21.03.2013 Views

Introduction to the Unknown Monet - Royal Academy of Arts

Introduction to the Unknown Monet - Royal Academy of Arts

Introduction to the Unknown Monet - Royal Academy of Arts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Monet</strong><br />

THE UNKNOWN<br />

`<br />

PASTELS AND DRAWINGS<br />

Sackler Wing <strong>of</strong> Galleries<br />

17 March – 10 June 2007<br />

An <strong>Introduction</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Exhibition<br />

for Teachers and Students<br />

Written by Lindsay Rothwell<br />

Education Department<br />

© <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arts</strong><br />

The exhibition has been organised by <strong>the</strong><br />

Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute,<br />

Williams<strong>to</strong>wn, Massachusetts,<br />

in association with<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Royal</strong> <strong>Academy</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Arts</strong>, London.<br />

Sponsored by<br />

COVER<br />

Detail <strong>of</strong> Cat.265<br />

Water Lilies, c.1918<br />

The Metropolitan Museum <strong>of</strong> Art,<br />

New York. Gift <strong>of</strong> Louise Reinhardt<br />

Smith, 1983 (1983-532)<br />

Pho<strong>to</strong> © 1998 The Metropolitan<br />

Museum <strong>of</strong> Art<br />

Designed by Isambard Thomas, London<br />

Printed by Tradewinds Ltd<br />

1<br />

<strong>Introduction</strong><br />

‘You must begin by drawing … Draw simply and directly, with charcoal,<br />

crayon or whatever, above all observing <strong>the</strong> con<strong>to</strong>urs, because you can<br />

never be <strong>to</strong>o sure <strong>of</strong> holding on <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, once you start <strong>to</strong> paint.’<br />

CLAUDE MONET, 1920<br />

Despite his statement, Claude <strong>Monet</strong> (1840 –1926) spent most <strong>of</strong> his life<br />

staunchly denying <strong>the</strong> role drawing played in his creative process. Critics,<br />

biographers and journalists did not write about it, and his paintings were<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten praised for <strong>the</strong>ir lack <strong>of</strong> it. The reality, however, is that <strong>Monet</strong> carried<br />

pocket-sized sketchbooks with him throughout his life, setting out in<strong>to</strong><br />

nature <strong>to</strong> make notations and jot down scenes and people that caught<br />

his eye. <strong>Monet</strong> left eight folios <strong>of</strong> sketches, containing 400 individual<br />

drawings, <strong>to</strong> his son Michel, who in turn donated <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Musée<br />

Marmottan in 1966. They are reproduced digitally in this exhibition,<br />

allowing visi<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> explore different periods in <strong>Monet</strong>’s artistic career.<br />

It is interesting <strong>to</strong> note that while his men<strong>to</strong>rs Eugène Boudin<br />

(1824–1898) and Johan Barthold Jongkind (1819–1891) left many more<br />

drawings as <strong>the</strong>ir legacies, not many sketchbooks belonging <strong>to</strong> <strong>Monet</strong>’s<br />

Impressionist peers have survived. Auguste Renoir (1841–1919) and<br />

Frédéric Bazille (1841–1871) left two sketchbooks each, Edouard Manet<br />

(1832–1883) and Alfred Sisley (1839–1899) one each and Gustave<br />

Caillebotte (1848–1894) left none. None <strong>of</strong> <strong>Monet</strong>’s sketches was ever<br />

shown or sold during his lifetime; in his eyes <strong>the</strong>ir value and purpose was<br />

as an early prepara<strong>to</strong>ry stage in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> making a painting. He<br />

generally drew in pencil, and as Richard Kendall states in <strong>the</strong> catalogue,<br />

had ‘an accomplished hand, fluent not only in multiple languages <strong>of</strong> line,<br />

but in <strong>to</strong>ne, texture, and chiaroscuro.’ This level <strong>of</strong> skill and interest in<br />

drawing, although at odds with <strong>Monet</strong>’s publicised creative process,<br />

holds very true with <strong>the</strong> quote above and his desire <strong>to</strong> ‘hold on <strong>to</strong>’ <strong>the</strong><br />

con<strong>to</strong>urs within his paintings.<br />

<strong>Monet</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Impressionists<br />

Although Impressionist art is now largely seen as a pleasing, benign and<br />

almost universally beloved school <strong>of</strong> art, in <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century it<br />

completely contradicted popular concepts about art’s purpose and ideals.<br />

The Impressionists’ method <strong>of</strong> painting was very different <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> academic<br />

‘I am pursuing success<br />

through work. I distrust all<br />

living painters save<br />

<strong>Monet</strong> and Renoir.’<br />

PAUL CÉZANNE, 1902

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!