an Assistant Secretary at<br />

the Department of the Interior to discuss<br />

enhancing the implementation of Habitattitude.<br />

June 3 & 4: Two-day meeting at <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s<br />

office with members of the herp community<br />

to review the National Reptile<br />

Improvement Plan (NRIP) and make recommendations<br />

to more widely implement<br />

the plan.<br />

June 4: Marshall, accompanied by <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

members Collette and Dan Sutherland and<br />

Eugene Bessette, met with staff from the<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to discuss<br />

export permits <strong>for</strong> CITES Appendix 2 captive-bred<br />

wildlife.<br />

June 10 & 11: Jamie participated in<br />

a Great Lakes Commission workshop on<br />

potentially invasive organisms in trade in<br />

Detroit, Michigan<br />

June 11: Marshall met with representatives<br />

from USFWS and a local university<br />

professor to plan meetings to discuss<br />

Habitattitude and other green marketing<br />

opportunities with major retailers.<br />

June 12: Marshall participated in an<br />

Albany meeting of the New York Invasive<br />

Species <strong>Council</strong>. Marshall has been<br />

appointed to a team <strong>for</strong>med to review data<br />

and work on producing lists of prohibited<br />

and non-regulated species.<br />

June 17 & 18: Michael attended a hearing<br />

in Harrisburg, PA on Dog Law legislation.<br />

June 18: Marshall met with USFWS<br />

about how to improve marketing of Habitattitude.<br />

June 18 & 19: Jamie participated in<br />

a workshop in Marathon Key, Florida<br />

on establishing an early detection/rapid<br />

response program <strong>for</strong> marine ornamentals<br />

in Florida. Co-sponsored by the National<br />

Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration<br />

(NOAA), US Geological Survey (USGS),<br />

and The Reef Environmental Education<br />

Foundation (REEF).<br />

June 20: Jamie and Marshall, joined by<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> Board Member Bill Brant and <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

member Eugene Bessette, met with senior<br />

park service staff at Everglades National<br />

Park to discuss the issue of Burmese<br />

pythons in the Everglades.<br />

June 26: Marshall was the only nongovernmental<br />

witness testifying in front of<br />

the House Natural Resources Subcommittee<br />

on Fisheries, Wildlife, and Oceans about<br />

the proposed Nonnative Wildlife Invasion<br />

Prevention Act.<br />

July 2: Marshall met with Senior USFWS<br />

official regarding Habitattitude as well as<br />

his June 26 testimony.<br />

July 7 & 8: Marshall hosted a meeting<br />

in San Diego to develop pet store guidelines<br />

required under the new Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Store Animal Care act that becomes effective<br />

January 1, 2009.<br />

July 10: Marshall, Jamie, Bill Brant, and<br />

several <strong>PIJAC</strong> members met with the U.S.<br />

Department of Agriculture (USDA) regarding<br />

the threat of ticks coming into the U.S.<br />

with imported animals.<br />

July 13-16: Jamie represented <strong>PIJAC</strong> at<br />

the Society <strong>for</strong> Conservation Biology annual<br />

meeting in Chattanooga, TN. n<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> receives<br />

Proceeds from<br />

Golf Tournament<br />

T he 4th Allan L. Levey Golf Tournament,<br />

to benefit <strong>PIJAC</strong>, was<br />

held at Torrey Pines South Golf<br />

Course in conjunction with Global<br />

<strong>Pet</strong> Expo. 152 golfers participated,<br />

resulting in almost $43,000 <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong>. Thanks to all who participated<br />

in this great event!<br />

And mark your calendar <strong>for</strong> next<br />

year – the 5th Allan L. Levey Golf<br />

Tournament will be held on Wednesday,<br />

February 11, 2009 at the Champions<br />

Gate Golf Club in Orlando.n<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008 5


Legislative & regulatory News<br />

fEDErAL NEWs<br />

Congress. In late June <strong>PIJAC</strong> testified be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

a subcommittee of the House Committee<br />

on Natural Resources in opposition to HR<br />

6311. The Nonnative Wildlife Invasion<br />

Prevention Act is intended to address real<br />

concerns about species imported into the<br />

US that then have the potential to threaten<br />

native ecosystems if released into the wild.<br />

The manner in which this bill is crafted,<br />

however, would result in an outright ban of<br />

all nonnative species unless and until they<br />

are shown not to have invasive potential.<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> noted that this was the resurrection<br />

of a failed approach initiated three decades<br />

ago when <strong>PIJAC</strong> successfully battled to stop<br />

implementation of a “low risk” wildlife list.<br />

The testimony further emphasized that the<br />

US Fish and Wildlife Service would be confronted<br />

with an impossible task of conducting<br />

“risk assessments on more than 10,000<br />

species currently in trade, many of which are<br />

not even scientifically identified to the species<br />

level let alone extensively studied” and<br />

the law would, pending completion of such<br />

assessments, “shut down a number of industries<br />

dependent upon nonnative species.”<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> urged the subcommittee to take<br />

