03.03.2013 Views

March 2011 - Lrf.co.za

March 2011 - Lrf.co.za

March 2011 - Lrf.co.za

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LRF/BREEDPLAN eNEWS - LRF/BREEDPLAN eNUUS<br />

Vol 1/No1 – <strong>March</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Unless noted otherwise all <strong>co</strong>ntributions by Peter Massmann. Editor: Dr. Michael Bradfield.<br />

Important: Copyright policy<br />

We strive to provide you with valuable information and <strong>co</strong>nsider it a <strong>co</strong>mplement if you make use of it. However, we have to protect our<br />

<strong>co</strong>pyrighted work otherwise it be<strong>co</strong>mes public domain and can be republished by anyone for their profit and without attribution to us. We<br />

therefore request that reproduction of the <strong>co</strong>ntent or parts thereof, directly or indirectly in any medium, is only permissible if the<br />

following is quoted: "Source – Southern Africa LRF/BREEDPLAN eNEWS<br />

Indien nie anders vermeld alle bydraes deur Peter Massmann. Redakteur: Dr. Michael Bradfield<br />

Belangrik: Outeursreg beleid<br />

Ons streef daarna om u van waardevolle inligting te voorsien en beskou dit as 'n kompliment as u daarvan gebruik maak. Maar ons<br />

moet ook ons kopiereg beskerm anders word dit publieke domein en kan deur enigiemand her-gepubliseer word vir hulle wins en<br />

sonder erkenning aan ons. Ons versoek dus dat reproduksie van die inhoud of dele hiervan, direk of indirek in enige medium, slegs<br />

toelaatbaar is met die volgende aanhaling: "Bron - Suidelike Afrika LRF / BREEDPLAN eNUUS<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

eNUUS INHOUD / eNEWS CONTENT<br />

1. Message from the Editor Dr. Michael Bradfield and LRF President Mr. Wessel Hattingh<br />

Editor Dr. Michael Bradfield<br />

"Wel<strong>co</strong>me to the first edition of the LRF/BREEDPLAN eNEWS. This is a joint venture between the LRF Societies and BREEDPLAN®.<br />

Affiliated to BREEDPLAN® is also Dairy Express®, now used by the SA Holstein Society. A number of smallstock societies are also<br />

using the system in Southern Africa. This Newsletter, that will be reproduced on a quarterly basis, also replaces the hard <strong>co</strong>py version<br />

of the BREEDPLAN® News.<br />

I am also pleased to say that Mr Peter Massmann has agreed to help produce eNEWS. His immense knowledge is thus not lost to<br />

industry and if you know Peter as well as I do, we can expect the very best information in an easy to read format.<br />

eNEWS will also assist astute stud and <strong>co</strong>mmercial producers to gain the required knowledge to take their breeding enterprises to<br />

another level. Our aim is to educate and assist producers to <strong>co</strong>mpete with the very best breeders internationally. The information given<br />

here will be from various sources, scientifically sound, practical easy to implement and principle based.<br />

The world of genetics is changing at an enormous pace and it is imperative that you do not fall behind. Southern Africa is the source of<br />

very good genetics and if you are serious about breeding the very best animals, then this eNEWS is very much for you. Happy reading.<br />

Regards Michael<br />

admin@agribsa.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

LRF President Mnr. Wessel Hattingh:<br />

"Baie welkom by ons eerste uitgawe van eNUUS. Die jaar het vir ons baie goed begin met gunstige weersomstandigheid asook 'n<br />

stygende fase in vleis- sowel as graanpryse.<br />

Ons is baie opgewonde met die verskyning van die nuusbrief en die geleentheid wat dit bied om kennis met u te deel. Met Peter<br />

Massmann aan die stuur en Dr. Michael Bradfield as redakteur kan u verseker wees dat u op hoogte gehou sal bly met die nuutste<br />

tegnologie en aktiwiteite in ons bedryf.<br />

Beste Groete Wessel<br />

klipkraal@heilbron.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

2. Het nog nooit van die LRF gehoor nie. Wie, wat, waar is hulle.<br />

LRF staan vir Lewendehawe Registrerende Federasie/ Livestock Registering Federation en dit is in 2000 gestig omdat sekere<br />

genootskappe uit frustrasie met die destyds wetlik verpligte SA Stamboek stelsel hulle eie registrasie/stamboom stelsel tot stand<br />

gebring het.<br />

Stamboek se stoetdier-sertifikaat het vir 70 jaar uit ’n drie-naam 'dier-plus-pa-en-ma' sertifikaat bestaan wat in die laat negentigs nie<br />

meer aan die Simmentaler/Simbra en Santa Gertrudis se vereistes voldoen het nie. Hierdie twee genootskappe het toe hulle eie stelsel


van ’n 30-naam vyf-generasie registrasie sertifikaat binne ’n paar maande ontwikkel. Min of meer dieselfde tyd skep SA Holstein en<br />

Brahman ook hulle eie nuwe moderne stelsel.<br />

Nieteenstaande daarvan dat ons SA Stamboek versoek om as 'assosiasie lede' van hulle oorhoofse SA telers organisasie wil aanbly<br />

deel Stamboek mee dat dit nie moontlik is nie en daar sit ons oornag sonder ’n oorhoofse spreekbuis. Ons vier bestuurders besluit toe<br />

vinnig om ’n nuwe oorkoepelende organisasie buite Stamboek te stig, skryf ’n konstitusie, rapporteer aan ons onderskeie Rade en die<br />

LRF word gestig. Dit klink eenvoudig maar het destyds bloedsweet gekos om ’n 80-jaar gevestigde staatsondersteunde stelsel te<br />

verander omdat dit nie meer aan ons telers se behoeftes voldoen het nie.<br />

Doelstellinge van die LRF<br />

Die bevordering en die beskerming van sy gewone lede se belange as registrerende owerhede, soos na verwys in die Wet; In die<br />

najaag hiervan is die LRF:<br />

• ’n Organisasie van, en mondstuk vir, die stoetdier bedryf verteenwoordig deur sy lede;<br />

• Bevoeg om betrokke te wees in alle sake wat die stoetdier bedryf raak;<br />

• Volkome in beheer in sake van huishoudelike aard;<br />

• Geroepe om enige aangeleentheid wat die stoetdierbedryf raak en wat ook raakpunte het met ander bedryfstakke en<br />

produkte, te bespreek en te oorweeg en aanbevelings met betrekking daartoe aan die betrokke buite instansies voor te lê;<br />

• A-polities.<br />

Die LRF se volle lede en geassosieerde lede sien u hier: www.lrf.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong>/Members.htm (Klik op die genootskap of geassosieerde lid se<br />

embleem vir hulle webblad.<br />

Die LRF se bestuur verkies in November 2010:<br />

Mnr. Wessel Hattingh (Brahman), PRESIDENT klipkraal@heilbron.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

Mnr. Johan Potgieter (Simmentaler & Simbra), VISE-PRESIDENT johan@simmentaler.org<br />

Dr Michael Bradfield (Agri-BSA Sekretariaat) admin@agribsa.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

Addisionele lede van bestuur:<br />

Mnr Llewelyn Angus (Lewenslange Ere-President) langus@vodamail.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

Mev. Charlotte Schuite (Braford) heelbofarms@mweb.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

3. Improvement of the <strong>co</strong>wherd through female selection is not effective. It is 90% more effective<br />

by <strong>co</strong>ntinuously using good bulls.<br />

Choosing a bull from a stud breeder to improve a <strong>co</strong>mmercial <strong>co</strong>wherd is today much easier than before EBVs were dis<strong>co</strong>vered. Why<br />

EBVs? The largest portion of what you see in a bull is <strong>co</strong>ntrolled by the environment (food, management, weather, etc.) and the smaller<br />

portion is due to genetics. Only the genetic <strong>co</strong>mponent is transmitted to his progeny. However, we can’t see this genetic <strong>co</strong>mponent<br />

separately from the environment’s influence and therefore breeders of all breeds all over the word use the BLUP technology to estimate<br />

the genetic <strong>co</strong>mponent and express it as an EBV. As the name implies, Estimated Breeding Value is an estimate of an animal’s value<br />

as a parent for a particular production trait such as growth rate in other words an estimate of how he will breed. The most important<br />

advantage of EBVs is that animals are <strong>co</strong>mparable within a breed, between herds and over years.<br />

I mention above "choosing a bull from a stud breeder". Why? Because pedigrees and performance testing are essential for EBVs and<br />

<strong>co</strong>nsequently stud or pedigree breeding.<br />

The bull is the herd<br />

A long term selection study in the USA has clearly proven the power of bull selection versus selection applied to females. Using<br />

yearling weight, bull selection ac<strong>co</strong>unted for almost 90% of the total genetic improvement. The result is presented in the figure. We<br />

suggest breeders enlighten their <strong>co</strong>mmercial clients about this.


In central Europe they realised the importance of the bull years ago when they introduced the male-licensing-law (Germany, where I<br />

experienced it, introduced in 1930) which stipulates that only licensed males (bulls, boars, stallions, etc) may be used on any type of<br />

female – pure, <strong>co</strong>mmercial or crossbred. Licensing by an independent governmental appointed <strong>co</strong>mmittee of experts is based on<br />

performance and structural <strong>co</strong>rrectness. For the last two decades the performance <strong>co</strong>mponent stipulates positive EBV's with a minimum<br />

accuracy. Bulls without EBVs or with negative EBVs must be slaughtered and everybody is happy with this because this system<br />

<strong>co</strong>ntinually improves their herds and the <strong>co</strong>untries livestock industry.<br />

To ensure sound breeding all EU <strong>co</strong>untries have <strong>co</strong>mpulsory licensing of bulls. The UK also re<strong>co</strong>gnized the value of the bull long ago<br />

by introducing the "Improvement of Livestock (Licensing of Bulls) Act, 1931".<br />

4. Die beste prestasie getoetste bulle, kom ons doop hulle rasleier-bulle, word na elke<br />

BREEDPLAN BLUP analise deur die betrokke telersgenootskappe bekendgestel. Dit is bulle wat<br />

volgens hulle eie prestasie, die prestasie van verwante en/of op grond van hulle nageslag se<br />

prestasie in een of meer eienskappe binne die ras uitblink. Hoe word hulle gekies en waar<br />

word die besonderhede gepubliseer.<br />

Rasleier-bulle (1) word geïdentifiseer op grond van hulle beraamde teelwaardes (EBV's) wat deur BREEDPLAN saamgestel word uit<br />

stamboom en prestasietoetsdata wat oor baie jare deur telers aan hulle genootskappe voorsien is. Die groot voordeel van BLUP<br />

teelwaardes is dat diere van dieselfde ras wat in verskillende jare, seisoene en kuddes gebore is met mekaar vergelykbaar is.<br />

Bulle wat op grond van hulle teelwaardes met ’n hoë akkuraatheid (2) in een of meer eienskappe uitblink word dan as ’n rasleier<br />

bekendgestel. BREEDPLAN se wetenskaplikes waarsku egter dat rasleiers nie noodwendig bedoel is om die beste diere in ’n teler se<br />

teelprogram te identifiseer nie. Telers moet self die bes moontlike kombinasie van teelwaardes vir hulle kuddes bepaal. Sien 'LRF tips'<br />

hieronder.<br />

Watter bulle word gepubliseer<br />

• Die lys van gepubliseerde vaders (Herdbook Sires) bevat bulle met nageslag gebore in die laaste drie jaar en ’n<br />

akkuraatheid van ten minste 75% in een van die groei eienskappe (riglyn - verskil tussen rasse). By elke bul is ’n eienaarnommer<br />

wat op ’n ander lys tesame met volle besonderhede van eienaars gepubliseer word. Die bulle word volgens telers<br />

gelys. In hierdie sowel as al ondervermelde lyste word die rasleier-eienskap aangedui deur die betrokke EBVs in ‘n blokkie te<br />

plaas.<br />

• Spesiaal geselekteerde jongbulle (Selected Junior Bulls) wat in ’n spesifieke jaar gebore is (sien links onderaan die lys) gelys<br />

volgens telers. Die teelwaarde en rangorde kwalifikasie vereistes is van u genootskap beskikbaar. Hierdie is bulle wat u moet<br />

dophou.<br />

• Rasleiers vir die verskillende eienskappe gelys volgens teelwaardes. Indien van toepassing word enige ander rasleier<br />

eienskappe in ’n blokkie vertoon. Vereistes en eienskappe verskil tussen rasse en die volgende is net ’n riglyn (nader u<br />

genootskap vir kwalifikasie besonderhede):<br />

Om as ’n leier vir 200, 400 en 600-dae-gewig; melk; skrotum omvang of karkasgewig te kwalifiseer moet die bul ten minste<br />

75% akkuraatheid vir die eienskap toon en binne die top 10% van die ras lê vir daardie eienskap.<br />

Leiers vir geboortegewig moet in die onderste 30% van die ras lê, maar moet ook in die top 50% lê vir ten minste een van die<br />

groei eienskappe (gemeet op 200, 400 & 600 dae).<br />

Die eienskappe wat vir elke bul aangeteken is, word ook getoon maar verskil tussen rasse. Die kodes is dragtigheids- lengte<br />

(G), geboortegewig (B), 200-dae groei (2), 400-dae gewig (4), 600-dae gewig (6), skrotumomvang (S) en ultrasoniese<br />

skandering rekords vir oogspier- area (E), ribvet (R), kruisvet (P) en tussenspiervet (I). (3)<br />

• Spesiale leiers met ras-spesifieke kwalifikasies: Daar is genootskappe wat ook ander leiers nomineer soos bv. bulle met<br />

raseie gebalanseerde teelwaarde - die 'Balanced Trait Leaders'. Persoonlik was ek ’n voorstander van hierdie leiers.<br />

Geluk aan al die telers van rasleiers, dit is iets waarop u trots kan wees.<br />

