17.03.2013 Views

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

JPMORGAN CHASE WHALE TRADES: A CASE HISTORY OF DERIVATIVES RISKS AND ABUSES

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102<br />

In its January 2013 report on the CIO whale trades, the JPMorgan Chase Task Force summarized<br />

the bank’s derivatives valuation approach as follows: “[B]oth U.S. GAAP and Firm policy<br />

required that CIO make a good-faith estimate of the exit price for a reasonably sized lot of each<br />

position, and assign values reflecting those estimates.” 621<br />

Since at least 2007, JPMorgan Chase policy has been to use midpoint prices as the<br />

“starting point” for valuing its derivatives:<br />

“The Firm makes markets in derivative contracts, transacting with retail and<br />

institutional clients as well as other dealers. … In general, the dealer market is<br />

the Firm’s principal market for derivative transactions as the greatest volume of<br />

the Firm’s derivatives activities occur in the dealer market. In addition the dealer<br />

market is the most advantageous exit market for the Firm. … The starting point<br />

for the valuation of a derivatives portfolio is mid market. As a dealer, the Firm<br />

can execute at or close to mid market thereby profiting from the difference<br />

between the retail and dealer markets. If the Firm cannot exit a position at mid<br />

market certain adjustments are taken to arrive at exit price.” 622<br />

Investment Bank. Within JPMorgan Chase, the Investment Bank is one of the largest<br />

holders of derivatives. JPMorgan Chase told the Subcommittee that the Investment Bank’s<br />

standard practice was to value its derivatives using the midpoint price in the relevant price<br />

range. 623 To identify the mid-price, the Investment Bank employed an independent pricing<br />

valuation service which provided pricing information on a number of derivatives for trading<br />

book valuations. 624<br />

This service typically provided the bank with the midpoints of the bid-ask<br />

spreads for specified derivatives.<br />

Chief Investment Office. The CIO began actively investing in credit derivatives and<br />

assembling a Synthetic Credit Portfolio beginning in 2006. The internal document authorizing<br />

the CIO to conduct credit derivatives trading contained this paragraph on valuing credit<br />

derivatives:<br />

“Valuation Control<br />

CIO is not a market maker and uses the Investment Bank’s risk and valuation<br />

systems to transact its products. As such CIO is a price taker using prices and<br />

valuation inputs controlled and determined by the market making businesses of<br />

the bank. CIO’s Valuation Control Group coordinator will ensure that where<br />

pricing adjustments are identified from the month end price test process for<br />

621 2013 JPMorgan Chase Task Force Report, at 48-49.<br />

622 11/8/2007 Controllers Corporate Accounting Policies, “Fair Value Measurements,” prepared by JPMorgan<br />

Chase, OCC-SPI-00056794 at 11. See also 5/10/2012 Controllers Corporate Accounting Policies, “Fair Value<br />

Measurements,” prepared by JPMorgan Chase, JPM-CIO 0003424-442.<br />

623 Subcommittee briefing by JPMorgan Chase (8/15/2012) (Olivier Vigneron).<br />

624 Subcommittee briefing by JPMorgan Chase legal counsel (2/4/2013). For example, Markit provides price data<br />

for credit derivative indices, while Totem, a related company, provides price data for credit index tranches. See<br />

5/10/2012 JPMorgan Chase Controllers special assessment of CIO’s marks, January through April 2012, at 6, JPM-<br />

CIO 0003637-654, at 642.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!