into consideration the findings and recommendations<br />

of the National Invasive<br />

Species Management Plan and the Aquatic<br />

Nuisance Species Task Force, which,<br />

among other things, relied heavily on the<br />

input of stakeholder groups to develop<br />

a rational system <strong>for</strong> addressing imports.<br />

Any such rational process, <strong>PIJAC</strong> testified,<br />

must ensure that screening or risk<br />

analysis is “carefully constructed to ensure<br />

that the analysis is science-based, credible,<br />

transparent, involves stakeholders, and<br />

evaluates and promotes viable management<br />

policies.” This analysis must also take<br />

into account socio-economic and other<br />

benefits as well as harm. The proposed<br />

legislation doesn’t do that, argued <strong>PIJAC</strong>,<br />

and should be redrafted to take a more<br />

practical and effective approach to dealing<br />

with potential invasive species that<br />

won’t unnecessarily harm significant sectors<br />

of the economy. Saying that “the bill<br />

assigns such an impossible task to an agency<br />

woefully bereft of resources <strong>for</strong> the job,<br />

and holds hostage several vital sectors of<br />

a challenged economy,” <strong>PIJAC</strong> concluded<br />

that “the bill as currently crafted sets the<br />

USFWS up <strong>for</strong> failure [and] would not<br />

visit upon the public the beneficial results<br />

to which it aspires.” The testimony called<br />

instead <strong>for</strong> creation of a working group<br />

involving various stakeholders whose recommendations<br />

could result in feasible legislation.<br />

There is no scheduled action <strong>for</strong><br />

the bill at this time.<br />

UsDA. A proposed rulemaking by USDA<br />

would amend Animal Welfare Act regulations<br />

to incorporate a minimum age<br />

requirement <strong>for</strong> transport of all animals<br />

covered by the act (except birds). Currently<br />

the regulations place an age restriction on<br />

certain animals, such as dogs and cats, but<br />

there is no all-encompassing rule. Although<br />

the rule is being justified as ensuring that<br />

animals are properly weaned prior to transport,<br />

the minimum eight-week restriction<br />

proposed by the Department would mean<br />

that the time restriction would exceed the<br />

normal weaning age <strong>for</strong> a number of species<br />

covered under the act. Limited exemptions<br />

would apply <strong>for</strong> transport to research<br />

facilities <strong>for</strong> specified purposes, and <strong>for</strong><br />

unweaned animals transported with their<br />

mother <strong>for</strong> routine medical care. The agency<br />

“speculates” that the proposed rule would<br />

have negligible economic impact on dealers<br />

and breeders, notwithstanding the fact that<br />

breeders would be compelled to keep some<br />

animals well past the time when they could<br />

otherwise be shipped without risk to their<br />

health. The Department set a deadline of<br />

July 8, 2008 <strong>for</strong> submission of comments<br />

from the public in response to the proposal.<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> submitted testimony on behalf of the<br />

pet industry.<br />

sTATE NEWs<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. Legislation that would mandate<br />

the spaying or neutering of dogs and<br />

cats was again amended, producing a 9th<br />

iteration of the bill since its initial introduction.<br />

AB 1634 no longer establishes a general<br />

requirement to sterilize pets, but<br />

does include mandatory sterilization<br />

<strong>for</strong> dogs or cats that have been<br />

impounded or received complaints<br />

on multiple occasions.<br />

The current version<br />

provides fines <strong>for</strong> owners<br />

of impounded unspayed/unneutered dogs<br />

and cats, as well as provisions that would<br />

compel sterilization of the animal under<br />

specified circumstances, which could include<br />

unsubstantiated complaints. And there is<br />

no opportunity to have a hearing or otherwise<br />

challenge the outcome. Due process<br />

is not part of the process. <strong>PIJAC</strong> opposed<br />

the mandatory sterilization requirements of<br />

earlier versions of the bill, but still has concerns<br />

about due process deficiencies of the<br />

amended bill, which was heard at a June<br />

25th hearing be<strong>for</strong>e the Senate Committee<br />

on Local Government. The Local Government<br />

Committee passed the bill, and it was<br />

re-referred to the Senate Appropriations<br />

Committee on July 1. The bill passed the<br />

Senate Appropriations Committee on July<br />

14th and is on its second reading in the Senate.<br />

Please check the Breaking News page at<br />

www.pijac.org <strong>for</strong> updates.<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Senate Bill 986 amends the<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia <strong>Pet</strong> Store Animal Care Act<br />

by clarifying the definition of “pet store” as<br />

well as euthanasia of feeder animals. The<br />

bill is currently in the Assembly, where it<br />

is going through its third reading. It will<br />

most likely be voted on in the Assembly,<br />

and then sent back to the Senate <strong>for</strong> concurrence<br />

in the Assembly amendments.<br />

Updates will be posted on the Breaking<br />

News page at www.pijac.org.<br />

Colorado. A bill that would have allowed<br />

<strong>for</strong> both economic and noneconomic damages<br />

<strong>for</strong> the “loss of companionship” of a companion<br />

animal, with a $25,000 cap on recovery,<br />

was stripped of those offending provisions<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e being passed into law. An<br />