LRF tips<br />

Indien jy byvoorbeeld ’n 'melk-bul' soek, kies ’n rasleier in melk maar bestudeer ook sy ander teelwaardes. Let ook op die 'Statistics'<br />

kolomme waar onder andere die getal kuddes waarin hy gebruik is en die aantal nageslag gepubliseer word sowel as die akkuraathede<br />

(2) .<br />

'Copy' dan die ID van die bul op die betrokke lys en 'paste' dit in die 'Animal Identifier' veld van die genootskap se dier-opkyk-fasiliteit vir<br />

volledige stamboom en ander besonderhede van die bul. Hier vind jy ook die moeder en haar nageslag se besonderhede. Oorweeg al<br />

die besonderhede om te bepaal hoe die bul by jou behoeftes inpas.<br />

Opkyk fasiliteite is hier beskikbaar - onder jou ras se embleem kies 'Animal Enquiry':<br />

Suid-Afrika - Kliek hier


Namibië - Kliek hier<br />

(1)<br />

My eie benaming wat van telersgenootskappe se benaming mag verskil. Die wêreldwye Engelse benamings is: Trail leader<br />

of sire leader.<br />

(2) Die akkuraatheid of betroubaarheid van ‘n teelwaarde word in ’n % syfer uitgedruk wat in die rasleier-lyste onder die<br />

teelwaarde gepubliseer word. Hoe hoër die syfer hoe beter.<br />

(3) Vir die na-geboortegewig gewigte, kan twee rekords vir elk aangeteken word. Indien die bul een waarneming vir ’n eienskap<br />

het, word ’n letter gedruk (bv. ’n letter W verteenwoordig een waarneming vir 200-Dae Gewig). Vir twee waarnemings vir die<br />

eienskap, word die nommer 2 gedruk. ’n Oop spasie dui aan dat die bul nie vir hierdie eienskap gemeet is nie.<br />

Waar word rasleiers gepubliseer.<br />

Simmentaler: Kliek hier<br />

Simbra: Kliek hier<br />

Brahman: Kliek hier<br />

Limousin: Kliek hier<br />

Brangus: Kliek hier<br />

Braford: Gaan dit binnekort implementeer.<br />

Namibia NSV: Die onderskeie rasse se trait leader bulle word nie apart gepubliseer nie. Wanneer ’n dier op die web opgekyk word is<br />

trait leaders se eienskap in blou gemerk. Nader Jacque Els (061-235168) vir meer besonderhede.<br />

Holstein : Die beste BVI bulle word elke ses maande opdateer - Kliek hier<br />

5. Wrong EBV's, who is to blame. Why do some breeders cheat themselves, and their stud bulls,<br />

by in<strong>co</strong>rrect re<strong>co</strong>rding? Performance testing breeders should read here, as well as serious bullbuyers.<br />

If you ask me, after 35 years of direct involvement, about my biggest headache in local performance re<strong>co</strong>rding I will respond with (i)<br />

selective testing and (ii) improper <strong>co</strong>ntemporary-grouping. Let's discuss the last mentioned one next time.<br />

Selective testing also referred to as in<strong>co</strong>mplete reporting, leads to biased and wrong EBV's. Complete reporting for every animal<br />

reported at birth (birth notification) and still on the farm at time of reporting is critical for the BLUP evaluation. For example at weaning<br />

all calves are weighed/s<strong>co</strong>red including those culled for whatever reason and sold to the feedlot and not just those that are good<br />

enough for registration. By only weighing "the better" animals breeders are not making their herd better, they are actually punishing<br />

their better animals because their inferior <strong>co</strong>ntemporaries are not weighed. Even more distressing is the 'wrong' influence this has on<br />

the EBV's of the sires whose poorer performing calves are not reported. In fact, my personal re<strong>co</strong>mmendation is "either weigh all the<br />

animals, including culls, or don’t weigh at all". Refer to the table below.<br />

A <strong>co</strong>uple overseas societies have a fee structure which favours the THE-system (Total Herd Reporting). This boils down to cheaper<br />

fees for <strong>co</strong>ws whose calves are weighed at weaning and en<strong>co</strong>urages submission of all births and subsequent weighing of every calf at<br />

weaning – wonderful system.<br />

Breeders need assistance.<br />

I used to check selective testing after every analysis for every breeder by <strong>co</strong>mparing the number of calves born in a year (birth<br />

notifications) to those weighed subsequently at weaning. The idea of this system was to bring selective testing under the attention of<br />

the relevant breeders and advice them of the <strong>co</strong>rrect procedure. It is amazing how many so called 'performance test breeders' weighed<br />

less than 50% of calves reported at birth later at weaning.<br />

Why do local breeders do this?<br />

Maybe tradition caused by an 'only the best' attitude. Only send the best to phase C or only present the best to the inspector.<br />

Or perhaps "I don’t want the office to see my low weights" or "I sell my culls to the feedlot, why weigh them". I think the main reason is<br />

a lack of guidance by breed society advisors.<br />

"The integrity of an EBV is dependent upon the integrity of the information submitted. Garbage in, garbage out."<br />

Table: Don’t cheat yourself and make animals worse than they are.


Bull<br />

no<br />

SELECTIVE WEIGHING leads to in<strong>co</strong>rrect EBV's<br />

(In this example we disregard information on relatives)<br />

Complete reporting<br />

Weigh all weaners including culls<br />

In<strong>co</strong>mplete reporting<br />

Only weigh the heaviest. Culled animals sold to feedlot<br />

not weighed.<br />

Weight EBV Weight EBV<br />

1 230 7 230 3<br />

2 220 4 220 0<br />

3 210 1 210 -3<br />

4 205 -1 Not weighed No EBV<br />

5 196 -4 Not weighed No EBV<br />

6 185 -7 Not weighed No EBV<br />

Ave 208 220<br />

When only the top 3 calves are weighed (right) the whole group is negatively affected because the group<br />

average has risen. The +7 bull 1 now be<strong>co</strong>mes an in<strong>co</strong>rrect +3.<br />

6. Holsteins eerste in melkproduksie. Die jongste melkaantekening syfers vir SA suiwel koeie.<br />

Vergeleke met alle geregistreerde melkaangetekende suiwel rasse (1) vaar die SA Holstein baie goed. Hier die jongste syfers per<br />

laktasie vir Holstein met alle suiwel rasse tussen hakkies is:<br />

29 000 (67 000) laktasies, 9567 (7435) kg melk, 359 (306) kg bottervet en 305 (254) kg protein.<br />

Holstein spog met die grootste bees-wêreld federasie. Van die 40 ledelande beklee Suid-Afrika wat melkproduksie betref na Israel, die<br />

VSA, Kanada, Swede en Denemarke die sesde plek.<br />

Die kg vet en protein vir die twee getalsterkte geregistreerde rasse word in die grafiek vertoon. Geregistreerde Holstein boere het kg<br />

vet/protein oor tien jaar met 22% verhoog – geluk!<br />

(1) L.N.R. melkaantekening jaarverslag<br />

Praat van melk. ’n Deense Holstein koei het met twee kalwings 101 251 kg melk (3.3% vet/3.2% protein) in ’n produksie periode van<br />

2386 dae geproduseer. Dit is meer as 42 kg per dag!


7. Google "Leachman Cattle of Colorado" and you get 9400 results. Dr. Bradfield persuaded a very<br />

busy Mr. Leachman to speak at the <strong>2011</strong> LRF Stockman's school (his trip sponsored by Unistel).<br />

'Lee' Leachman II graduated from Harvard University with an Honors BA in E<strong>co</strong>nomics in 1988 and in animal breeding at Colorado<br />

State University in 1992. For 11 years Mr. Leachman has served as the CEO of Leachman Cattle Company with annual sales of R100<br />

mil. In 2003, Lee formed Leachman Cattle of Colorado, a studstock marketing <strong>co</strong>mpany. Leachman Cattle is respected worldwide as a<br />

leader in objective selection criteria and Lee’s primary duties include determining genetic selection objectives, financial planning, and<br />

overall <strong>co</strong>mpany management. Lee travels extensively within the US and globally to advise cattle breeding operations. In 2010,<br />

Leachman launched a new <strong>co</strong>ntract breeding initiative know as the Bull Improvement Company in Paraguay, Brazil, and Australia.<br />

For this edition of eNEWS I asked Mr. Leachman a few questions:<br />

• What is the most important trait?<br />

Profit. Most EBVs measure output, but not <strong>co</strong>st. In<strong>co</strong>me does not equal profit. More and more EBV's will be expressed in dollar<br />

terms – some will measure profit.<br />

• For how many years has the Leachman name been in the beef cattle business?<br />

My grandfather and namesake, Lee Leachman, graduated from Ohio State University in 1940 and started his Angus operation.<br />

In 1971, my father, Jim Leachman, started Leachman Cattle Company in Billings. In 2003, I started Leachman Cattle of<br />

Colorado .<br />

• During your term with Leachman cattle <strong>co</strong>mpany, how many bulls did you sell per year?<br />

Our Spring Sale featured 1400 bulls and 700 yearling heifers. Per year, we market a total of just over 3,200 bulls.<br />

• The biggest challenge for beef cattle producers?<br />

Managing volatility and rising input <strong>co</strong>sts is the #1 challenge.<br />

• The most important method to improve the profitability of a <strong>co</strong>mmercial beef cattle enterprise?<br />

Controlling <strong>co</strong>sts is the key to profitability. Ranchers can <strong>co</strong>ntrol their <strong>co</strong>sts, but they cannot <strong>co</strong>ntrol the price in the<br />

marketplace. Even if ranch productivity is rising at a steady rate, the inevitable market fluctuations will challenge cash flow<br />

and profitability. As such, the only way to ensure profitability is to keep your <strong>co</strong>st structure low. In practical terms, this means<br />

raising cattle that can reproduce and grow at high levels with a minimum of supplemental feed, labour, and other inputs. Your<br />

genetic selection should ensure that your cattle have rising output while maintaining or reducing the amount of inputs required.<br />

Thanks Mr. Leachman<br />

8. Bewaar populêre bloedlyne vir DNA-merker doeleindes. LRF rasgenootskappe behoort ’n genebank<br />

te stig.<br />

Deesdae is genetiese merkers die populêrste tema op buitelandse bees-kongresse. DNA-merker navorsing en kommersialisering<br />

vorder geweldig vinnig en veral getalsterk stoet rasse soos die Amerikaanse en Australiese Angus raak al hoe meer betrokke tot<br />

uiteindelik voordeel van hulle rasse en telers. Meer en meer merkers word ontdek en wêreldleiers in genetiese evaluering soos<br />

BREEDPLAN gebruik hierdie nuwe tegnologie tesame met 'konvensionele prestasietoets' teelwaardes om meer akkurater teelwaardes<br />

te skep. Gaan hare die skaal vervang? Ek glo nie. Lees gerus die 'Genomics' artikel in Engels in hierdie eNUUS.<br />

Het dit nie tyd geword vir rasse met ’n groot prestasietoets-databasis om hulle populêre bulle se DNA in ’n veilige LRF-DNA-bank te<br />

stoor. Dit sal besmoontlik oormôre gebruik word om merkers te identifiseer. Ek het Dr. M Bradfield die LRF Administrateur se<br />

kommentaar hieroor gevra:<br />

"Tans word meer as 80% van alle navorsing in teling aan DNA merker tegnologie gespits. Die inkorporering van DNA merkers in<br />

teelwaardes is ’n realiteit. Sagtheid van vleis word byvoorbeeld reeds deur BREEDPLAN in Australiese Brahmane teelwaardes<br />

geïnkorporeer. Oorsee word DNA merkers vir beide Holstein en Jersey ook in teelwaardes inkorporeer. Die informasie wat vanaf DNA<br />

merkers verkry word beïnvloed veral die syfers van jong bulle. Alle indikasies wys daarop dat DNA merkers die toekoms van teling<br />

drasties gaan verander. Hoekom is dit dus belangrik dat rasse DNA monsters moet stoor.<br />

• Dit is goedkoop en ’n goeie en noodsaaklike belegging vir die toekoms.<br />

• Vandag se bulle bepaal more se genetika. Met die groot spronge wat gemaak word in die getal “gene” en genetiese merkers<br />

wat geïdentifiseer word sal dit in die toekoms moontlik wees om vandag se bulle te toets om die invloed op die nageslag te<br />

bepaal.<br />

• DNA in ’n databank sal sorg dat die akkuraatheid van teelwaardes drasties sal kan verbeter indien die genetika van die<br />

voorgeslagte bepaal kan word. Teelwaardes word bepaal deur die dier se eie prestasie, die prestasie van die voorgeslag<br />

asook nageslag. Indien die DNA informasie van die voorgeslagte later bekend word sal dit in die syfers inkorporeer word..<br />

• Gene met ’n nadelige of resessiewe geen (siekte) sal vinniger opgespoor kan word.<br />

• Dit kan moontlik diversiteit behou. Seleksie lyne sterf voortdurend uit en genetiese materiaal kan toelaat dat die lyne weer<br />

geskep kan word of ten minste identifiseer watter lyne gebruik moet word. Dit a.g.v die enorme moontlikhede wat kloning vir<br />

die veebedryf kan inhou.


