04.03.2013 Views

The Spirit of Enterprise 25 years of Watson, Farley & Williams

The Spirit of Enterprise 25 years of Watson, Farley & Williams

The Spirit of Enterprise 25 years of Watson, Farley & Williams

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

Chapter 3: Creating the WFW network<br />

on some advanced communications technology<br />

to its distinct advantage: a fax machine, which,<br />

astonishingly, no other law firm in Greece then<br />

possessed, and an electronic link to the firm’s<br />

computer database in London, an almost<br />

unheard-<strong>of</strong>, and very expensive, thing in<br />

the 1980s.<br />

<strong>The</strong> success <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fice in Greece gave<br />

the firm confidence to open elsewhere. Peter<br />

Cull was sent out to open an <strong>of</strong>fice in Oslo,<br />

in September 1986, making <strong>Watson</strong>, <strong>Farley</strong> &<br />

<strong>Williams</strong> the first foreign law firm to open in<br />

Norway. <strong>The</strong> decision was taken purely to<br />

practise English law, and not to take on<br />

Norwegian qualified lawyers – so as not to<br />

upset the many Norwegian law firms from<br />

whom the firm received referrals – which was<br />

later to prove a disadvantage. But the move<br />

was certainly vindicated. As in Greece, the<br />

business flowed in and, as with the Piraeus<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, the timing <strong>of</strong> the move was propitious.<br />

Norwegian ship owners started to register<br />

their vessels with ‘flags <strong>of</strong> convenience’ in<br />

Liberia, Panama and other tax-friendly<br />

jurisdictions. At the same time as Nigel<br />

Thomas took over from Peter Cull in 1988,<br />

the Norwegian government introduced socalled<br />

‘KS’ schemes, which permitted limited<br />

partnership ownership <strong>of</strong> vessels. WFW’s<br />

practice flourished; the firm had originally<br />

anticipated that Oslo might serve as a base for<br />

Swedish business, but it turned out to be a big<br />

enough market in its own right.<br />

At the same time the London <strong>of</strong>fice was<br />

developing fast, and diversifying. As well as<br />

litigation, the firm built its company and<br />

corporate work (recruiting William Fossick<br />

from Norton Rose, much to the relief <strong>of</strong> those<br />

who had been advising on PLC matters before<br />

his arrival) and general banking and finance<br />

(taking on Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Wynne and Neil Cuthbert,<br />

both from the Royal Bank <strong>of</strong> Canada). Ge<strong>of</strong>frey<br />

<strong>Williams</strong> expanded his practice to start doing<br />

film finance (“Ge<strong>of</strong>frey was our leasing guru,”<br />

says Alastair <strong>Farley</strong>). Specialists were recruited<br />

to meet the demands from clients for a broader<br />

range <strong>of</strong> services – Maria Llewellyn to develop<br />

a property practice, Richard Whish to provide<br />

competition law expertise and later Liz Buchan<br />

on employment and immigration, “We never<br />

had ‘departments’, and in fact Alastair forbade<br />

us from using the term,” remembers Frank<br />

Dunne. <strong>The</strong> focus <strong>of</strong> the firm’s energy was<br />

entirely on servicing existing clients in a<br />

booming market and winning new business.<br />

No unnecessary time was spent on management.<br />

“We had a very simple philosophy, that no feeearner<br />

should spend more than 10 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

his time on management,” jokes Alastair <strong>Farley</strong>.<br />

Even when William Fossick became the firm’s<br />

first managing partner in 1987, that was on the<br />

basis that he would not spend more than a<br />

quarter <strong>of</strong> his time on management.<br />

A simple philosophy, and a very successful<br />

one. Fee income rose to more than £2 million at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the second year, £3.5 million at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> the third and £4.6 million at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the fourth. By the end <strong>of</strong> the decade, fee<br />

income would exceed £10 million. After the<br />

first couple <strong>of</strong> <strong>years</strong>, more were brought into<br />

equity partnership (another seven by 1985 and<br />

a further 10 by the end <strong>of</strong> the decade). <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were five times as many fee earners in 1990 as<br />

there had been in 1983. To accommodate all<br />

these extra people, the firm moved from its<br />

Navigation House <strong>of</strong>fices to Minories House,<br />

in January 1988. To begin with one floor (out <strong>of</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!