early version of HB 1308 found<br />

that “harm to companion or<br />

assistance animals is an increasing<br />

problem <strong>for</strong> Colorado pet owners” and<br />

that “current laws do not adequately address<br />

the recovery of damages <strong>for</strong> harm caused” to<br />

companion animals. <strong>PIJAC</strong> opposes noneconomic<br />

damages <strong>for</strong> pets because such damages<br />

typically aren’t even available in wrongful<br />

death <strong>for</strong> people, and establishment of this<br />

type of damage award in law would substantially<br />

increase the cost of veterinary care and<br />

pet products <strong>for</strong> all pet owners.<br />

Georgia. Proposed pet warranty legislation<br />

died in the House Committee on Agriculture<br />

and Consumer Affairs. HB 1194<br />

6 <strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008


would have imposed requirements on any<br />

person importing pet dogs or cats into the<br />

state <strong>for</strong> resale, and provided remedies to<br />

buyers of a dog or cat that is certified<br />

by a veterinarian to be unfit<br />

<strong>for</strong> purchase. Consumers would<br />

have access to remedies similar<br />

to those found in other state pet<br />

warranty laws, including a choice<br />

of either returning the animal <strong>for</strong> a refund<br />

and reimbursement of veterinary costs<br />

related to the veterinarian's certification,<br />

exchanging the animal and reimbursement<br />

of veterinary costs, or keeping the animal<br />

and receiving reimbursement <strong>for</strong> veterinary<br />

costs of treatment.<br />

Hawaii. The Governor signed SB 3203,<br />

which makes a person guilty of “animal<br />

hoarding” if he or she possesses more than<br />

20 dogs and/or cats at a time and fails to<br />

provide necessary sustenance <strong>for</strong><br />

each dog or cat, as well as failing<br />

to “correct the conditions<br />

under which the<br />

dogs or cats are living”<br />

where these conditions<br />

are injurious to<br />

the health of the dogs, cats, or owner. By<br />

couching legislation in terms of the number<br />

of animals owned, the act could motivate<br />

allegations of “hoarding” against pet stores.<br />

Massachusetts. Legislation to which <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

testified in opposition earlier this year was<br />

favorably reported by the <strong>Joint</strong> Community<br />

Development and Small Business Committee<br />

without amendments. HB 147 would<br />

mandate that “every person engaged in the<br />

business of operating a<br />

pet shop and selling pet<br />

animals [must] display<br />

and provide free basic<br />

care in<strong>for</strong>mation on all<br />

birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and<br />

fish sold on the premises.” While Cali<strong>for</strong>nia<br />

has in effect a statute with a similar mandate,<br />

the way that law requires in<strong>for</strong>mation to<br />

be provided is substantially different. Under<br />

this proposal, pet stores could be subject to<br />

liability <strong>for</strong> providing care in<strong>for</strong>mation when<br />

they have no control over the content of the<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation, and may even deem it to be<br />

inaccurate. HB 147 provides that the Massachusetts<br />

Board of Registration in Veterinary<br />

Medicine shall develop the care in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

and no opportunity <strong>for</strong> input from pet stores<br />

is permitted in the bill. The measure was sent<br />

to the House Committee on Ways and Means<br />

but has not yet been set <strong>for</strong> a hearing.<br />

Pennsylvania. In June <strong>PIJAC</strong> submitted<br />

testimony be<strong>for</strong>e the House Committee on<br />

Agriculture and Rural Affairs on House Bill<br />

2525. This legislation,<br />

proposed by the Rendell<br />

administration, has<br />

incorporated many of<br />

the provisions that were<br />

initially in a Department<br />

of Agriculture proposed regulation. That<br />

proposed rulemaking was withdrawn in the<br />

face of thousands of comments received by<br />

the department, many expressing opposition<br />

to numerous different sections of the<br />

proposal. <strong>PIJAC</strong> and others in the pet trade<br />

have been working with the department<br />

to resolve problems with the original proposal,<br />

and many changes were made prior<br />

to introduction of HB 2525. Since that time,<br />

additional amendments have been made<br />

to the bill. Provisions that would have had<br />

a severe adverse impact on pet stores have<br />

been remedied, as have some others. However,<br />

because problems with the bill remain,<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> was compelled to offer qualified<br />