• Indien genetiese merkers bepaal word wat produksie drasties beïnvloed sal rasse kan opspoor hoe die merkers in die<br />

populasie segregeer.<br />

• Dit sal die identifisering van DNA merkers met n invloed op produksie eienskappe kan bepaal. DNA tesame met die fisiese<br />

produksie word benodig om die invloed van genetiese merkers te bepaal." (Einde)<br />

Dr. Munro Marx van Unistel (die LRF se lab) is ook vir kommentaar oor ’n LRF-DNA bank versoek:<br />

"Ontwikkelings op die gebied van genomiese DNA ontledings vind teen ‘n ongelooflike tempo plaas en toetse wat twee jaar gelede<br />

uiters progressief was, is vandag ou nuus. Neem byvoorbeeld die 56 merker GeneStar profile. Twee jaar terug was die toets die “goue<br />

standard”. ‘n Jaar later verskyn die 3 000 merker Igenity toets wat 13 verskillende ekonomies belangrike kenmerke se genetiese<br />

potensiaal voorspel. Net 6 maande later word die 50 000 merker toets vrygestel en vandag praat hulle reeds van die 700 000 tot 900<br />

000 merkertoets wat binne kort vrygestel gaan word. Dit is dus duidelik dat genomiese DNA profiele ‘n nuwe dimensie aan seleksie- en<br />

teelprogamme gaan bied.<br />

Die stoor van genetiese material (semen, hare en DNA) is dus van uiterste belang om te verseker dat top bulle se DNA bewaar word en<br />

onmiddellik beskikbaar is vir wanneer nodig. Beestelers sal deeglik kennis moet neem van hierdie nuwe tegnologie. Dit is hier om te<br />

bly! Dit gaan al hoe toepasliker word en produsente wat nie hul beeste toets en die resultate aanwend gaan stagneer en agter raak.”<br />

Hieruit kan u sien dat so ’n DNA-Bank belangrik vir ’n ras kan wees. Ons beveel aan dat genootskappe hierna kyk en georganiseerde<br />

aksies loots. Telers kan Unistel direk nader (021 938 9213) vir Guthrie kaarte, spesiale bruin koevert en inskrywings vorm. Sterthare<br />

werk die beste maar sorg dat hulle droog en skoon is. Trek 20-30 hare MET groot haarwortels en moet nie aan die wortels vat nie.<br />

Monster kan korter geknip word maar stuur die deel met die wortels aan. Plaas in spesiale koevert (nie plastiek sakkie nie), verseël en<br />

merk onmiddellik met dier se besonderhede.<br />

Unistel en die LRF sal ’n spesiale prys vir so ’n DNA-Bank onderhandel.<br />

9. The beef cattle stud industry reaches a 20 year high. What's happening in the stud industry.<br />

Which breeds types are dominating.<br />

Its going well with the SA beef cattle stud industry (1) . Total females over two years (hereafter females) in procession of breeders<br />

increased in the last decade with 30% to 275 000 of 35 breeds and 3200 breeders which gives you an average of 86 females per<br />

breeder. Breeders increased in the same period by 17%. Bearing in mind the unique advantage pedigree <strong>co</strong>mbined with performance<br />

re<strong>co</strong>rding has in determining breeding values or ' how will he breed', this trend should <strong>co</strong>ntinue if the Dpt. of Agriculture with its<br />

provincial associates, private role players and the stud breeders will propagate the advantages of using good bulls.<br />

I wonder why? Any idea for the decline from the 240 000's in early 1900's to 180 000s in early 2000. Would like to hear from you –<br />

cpeterm@iafrica.<strong>co</strong>m<br />

Breeds with more than 5000 females today which showed an increase of 100% plus in the last decade are in alphabetical order<br />

Beefmaster, Boran, Brangus, Nguni and Simbra – well done.<br />

Breed types<br />

Based on international re<strong>co</strong>gnized breed type groups the current relation in South Africa (2) is Tropical 80% (up from 74% ten years<br />

ago), Continental 12% (down from 16%) and British 8% (down from 10%). The most important breeds within these types are:


Tropical (80%) <strong>co</strong>nsisting of Bonsmara, Nguni en Brahman (jointly 54% within this group), Afrigus, Afrikaner, Afrisim, Beefmaster,<br />

Boran, Braford, Brangus, Charbray, Drakensberger, Huguenot, Sanganer, Santa Gertrudis, Simbra, Senepol and Tuli.<br />

Continental (12%) <strong>co</strong>nsisting of Simmentaler (63% within group), Braunvieh, Charolais, Chianina, Gelbvieh, Limousin, Pinzgauer,<br />

Romagnola and Salers.<br />

British (8%)<br />

Angus, Hereford (jointly 65%), Beef Shorthorn, Dexter, Red Poll, South Devon, Sussex and Wagyu (Australian).<br />

Comparable breed type data for selected <strong>co</strong>untries are presented in the figure. The details for Namibia (3) : Tropical (79%) mainly<br />

Brahman, Simbra and Bonsmara with eight others. Continental (19%) made up of nearly 70% Simmentaler and five others. British (2%)<br />

made up of Angus 47% and three others.<br />

Top-3 dominate the industry<br />

In many <strong>co</strong>untries the beef stud industry is determined by around 30 breeds but essentially by only 3. This dominance is shown in the<br />

following figure for a few <strong>co</strong>untries. (Namibian animals under SA Societies included under Namibia).


The top-3 in order of females are:<br />

South Africa: Bonsmara, Nguni and Brahman.<br />

Namibia: Brahman, Simbra and Bonsmara.<br />

Australia: Angus, Hereford and Brahman.<br />

USA: Angus, Charolais and Hereford.<br />

Top-5 in membership 25 years ago and today.<br />

Unfortunately I don't have female figures for a ¼ century ago and have to take number of active breeders which is not necessarily a<br />

good measurement of the number of females. For example, the average females per breeder for the top-20 breeds varies from 40 to<br />

203.<br />

The top-5 twenty five years ago were in order of membership: Brahman, Simmentaler, Hereford, Bonsmara and Afrikaner.<br />

Today in order of membership: Brahman, Nguni, Bonsmara, Simmentaler and Simbra.<br />

(1) Includes Namibian Simmentaler, Simbra and some Santa Gertrudis, Brangus.<br />

(2) Here I excluded animals of all Namibian breeders – They are included in the Namibian stats<br />

(3) Included Simmentaler, Simbra, Bonsmara and Santa's registered by SA Society.<br />

Sources: ARC Reports; J.Els,NSBA; NPLC, USA; ARCBA, Austrlia and own notes/stats accumulated over years.<br />

10. Suider-Afrika se populêrste internet stoetbees diensverskaffer verby die miljoen kerf. Die<br />

populariteit van enige webtuiste word gemeet aan die getal gebruikers of aantal transaksies. Die<br />

LRF/BREEDPLAN rasse in Suid-Afrika en Namibië se webtuistes het verlede jaar vir die eerste<br />

keer ’n miljoen transaksies oorskry. Hoekom die populariteit en watter rasse staan uit.<br />

Nog ’n groot voordeel van die BREEDPLAN stelsel is hulle fantastiese internet-gebruikers platform waar<br />

’n magdom inligting gratis en sonder lastige registrasie of wagwoorde aan almal beskikbaar gestel word.<br />

Hierdie informasie bevat omvangryke prestasie en stamboom inligting van elke dier, lewendig of dood,<br />

aktief of gekanselleer. Volle besonderhede van alle telers word vinnig bereik en as jy op ’n teler se e-pos<br />

adres klik open jou e-pos program outomaties. Aangesien die meeste gebruikers volgens my ervaring<br />

nog nie bewus is van hierdie en ander dienste sal veral soek-fasiliteite wat volgens die gebruiker se<br />

behoefte opgestel kan word d.m.v. hierdie eNUUS bekend gestel word.<br />

Terug na die miljoen 'hits' rekord. Die LRF-rasse van Namibië en Suid-Afrika se transaksies is verlede<br />

jaar met 14% na 1 018 000 verhoog. Hierdie sluit net BREEDPLAN transaksies in en NIE besoeke na<br />

ander inligting op rasse se webtuistes. ’n Paar afleidings:<br />

• Daar is ook ’n nuwe maandelikse rekord opgestel toe in Augustus 2010 meer 110 000 transaksies plaasgevind het.


• In Suid-Afrika het die Brahman die meeste transaksies gevolg deur Simmentaler en Simbra (laasgenoemde twee sluit Namibië<br />

in). Interessant, al drie rasse wat sterk op hulle BREEDPLAN komper veilings-dienste konsentreer.<br />

• By die groot aantal Namibiese rasse het Brahman nagenoeg ¾ van alle transaksies aangeteken gevolg deur die Braunvieh en<br />

Nguni.<br />

• Die grootste jaarlikse toename by rasse met meer as 10 000 transaksies was Holstein 43%, SA Brangus 30% en SA/Namibië<br />

Simmentaler met 25%.<br />

BREEDPLAN voorsien aan web-administrateurs ’n funksie waardeur die populariteit van die verskillende web-dienste gemonitor kan<br />

word. Dit is veral die volgende dienste wat aandag trek:<br />

• Soos vermeld het die rasse met die meeste "BREEDPLAN- stelsel veilings" ook die meeste hits. Die binne-veiling soekfunksie<br />

na spesifieke diere sal in die volgende eNUUS bespreek word, dit werk fantasties.<br />

• Opkyk van stambome tot sovêr as 12 generasies (hang af van hoeveel die genootskap destyds opgeneem het);<br />

• Teelwaarde navrae in tabel of skets vorm sowel as ’n soekfunksie na diere wat aan sekere prestasie vereistes voldoen en<br />

• Besonderhede van koeie se nageslag en ’n soekfunksie na alle nageslag wat ’n bul geteel het.<br />

Veilings op die BREEDPLAN stelsel 2010<br />

Dit is seker een van die voordeligste BREEDPLAN dienste omdat die gebruiker ’n aantal fasiliteite binne veilings verband kan gebruik.<br />

Nog ’n voordeel is dat al die besonderhede direk van die stelsel kom m.a.w. daar kan nie "foute in die katalogus wees nie". In 2010 is<br />

die volgende veiling katalogusse binne die BREEDPLAN stelsel (m.a.w. nie net ’n pamflet op die web nie) saamgestel en vryelik aan<br />

enige belangstellende d.m.v. die web beskikbaar gestel.<br />

1. Simmentaler 43 veilings (met oor die 40 000 hits net vir veilings).<br />

2. Simbra 35 veilings.<br />

3. Brahman 31 veilings (55 000 hits).<br />

4. SA Holstein hou soos alle suiwelrasse nie baie veilings nie maar publiseer hulle nasionale en ’n paar ander op hulle web volgens<br />

die BREEDPLAN stelsel.<br />

Namibia. Die NSV verskaf die inligting aan die betrokke Afslaers Huise. Dit sluit die stamboom, reproduksie en teelwaarde inligting in,<br />

wat dan deur die Afslaers in hulle katalogusse gepubliseer word. Veilingsdienste op van die rasse se webtuiste sal uitgebrei word.<br />

11. Why is weaning-time the most important weighing/re<strong>co</strong>rding time for the BREEDPLAN breeder?<br />

Because weaning weight is <strong>co</strong>mpulsory and a <strong>co</strong>uple of other very important traits can only be<br />

re<strong>co</strong>rded at weaning before calves are culled and sold. Do I weigh the calf at exactly 200 days or<br />

can I reduce weighing to only a few times a year.<br />

At around 200 days of age, there are a few re<strong>co</strong>rds that should be <strong>co</strong>llected from every animal re<strong>co</strong>rded at birth. I assume breeders<br />

reported every birth by an active <strong>co</strong>w (update <strong>co</strong>ws ICP and days to calving re<strong>co</strong>rd) regardless how bad the calf is. The larger the group<br />

the better and therefore BREEDPLAN allows an age range of 100 to 300 days for weaning. If weaned and unweaned calves are<br />

weighed together they should be flagged/indicated as a weaned and unweaned group.<br />

What re<strong>co</strong>rds can we measure at weaning time?<br />

This will depend on your breed society policy and your breeding aims but BREEDPLAN can handle the following if adequate data is<br />

available:<br />

• The most important weight of all is the weaning weight which is used for the 200-day weight EBV. Because of a genetic<br />

<strong>co</strong>rrelations between weaning and other weights, re<strong>co</strong>rding at weaning also helps to improve the accuracy of other weight<br />

EBVs. It also provides information to all pedigree and <strong>co</strong>ntemporaries.<br />

• In general we do not only aim for heavy weaners but also for mothers which wean a heavy calf relative to their weight. This is<br />

only measureable if the mothers are also weighed at weaning for a mature <strong>co</strong>w weight (MCW) EBV. (I prefer a +12 weaner<br />

with a +25 MCW dam to a +16/+40 <strong>co</strong>mbination). Also read the article on MCW in this eNEWS.<br />

• The 200-day weight is also the <strong>co</strong>ntributing weight used to estimate the MILK EBV This provides an estimate of the maternal<br />

<strong>co</strong>ntribution of a dam to the 200 day weight of her calf. In the case of sires, this estimates the maternal <strong>co</strong>ntribution that his<br />

daughters will make to the 200 day weight of their progeny.<br />

• Sheath/naval s<strong>co</strong>re, ac<strong>co</strong>rding to the society s<strong>co</strong>re card, is done when calves are weighed and before they are culled for this<br />

trait.<br />

• Simultaneously with weighing and sheath s<strong>co</strong>re, animals can also be s<strong>co</strong>red for temperament by the breeder ac<strong>co</strong>rding to the<br />

society s<strong>co</strong>re-chart.<br />

What about s<strong>co</strong>ring at inspection<br />

Please note that docility, sheath and all other structural s<strong>co</strong>res at inspection are not used for the BLUP analysis because it is selective<br />

testing (see article in this eNEWS) which will lead to in<strong>co</strong>rrect EBVs because animals with problems are culled long before inspection. I<br />

investigated this bias re<strong>co</strong>rding in a few breeds and found that only between 3-4 bulls reported at birth are presented to the inspector. I<br />

suggest "BLUP is more interested in the s<strong>co</strong>re of the 6 to 7 culled ones".<br />

Another facet of inspection s<strong>co</strong>res is that animals are often older than the analysis cut off age and unusable.


