Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
180 SPEECHES<br />
Indianapolis platform. When we consider 7,000,000 voted for interna<br />
tional free silver, and 6,500,000 voted for independent free silver, we see<br />
the United States has 13,500,000 bimetallists; only 134,000, or less than<br />
one per cent, voted the Gold-standard Democratic ticket Yet, my friends,<br />
we today find Mr. Gage trying to overrule the desire of more than<br />
ninety-nine per cent and put into law the will of less than one per cent<br />
of our voting population. And what amount of money do the gold stand<br />
ard people want ? They say they want it safe, uniform and elastic, meas<br />
ured in volume by the need of business. Will you tell me by whose<br />
business they wish to measure the volume of money? It cannot be the<br />
farmers' business and the merchants' business they would have to meas<br />
ure the volume by, for that would make a double standard of measure<br />
ment, and they tell us we cannot have but one standard of measure<br />
ment.<br />
Then I ask, whose business will measure the amount under such a<br />
law? To me the answer comes back in reverberating tones repeated<br />
with emphasis, measured in volume according to the bankers' business, of<br />
course. Our philosophers tell us there are two kinds of elasticity—<br />
elasticity by compression and elasticity by expansion. Thus an elastic<br />
substance after being either compressed or expanded when released, re<br />
turns to its original shape and size, so when the bankers want money<br />
expanded in volume according to the need of their business, they would<br />
expand it, and whenever their business ends are best accomplished by<br />
contraction; then, of course, contraction is the program with them. While<br />
the government is completely separated from the banking business so<br />
they can furnish no relief, we might compare that system with an alligator<br />
on the banks of a Louisiana river lying out to sun himself; he gets the<br />
bankers' elastic idea in his head, and his upper jaw flies over his back,<br />
and his mouth is twice as large as when it is closed, elasticity by ex<br />
pansion. (Laughter.) A sweet substance gathers on his open mouth,<br />
and the flies light there to eat it (just as the people will gather around the<br />
bankers for money when there is no other place to procure it). The<br />
flies gather thicker and thicker, and the mouth gets bigger and bigger,<br />
more and more elasticity by expansion; finally the alligator, like the<br />
banker, happens to think that there is another kind of elasticity, when<br />
down comes the upper jaw on the lower jaw and the flies are caught in<br />
the trap, and the Government shall go out of the banking business to<br />
furnish no relief or escape (cried of good, and cheers). My friends, if I<br />
mistake not, every cry of the Republican party from the time of John C.<br />
Fremont until the campaign of 1896 has been against banks issuing paper<br />
money except that the Government was strictly in the banking business.<br />
Have not they always told us, that when state or other banks issue paper<br />
OP C. A. BOGAEDUB. 181<br />
money without the Government in the banking business to back up the<br />
issue, such money in case of a failure of the issuing bank became wild<br />
cat money, and did they not say to us wild-cat money made paupers?<br />
Now they go squarely back on all they have taught us on the money<br />
question, and advocate the wild-cat money system themselves according<br />
to their own statements. One thing I will concede is, that the Republi<br />
cans and gold standard Democrats are certainly on their past statements<br />
entitled to the $1,000,000 offered by the United States patent office for<br />
the invention of a perpetual motion, would not they have a complete<br />
and perpetual motion in their bank issuing money with the Government<br />
completely separate from the banking business, for we see the bank issue<br />
would be made of paper, so we have the perpetual motion in this simple<br />
problem. Rags make paper, paper makes money, money makes banks,<br />
banks make paupers, and paupers make rags. Rags make paper, paper<br />
makes money (great cheer and laughter).<br />
Now, my friends, let me read you a plank in a platform that con<br />
tains the spirit upon which our forefathers freed the thirteen American<br />
colonies from England, the spirit on which their descendants maintained<br />
American liberty and builded from 3,000,000 population along the At<br />
lantic shores in 1781,.a nation of 70,000,000 grand Anglo-Americans,<br />
with their half a hundred states and territories extending from the rock<br />
bound coast of the pine tree state to the golden gates of California,<br />
stretching over a vast area of more than 3,000,000 square miles, with"<br />
great cities, towns, villages and hamlets, with our colleges and universi<br />
ties that are equaled by none in Europe. I will now read you the money<br />
plank of the Chicago platform, which contains the spirit represented by<br />
the statute at New York, of liberty enlightening the world. It is as fol<br />
lows: "We demand a free and unlimited coinage of both gold and sil<br />
ver at the present legal ration of 16 to 1, without waiting for the aid or<br />
consent of any other nation. We demand that the standard silver dollar<br />
shall be a full legal tender equally with gold, for the payment of all debts<br />
public and private, and we favor such legislation as will in the future<br />
prevent the demonetization of any kind of legal tender money by private<br />
contract." While bimetallism is the theme this evening, you will excuse<br />
me for intruding on your time long enough to briefly comment on the<br />
spirit of that plank that shines prominently above all other issues in tfie<br />
Chicago platform—it is these simple words, "Without waiting for the aid<br />
or consent of any other nation." I want to ask you, what would have<br />
been the result if our forefathers in 1776 had adopted any other spirit<br />
than this? Does not the answer immediately echo that we would be<br />
today English?<br />
History tells us that while the British red coats with their muskets