opposition in its testimony. The Committee<br />

reported the bill, and it was sent to the<br />

Committee on Rules. <strong>PIJAC</strong> has submitted<br />

a number of further proposed amendments.<br />

As of this writing, the committee has not yet<br />

acted on the bill.<br />

virginia. The legislature<br />

passed, and the Governor<br />

signed, a bill that limits<br />

the number of dogs<br />

a commercial breeder<br />

may maintain. HB<br />

538 defines a commercial dog breeder as<br />

any person who maintains 30 or more adult<br />

female dogs <strong>for</strong> the “primary purpose” of<br />

selling their offspring as companion animals.<br />

Such persons may not maintain more than<br />

50 dogs over the age of one year <strong>for</strong> breeding<br />

purposes, and must comply with various<br />

other provisions, including new recordkeeping<br />

requirements.<br />

Also passing into law this session was HB<br />

1331, which amended many sections of<br />

existing statutes effecting pet owners, breeders<br />

and pet stores as well as those who sell<br />

commercial feed. Among these are provisions<br />

covering animal care (such as housing,<br />

feeding, watering and exercise of pets), the<br />

pet warranty law covering persons buying<br />

dogs from pet retailers, requirements<br />

<strong>for</strong> boarding establishments, animal cruelty<br />

law, and en<strong>for</strong>cement provisions (including<br />

police powers). n<br />

APPMA 50th<br />

Anniversary Gala<br />

Benefits <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

G lobal <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Expo 2008<br />

kicked off<br />

with a gala in<br />

honor of APP-<br />

MA’s 50th Anniversary. Proceeds<br />

from the gala, hosted by <strong>Pet</strong> Business,<br />

were donated to <strong>PIJAC</strong>. <strong>PIJAC</strong><br />

thanks <strong>Pet</strong> Business, APPMA, and<br />

all who attended the gala <strong>for</strong> their<br />

ongoing support! n<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008 7


Education/Certification News<br />

Congratulations to the following people who recently earned <strong>PIJAC</strong> Animal Specialist<br />

Credentials. If you’re interested in <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Certification program, please visit our website at<br />

www.pijac.org. For additional in<strong>for</strong>mation, please contact Nancy Knutson at 202-452-1525<br />

or email Nancy at NKnutson@pijac.org.<br />

AvIAN (CAs)<br />

Abarca, Christine<br />

Ontario, CA<br />

Abbott, S. August<br />

Fair Oaks, CA<br />

Allen, Jonathan<br />

Walpole, MA<br />

Alvarado, Tina<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Ambrose, Angel<br />

Temecula, CA<br />

Anderson, John<br />

Cody<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Ace, Ashley<br />

Nuevo, CA<br />

Arredondo, Lorraine<br />

Pasadena, CA<br />

Arreola, Leo<br />

Wilmington, CA<br />

Arthur, Christopher<br />

E.<br />

Whittier, CA<br />

Babcock, Derek<br />

Troy, MI<br />

Barragan, Delia M.<br />

West Covina, CA<br />

Baroni, Jennifer<br />

Etiwanda, CA<br />

Beard, Stephanie<br />

Richfield, MN<br />

Beck, Melissa Rose<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Belmonte, Rocco S.<br />

Westminster, CA<br />

Berberich, Edward<br />

B,<br />

Modesto, CA<br />

Berkley, Becky<br />

Fresno, CA<br />

Bernat, Carol<br />

Duncansville, PA<br />

Bohn, Pamela<br />

Edison, NJ<br />

Boltwood, Jesse M.<br />

Modesto, CA<br />

Boyd, Tracy<br />

Lakewood, CA<br />

Brown, Cheryl<br />

Orlando, FL<br />

Brown, Stephanie<br />

Sand City, CA<br />

Bustamante, Norma<br />

Whittier, CA<br />

Carlo, Katie<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

Carranza, Josephine<br />

Riverside, CA<br />

Carvalho, Kara<br />

Kensington, CT<br />

Caslin, Michelle K.<br />

Hawthorne, CA<br />

Cerrato, Christine<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Chapman, Chad L.<br />

Inglewood, CA<br />

Chavez, Mario<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Chiu, Wan H.<br />

San Jose, CA<br />

Christopher, Nicola<br />

Palm Desert, CA<br />

Cimino, Patricia<br />

Toms River, NJ<br />

Clark, Maurice<br />

S. San Francisco, CA<br />

Clemmons, Timothy<br />

Woodbridge, VA<br />

Collar, Michael A.<br />

Tujunga, CA<br />

Cortez, Manuel<br />

<strong>Industry</strong>, CA<br />

Couto, Mary<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

Cross, Sherri<br />

Flint, MI<br />

Culpepper, Candace<br />

Shanae<br />

Bay City, MI<br />

Dancosse, Patricia<br />

New Bed<strong>for</strong>d, MA<br />

Daw, Jessica<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Denny, Haven<br />

Huntington Beach,<br />

CA<br />

Dixon, Naomi J.<br />

Santa Monica, CA<br />

Dotzler, Leslie<br />

Poway, CA<br />

Drummond, Jennifer<br />

Orlando, FL<br />

Duran, Tanya M.<br />

Montebello, CA<br />

Ellegard, Denise<br />

Wildomar, CA<br />

Eugenio, Christopher<br />

L.<br />

San Pedro, CA<br />

Everett, Ken<br />

Jackson, CA<br />

Jarrah, Amber<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Faust, Susan Leigh<br />

Torrance, CA<br />

Feder, Kimberly<br />

Atlanta, GA<br />

Flint, Katherine<br />

San Bernardino, CA<br />

French, Kit<br />

Anza, CA<br />

Gagliarod, Mary Kay<br />

Ramona, CA<br />

Gern, William<br />

National City, CA<br />

Giamario, Kendra L.<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Gomez, Elsa<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Gonzalez, Denise<br />