12. Is mooi uiers by suiwel beeste net mooi of ook funksioneel?<br />

Alle suiwel rasse punt uiers vir verskeie eienskappe. So bv. punt SA Holstein klassifiseerders ongeveer 16 000 koeie jaarliks vir agt<br />

verskillende eienskappe van 1 tot 9. Suiwel rasse het gevind dat daar ’n verband is tussen die somatiese sel telling, wat ook gemeet<br />

word, en uiers. Die mooi uier is meer funksioneel.<br />

In Oostenryk punt hulle jaarliks 12 000 eerste kalf Simmentalers en het hulle ook ’n hoë korrelasie tussen somatiese EBV's en uier-<br />

EBVs gevind (in sentraal Europa word alle Simmentalers gemelk). Alhoewel somatiese telling ’n goeie barometer van mastitis is<br />

(genetiese korrelasie 0.70), vertel dit nie die hele storie nie en is somaties ook nie ’n goeie barometer van kliniese (akute) mastitis nie.<br />

Dr. C Fuerst van Oostenryk het die verband tussen uier punting en werklike voorkoms van mastitis bepaal.<br />

Hy het 6880 eerstekalf-koeie koeie volgens hulle stelsel vir ’n aantal uier eienskappe gepunt, dit in een uier teelwaarde vasgelê en ook<br />

mastitis voorkoms in elk van hierdie koeie gemonitor. Die bevindinge is toe statisties ontleed en het getoon dat daar ’n baie goeie<br />

verband tussen hulle uier klassifikasie en die werklike voorkoms van mastitis bestaan. Sien Fuerst se grafiek – uiers word van 1<br />

(pateties) to 9 (ideaal) gepunt en KI bulle se moeders moet ten minste ’n 6 kry.<br />

13. Expert on advantages of using performance tested bulls. This should also be very informative<br />

to your <strong>co</strong>mmercial bull buyer.<br />

The reader will gather that there are a few <strong>co</strong>ntributions on the financial rewards for farmer and <strong>co</strong>untry in using good bulls. For that<br />

reason the approved bull with superior genetic merit plays for years already an important role in many <strong>co</strong>untries. Here a summary from<br />

a statement by Dr. Rob Banks the Manager of Genetics of Australian Meat & Livestock.<br />

"Buying better genetics is the easiest and most reliable way for <strong>co</strong>mmercial producers to improve their bottom line. Commercial<br />

producers should look to buy bulls from breeders who have a strong track re<strong>co</strong>rd of using BREEDPLAN. They are the ones that will<br />

have more bulls with higher $Index-values within their respective breeds. Accelerating genetic progress through BREEDPLAN <strong>co</strong>uld<br />

earn the Australian beef industry an additional $50 million (R350m) annually".<br />

Rob advice to stud breeders is:" To keep increasing the rate of progress breeders need to use the best bulls for traits that would make<br />

money for their clients, make better use of high merit young bulls, use the best bulls and replace them as soon as there is something<br />

beter."<br />

14. Fase C groeitoets deelname daal. In die dae voor BLUP was daar meriete in hierdie toetse,<br />

vandag nie. Teel die fase C goue meriete beter as die dood gewone fase C bul?<br />

Die deelname aan fase C bul groeitoetsing deur LRF rasse (ingesluit Santa Gertrudis wat by die L.N.R. prestasie toets) het van net<br />

onder die 500 tien jaar gelede na 75 gedaal. BREEDPLAN bevorder nie fase C toetsing nie omdat die beste bul uit sy groep geneem<br />

word om op ’n toetssentrum getoets te word met 'enkelgroep-groepering' as gevolg. Dit dra glad nie by tot sy EBV nie en die bul kry


gevolglik ’n lae akkuraatheid wat later, tot ontsteltenis van die eienaar, baie kan verander. Dit is jammer want dis meestal die teler se<br />

bulle met die beste potensiaal. Wat sê die kenners:<br />

Dr M Bradfield onderskraag deur Prof F Neser:<br />

"Voor die ontdekking van EBVs was dit onmoontlik om diere oor verskillende groepe, jare, seisoene en kuddes te vergelyk. Die<br />

enigste logiese manier van vergelyking was om jong bulle vanaf verskillende telers in 'n sentrale toetsstasie (Fase C soos Irene,<br />

Armoedsvlakte, Omatjenne, ens) saam te toets. Daar is egter nooit voldoende voorsiening gemaak vir voorspeense verskille nie.<br />

Onder andere het kalwers van koeie met min melk, kalwers uit verse en kalwers sonder kruipvoeding 'n agterstand gehad wat hulle<br />

finale indekse kon beïnvloed."<br />

Dr. W Shaefer Hoof prestasietoetsing VSA Simmentaler:<br />

"Peter jy het my gevra waarom daar nog enkele rasse is wat bulle op stasies toets. EBV's is sonder twyfel die belangrikste seleksie<br />

hulpmiddel in die bedryf en by vere die beste metode om bulle met mekaar te vergelyk. Omdat stasie-toetsing geneig is om<br />

kontemporêre groepe op te breek, kan 'n mens met redelike sekerheid sê dat bultoetse genetiese evaluasie teenwerk Daar is nog ’n<br />

paar telers met 'n bultoets-mentaliteit maar omtrent al ons groter telers breek nie meer hul kontemporêre groepe op nie om bulle na<br />

bultoetse te stuur."<br />

Dr. J Kluyts, Simmentaler/Simbra President:<br />

Verwys na ’n klassieke eksperiment waar Fal<strong>co</strong>ner bewys dat seleksie vir groei onder intensiewe 'ad lib.' voeding (fase C voeding) niks<br />

anders is as seleksie vir aptyt (inname) nie terwyl meer doeltreffende diere onder beperkte voedings toestande geselekteer word.<br />

Volgens my navorsing (onder) is die verband tussen die prestasie van bulle by stasies en die genetiese prestasie (EBVs) van hulle<br />

nageslag laer as wat verwag word. Inderwaarheid, die laer indeks-bulle teel baie keer beter as die goue meriete bulle. Dit is seker ook<br />

die rede waarom sentrale toetsing van bulle in lande soos die VK en Australië al jare gelede gestaak is en in die VSA en Kanada<br />

dramaties afgeneem het.<br />

Bewys dit<br />

Agtergrond - Ons het in die verlede, toe daar nog nie EBV's was nie, by die Simmentaler ’n gesogte KI skema gehad waar bulle aan<br />

streng destydse prestasie en voorkoms vereistes moes voldoen. Hierdie bulle is aan Taurus voorsien vir landswye semen distribusie<br />

(die 1ste vleisbees KI skema in die land, 1979). Die vereistes was streng:<br />

.... positiewe Fase C (i) GDT sowel as (ii) Voeromset indekse;<br />

.... speenindeks (die destyds weergawe van melk) moes oor 100 wees;<br />

.... voorkoms van bul en ouers - streng spesiale inspeksie deur senior beoordelaars en<br />

.... goeie Simdeks (oud 1ste kalwing en TKP).<br />

Om te kyk hoe hierdie bulle werklik in baie kuddes in Suidelike Afrika (weens KI) teel het ek vandag se EBVs met die destydse fase C<br />

vergelyk. Om nader aan die werklikheid te wees het egter net KI bulle geneem met ’n 400 dae gewig en melk EBV akkuraatheid van<br />

oor 90%. Daar was uiteindelik 34 bulle wat voldoen het.<br />

Hier word die fase C toetsperiode groei (GDT) sowel as die gewig aan einde van die toets (GDO) vergelyk met die 400 dae gewig<br />

teelwaarde (EBV). Ek het die beste en swakste 10% groepe volgens fase C gebruik. U sal opmerk dat, nieteenstaande die groot indeks<br />

verskille in die hoogste en laagste indeks-groepe, daar geen verskil in werklike teelprestaie was nie.<br />

Groei in toetsperiode (GDT).<br />

Seleksie prioriteit<br />

Fase C groei<br />

(Gem. GDT indeks)<br />

400 dae EBV<br />

(Akkuraatheid >90%)<br />

Beste 10% in groep op GDT indeks 125 16<br />

Die swakste 10% op GDT indeks 102 15<br />

Gem. vir alle bulle: ’n Goeie GDT indeks van 115 maar 400dae in swakste 40% van die ras.<br />

Groei van geboorte tot einde toets (GDO). Het teen<br />

te hoog gediskrimineer.<br />

Groei tot einde fase C<br />

(Gem. GDO indeks)<br />

400 dae EBV<br />

(Akkuraatheid >90%)<br />

Beste 10% in groep op GDO indeks 121 14<br />

Die swakste 10% op GDO indeks 97 13<br />

Gem. vir alle bulle: ’n Goeie GDO indeks van 110 maar 400dae in swakste 40% van die ras.<br />

Melk en geboortegewig<br />

Destyds het ons by die uitsoek van KI-bulle die speenindeks gebruik om melkproduksie te voorspel en die bul se geboortegewig<br />

(sonder enige tussenkudde korreksies) is as barometer vir kalfprobleme gebruik. Kom ons kyk hoe hierdie groep KI-bulle se destydse<br />

seleksie hulp middels vergelyk met hulle werklike teling of teelwaardes.


Melk: Die beste 10% speenindeks bulle (gem. indeks ’n baie hoë 126) se melk EBV is 2.7 (swakste 20% van ras) en die swakste 10%<br />

(gem. indeks 99) se melk EBV is 3.5.<br />

Geboortegewig: Die swaarste 10% van die bulle se gem. geboortegewig was 49kg en hulle het ’n gem. geboortegewig EBV van 1.5<br />

(dis nou nadat BLUP kudde- en omgewings verskille in ag geneem het). Die ligste geboortegewig groep (gem. 35 kg) se EBV is 1.7,<br />

dus swakker as die swaar geboortegewig groep. Bul 'H' het 36kg geweeg maar sy EBV is in die swaarste/swakste 5% van die ras<br />

vergeleke met bul 'A' wat 48kg geweeg het met ’n EBV in die beste 15% van die ras.<br />

Dit toon die voordeel van teelwaardes teenoor indekse.<br />

15. Genomics, the new buzzword in the stud industry. A popular discussion issue at US, Australian<br />

and European <strong>co</strong>ngresses is genomic research and applications. In just a few years it has<br />

evolved from <strong>co</strong>vering just a few markers (remember the tenderness and marbling Genestar<br />

tests) to a powerful selection tool.<br />

LRF-breeders should be aware of the latest developments in the use of DNA markers. It's not just a matter of sending hair samples to<br />

the lab and getting results, times changed. The smart 'EBV providers' like BREEDPLAN have developed the methodology to <strong>co</strong>mbine<br />

the pedigree and performance information of the breed society with gene marker information from the lab to calculate a more powerful<br />

EBV's.<br />

What is your breed society policy in this regard? Give Drs. Munro Marx or Joubert Oosthuizen of Unistel (the LRF lab.) a call at 021-<br />

9389213/4 and enquire about availability in SA, <strong>co</strong>sting and how to submit hair, semen or blood samples. Unistel is an associate<br />

member of the LRF.<br />

A few brief remarks from <strong>co</strong>untless publications on this subject:<br />

• It's more <strong>co</strong>mplicated than we believed. BREEDPLAN CEO Dr. A Rickards: "We thought that producers would simply DNA test<br />

their cattle and then use the information to determine the best way to manage their stock. However, what the scientists have<br />

since learned is that hundreds if not thousands of genes determine the phenotypic expression of each trait and that a more<br />

practical approach to use of DNA markers is to <strong>co</strong>mbine them with phenotypic measures to provide marker-assisted EBVs.<br />

Suddenly, the pendulum has swung in the other direction with more phenotypic re<strong>co</strong>rds being required to validate DNA<br />

markers".<br />

Shows you our 'old fashioned' weighing, scanning and measuring stays important.<br />

• Prof. M Goddard, Australia: "BREEDPLAN will be<strong>co</strong>me more important in future. The inclusion of DNA information in<br />

BREEDPLAN will further enhance the system and provide producers with even more information by which to select sires.<br />

Producers won’t have to worry about DNA markers at all. They’l just select animals with the EBVs they think are most<br />

appropriate to their own breeding objectives,”<br />

• More good news for BREEDPLAN users is that the Cooperative Research Centre (CRC) in Australia announced that<br />

prediction equations for growth, feed efficiency, carcase and beef quality and female reproduction attributes that ac<strong>co</strong>unt for at<br />

least 15% of the genetic variation for these traits within Bos taurus and Bos indicus breeds will be delivered to BREEDPLAN<br />

by December <strong>2011</strong>. When this information is used in <strong>co</strong>njunction with current performance and pedigree information the<br />

resulting EBV's will add value for industry.<br />

LRF breed societies one ahead<br />

BREEDPLAN's involvement in this new technology is a big plus for LRF breeders in Southern Africa. Why? I asked the BREEDPLAN<br />

representative in Africa Dr. Michael Bradfield:<br />

" The BREEDPLAN® SmartGENE for beef project has been going for over five years. This project has <strong>co</strong>nsidered the efficacy of DNA<br />

marker technology and the ability to in<strong>co</strong>rporate DNA results into EBVs. The first Marker assisted EBV’s for tenderness (measured as<br />

shear force) was produced by BREEDPLAN® in 2010. Breed Societies that have sufficient genetic marker information have a lot to gain<br />

from this transformational technology. It is technology that will allow the LRF breeds to remain internationally <strong>co</strong>mpetitive and has again<br />

put it way ahead of its South African <strong>co</strong>mpetitors."


