9B - Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies
9B - Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies
9B - Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
vii<br />
Case Concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of Congo v<br />
Belgium, Separate Opinion of Judge Koroma, [2002] ICJ Rep 59, hereinafter cited as: Separate<br />
Opinion of Koroma (2002)<br />
Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v France), [2008], ICJ<br />
Rep 177, hereinafter cited as: Djibouti v France<br />
Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v France), “Oral argument<br />
of Alain Pellet” (25 January 2008), online: ICJ www.icj-cij.org<br />
Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v Italy), ICJ Press Release No. 2008/44 (23<br />
December 2008) online: ICJ www.icj-cij.org, hereinafter cited as: Jurisdictional Immunities of<br />
the State<br />
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v United States of<br />
America), [1984] ICJ Rep 14, hereinafter cited as: Nicaragua Case (1984)<br />
Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v France, United Kingdom of Great Britain<br />
and Northern Ireland and United States of America), [1954] ICJ Rep 19<br />
North Sea Continental Shelf Case (Federal Republic of Germany v Denmark and The<br />
Netherlands), [1969] ICJ Rep 3, hereinafter cited as: North Sea Continental Shelf Case<br />
<strong>Legal</strong>ity of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, [1996] ICJ Rep 226,<br />
hereinafter cited as: Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion<br />
2.3 <strong>International</strong> Criminal Tribunal <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer Yugoslavia<br />
Prosecutor v Radislav Krstic, IT-98-33-T, Judgement (2 August 2001) (ICTY, Trial Chamber)<br />
online: ICTY www.icty.org, hereinafter cited as: Krstic Case<br />
Prosecutor v Kupreskic, IT-95-16-T, Judgement (14 January 2000) (ICTY: Trial Chamber)<br />
online: ICTY www.icty.org, hereinafter cited as: Prosecutor v Kupreskic<br />
Prosecutor v Tadic, Case No. IT-94-1-AR72, Decision on the Defence Motion <strong>for</strong> interlocutory<br />
Appeal on Jurisdiction, (2 October 1995) (ICTY, Trial Chamber) online: ICTY www.icty.org,<br />
hereinafter cited as: Tadic Case<br />
Prosecutor v Mrksic, Radic, Sljivancanin & Dokmanovic, IT-95-13/1-T, Judgement (27<br />
September 2007) (ICTY, Trial Chamber ) online: ICTY www.icty.org, hereinafter cited as:<br />
Prosecutor v Mrksic, Radic, Sljivancanin & Dokmanovic<br />
Prosecutor v Anto Furundzija, IT-95-17/1-T, Judgement (10 December 1998) (ICTY, Trial<br />
Chamber) online: ICTY www.icty.org, hereinafter cited as: Prosecutor v Furund
Change language