Bell, CA<br />

Graves, Shelia<br />

Camarillo, CA<br />

Gray, Ronald<br />

Clayton, CA<br />

Guadarrama, Laura<br />

Van Nuys, CA<br />

Guillen, Yvu<br />

El Monte, CA<br />

Gurierrez, LaDonna<br />

Lawndale, CA<br />

Gutierrez, Kelly L.<br />

Bakersfield, CA<br />

Hale, Duane<br />

Oxnard, CA<br />

Hammond, Heather<br />

Anne<br />

San Pedro, CA<br />

Hayes, Lyndsay<br />

Nichole<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Henderson, Mary A.<br />

Poway, CA<br />

Hernandez, Jose<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Hogan, Michelle<br />

Vallejo, CA<br />

Hubbard, Kathryn<br />

Anaheim, CA<br />

Huemer, Gloria W.<br />

Westlake Village, CA<br />

Huston, Barbara<br />

Leesburg, FL<br />

Huttner, Heather<br />

Garden Grove, CA<br />

Janacito, Kevin M.<br />

Hawthorne, CA<br />

Jennings-Bowen,<br />

Robin<br />

Hart<strong>for</strong>d, CT<br />

Johnson, Angela<br />

Andover, MN<br />

Johnson, Anne<br />

Flores<br />

Camarillo, CA<br />

Jones, Rosa<br />

Rapid City, SD<br />

Jones, Shawna<br />

Downey, CA<br />

Kalb, Jennifer<br />

Mission Viejo, CA<br />

Kautz, Maryann S.<br />

Corona, CA<br />

Keimel, Lisa<br />

Corona, CA<br />

Kekos, John<br />

Wildomar, CA<br />

Kendall, Josh<br />

West Hills, CA<br />

Kerns, De Ette<br />

North Hills, CA<br />

Key, Karen<br />

Chatsworth, CA<br />

Kilpatrick, Grace<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

King, David Allen<br />

San Gabriel, CA<br />

King, Kyle<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

King, Taren<br />

Yorba Linda, CA<br />

Kler, H. Joseph<br />

Zephyrhills, FL<br />

Knight-Trevor,<br />

Denise<br />

Brentwood, CA<br />

Kononchuk,<br />

Natasha<br />

Apopka, FL<br />

Kothari, Marage<br />

<strong>Industry</strong>, CA<br />

Labbe, Jennifer<br />

Kensington, CT<br />

LaCour, Michelle<br />

Gardena, CA<br />

LaPrise, Shannon<br />

Berkley, MI<br />

Laurel, Paul B.<br />

Carson, CA<br />

Leideritz, Robin<br />

Irvine, CA<br />

Levasseur, Natalie<br />

Berlin, MA<br />

Lopez, Viridiana<br />

Oceanside, CA<br />

Loraas, Stefanie<br />

Moreno Valley, CA<br />

Lowery, Monica<br />

Clayton, CA<br />

Macissaac, Dan<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

Marshall, Terry<br />

Hacienda Heights, CA<br />

McCray, Melissa<br />

Temecula, CA<br />

McElvoy, Wendy<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

McKay, Jennifer<br />

West Paris, ME<br />

Mendoza, Nathalie<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Mercer, Leyann N.<br />

Palm Springs, CA<br />

Miceli, Karen<br />

Kensington, CT<br />

Miles, Josiah<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

Mitchell, Jacob<br />

Temecula, CA<br />

Monge, Ryan<br />

Concord, CA<br />

Montavo, Brett<br />

Torrance, CA<br />

Mora, Jose L.<br />

Chula Vista, CA<br />

Morton, Robin<br />

Culver City, CA<br />

Moses, Jamie<br />

Rancho Santa Margarita,<br />

CA<br />

Motyer, Emma<br />

Santa Barbara, CA<br />

Mullins, Lisa<br />

Manassas, VA<br />

Murphy, Mary Ann<br />

Poway, CA<br />

Nagy, Nickol E.<br />

Wildomar, CA<br />

Napolitano, Michelle<br />

Kensington, CT<br />

Nationalesta, Mark<br />

Steven<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Nomi, Emily<br />

San Jose, CA<br />

Novak, Sara<br />

Del Mar, CA<br />

Palmer, Pat<br />

Bonita, CA<br />

Parish, Melisa<br />

Minneapolis, MN<br />

Peralta, Carlos<br />

Hawthorne, CA<br />

Pierson, Kitt (Mary)<br />

Minneapolis, MN<br />

Pilgrim, Candace<br />

Vallejo, CA<br />

Poloni, Brittany<br />

Rose<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Potter, Debbie<br />

El Cajon, CA<br />

Preciado, Adrian<br />

Chula Vista, CA<br />

Provencher, Leah<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Pryslek, Cynthia A.<br />

Boiling Springs, SC<br />

Quinones, Jason M.<br />

Desert Hot Springs,<br />

CA<br />

Quintero, Claudia<br />

Cudahy, CA<br />

Raaseld, Jennifer<br />

Riverside, CA<br />

Ramirez, Geneva<br />

Marie<br />

Bellflower, CA<br />

Ramirez, Monica<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Read, Tammy<br />