16. LRF-Rasse se toetsplan. Druk en bewaar. [Bylae tot LRF-BREEDPLAN E-NUUS 1/<strong>2011</strong>]<br />

Gerieflike indiening van gewigte/punte d.m.v. (i) HerdMaster (1) ; (ii) elektroniese Excel weegvorm; (iii) via internet; (iv) 'papier' vorm of (v) voorafgedrukte<br />

BREEDPLAN weeglys. Nader u genootskap vir hulle keuses. Sien ook "Watter EBVs is vir u ras beskikbaar".<br />

Watter<br />

stadium<br />

Dek-<br />

seisoen<br />

By dekking<br />

en<br />

kalwing<br />

By kalwing<br />

van koei<br />

By speen<br />

van kalf<br />

Rondom<br />

400 dae<br />

Rondom<br />

600 dae<br />

Meet dit<br />

Verw<br />

Nr<br />

Notas<br />

NIE moontlik as bul heeljaar met koeie loop.<br />

Reproduksie koeie 1 Voorsien Bul-in, bul-uit en resultaat vir ELKE<br />

koei wat bul kry.<br />

Dragtigheid lengte (Gekoppel aan<br />

kalwings gemak)<br />

Wanneer<br />

Ouderdomsgroep<br />

Van bul in datum tot<br />

bul uit datum<br />

Slice (2) EBV benaming<br />

Sodra voldoende data<br />

Days to Calving<br />

2 Voorsien dek/KI datum en geboorte kennis Sien notas Gestation Length<br />

Geboorte gewig (Gekoppel aan<br />

kalwingsgemak)<br />

Kalwingsgemak: Vader van kalf<br />

3<br />

4<br />

Weeg kalf by geboorte<br />

Toekenning van ’n kalwingsgemak kode by<br />

Binne 24 uur 45 d<br />

Birth Wght<br />

Calving Ease Direct<br />

Kalwingsgemak: Moeder van kalf 5 geboorte<br />

Calving Ease Maternal<br />

Speen- of 200 dae gewig 6 200 d wght<br />

Speengewig van kalf 80 tot 300 dae oud 45 d<br />

Melk 7 Milk<br />

Skede/Nael 8<br />

Temperament 9<br />

Skede/nael punting volgens genootskap se 1<br />

tot 9 skaal.<br />

Temperament punting volgens genootskap se<br />

skaal.<br />

80 tot 300 dae oud 45 d Sodra voldoende data<br />

60 tot 400 dae oud 45 d Sodra voldoende data<br />

Koei grootte (Gekorrigeer 5 jaar) 10 Weeg ma en kalf saam by speen. By speen van kalf MCW<br />

400 dae gewig 11 Gewig 300 tot 500 dae 60 d 400d wght<br />

Reproduksie 12<br />

Doen aansoek om geakrediteerde<br />

skandeerder.<br />

13<br />

Meet skrotum omvang volgens genootskap<br />

instruksie nie later as 23 mde ouderdom (Bos<br />

Taurus rasse)<br />

Skandeer bulle en verse vir oogspier<br />

oppervlakte, rib- en kruisvet dikte, % verkoopbare<br />

vleisopbrengs en binnespierse vet%<br />

300 tot 700 dae 60 d Scrotum Circumference<br />

300 tot 800 dae 60d<br />

Cwt; EMA; RIB;<br />

RUMP; RBY%; IMF%<br />

600 dae gewig 14 Gewig 500 tot 900 dae 60 d 600 d wght<br />

Reproduksie Skrotum soos hierbo (Bos Indicus rasse) 300 tot 700 dae 60 d Scrotum Circumference<br />

(1) HerdMaster rekenaar program word sterk aanbeveel (2) Diere gebore binne hierdie periode word as groep saam ontleed


Watter EBV's is vir u ras beskikbaar – In 2010 gepubliseer<br />

(Eerste kolom tussen hakkies die verw. nr. vir ’n beskrywing by "LRF-rasse se Toetsplan"<br />

EBV beskikbaar vir...<br />

Braford<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Brahm<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Brangus<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Limou<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Simbra<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Simment<br />

SA<br />

Namibia<br />

Dae tot kalwing (1) Ja Ja<br />

Dragtigheidslengte (2) Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Namibia<br />

ander (1)<br />

Geboorte gewig (3) Ja Ja Ja, Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Kalwingsgemak-bul (4) Ja<br />

Kalwingsgemak-koei<br />

(5)<br />

Ja<br />

200 dae gewig (6) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Melk (7) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Koeigrootte-MCW (10) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

400 dae gewig (11) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Skrotum omvang (12) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

600 dae gewig (14) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Karkas gewig (13) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Oogspier oppervlakte Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Rib en kruisvet dikte<br />

(13)<br />

Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

% verkoopbare vleis<br />

(13)<br />

Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja<br />

Binnespierse vet (13) Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja Ja,<br />

Breed object<br />

Ja<br />

Ja Ja<br />

Namibia<br />

Daar is rasse wat besig is om ander eienskappe te meet en data te versamel<br />

vir die toekomstige vrystelling van EBVs<br />

(1)<br />

Namibia ander: Braunvieh, Hereford, Nguni, Santa Gertrudis


17. What a pleasure, for a decade part of a world leader. Ten years ago a mad idea but today all<br />

smiles.<br />

It was a crazy, unheard idea to move away from an established local government supported system to the then unheard foreign<br />

BREEDPLAN system but I had no difficulty to <strong>co</strong>nvince our visionary Board and AGM to do so. After some heavy and often nasty<br />

résistance from SA Studbook and the ARC we at Simmentaler were the first in Africa to introduce the BREEDPLAN<br />

registration/performance test system ten years ago. In retrospect, this was the best decision our AGM ever took. The Braford, Brahman,<br />

Brangus, Limousin, Simbra and Namibian breeds also joined and the Holstein launched the registry arm of BREEDPLAN. Today nearly<br />

40% of all the South African beef breeders are with BREEDPLAN, all the Namibian breeders except Bonsmara as well as all the<br />

Zimbabwe breeders.<br />

World leader<br />

BREEDPLAN (ABRI) today is a major provider of livestock re<strong>co</strong>rding and genetic evaluation technology in Australia, the USA, Canada,<br />

South Africa, Namibia, Zimbabwe, the United Kingdom and New Zealand. Services are also provided in Malaysia, Thailand, the<br />

Philippines, Hungary, Brazil, Chile, Russia, Turkey, and China and include traceability as well pedigree re<strong>co</strong>rding. This <strong>co</strong>vers 120<br />

breed societies with 44 breeds and over 40 million animals re<strong>co</strong>rded in the database with 65 000 participating breeders. (To get some<br />

perspective – in total there are 4100 registered breeders of the 42 beef and dairy cattle breeds in SA).<br />

To stay at the forefront BREEDPLAN has a team of more than 200 highly professional staff which annually has R140 million available<br />

for research and development of new re<strong>co</strong>rding and evaluation techniques. The useful animal information is made available to<br />

everybody free of charge via their 24/7 Internet Solutions System which gets more than 3.2 million hits per month. Shows you how<br />

popular this system is among breeders and their client's worldwide.<br />

Top service<br />

To <strong>co</strong>mmemorate a decade of service provision in Africa, Dr. A Rickards the CEO of ABRI (BREEDPLAN) emphasized a few key<br />

<strong>co</strong>mponents of their model:<br />

• Participating breed societies utilize the BREEDPLAN one-stop re<strong>co</strong>rding and genetic evaluation services without any form of<br />

government subsidies;<br />

• The breeds have in-office access to an integrated pedigree / performance re<strong>co</strong>rding database using BREEDPLAN<br />

International software under an inexpensive licence from ABRI;<br />

• All data is owned by the respective breeds and it resides in Southern Africa under breed society <strong>co</strong>ntrol. A <strong>co</strong>py of the breed<br />

data is sent electronically to ABRI periodically where the across-herd genetic evaluation report is <strong>co</strong>mputed by fast ultra<br />

modern <strong>co</strong>mputers and the results are returned electronically to the breed involved;<br />

• In <strong>co</strong>ntrast to the SA INTERGIS system were breeds have to pay for their own data, breeds which wish to depart from<br />

BREEDPLAN to join any other system of their choice get their data free of charge.<br />

• The breeds involved have access to and benefit from the substantial international research program <strong>co</strong>nducted by<br />

BREEDPLAN. The BREEDPLAN product also has the unique advantage of access to the output of the R280M research and<br />

development program being undertaken by the Beef Quality Cooperative Research Centre<br />

• Breed society staff are trained to run genetic evaluations at a herd level throughout the year using in-house facilities;<br />

• Research on breed data is <strong>co</strong>nducted within South Africa (by universities) and by the ABRI team to ensure that genetic<br />

parameters are South-African specific. There is no charge for supplying data to bona fide research organisations.”<br />

Put your service where your mouth is:<br />

Ten years ago. We worked 12 hours a day for months to 'clean the data' inherited from the ARC and Studbook (to ensure quality EBVs<br />

the data has to be of high quality) and BREEDPLAN puts the relevant genetic aspects in place. We 'challenged' them to produce the<br />

first SA/Namibian BLUP breed analysis before 31 Dec 2001 and on the 24 rd December 22h00 Australian time the person in charge<br />

phoned me from his office to inform that the EBV's for all Simmentalers will be on the system when I get up on the 25 th . I <strong>co</strong>uld not tell<br />

him that breed societies in SA close shop from mid December. Thanks Arthur and your capable team.<br />

18. My speengewigte is vanjaar weens droogte heelwat laer as verlede jaar maar my kudde se<br />

speen-teelwaarde (EBV) het gestyg. Wys jou BLUP werk nie.<br />

Die BREEDPLAN-ontleding elimineer die effek van veranderde seisoene en voeding en publiseer dit on vorm van ’n genetiese tendens<br />

grafiek/tabel vir deelnemende kuddes. Hieruit kan die teler waarneem:<br />

(i) of daar oor die jare genetiese vordering is en<br />

(ii) hoe die kudde op genetiese vlak met die ras vergelyk.


Hierdie is wat my betref die belangrikste verslag wat uitgereik word en kan jaarliks met die inspekteur/voorligter/bestuurder bespreek<br />

word. Telers wat deelneem kan die verslae van hulle kantoor bestel of van hulle privaat BREEDPLAN internet fasiliteit afgelaai. Daar is<br />

ook ’n aantal ander "privaat-verslae" wat afgelaai kan word maar daaroor gesels ons volgende keer. Nader u kantoor vir die prosedure.<br />

Om die verskil tussen teelwaarde en rou gewig te demonstreer het ek ’n ekstensiewe kudde van ’n LRF ras geneem en die speengewig<br />

(blou - driehoek) en speengewig-EBV (rooi - kwadraat) hieronder in die grafiek uitgebeeld. Die genetiese tendens 2000 tot 2009 toon ’n<br />

redelik styging oor jare. Die daling in die 2006 kalweroes is deur ’n spesifieke bul veroorsaak. Alhoewel die werklike speen gewigte<br />

(fenotipiese tendens) in 2002-03 en 2007 deur omgewing (droogte/voeding/bestuur) beïnvloed is toon dit nie in die genetiese tendens<br />

nie. Dis interessant dat die 2001-02 kalwers deur dieselfde bulle verwek is.<br />

19. How do we define the optimum <strong>co</strong>w? Cattle farmers world wide and judges of all breeds have<br />

discussed this for many decades and scientists investigated this <strong>co</strong>mprehensively. I found a<br />

few very noteworthy <strong>co</strong>mments by well known beef cattle specialists on this important subject.<br />

In my exploration the optimum <strong>co</strong>w was also defined as the high performance <strong>co</strong>w; the minimum care <strong>co</strong>w; the low maintenance <strong>co</strong>w<br />

and the biologically efficient <strong>co</strong>w.<br />

Harlan Ritchie says: "The optimum beef <strong>co</strong>w is indeed an elusive beast. I have searched for her for more than twenty years, and have<br />

<strong>co</strong>me up empty handed. But I believe I’m getting close."<br />

A Large number of experts measure <strong>co</strong>w efficiency as kg of calf weaned per <strong>co</strong>w exposed to the bull which in<strong>co</strong>rporates <strong>co</strong>w fertility,<br />

calving ease, calf survival, milk and growth up to weaning. To <strong>co</strong>mplicate matters some use kg of calf produced per unit of energy<br />

<strong>co</strong>nsumed by the <strong>co</strong>w and calf.<br />

Kit Pharo says "Most of the discussions I have read lead you to believe optimum is different for different environments. A few will lead<br />

you to believe the optimum <strong>co</strong>w <strong>co</strong>uld be different for different people within the same environment. I’m not sure I agree with either of<br />

those viewpoints and think that for most ranchers, the optimum <strong>co</strong>w is the most profitable <strong>co</strong>w, the <strong>co</strong>w that can do the most for the<br />

least."<br />

Bob Taylor suggested more than a decade ago: "Maximum profitability is usually achieved before maximum productivity".<br />

S<strong>co</strong>tt Greiner is more specific:" She reaches puberty early, calves at two years of age, and then annually thereafter with minimal calving<br />

difficulty. She weans a calf annually which fits demands of marketplace and meets <strong>co</strong>nsumer expectations. She is highly adapted to<br />

environmental and managerial resources and optimizes revenue vs. <strong>co</strong>sts over a long, productive life".<br />

The world renown Beef Improvement Federation - 2010 Convention: “For the majority of producers, the most efficient <strong>co</strong>w is the one<br />

with the highest milk potential that can, without reducing the percentage of calves successfully weaned, repeatedly produce a calf by<br />

bulls with growth and carcass characteristics valued most in the marketplace.”<br />

Lets wrap up with Harlan Ritchie's food for thought:<br />

Is there an optimum <strong>co</strong>w? Yes, for a given production and marketing environment.


