05.03.2013 Views

external influence in the making of development ... - FES Ethiopia

external influence in the making of development ... - FES Ethiopia

external influence in the making of development ... - FES Ethiopia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary <strong>of</strong> Policy Frameworks between <strong>the</strong> Government and <strong>the</strong> IFIs<br />

- First phase <strong>of</strong> structural and economic reform program…..1992/3 - 1994/5<br />

o Economic stabilization<br />

o F<strong>in</strong>ancial, public enterprises and civil service reforms<br />

o Promot<strong>in</strong>g private sector and export<br />

o Liberaliz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> economy & reduc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector<br />

6.6 percent growth rate was achieved<br />

8.2 percent <strong>in</strong>flation<br />

- Second phase <strong>of</strong> economic policy reform……….1994/5 - 1996/7<br />

o ADLI long term <strong>development</strong> strategy<br />

o Rehabilitation and reconstruction<br />

o Liberal <strong>external</strong> trade and foreign exchange policies<br />

o Improv<strong>in</strong>g competitiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry & agriculture<br />

5.6 percent growth rate was achieved<br />

- Three year ESAF (Enhanced Structural Adjustment Facility) arrangement with<br />

<strong>the</strong> IMF………………………... Oct. 1996<br />

- Third Phase <strong>of</strong> economic reform program…………… 1996/7 - 1998/9<br />

o Poverty reduction through broad based growth<br />

o F<strong>in</strong>ancial stability & fur<strong>the</strong>r deregulation<br />

o Rapid pace <strong>of</strong> structural reforms<br />

o Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g human resource base<br />

o Rebuild<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> environment and physical <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

- Second Annual ESAF arrangement ……. ……………Oct. 1998<br />

- Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper……………………Nov. 1999<br />

- Fourth phase <strong>of</strong> economic reform……………….1998/9 - 2000/1<br />

o Accelerated & equitable economic growth<br />

o Streng<strong>the</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> legal & regulatory framework<br />

o Foster<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Ethiopia</strong>'s <strong>in</strong>tegration with International economy<br />

o Capacity build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> public and private sectors<br />

- Three-year PRGF (Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility)<br />

……………………………………………….…March 22, 2001<br />

- Second Annual economic and f<strong>in</strong>ancial program… Oct. 2001 - September 2002<br />

- WB's Poverty Reduction Support Credit (PRSC)………Sept. 2003<br />

Moreover, recent macro economic <strong>development</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> have been adversely<br />

affected by a severe drought <strong>in</strong> 2002/03, <strong>the</strong> worst to hit <strong>Ethiopia</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce 1984/85. Real<br />

GDP <strong>in</strong> 2002/03 is estimated to have decl<strong>in</strong>ed by -3.8%, largely because <strong>of</strong> a fall <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cereals harvest. Agricultural production is estimated to have fallen by 12% compared to<br />

<strong>the</strong> previous year’s production, which was itself already slightly down from <strong>the</strong> bumper<br />

harvest <strong>of</strong> 2000/01.<br />

Poor economic performance is witnessed <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> public spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ethiopia</strong> that has<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased substantially <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past 5 years, by 80 percent <strong>in</strong> nom<strong>in</strong>al terms s<strong>in</strong>ce 1997/98 3 .<br />

This represents an <strong>in</strong>crease from 24 percent <strong>of</strong> GDP <strong>in</strong> 1997/98 to 35 percent <strong>in</strong> 2002/03.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>crease was driven at first by higher military spend<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war years (1998-<br />

2000). Defence spend<strong>in</strong>g has s<strong>in</strong>ce decl<strong>in</strong>ed, but spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r areas has been<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased by a correspond<strong>in</strong>g amount, leav<strong>in</strong>g total spend<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> new, substantially<br />

3 In <strong>the</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>flation environment <strong>of</strong> recent years <strong>the</strong>re is not much difference between real and nom<strong>in</strong>al.<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!