Cherie<br />

Walnut Creek, CA<br />

Reed, Matthew A.<br />

Lawndale, CA<br />

Richards-Eastham,<br />

Leanne<br />

Bellbrook, OH<br />

Rico, Rita<br />

Hawthorne, CA<br />

Rodenburg, Sarah L.<br />

Clayton, CA<br />

Rodriguez, Barbara<br />

Moreno Valley, CA<br />

Romero, Maria<br />

Lafayette, CA<br />

Romo, Todd Blair<br />

North Hollywood, CA<br />

Roney, Shanna<br />

Ypsilanti, MI<br />

Rose, Kristine R.<br />

Fair Oaks, CA<br />

Rose, Ryan Steven<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Rosenan, Jilliam<br />

Indio, CA<br />

Ross, Megan<br />

La Habra, CA<br />

Ruelas, Christina<br />

Palmdale, CA<br />

Sabedra, George A.<br />

Covina, CA<br />

Sacks, Jaqueline<br />

Cambridge, MA<br />

Sakamoto, Susan<br />

Charlotte<br />

Livermore, CA<br />

Sandoval, Norma<br />

Inglewood, CA<br />

Santchez-Fitzgerald,<br />

Kathy<br />

Pasadena, CA<br />

Schowalter, Charles<br />

Temecula, CA<br />

Schular, Linda<br />

La Habra, CA<br />

Shannon, Michelle<br />

Kingsburg, CA<br />

Shaver, Ron<br />

Spanish Fork, UT<br />

Shrewsbury,<br />

Michelle<br />

Oakhurst, NJ<br />

Simmerman, Tiffany<br />

L.<br />

Maneca, CA<br />

Skagerberg, Jennifer<br />

Rialto, CA<br />

Sloan, Summer<br />

Lakeside, CA<br />

Slominski, Rickie L.<br />

Clayton, CA<br />

Smith, Teesha<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Spina, Wendy<br />

Bergenfield, NJ<br />

Stang, Shainna<br />

Simi Valley, CA<br />

Strait, Jennifer<br />

San Antonio, TX<br />

Stringer, Cherise<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Stringer, Janielle<br />

Walnut Creek, CA<br />

Strosnider, Lee<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Stulting, Joseph<br />

Robert<br />

Palmdale, CA<br />

Talai, Freddie<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

Taylor, Jamie Lee<br />

San Francisco, CA<br />

Tehada, Julie<br />

Alameda, CA<br />

Thomas, Farima<br />

Palmdale, CA<br />

Torio, Terry<br />

Santee, CA<br />

Trulock, Lenora<br />

Lynn<br />

Ridgecrest, CA<br />

Trump, Molly Ann<br />

Martinez, CA<br />

Tufano, Lisa Marie<br />

Rancho Cucamonga,<br />

CA<br />

Valle, Sonia<br />

Chino Hills, CA<br />

Van Zile, Karen<br />

Bellflower, CA<br />

Vanegas, Maria<br />

Rancho Cucamonga,<br />

CA<br />

Vargas, Amanda<br />

Montebello, CA<br />

Vasquez, Mirna<br />

Studio City, CA<br />

Vassallo, Gordon<br />

Arthur<br />

San Francisco, CA<br />

Veach, Erik<br />

Santa Monica, CA<br />

Vincent, Patricia<br />

Lompac, CA<br />

Vu, Thi<br />

Glendale, CA<br />

Wagers, Brenda<br />

Corona, CA<br />

Ward, Chris<br />

Oceanside, CA<br />

Welch, Kiim<br />

Anoka, MN<br />

Wheelwright, Rona-<br />

Leigh<br />

Sandy, UT<br />

Wilbur, Joyce<br />

South Easton, MA<br />

Williams, David<br />

Pell Lake, WI<br />

Williams, Vicki<br />

Boerne, TX<br />

Wilson, Bettine<br />

Chula Vista, CA<br />

Zanardi, Monica<br />

Cedron<br />

Miami, FL<br />

Zeldin, Annette<br />

Culver City, CA<br />

CANINE (CCs)<br />

Colon, Suzan<br />

Old Bridge, NJ<br />

Cristiano, Beth A.<br />

Harrison, NY<br />

Oquendo, Mary<br />

Danbury, CT<br />

frEsHWATEr<br />

(Cffs)<br />

Spangler, Jason<br />

Carl Junction, MO<br />

Spangler, Michael<br />

Joplin, MO<br />

rEPTILE (Crs)<br />

Stratton-Copley,<br />

Dana<br />

Ft. Pierce, FL<br />

8 <strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008


<strong>PIJAC</strong> Plays key<br />

role in Live Animal<br />

Imports Conference<br />

Invasive species are non-native species that<br />

cause or have the potential to cause harm<br />

to the environment, economy, or human<br />

health. Increasingly, regulators and environmental<br />

activists are blaming pet owners and<br />

the pet industry <strong>for</strong> the establishment of<br />

invasive species, especially ornamental fish,<br />

reptiles, and amphibians. <strong>PIJAC</strong> recognizes<br />

that the pet trade has been a contributing<br />

factor in some circumstances and has<br />

become a world leader in ef<strong>for</strong>ts to educate<br />

the industry and pet owners on the importance<br />

of protecting the environment by finding<br />

alternatives to the release of unwanted<br />

pets. <strong>PIJAC</strong> has also been working closely<br />

with governmental and non-governmental<br />

organizations to develop science-based policies<br />

and non-regulatory measures that support<br />

the environment, as well as the public’s<br />

ability to benefit from having companion<br />

animals in their lives.<br />

On May 8-10, the University of Notre<br />

Dame hosted an international conference<br />

on the pre-screening of live animal imports<br />

(pets in particular). The meeting was coorganized<br />

by the Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity (CBD), IUCN Invasive Species<br />