Have we fully characterized those optimum <strong>co</strong>ws? No, but we are getting closer.<br />

What is impeding our progress? Antagonisms between reproduction, growth, and carcass traits.<br />

Is there a solution? Perhaps. Development of selection indexes within a production / marketing environment is a possibility.<br />

Is it do-able? — I would hope so!<br />

20. Kan rasgenootskappe die bulle voorsien. Is daar genoeg koeie vir die bulle wat ons produseer.<br />

Lisensiëring van bulle.<br />

Die standaard van enige land se bees populasie word bepaal deur die genetiese meriete van die bulle wat gebruik word. Die enorme<br />

invloed van die bul op ’n kudde en derhalwe op die land se koeikudde word duidelik in hierdie eNUUS uitgewys. Vooruitstrewende<br />

lande se landbou leiers is al etlike jare deeglik bewus hiervan en akkommodeer dit tot groot voordeel vir die bedryf deur wetlike en/of<br />

opleidings aksies in hulle nasionale teelbeleid.<br />

Tydens my oponthoud in Duitsland kon ek eers nie hulle streng bul lisensiëring wette verstaan nie en het nie verstaan waarom<br />

duisende bulle geslag moet word. Ek het egter vinnig besef waarom hulle al voor die 2de wêreldoorlog ’n 'nasionale bulwet' geskep het.<br />

Hulle het besef dat die maklikste en vinnigste manier om die land se totale veestapel jaarliks geneties te verbeter is om net die beste<br />

manlike diere (bulle, bere, hingste, ramme, ens.) vir paring te lisensieer (permit-bulle). Kortweg niemand insluitende die kommersiële<br />

bedryf mag ingevolge die land se wette ongelisensieerde manlike diere gebruik nie en almal is gelukkig met die wet omdat dit net goeie<br />

bulle en derhalwe voortdurende verbetering vir almal teweeg bring.<br />

Lisensiëring geskied gereeld landswyd deur ’n kundige komitee en daar word streng vereistes gestel: Bulle moet struktureel korrek<br />

wees (keuring), met positiewe BLUP teelwaardes met ’n minimum akkuraatheid (derhalwe moet alle bulle sonder en met swak<br />

teelwaardes geslag word) en moet die veearts se streng semen toets slaag. Hierdie 'bulwet' vereistes word intussen ook deur die<br />

Europese Unie voorgeskryf.<br />

Die nadeel van hierdie fantastiese stelsel – die boere en hulle beeste is te produktief. Kan dit nadelig wees? Sentraal Europese lande<br />

produseer meer melk en vleis as ooit tevore met minder koeie en daar heers ’n oorproduksie wat d.m.v. van subsidies na buite EU<br />

lande uitgevoer word.<br />

Weens redes wat ek nie hier wil uitspel nie is ’n geordende nasionale 'bulwet' in Suider-Afrika onmoontlik. Dit is die primêre<br />

verantwoordelikheid van die stoetveebedryf om meerderwaardige bulle aan die land beskikbaar te stel om sodoende produktiwiteit te<br />

verhoog. Soos reeds elders vermeld is prestasiedata en stambome nodig om teelwaardes te bepaal en derhalwe is geregistreerde bulle<br />

die enigste bulle met meetbare genetiese meriete en by rasse met verpligte keuring voldoen elke geregistreerde bul ook aan minimum<br />

strukturele standaarde.<br />

Hoeveel bulle word benodig?<br />

Kan die stoetveebedryf genoeg bulle aan die kommersiële beesvleis bedryf in SA voorsien. (Het ongelukkig nie syfers vir Namibië nie<br />

maar glo dat Reinie Rusch, Mecki Schneider en Jacque Els dit vir die bedryf daar kan uitwerk). Weens swak/geen behoorlike Dpt.<br />

Landbou statistieke is dit baie moeilik bepaalbaar en verskil die opinies. Ek het koei getalle, vrugbaarheid en seleksie-druk syfers van<br />

die LRF rasse beraam en by kenners Charl Hunlin (SA Stamboek rasse se syfers) en Peter Milton (kommersiële vleisbees bedryf) gaan<br />

kers opsteek om die volgende te beraam:<br />

• Die kommersiële bedryf benodig jaarliks ongeveer 42 000 vleis-dekbulle (syfers varieer van 38 tot 48 000).<br />

• Die stoetvee bedryf kan ongeveer 36 000 hiervan lewer maar dit sluit alles in m.a.w. gekeur/geregistreer minus bulle aan<br />

mede telers verkoop plus bulle deur stoettelers as graad verkoop (variasie 30 000 tot 40 000).<br />

• Van hierdie 36 000 het hoogstens 25 000 BLUP teelwaardes (ingesluit ongetoetste bulle met teelwaardes d.m.v. getoetste<br />

verwante) maar ek gaan nie raai hoeveel van die 25 000 positiewe waardes het nie. (Nota: Retensie van geboorte tot<br />

registrasie en prestasie toets deelname verskil baie tussen rasse.)<br />

Daar is ’n geweldige mark vir 'ordentlike bulle' maar ons het, vergeleke met Australië, VSA, Kanada en natuurlik Europa, ’n enorme<br />

agterstand wat voorligting/opleiding oor die waarde van goeie bulle betref. In hierdie verband speel genootskappe ’n belangrike rol om<br />

d.m.v. hulle veldpersoneel, beoordelaars, bestuurslede en veral telers landswyd die boodskap uit te verkondig deur byvoorbeeld<br />

'kommersiële boeredae".<br />

Lees ook eNUUS artikel 3: "Improvement of the <strong>co</strong>wherd through female selection is not effective".<br />

21. Whow! HerdMASTER® introduces new version <strong>co</strong>mputer program for breeders. This reduces<br />

the breeders' paperwork significantly.<br />

Let's ask a test-user Me Charlotte Shuite (Braford and Hereford breeder). "I am very impressed with the new HerdMASTER4®<br />

program. There are many new functionalities, you can create your own reports much easier than previously and, to me very important,<br />

is the ease with which I can load animals and weights and submit the reports to the breed society. This should end grumbling by some<br />

stud breeders about the "paperwork" involved in stud breeding."


Here a brief summary by the HerdMASTER® CEO in South Africa.<br />

Firstly, wel<strong>co</strong>me to Duard Cloete whom has taken over the support. Duard has worked in IT all his life and is the ideal person to support<br />

HerdMASTER.<br />

The new "HerdMASTER® 4 is a significant upgrade <strong>co</strong>mpared to all the other versions. It is basically a <strong>co</strong>mplete new program but has<br />

the same feel as the older versions. It also creates a <strong>co</strong>mplete new database on your <strong>co</strong>mputer. The older version is retained.<br />

HerdMASTER® 4 has significantly new useful functions including:<br />

A cleaner interface throughout. Loading new calves for e.g. is a breeze and it uses mating's to achieve this ensuring that reproduction<br />

re<strong>co</strong>rds are updated.<br />

Ability to update itself from the webserver (no more CD's need to be sent as your version is now always updated). Producer requests<br />

are easily in<strong>co</strong>rporated at the same time.<br />

Days to Calving (DTC) re<strong>co</strong>rding forms a significant part of the upgrade. BREEDPLAN has recently put a lot of work into the<br />

development of DTC to ensure proper re<strong>co</strong>rds are taken. This aspect is a major enhancement.<br />

Reports are easily changed on the fly. HerdMASTER has used a new, modern database that allows reports to be created a lot easier.<br />

The new database is also a major improvement from the old database.<br />

Lots of new functionality; for example Visual farm (downloaded from Google maps), new reports, inbreeding functionality in the matings<br />

option, updated crush side re<strong>co</strong>rder, update to mobile version and a whole lot more."<br />

SOS is a new Internet function that gives 24h/365day support. Tips, frequently asked questions and a <strong>co</strong>mplete repository of all<br />

HerdMASTER® issues.<br />

Contact Duard Cloete at 012-6675258 or herdmaster@agribsa.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

22. Hoe vergelyk ek die genetika van diere met mekaar. Dis mos belangrik om perspektief te kry.<br />

Hoe hanteer ek dit.<br />

Telers en kommersiële bulkopers kan bulle op grond van voorkoms of die uiterlike vergelyk maar hoe vergelyk jy bulle op grond van<br />

hulle genetiese waardes wat bekend staan as BLUP teelwaardes (1) .<br />

(i) Vergelyk diere met mekaar<br />

Moet nie die teelwaarde in die veilings katalogus met '0' vergelyk nie, vergelyk dit met die ’n ander bul sin. Baie boere dink +28 vir sê<br />

maar 400 dae is 28 kg beter as die ras se gemiddelde. Nee, +28 beteken dat die bul se teelwaarde18 kg beter is as die +10 bul van<br />

dieselfde ras.<br />

Wat sê dit vir die koper? Die kanse is goed dat die bul met die +28 teelwaarde swaarder kalwers sal teel as die +10 bul ongeag die<br />

omgewing waarin hulle gebruik word. Op gelykwaardige suiwer of kruis-koeie beteken dit vir die speenkalf produsent 9 kg meer vir elke


kalf of R15 000 meer as die +10 bul oor die aantal 'bul gebruik jare' (2) . Die koper van die +28 EBV bul kan derhalwe R10 000 meer vir<br />

sy bul betaal en maak nog R5 000 meer as die +10 bul se koper. Hier het ons nie die addisionele voordeel van die beter dogters en<br />

hulle kalwers in ag geneem nie.<br />

Gepaard hiermee kyk ook na die akkuraatheid (3) maar meer oor dit in ’n volgende e-nuus.<br />

(ii) Vergelyk diere met die ras.<br />

Alle LRF-rasse het ’n raseie persentiel-tabel waar die teelwaarde distribusie van alle tweejaar oud diere se getoetste eienskappe gelys<br />

word. Waarom tweejaar oud: Die ras gemiddeld verbeter jaarliks en dit is nutteloos om vandag se behoeftes met standaarde van vyf<br />

jaar gelede te vergelyk. Ons beveel aan dat genootskappe hierdie tabel in elke veilings katalogus publiseer. Aan die einde hiervan is<br />

die 'links' om die tabelle af te laai.<br />

Die tabel werk so - getoetste eienskappe verskyn in die persentiel tabel kolomme en die rangorde word in rye van 'Top 1%' tot 'Top<br />

99%' aangetoon. Voorbeeld: ’n +16 in die speengewig kolom staan regoor 'Top 25%' en is derhalwe in die top 25% van die spesifieke<br />

ras se tweejaar oud diere. Syfers hoër as 'Top 50%' is bokant ras gemiddeld en Top 80% is inderwaarheid in onderste 20% van die ras.<br />

My grootste probleem met rangordes is dat teling nie met sport of skool resultate verenigbaar is nie omdat die hoogste teelwaarde nie<br />

noodwendig die beste nie. Telers van die groter groeikragtige rasse gaan nie sommer ’n bul koop wat in die top 10% van die ras se<br />

geboortegewig is nie. Top 10% is vir hulle swakker as top 50%. Eweneens sal ’n ekstensiewe boer normaalweg bulle met ’n MCW<br />

(mature <strong>co</strong>w weight) in die middelste ⅓ kies omdat ’n top ⅓ bul is weens onderhoud/konstitusie van sy dogters vir nadelig is.<br />

(iii) Ek hou nie van syfers nie<br />

Vir die 'kyker' wat sy dier se teelwaardes op ’n skematiese wyse met die ras wil vergelyk het BREEDPLAN ’n mooi histogram geskep<br />

wat soos hieronder vertoon met 50% as die ras gemiddeld. Dit is by BREEDPLAN se 'Animal enquiry' funksie vir elke dier met<br />

teelwaardes beskikbaar as jy op die blou View druk – dit lyk so: EBV Graph: [View]<br />

Die bul in die diagram hierbo:<br />

Nie op verse nie (lang dragtigheid periode, geboortegewig en kalwingsgemak swakker as rasgemiddeld); sy dogters kalf egter maklik;<br />

positiewe groei veral 600 dae gewig; baie goeie skrotum omvang (vrugbaarheid) met swaar karkasgewig en die ras-spesifieke indekse<br />

is positief (dit het niks met die ouderwetse indekse te make nie).<br />

Indien u die figuur vanaf die web na ’n e-pos of enige ander dokument wil kopieer regsklik u op die figuur, kies 'Copy image' en 'paste'<br />

in jou dokument.<br />

(iv) Onbetekenend<br />

’n Fout wat telers dikwels maak is om klein verskille in teelwaardes as betekenisvol te interpreteer. Moenie gepla wees deur klein<br />

verskille nie. Klassifiseer die teelwaardes volgens die persentiel tabel in drie groepe op te deel nl. laag of onderste ⅓, gemiddeld<br />

(middelste ⅓) en hoog boonste ⅓) en vergelyk bulle dan so.


(v) Mik vir die ras se ideaal<br />

Alle rasse het ‘n teeldoelwit gebaseer op voorkoms of die 'standaard van voortreflikheid'. Van die rasse het ook ’n genetiese doelwit in<br />

vorm ’n ideale stel teelwaardes wat op die ras persentiel aangedui word. By die rasse waar ek betrokke was, is die EBV-teeldoelwit<br />

gebaseer op die toekomstige marknavraag omdat vandag se teling al afgehandel is. Hierdie teeldoel-EBVs is baie belangrik vir<br />

stoettelers en is van die betrokke genootskappe beskikbaar.<br />

(vi) Stoettelers moet hulle kommersiële bulkopers hieroor inlig.<br />

Moet nooit rasse se EBV's met mekaar vergelyk nie. Ek vind dit ’n groot probleem by alleras- veilings soos bv. Vryburg of Ermelo.<br />

Afslaers moet asb. dit voor elke alleras-veilings aankondig. Die Limousin bul met ’n +15 speengewig EBV is in die top 20% van sy ras<br />

en die Simmentaler +15 bul is in die top 5% van sy ras. Dit sê dat nieteenstaande dieselfde teelwaarde die Sim binne sy ras beter is as<br />

die Limo binne sy ras. Dit beteken ook nie dat die Limousin weens hierdie rangorde swaarder kalwers speen as die Simmentaler want<br />

EBVs is nie oor rasse vergelykbaar nie.<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

(1) Teelwaarde of EBV: Die grootste gedeelte van wat ons in ’n dier sien word deur die omgewing beheer (kos, bestuur, weer)<br />

en die kleiner gedeelte word aan genetika toegeskryf. Slegs die genetiese komponent word aan die nageslag oorgedra. Ons<br />

kan egter nie hierdie genetiese komponent afsonderlik van die omgewing se invloed sien nie en daarom gebruik telers van alle<br />

rasse wêreldwyd die BLUP tegnologie om die genetiese komponent te beraam en in teelwaardes uit te druk. Teelwaardes<br />

word bereken vanaf stambome en prestasierekords van diere en al hulle verwante. Die grootste voordeel van EBV's is dat<br />

diere binne ‘n ras, tussen kuddes en oor jare vergelykbaar is.<br />

(2) = 28 kg min 10 = 18kg X 50% bydrae deur bul = 9 kg X R14/kg X 30 kalwers/jaar X 4jaar in kudde = meer as R15 000<br />

(3) Die akkuraatheid of betroubaarheid van ‘n teelwaarde word in ’n % syfer uitgedruk, hoe hoër die syfer hoe beter.<br />