Specialist Group (ISSG), and the Global<br />

Invasive Species Programme (GISP), and<br />

co-sponsored by several other organizations,<br />

including <strong>PIJAC</strong> (with support from<br />

the <strong>Pet</strong> Care Trust). Approximately <strong>for</strong>ty<br />

individuals were invited to participate in<br />

this “experts consultation,” including representatives<br />

of government ministries,<br />

inter-governmental and non-governmental<br />

organizations, academia, and industry. The<br />

pet industry was represented by Drs. Jamie<br />

K. Reaser of <strong>PIJAC</strong> and Alex Ploeg of the<br />

Ornamental Fish International (OFI).<br />

For the first two days, participants<br />

reviewed the best available scientific and<br />

technical approaches, international legal<br />

and institutional frameworks, national<br />

programs and program needs, and data<br />

management and analysis tools to in<strong>for</strong>m<br />

science-based risk assessment of live animals.<br />

Dr. Reaser presented a talk on socioeconomic<br />

considerations <strong>for</strong> pre-screening<br />

of live animal imports.<br />

Drs. Reaser and Ploeg emphasized the<br />

need <strong>for</strong> pre-screening processes to be sci-<br />

ence-based, transparent, comparable, and<br />

inclusive of stakeholders. They also underscored<br />

the need <strong>for</strong> capacity building (e.g.,<br />

many governments do not have adequate<br />

data or finances) and the advantages of governments<br />

working with the pet industry<br />

to proactively develop risk management<br />

approaches [e.g., Habitattitude and the<br />

National Reptile Improvement Plan (NRIP);<br />

www.pijac.org]. They cautioned that several<br />

on-line databases on invasive species rely on<br />

out-dated in<strong>for</strong>mation and include substantial<br />

errors. Thus, they encouraged database<br />

managers and sponsors to find ways to test<br />

<strong>for</strong> accuracy, update in<strong>for</strong>mation in a timely<br />

manner, and reflect in<strong>for</strong>mation quality.<br />

On the third day, participants broke into<br />

working groups and attempted to summarize<br />

the major conclusions and recommendations<br />

arising from the workshop.<br />

While there was a general agreement that<br />

pre-import risk assessment has the potential<br />

to reduce the risk of biological invasion<br />

of live animals, there were differences in<br />

opinion on when (e.g., all imports versus<br />

species new to trade) and how specifically<br />

risk assessments should be conducted.<br />

The general conclusions of the meeting<br />

were released through the Convention on<br />

Biological Diversity (CBD) at a Conference<br />

of Parties in Bonn, Germany, May 19-30,<br />

and are available on-line at: www.issg.org<br />

(click on “Expert Workshop on Live Animal<br />

Imports on the left).<br />

<strong>PIJAC</strong> will continue to engage in the process<br />

as opportunities permit.n<br />

ornamental fish<br />

International Honors<br />

Meyers<br />

o rnamental Fish International, an international<br />

trade association representing<br />

all segments of the ornamental aquatic sector,<br />

honored <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Marshall Meyers with the<br />

OFI Award 2008. The award, which honors<br />

people, companies and organizations who<br />

have contributed to the good of the ornamental<br />

aquatic industry, was handed out at<br />

Interzoo in Nuremburg, Germany and was<br />

given to Marshall <strong>for</strong> the work he has done<br />

on behalf of the pet industry. Gerald Bassleer,<br />

OFI President, specifically noted Marshall’s<br />

work on international panels such as CITES<br />

(the Convention on International Trade in<br />

Endangered Species), ISAC (the Invasive Species<br />

<strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Council</strong>, and CBD (the Convention<br />

on Biological Diversity).<br />

OFI recalled one of Marshall’s first achievements<br />

– in the early 1970s he fought a proposal<br />

to ban the importation of all non-native<br />

species unless the pet industry could prove<br />

that their importation would not injure the<br />

environment, agriculture, or humans. In<br />

the end, the government adopted a policy<br />

that any prohibition has to be science-based.<br />

OFI summed it up well, noting the policy is<br />

one “that has survived the test of time.” The<br />

same can be said <strong>for</strong> much of Marshall’s work<br />

on behalf of our industry.<br />

Congratulations, Marshall! n<br />

OFI's Gerald Bassleer presents the Ornamental Fish International 2008 Award to <strong>PIJAC</strong>'s Marshall Meyers<br />

at Interzoo. Photo by Jamie K. ReaseR<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>Letter/Summer 2008 9


<strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

1220 19th St. NW<br />

Suite 400<br />

Washington, DC 20036<br />

Look <strong>for</strong> Us!<br />

superZoo 2008<br />

Sept. 9-11<br />

Mandalay Bay, Las Vegas<br />

Booth #2438<br />

PLUS – <strong>PIJAC</strong>’s Marshall Meyers at SuperZoo University<br />

Protecting <strong>Pet</strong>s & the <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong><br />

Wednesday, September 10 at 12:00 noon<br />

It goes without saying that without pets we would not have a pet industry. Join Marshall as<br />

he introduces you to the dynamic protection plan that the <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Council</strong><br />

has developed <strong>for</strong> your business and the pet industry. Discover ways to get involved and be<br />

in<strong>for</strong>med about the past, present and future of protecting the pet industry!<br />

PRESIDENT<br />

Elywn Segrest<br />

Segrest Farms<br />

Gibsonton, FL<br />

FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT<br />

Frank Koch<br />

Natural Balance <strong>Pet</strong> Foods<br />

Pacoima, CA<br />

SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT<br />

Ruth Jeffers<br />

Jeffers <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Dothan, AL<br />

SECRETARY/TREASURER<br />

Jeff Sutherland<br />

Central <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Walnut Creek, CA<br />

DIRECTORS<br />

Bill Brant<br />

The Gourmet Rodent<br />

Jonesville, FL<br />

Bruce Cook<br />

Classic Products LLC<br />

Elwood, TN<br />

Ken Hall<br />

<strong>Pet</strong>Smart, Inc.<br />

Phoenix, AZ<br />

James P. Heim<br />

Central Garden & <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Walnut Creek, CA<br />

Roger E. Lambert<br />

Lambriar Inc.<br />

Mahaska, KS<br />

Chuck Latham<br />

Chuck Latham Associates<br />

Parker, CO<br />

Bob Merar<br />

General <strong>Pet</strong> Supply<br />

Milwaukee, WI<br />

Mark Pustizzi<br />

NEMA, Inc.<br />

Hollis, NH<br />

Jim Seidewand<br />

<strong>Pet</strong> World, Inc.<br />

West Henrietta, NY<br />

Gerry Tomas<br />

Tomas Sales & Marketing<br />

Homer Glen, IL<br />

Kevin Whalen<br />

PETCO Inc.<br />

San Diego, CA<br />

ASSOCIATION<br />

REPRESENTATIVES<br />

Joel Adamson (APPMA)<br />

Sergeant’s <strong>Pet</strong> Care<br />

Products, Inc.<br />

Omaha, NE<br />

Backer's 42nd Annual <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong><br />

Christmas Trade show<br />

Donald E. Stephens Convention Center<br />

Rosemont (Chicago), Illinois<br />

October 3-5, 2008<br />

Booth #1442<br />

Ruth Jeffers (WWPIA)<br />

Jeffers <strong>Pet</strong><br />

Dothan, AL<br />

Bob Merar (PIDA)<br />

General <strong>Pet</strong> Supply<br />

Milwaukee, WI<br />

W. Paul Norton (FTFFA)<br />

Norton’s Fisheries<br />

Ruskin, FL<br />

PAST PRESIDENTS<br />

Neill J. Hines<br />

Federal Way, WA<br />

Timothy A. Hovanec,<br />

PhD<br />

Moorpark, CA<br />

Allan Levey<br />

Secaucus, NJ<br />

Joel Martin<br />

Chalfont, PA<br />

Alexandre G. Perrinelle<br />

Los Angeles, CA<br />

EXECUTIVE VICE-PRESIDENT<br />

AND GENERAL COUNSEL<br />

Marshall Meyers<br />

GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS<br />

Marshall Meyers<br />

Michael Maddox<br />

Jeff Plummer<br />

The <strong>Pet</strong>Letter is a member service newsletter published by the<br />

<strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Council</strong> (<strong>PIJAC</strong>), 1220 19th<br />

Street, NW, Suite #400, Washington, DC 20036. Phone<br />

(202) 452-1525, (800) 553-PETS (7387), fax (202) 293-4377.<br />

E-mail info@pijac.org. Web address: www.pijac.org<br />

Your ideas or suggestions regarding <strong>Pet</strong>Letter content can<br />

be sent to Kari Ardolino Rudgers at Kari@pijac.org. Opinions<br />

expressed are those of the staff and do not necessarily reflect<br />

opinions of officers, directors, or members of the <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Copyright ©2008 <strong>Pet</strong> <strong>Industry</strong> <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Quotations or reproduction in any <strong>for</strong>m without express<br />

written permission from <strong>PIJAC</strong> is prohibited.<br />

Printed on recycled paper.<br />

SENIOR SCIENCE AND POLICY<br />

ADVISOR<br />

Dr. Jamie K. Reaser<br />

DIRECTOR OF<br />

ADMINISTRATION AND<br />

CERTIFICATION<br />

Nancy Knutson<br />

DIRECTOR OF MEMBERSHIP<br />

AND COMMUNICATIONS<br />

Kari Ardolino Rudgers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!