Teelwaardes verander jaarliks (gelukkig) deur die toevoeging van meer inligting en lae akkuraatheid teelwaardes kan nogal<br />

baie verander. Hou altyd in gedagte dat ‘n teelwaarde ‘n gelyke kans het om op- of afwaarts te verander soos wat meer<br />

inligting bykom.<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Skakels na rasse se persentiel tabelle<br />

Suid-Afrika<br />

Braford - Kliek hier<br />

Brahman - Kliek hier<br />

Brangus - Kliek hier<br />

Limousin - Kliek hier<br />

Simmentaler - Kliek hier<br />

Simbra - Kliek hier<br />

Namibia<br />

Brahman - Kliek hier<br />

Die 13 ander Namibië rasse kan die NSBA se web blad gebruik - vir instruksies kontak NSBA. Kliek hier<br />

23. DNA tests alone don’t tell you much but can be used much more effectively when in<strong>co</strong>rporated<br />

into the performance testing evaluation of a breed and presented as an EBV.<br />

The <strong>co</strong>mbination of DNA results from the lab with the breeds genetic or performance test evaluation will result in higher-accuracy EBVs.<br />

This will especially benefit buyers of young bulls who normally buy the bull before he has progeny and therefore a bull with a low EBV<br />

accuracy. These EBVs often change when the bull's progeny is weighed/analysed.<br />

Although the Austrian/German Simmentaler analysis cannot be <strong>co</strong>mpared with the BREEDPLAN Sim-analysis (they <strong>co</strong>mbine<br />

milk/fat/protein produced, beef, carcase and a large number of <strong>co</strong>nfirmation traits) it gives us a good indication of how the accuracy of<br />

EBVs of young bulls at purchase age is improved with inclusion of DNA information. I summarised this from a study by Fuerst and<br />

Egger-Danner.<br />

Total merit EBV accuracy of Simmentaler in Austria and Germany:


Conventional EBV accuracy<br />

Genomic EBV accuracy Marker<br />

assisted EBVs)<br />

Young bull 35% 65%<br />

Cow – 1 st lactation 50% 70%<br />

Bull with progeny 88% 90%<br />

Including genomics into BREEDPLAN EBVs<br />

Just before publication of this eNEWS, BREEDPLAN released information on the in<strong>co</strong>rporation of Pfizer Animal Genetics MVP<br />

information in the Angus BREEDPLAN analysis. The example below shows the change in some EBVs when Pfizer MVP information<br />

has been in<strong>co</strong>rporated for a young bull with only limited re<strong>co</strong>rding for early weight traits. With no scanning or carcass data available this<br />

bull has low accuracy EBVs for the carcass traits but the inclusion MVPs (triats in highlighted boxes) increased accuracies.<br />

Original EBV<br />

Source: AGBU Research press<br />

release<br />

24. Meer vleis met minder koeie. Dit vind in die meeste westerse lande plaas. Wat is die situasie by<br />

ons.<br />

Die doeltreffendheid van beesvleis produksie in ’n land word hoofsaaklik deur die produksie per koei of koei produktiwiteit bepaal. Die<br />

meeste navorsers definieer dit ook as kilogram kalf gespeen per koei wat by die bul gekom het m.a.w. as 100 koeie by die bulle kom<br />

meet jy kg gespeen ongeag van hoeveel koeie gekalf het aldan nie. Hierdie maatstaf word verbeter deur<br />

(i) die verhoging van bul en koei vrugbaarheid,<br />

(ii) hoër speengewig en<br />

(iii) laer mortaliteit vanaf geboorte tot speen.<br />

Van die bekende vleisbees lande het goed gevorder – volgens my bronne a.g.v. beter bulle met EBVs, geordende kruisteling, vroeër<br />

kalwing en hoër kalfpersentasie weens beter bestuur:<br />

Kanada – Vleisproduksie per koei verhoog van 170 kg in 1972 na 260 kg in 2008. Minder diere produseer meer vleis.<br />

Brasilië, die grootste beesvleis uitvoerder in die wêreld, sê koei-doeltreffendheid het sedert 1990 met ’n indrukwekkende 50%<br />

toegeneem. Hulle (Beef Issue quarterly) skryf dit toe aan doelgerigte kruisteling, KI met goeie bulle en vermindering van slagouderdom<br />

van die geharde laatryp Nelore – getalsterkste ras in die land.<br />

VSA – Oor die afgelope tien jaar is die produksie per koei met ’n geweldige 20% of 57kg verhoog (Beef magazine). Beter bestuur, beter<br />

genetika, beter reproduksie. 'The industry has produced more with less'.<br />

Dr. LR Corah van die VSA het produktiwiteit bestudeer en kom tot die gevolgtrekking dat die goeie verhoging hoofsaaklik toegeskryf<br />

kan word aan EBV gebaseerde seleksie (hoër gewig) sonder dat geboortegewig noemenswaardig verhoog is (kalfprobleme) sowel as<br />

bestuur faktore (reproduksie).<br />

Wat is die situasie by ons<br />

Gesprekke met verskeie persone by die Dpte Landbou en Statistieke oor koei produktiwiteit was nodeloos. Ander bronne geraadpleeg<br />

praat van ’n verhoging in totale beesvleis produksie wat egter eerder aan hoër karkasgewig, voerkraal effektiwiteit, ens. toegeskryf kan<br />

word en nie noodwendig aan verbeterde koei produktiwiteit nie.<br />

Weens ’n gebrek aan enige betroubare statistieke oor koei produktiwiteit het ek die saak daar gelaat en gaan kyk hoe die kommersiële<br />

bedryf (1) gaan baat indien die volgende elk met 5% verhoog word:<br />

- kg vleis gespeen per koei deur die gebruik van goeie bulle met positiewe groei EBVs en<br />

- koeikudde reproduksie deur beter bestuur.<br />

Original<br />

accuracy<br />

New<br />

EBV<br />

New accuracy<br />

Birth weight 5.6 76 5.3 78<br />

200 day weight 30 60 29 64<br />

400 day weight 40 58 39 58<br />

600 day weight 52 57 50 57<br />

200 milk 7 33 7 48<br />

Carcass weight 28 43 27 52<br />

Carcass traits – Rib -1.5 36 -1.5 51<br />

- P8 -1.3 36 -1.3 44<br />

- EMA 0.5 29 -0.4 44<br />

- RBY 0.4 30 0.4 30<br />

- IMF 0.2 28 0.0 33


Die antwoord is ’n addisionele inkomste van R891 000 vir een speenkalf-oes met dieselfde getal koeie.<br />

(1)<br />

= Gegrond op Peter Milton se kommersiële bedryf syfers van 10 000 produsente, 3 mil koeie, speengewig 200kg, kalf<br />

persentasie 60% en speenkalf R14.<br />

Verhoog karkaswaarde met R1.56 mil<br />

Mnr. John Devenport, ’n voormalige voorsitter van die LRF het die volgende projeksies bereken t.o.v. karkasgewig geproduseer (2) :<br />

• Indien die kalfpersentasie met net 1.5% verhoog word beteken dit R477 mil ekstra in karkas waarde.<br />

• As speengewig met 2.5% (5kg) verhoog is dit ’n addisionele R516 mil.<br />

• Totale waarde vermeerdering dus R994 mil.<br />

(2)<br />

= Gegrond op ’n teelkudde (breeding herd) van 7mil met ’n 58% kalf persentasie; mortaliteit van 5%; slaggewig 400kg met<br />

52% uitslag en R23 karkas prys.<br />

25. Cow weight is the best indicator of <strong>co</strong>w feed requirements and a valuable benchmark for sought<br />

after 'growth curve bender bulls'. But when and how do we weigh <strong>co</strong>ws.<br />

Under Southern African extensive farming <strong>co</strong>nditions mature <strong>co</strong>w weight (MCW) is the most underrated EBV. This EBV is calculated<br />

from <strong>co</strong>w weights taken when calves are weaned or, when not weighed at weaning, calculated from weights taken previously (like 600<br />

day). A <strong>co</strong>w with a MCW EBV of +60 should have a higher mature weight than a <strong>co</strong>w with a MCW of +40 and will therefore require<br />

more feed to maintain her than the other one.<br />

My biggest problem with the MCW EBV interpretation is that many breeders get a EBV although they don't weigh their <strong>co</strong>ws. This is<br />

normal procedure because of MCW's high <strong>co</strong>rrelation with weights taken at 600 and/or 400 days. But be careful, you can only identify<br />

growth curve bender bulls/animals <strong>co</strong>rrectly by weighing <strong>co</strong>ws at weaning.<br />

Emphasize 'at weaning'<br />

Many breeders in SA are not aware that BREEDPLAN will only analyze <strong>co</strong>w weights taken within two weeks of the 200 day weight.<br />

Subsequently, <strong>co</strong>ws should be weighed at the same time as the 200 day weight is re<strong>co</strong>rded. Breed society advisors should inform their<br />

breeders about this rule in order to avoid unnecessary weighing of <strong>co</strong>ws. I checked this: Breed society X weighed 4450 <strong>co</strong>ws in a<br />

certain year but BREEDPLAN informed me that only 1500 or a third <strong>co</strong>uld be used for the analysis because the rest were re<strong>co</strong>rded<br />

in<strong>co</strong>rrectly. BREEDPLAN's Dr. B Crook:" Taking lots of <strong>co</strong>w weights within a year does not make for a better analysis. It is far better to<br />

take ONE weight on the <strong>co</strong>w in any ONE year, and to take this WHEN the calf is being weighed for its relevant 200-day weight.<br />

Females are only permitted to have a maximum of four MCW re<strong>co</strong>rds included, and the weight must be taken within 2 weeks of the calf<br />

being weighed for 200-day weight."<br />

Why not weigh <strong>co</strong>ws at birth<br />

At Simmentaler we liked to weigh <strong>co</strong>ws at calving to determine the calf:mother weight relation but we also promoted weighing at<br />

weaning for the same relation at weaning. I often discussed the merit of these <strong>co</strong>w weighing stages with BREEDPLANs Dr. B Crook<br />

and eventually he analyzed 20 000 of our <strong>co</strong>ws which were weighed at birth and at weaning. He <strong>co</strong>ncludes:<br />

“ The high genetic <strong>co</strong>rrelation of 0.95 indicates that any attempts to modify <strong>co</strong>w weight via selective breeding, will achieve a similar<br />

out<strong>co</strong>me irrespective of whether selection is based on <strong>co</strong>w weights taken at calving or at weaning. However, the higher repeatability<br />

and heritability for <strong>co</strong>w weight at weaning indicate that this is the more reliable measure of the two <strong>co</strong>w weight traits. It is also the more<br />

practical measurement, given that all <strong>co</strong>ws and calves in the management group are being handled and weighed together, as opposed<br />

to weighing single <strong>co</strong>ws in the calving group over a period of time. Weighing <strong>co</strong>ws at calving also has the added problem of greater<br />

stress to the postpartum <strong>co</strong>ws."<br />

You cant <strong>co</strong>mpare a show <strong>co</strong>w with a veld <strong>co</strong>w<br />

Condition or management notes/<strong>co</strong>des are also applicable to MCW for example pointing out sick <strong>co</strong>ws or, what nearly all show<br />

people forget, show or sale <strong>co</strong>ws. If no management <strong>co</strong>de is supplied with the <strong>co</strong>w weight, BREEDPLAN will use the management<br />

<strong>co</strong>de submitted with the 200 day weight of the calves to sub-group the weights of the <strong>co</strong>ws.<br />

Breeders submit <strong>co</strong>w weights electronically via HerdMaster, weighing lists supplied by the office or a BREEDPLAN <strong>co</strong>mpatible<br />

Microsoft Excel template for weaning and <strong>co</strong>w weights. (only a few societies).<br />

Growth curve bender bulls<br />

Most beef breeds aim for an average birth weight EBV, high wean and post weaning EBV's to maximize weight at the selling stage<br />

<strong>co</strong>mbined with an average MCW EBV so that lifetime maintenance energy for the breeding herd is minimized. "Curve benders” are not<br />

<strong>co</strong>mmon because we try to change natures normal growth curve for our e<strong>co</strong>nomic benefit.<br />

Bottom line: The only way to identify curve benders is to weigh calves at birth, plus at least one post-weaning stage and definitely <strong>co</strong>ws<br />

at weaning for a reliable MCW EBV.


26. SA Holstein eerste in SA met top registrasie rekenaarprogram.<br />

BREEDPLAN International het verlede jaar hulle "nuwe-generasie" rekenaarprogram vrygestel wat<br />

genootskappe in staat stel om hulle registrasie, teler en prestasie aangeleenthede d.m.v. van die uiters<br />

verbruikersvriendelike "ILR2" program te hanteer. ’n Aantal internasionale genootskappe het al<br />

opgradeer en onlangs was SA Holstein die eerste lokale BREEDPLAN gebruiker wat oorgeskakel het.<br />

Mev. Ellen Ja<strong>co</strong>bs van Holstein sê:" Dit is die beste program in die 23 jaar wat ek vir Holstein werk. Die<br />

opstel van veilings en skou katalogusse werk baie makliker en enigiets wat die teler soek kry jy baie<br />

vinnig d.m.v. ILR2".<br />

Mev. Isabel Bouwer werk ook al tien jaar by SA Holstein: "Ek het nog nie so iets beleef nie – user<br />

friendly, alle inligting op een screen, om op te kyk tik jy nie meer nie jy klik net en die opname van<br />

kalwers se kleur beskrywing (foto’s) werk baie vinnig wonderlik met ’n scanner."<br />

Ander BREEDPLAN gebruiker-genootskappe in onder andere Australië, New Zealand, die VSA, Kanada en die VK is net so in hul skik<br />

met hierdie "lekker program".<br />

27. Let's talk bull.... The experts say and I quote in not more than 5 lines.<br />

"Bull selection is not a "horse race" to maximize a single trait; it is an attempt to find <strong>co</strong>mplete, functional bulls capable of making an<br />

<strong>co</strong>ntribution to herd profitability through their calves." (Jim Gosey)<br />

"The first thing a bull buyer should do is cull out the breeders. Buy from a breeder that measures performance with no excuses like "I<br />

don’t have the time" or "I can see good cattle". Any breeder who produces good bulls should be able to put his re<strong>co</strong>rds where his mouth<br />

is." (Rob de Baca).<br />

Preliminary Australian research results on sperm <strong>co</strong>unt: "The percentage of normal sperm in a bulls ejaculate is not only a reliable<br />

indicator of the bulls calf getting ability but also points to daughters that reach puberty faster than heifers born from bulls with lower level<br />

of normal sperm. It also seems to point to lactating first calf <strong>co</strong>ws who are ready to mate at a shorter interval after calving." (Dick<br />

Holroyd).<br />

"Usually, the cheap bulls in a sale are the most expensive. Have you ever wondered why the successful cattlemen never buy the<br />

bottom end of a sale? It is because they have figured out that good genetics pay and do not <strong>co</strong>st."(Steve Meadows)<br />

"Be aware that a bull's physical appearance can mask the true underlying genetics. The heritability of growth rate is moderate at around<br />

30% which means that even among a group of cattle reared together, 70% of the difference you see are due to factors other than<br />

genetics. At multi-vendor sales bulls were prepared different, so the problem of deciding how much of the difference is due to genetics<br />

is even greater. That's why we use EBV's". (Bob Gaden)<br />

"Visual appearance tells you what a bull appears to be. His pedigree tells you what he ought to be. His performance tells you what he<br />

actually is". (A very old saying I often used – Author unknown).<br />

"We tested many bulls. Bulls fed high gaining rations often lay down fat in the scrotum, and this results in lower fertility. The testes<br />

normally maintain a temperature four to six degrees <strong>co</strong>oler than body temperature. If fat deposits develop in the neck of the scrotum,<br />

the <strong>co</strong>untercurrent heat exchange, where warm blood from the body is <strong>co</strong>oled by the blood in the testes, is disrupted. Sperm<br />

production is not normal at higher temperatures and results in negative reproductive traits.” (J. Pruitt).<br />

28. Zimbabwe, slaan oor na BREEDPLAN.<br />

In die verlede was die land nie net bekend vir sy uitstaande boere nie maar ook vir sy stoettelers. Ons is bly om te verneem dat die<br />

Zimbabwe Herd Book weer gestalte aanneem deurdat hulle die BREEDPLAN registrasie en prestasie geïnstalleer het. Hulle het tans<br />

55 telers van 15 vleis- en 1 suiwel-ras met 6000 aangetekende diere. Die grootste drie rasse is Brahman, Tuli en Beefmaster. Sodra<br />

alle rekords met prestasies data bygewerk is, sal teelwaardes vrygestel word.<br />

29. Things are moving fast in the stud breeding business and on going research is of the utmost<br />

importance. Agricultural research has stagnated in Southern Africa but BREEDPLAN<br />

participants are privileged to have access to and benefit from the latest research and<br />

development programs.


It's nice to be part of the leaders. I abridged the following for the LRF from various sources.<br />

• For the past 30 years, beef producers have used BREEDPLAN EBV's to accelerate genetic progress, tighten up breeding<br />

operations, improve productivity and increase prices for cattle sold for breeding and slaughter. The inclusion of DNA<br />

information in BREEDPLAN will further enhance the system and provide producers with even more information by which to<br />

select sires. (Beef CRC Chief Scientist Professor Mike Goddard).<br />

• BREEDPLAN released marker assisted Shear Force EBVs for the Australian Brahman a while ago. They <strong>co</strong>mbine pedigree,<br />

measured performance of meat tenderness, flight time (temperament) and GeneSTAR DNA marker information. (Tropical<br />

Beef Technology Services).<br />

• The Australian Beef CRC, CSIRO, Meat and Livestock Australia and the Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU), in<br />

<strong>co</strong>llaboration with the University of Queensland, have announced the release of a DNA test that accurately predicts polledness<br />

in beef cattle. The test has proven highly accurate in several breeds of cattle in research trials <strong>co</strong>nducted across Australia and<br />

is now available at a reduced <strong>co</strong>st to producers who are willing to assist in validating the accuracy of the test in wider cattle<br />

populations.(Beef CRC). More on this in the next eNEWS.<br />

• To assist members in improving the structural soundness of their animals, Angus Australia has recently published<br />

BREEDPLAN trial EBVs for Structural Soundness which include five leg and feet traits - Front Feet Angle, Rear Feet Angle,<br />

Front Feet Claw Set, Rear Leg Hind View and Rear Leg Side View. S<strong>co</strong>res were gathered on 9000 Angus bulls and females<br />

which <strong>co</strong>ntributed 37,472 re<strong>co</strong>rds to the database. (Angus Australia).<br />

• Enhancements have been made to the Calving Ease analysis that is <strong>co</strong>nducted by BREEDPLAN. This will particularly effect<br />

the genetic evaluation that is <strong>co</strong>nducted for breeds where both Calving Ease EBVs and Selection Index values. (Southern<br />

Beef Technology Services).<br />

• ILR2, is BREEDPLANs new generation software to manage pedigree and performance services of breed societies. The new<br />

software includes several new features such as enhanced user-oriented reports and the running of monthly GROUP analyses<br />

(a full analysis of all re<strong>co</strong>rds within a breed). (Own review from many – PM)<br />

• Pfizer Animal Genetics has released a new DNA test for the Black Angus breed in Australia. The Australian Animals Genetics<br />

and Breeding Unit (AGBU), Pfizer, Animal Genetics and Angus Australia are now working on the integration of these results<br />

into the Angus BREEDPLAN evaluation to create marker assisted EBVs for 13 different traits - Calving Ease Direct, Rib Fat,<br />

Calving Ease Daughters, Eye Muscle Area, Birth Weight, Marbling, Weaning Weight, Tenderness, Milk, Dry Matter Intake,<br />

Average Daily Gain, Net Feed Intake and Carcase Weight. The new DNA test is available at R1400 per animal. (From SBTS).<br />

• The Australian Beef CRC is currently <strong>co</strong>nducting a research project to develop new knowledge which will enable beef<br />

producers to select for improved <strong>co</strong>w efficiency. The project involves ongoing performance and reproduction re<strong>co</strong>rding on<br />

approximately 8000 BREEDPLAN re<strong>co</strong>rded heifers from <strong>co</strong>nception to their se<strong>co</strong>nd calf. (From SBTS).<br />

• "I can't keep up with all the fancy new developments". No problem in Australia – Their stud breeders now have access to<br />

ongoing support and assistance in the use and understanding of the different genetic technologies. Assistance is primarily<br />

provided by a team of experts through phone and email <strong>co</strong>nsultation, supplemented by property visits where required. (Own<br />

review).<br />

Mr Wessel Hattingh, Chairman of the LRF, <strong>co</strong>mmentary on "It's nice to be one of the leaders":<br />

In recent years we have seen exponential development in the genetic advancement of agriculture. Dry land yield of cash crops are<br />

closing up on crops under irrigation. Active participation in all the options of performance testing under BREEDPLAN will afford us as<br />

breeders the opportunity to achieve the same results. The best technology in the world is available to LRF breeders – Make use of it.<br />

30. Stud breeders must be responsible.<br />

Unfortunately I cannot call to mind the person responsible for the following very wise notes which I scribbled down at a cattle <strong>co</strong>ngress<br />

a few years ago. My version of the notes:<br />

Stud breeders provide genetic leadership to the industry, but it <strong>co</strong>mes with responsibilities. Don't practice 'single trait' selection. The<br />

single trait frame chase years ago messed up many a breed and the 'elephant-chaser-breeders' did not show leadership at all.<br />

Profitability lies in the middle of the road in a lot of traits.<br />

Furthermore, always <strong>co</strong>ncentrate on the total package. EBV's are a great tool to keep things balanced but they can also be misused to<br />

chase and maximize a trait to the disadvantage of a breed.<br />

31. A team of experts on meat production, <strong>co</strong>nsumption and prices in South Africa.<br />

From a <strong>co</strong>mprehensive report "The South African Baseline" by the Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy (BFAP). Thanks, you are<br />

doing a wonderfull and important job.<br />

Refer figure 1:


The growth in the <strong>co</strong>nsumption of chicken meat is projected to outpace the growth for all the other types of meat. With an increase of<br />

42% over the next decade, the total <strong>co</strong>nsumption of chicken meat is projected to exceed 2 million tons by 2019. Beef <strong>co</strong>nsumption is<br />

expected to grow by 17%. Although the sheep meat market is relatively small, a significant growth of 31% is expected over the next<br />

decade as per capita in<strong>co</strong>me increases. Pork <strong>co</strong>nsumption is projected to grow by 14% until 2019.<br />

Figure 1: SA meat <strong>co</strong>nsumption<br />

Refer figure 2:<br />

The impact of the financial crises is clearly illustrated by the stagnation of growth in the <strong>co</strong>nsumption of beef from 2008 to 2010. From<br />

<strong>2011</strong> onwards beef <strong>co</strong>nsumption will increase at an annual average rate of 1.7%, driven by the gradual e<strong>co</strong>nomic re<strong>co</strong>very to reach a<br />

level of more than 700 000 tons in 2019.<br />

Figure 2: SA beef production, <strong>co</strong>nsumption and price<br />

Refer figure 3:<br />

Over the outlook period beef prices will move in a typical cyclical pattern with the next increasing trend <strong>co</strong>mmencing in <strong>2011</strong>. With a<br />

projected annual average rate of increase of 7%, the beef price will reach R46/kg in 2019 <strong>co</strong>mpared to a calf price of R28/kg.


Figure 3: SA beef price versus calf price<br />

32. A team of experts on milk production, <strong>co</strong>nsumption and prices in South Africa.<br />

From a <strong>co</strong>mprehensive report "The South African Baseline" by the Bureau for Food and Agricultural Policy (BFAP). Thanks, you are<br />

doing a wonderfull and important job.<br />

Figure 1:<br />

The tight balance between demand and supply of milk is projected to <strong>co</strong>ntinue over the baseline with <strong>co</strong>nsumption growing at a<br />

marginally faster rate than production. The small shortage in the market will be supplemented through the imports of dairy products.<br />

Whereas the producer price of milk increased by an annual average of 10.1% over the past decade, an annual average increase of<br />

8.1% is projected for the baseline period. This brings the milk producer price to R6.98 per litre by 2019. The higher prices over the<br />

outlook period are supported by the <strong>co</strong>nsistent growth in demand as the e<strong>co</strong>nomy re<strong>co</strong>vers and <strong>co</strong>ntinues to grow over the baseline.<br />

Figure 1: SA fluid milk production and utili<strong>za</strong>tion<br />

Figure 2:<br />

Over the next decade the growth in the <strong>co</strong>nsumption of skimmed milk power (SMP) and whole milk powder (WMP) is projected to<br />

increase rapidly with a respective annual average growth rate of 4.9% and 5.9%. The <strong>co</strong>nsumption of cheese is projected to increase<br />

by 2.4% per annum to reach approximately 45 000 tons by 2019. The growth in butter <strong>co</strong>nsumption is expected to remain stagnant<br />

around 11 000 tons.


Figure 2: SA <strong>co</strong>nsumption of dairy products<br />

33. Kalender<br />

<strong>March</strong> 29 -30 Tues-Wed HerdMASTER & BREEDPLAN Course Zimbabwe<br />

April 11 Mon HerdMASTER & BREEDPLAN Course Botswana<br />

15 Fri HerdMASTER Course Bloemfontein<br />

May 3-5th Tues-Fri Vryburg skou Vryburg<br />

16-20th Mon-Fri NAMPO Bothaville<br />

30-31 Tues-Fri Royal show Pietermaritzburg<br />

June 1-2nd Wed-Thurs Royal show Pietermaritzburg<br />

9 Thurs LRF Uitvoerende Vergadering Bloemfontein<br />

23rd Thurs Breedplan Course Bloemfontein<br />

24th Fri HerdMASTER Course Bloemfontein<br />

30 - 2 July Thurs-Sat Small Stock Expo of Excellence Grootfontein<br />

August 30-2nd Tues-Fri Pretoria Show Pretoria<br />

September 1st Thurs Breedplan Course Pretoria<br />

2nd Fri HerdMASTER Course Pretoria<br />

6th Tues Breedplan Course Zimbabwe<br />

7th Wed HerdMASTER Course Zimbabwe<br />

13th Tues Breedplan Course Botswana<br />

14th Wed HerdMASTER Course Botswana<br />

26-30th Mon-Thurs Windhoek Show Windhoek<br />

26th Mon Breedplan Course Windhoek<br />

27th Tues HerdMASTER Course Windhoek<br />

Oct 19-21 Wed-Fri STOCKMAN SCHOOL Aldam<br />

21 Fri LRF AGM Aldam<br />

25-26 Tues-Wed STOCKMANSCHOOL Botswana


Nov 16th Wed HerdMASTER Course Bloemfontein<br />

17th Thurs LRF AGM Bloemfontein<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

The views expressed by the <strong>co</strong>mpiler and his references are not necessarily those of the members and management of the LRF<br />

(www.lrf.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong>); BREEDPLAN International (http://breedplan.une.edu.au) and Agricultural Business South Africa (Pty) Ltd.<br />

(2002/032134/07) (www.breedplan.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong>).<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

• To unsubscribe please send an e-mail to: admin@agribsa.<strong>co</strong>.<strong>za</strong><br />

• To change your email address please <strong>co</strong>ntact your society office.<br />

• We will not make our subscriber list available to anybody.<br />

• Advertisements are not possible; we see that as a breed society matter.<br />

• We don’t make use of <strong>co</strong>okies.<br />

• We wel<strong>co</strong>me suggestions about improvements and idea's regarding topics we should <strong>co</strong>nsider for future e-News. Write to<br />

cpeterm@iafrica.<strong>co</strong>m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!